AlexisANew
Posts: 103
Joined: 2/10/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75 Actually, technically, with satellite imaging, they should be able to spot debris alot faster, but there is no debris. Yes they should but actually they can't. "It’ll be a while yet before the watershed moment when digital imagery will fully supplant the tedious, hard yards of physical searching, which has been the hallmark of SAR [search-and-rescue] activities for the past 50 years or more," he wrote on The Conversation. "While the notion of being able to examine hundreds of thousands of square kilometres of ocean, in short order, seems like it’d be just what the doctor ordered, I think the real challenges associated with the practical application of the technology might yet be just beyond our present capability." Associate Professor Dell said complex algorithms were needed to synthesise areas of interest from digital imagery and, without this, people would need to visually examine all of the images, which would take a long time. "However, the crowdsourcing of hundreds of thousands of volunteers might make a valuable contribution with the use of effective and reliable algorithms to consolidate consensus tagging of areas of interest," he wrote. "Albeit, even then, if an area of interest is identified, someone will have to fly out there and take a look. Doubtless it will still [take] significant effort and be a difficult and time-consuming process. http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/missing-malaysia-airlines-jet-searching-from-space-may-help-201403 quote:
Black box not working. No debris, no blackbox signals. The blackbox is suppose to be explosion proof. It can take many months or even years to find the black box. We know that these particular black boxes weren't fitted with satelite signal devices which are hugely expensive. This means search teams have to rely on a beacon detected by sonar but search teams have to be within a 15 mile radius to pick up that beacon. Even if they were to find a debris field, by this time that debris could be many, miles away from the actual crash site. quote:
So many countries involve in this search now. Perfect weather! Safest possible flying conditions. Military radar picked up that the plane changed course, and their radar detected the plane for awhile until it also dropped out of their radar and when it did change course, it did not communicate any emergency. It silently dropped out of the local airports radar, and just changed course. It had enough fuel to keep flying for 4 hours. Latest news is it was sending out signals to US Satellites for another 4 hours after it dropped out of radar. It's all very fishy. Its not necessarily fishy at all. Read possible accounts from airline pilots. They believe its likely the plane went through whats called 'catastrophic electrical failure'. If this were to happen there would be no air to ground contact and the pilots would of had to fly the plain in the pitch black with no navigations system. Pilots faced with such a scenario will take the plane down low, if possible and try and fly it to the nearest airport. It could also be that something hit the plane and made a hole in it. If this happened at 35,000 ft all the oxygen would be sucked out and the crew and passangers would be on limited oxygen supply. Put the first scenario with the second and what we have is an air crew trying to lower and divert the plane before passing out. The plane could fly on its own until it ran out of fuel. I hope that the passangers and the crew just fell asleep and new little about what was about to happen. quote:
I still feel like it's an inside deliberate job for some reason. I don't know what the intention is, as if it's the usual terrorists, they would brag about it, but they are being rather quiet. Don't think they crash the plane or they crash it on land after flying it for 4 more hours. Or they landed somewhere. That's certainly an option to consider but you must keep in mind that a huge amount of propaganda has been put out since this plane disappeared. The conspiracy theorists claim that we have all the technology to quickly find this plane when actually we don't. Since 1953 a hundred aircraft's have been lost without trace at sea and although technology has moved on a great deal in recent years, its not fool proof.
|