blacksword404 -> RE: About Cum....A question for all the men out there....Dom, sub and switch (3/20/2014 10:05:25 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FieryOpal quote:
ORIGINAL: angelikaJ They don't know they are being hypocritical. They only know one thing: that to them, gal on gal is extremely hot. So trying to approach it with any sort of logic isn't going to work. Logic can't apply: the blood flow is being diverted to other places. [8D] For whatever it's worth, an LGBT-friendly psychotherapist I know told me that she has observed that straight males who have a gal-on-gal voyeuristic fetish often have suppressed/repressed bisexual tendencies which they have found consciously acceptable to project in this manner. In other words, it's acceptable to get turned on by seeing two females together performing sexual acts and to be fascinated by this prospect, but not two males. That hits too close to home per homophobia, hence the seeming hypocrisy. In some cases, the voyeuristic male is actually identifying with one of the females. She says it's not uncommon for this type of male to choose a female avatar he can hide behind or to impersonate a female on line. And what about the men who are not turned on by it? They gay as well? Quacks. If you don't like dicks, you're gay. If you don't like swallowing cum you're gay. If you like swallowing cum you're gay. If you like seeing two hot naked women have sex and make all sort of noises, you're certainly gay.
|
|
|
|