DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen I love the pontificating. Did no one actually go and find the Department of Education report? http://ocrdata.ed.gov/Home You can actually look at individual school districts and even individual schools and the results are very troubling. I think you might need to explain how the results are troubling. Please. Show how they prove racism. I find it unlikely that a school district with a 10% black enrollment, for example, would have 30% of it's suspensions be from the black population across the entire district. That is simply not statistically sound. For instance the Escambia County School district, that's Pensacola Florida. http://ocrdata.ed.gov/Page?t=d&eid=31607&syk=6&pid=736 black enrollment is 32.5% black in school suspensions is 62.7% black out of school suspensions is 50.1% For a district that big that's a big imbalance. Thank you for explaining. Your basis for assertions of racism in the schools is that you find it unlikely the results are anything but racism. How damning.  How damning depends on how you define racism. Institutional racism can be overt as in Jim Crow Laws and segregation, or it can be covert. Two ways it can be covert: 1) pretending the numbers are meaningless, and 2) accepting there is a problem but not implementing solutions. Please note that I referred to INSTITUTIONAL racism. I am not suggesting anything about posters here. These numbers may be meaningless, and are meaningless as they stand. We need more information. If black students are committing twice as many "crimes," is it racism that they are punished twice as much? What the numbers aren't showing is how many incidents are being committed, broken down by race, and the outcomes of those incidents, also broken down by race. If blacks are punished twice as often as whites, but not committing twice as many incidents, then that would seem to point towards racism. But, we don't have those numbers, do we? That's where the "proper investigation" comes in. Is a 6'2" 235# man out of shape? Obese? Fat? Those two numbers alone aren't enough information. I contend that the report isn't enough information, either.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|