RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


KnightofMists -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/24/2014 2:32:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: SirEpitome

IT seems that some people don't read profiles, they also don't read or don't read well.

I don't think anyone here has a problem reading you.



I tend to agree... Anyone who makes their first post a rant and whine about all the fake submissives he sees just isn't going to go well with most people.




SeekingTrinity -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/24/2014 2:54:54 PM)

~FRing it~

That's a hell of a lot of time, energy, and effort to devote to ranting about people just because you are making observations, OP. Do you think these submissives you are complaining about will know to come here, see your wall of texty observations on how things should be, see the error of their ways, and start doing something different? Not likely

But if complaining about the sad state of some submissives is time well spent in your world, more power to you.




smartsub10 -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/24/2014 3:15:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingTrinity

~FRing it~

That's a hell of a lot of time, energy, and effort to devote to ranting about people just because you are making observations, OP. Do you think these submissives you are complaining about will know to come here, see your wall of texty observations on how things should be, see the error of their ways, and start doing something different? Not likely

But if complaining about the sad state of some submissives is time well spent in your world, more power to you.


I'm one of those subs who came here and read the wall of text complaining about subs who speak their mind about what they want. I don't automatically obey and I will want to talk about things I disagree with. My intention is always to clarify if some things are negotiable or dealbreakers. As far as "recruiting" online friends to back me up....WTF?
So, as SeekingTrinity stated: "not likely" that I'll be changing how I go about seeking a partner.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/24/2014 3:19:13 PM)

quote:

if you don’t care for the dynamic, then don’t do anything with them.


I dunno why it took a wall of text to say what this sentence says.

Sometimes, folks aint a match. Duh.




NiceButMeanGirl -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/24/2014 4:32:48 PM)

SirEpitome,

Just because you check the Dominant box on a website and choose to call yourself one, that does not mean every submissive in the world has to bow down and kow-tow to you. Unless she or he is your own submissive, s/he does not have to submit to you. I have always said in my correspondences that, unless a submissive is already in a consensual dynamic with me, s/he doesn't owe me shit other than the manners afforded toward any fellow human being.

NBMG

P.S. Thinking otherwise, is the "epitome" of self-importance.




SirEpitome -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/28/2014 5:59:37 PM)

Great Posts, I appreciate the comments.

I am flattered that so many people were condescending and judgmental enough to comment on how they think I failed to dominate, connect with, or inspire. You wound me.[sm=sigh.gif]

I never said these were my experiences or expectations. I made a point to post that I DON'T expect anyone to know-tow to me. I just took a topic I have seen people talk about and I recently had discussions overt. It had nothing to do with me or my experiences.







DesFIP -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/28/2014 6:54:49 PM)

I'm submissive to one. I turned down hundreds of guys who I decided quite summarily that I was not sufficiently compatible with. That I could not respect them for a variety of reasons. Some quite shallow, which is still my choice. And some of life changing importance.

I'm still submissive. Just not with a guy who could not inspire submission and respect and genuine liking and friendship in me.

The only person who gets to decide what I need in life to be happy is me. Not some online dominant. And maybe you didn't mean it that way, but that's surely how your op reads. If so, instead of rapidly backtracking in the future while bewailing the fact that people judged what you said instead of mind reading what you meant, I strongly suggest you learn to be more clear in future written only communications.




BecomingV -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/28/2014 9:49:00 PM)

The OP is didactic. The tone is a blend of intolerably boring and glaringly pompous. What does not come through is humility. If a person lacks humility, then the capacity for dominance is nonexistent.

This is worse than a whine, but too sad to inspire mockery.

Education may help.

Best of luck.




metamorfosis -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/28/2014 11:44:50 PM)

Your post would be more appropriate as a journal entry, but I would like to respond to the following:

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirEpitome

I see so many postings from women who swear they are "submissive", that they want someone to take control and to set the rules...What I am noticing is that these women, the reality that they want is someone first to accept them, their body and their personality, and they want to determine the rules, and any decision that does not agree with what they want is summarily rejected. Any attempt to assert authority, respect, consideration is met with open resistance, surreptitious disobedience, passive-aggressive behavior, interest, commitment, and even attempted recruitment of "allies" from other online friends, from among friends and family (who, sadly enough, do not have the maturity to say "It's between you two.") Any response is generally either ignored, or meant to deride and insult any approach that is not one they have already predetermined as the one true way of doing anything.

I kind of agree with what you're saying here.

...If some outside event disrupted daily life, not only the disruption but the event, itself, is entirely the Dom/me's fault.

As relationships end, the Dom/me is the one who is at fault, if there was any sharing of responsibility, their portion consisted of them being “too kind” or “too tolerant” of the Dom/me and their innately wrong attitudes and methods.

I agree with this too.

...In terms of what you can “do” about a submissive like this, if you don’t care for the dynamic, then don’t do anything with them. If you have been open, respectful considerate, been clear in your direction, flexible in trying to meet their needs, and attempted to communicate the problem with them, all you can do is walk away. It also sounds like a lot of work for little reward and if you don’t want a constant fight (that you're likely always losing anyway) then don’t. I would have a serious “come to Jesus” with someone like that and if it didn’t change, I’d have to accept that they just aren’t a good fit for what I’m looking for.

I agree, but I would add that all this seems kind of obvious. I wonder what you think there is to discuss.

...Essentially, you want to make a contract with yourself. You want to get clear on what your new, more stringent set of hard limits are in relationships, based on these awful experiences you’ve had. You want to spell them out and stick by your commitment to not put up with it anymore. Period. If you can’t do that and this keeps happening, then I’d say you definitely have some sort of internal problem that’s making you step into relationships that essentially aren’t good for you. In that case, some therapy, spiritual work or some kind of healing process might help you figure out what that issue is and how to change it before you try to start a relationship again...

This last bit might have made a good discussion topic on it's own. I would encourage you to focus your thoughts better if you want to stimulate discussion.





MissImmortalPain -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/29/2014 1:39:22 AM)

*snorts, cackles, falls off her broom* What I am about to say is likely to come off very bitchy so I will start by saying that I do not believe the Op is a rant, a whine, or a moan about his bad luck(congrats on that Epitome because we see a lot of people do those things daily) I also, this might be the bitchy part, don't think the op was made in a desire to just help out the rest of us poor little losers that don't know how to figure out a relationship. What I, my opinion mind you, read the op as is (this is the bitchy part) a condescending advertisement. Catch keywords and listen the way you would to a guy running for congress. He admits he is sensual, kind, loving. He implies he is intelligent(not saying you aren't just pointing out what it seems to say) He has the answers to all of the most important questions anyone in the "lifestyle" would ever want to ask....so everyone should listen, shouldn't they. His last few lines even scream that he can be anything you (you being a random submissive female) need him to be. These all scream advertisement not helpful lecture. Well played "sir" I couldn't have done it better myself....well actually I could but I won't because general bdsm is not where advertisements go.
*side note* I have no issues with reading comprehension but am willing to admit I did not bother reading your profile as you claim to be dominant and as a sadist I would just have to hurt you (laugh it is funny, I swear)




metamorfosis -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/29/2014 2:04:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain
*snorts, cackles, falls off her broom* What I am about to say is likely to come off very bitchy so I will start by saying that I do not believe the Op is a rant, a whine, or a moan about his bad luck(congrats on that Epitome because we see a lot of people do those things daily)

I agree.

I also, this might be the bitchy part, don't think the op was made in a desire to just help out the rest of us poor little losers that don't know how to figure out a relationship. What I, my opinion mind you, read the op as is (this is the bitchy part) a condescending advertisement. Catch keywords and listen the way you would to a guy running for congress. He admits he is sensual, kind, loving. He implies he is intelligent(not saying you aren't just pointing out what it seems to say) He has the answers to all of the most important questions anyone in the "lifestyle" would ever want to ask....so everyone should listen, shouldn't they. His last few lines even scream that he can be anything you (you being a random submissive female) need him to be. These all scream advertisement not helpful lecture. Well played "sir" I couldn't have done it better myself....well actually I could but I won't because general bdsm is not where advertisements go.

This too.






JollyBoots -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/29/2014 5:05:17 AM)

I just want to say I have a hard time taking any dom who puts "Sir" "Master" "lord" etc. in their user name. To me it just screams "HEY I LIKE PLAYING D&D! HEY! PAY ATTENTION TO ME, LORD MASTER DARKWOLF THE 875,000th.". That being said, I meant no offense to any and all persons that used to or currently play D&D. [:D]




metamorfosis -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (4/29/2014 12:10:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JollyBoots
I just want to say I have a hard time taking any dom who puts "Sir" "Master" "lord" etc. in their user name. To me it just screams "HEY I LIKE PLAYING D&D! HEY! PAY ATTENTION TO ME, LORD MASTER DARKWOLF THE 875,000th.". That being said, I meant no offense to any and all persons that used to or currently play D&D. [:D]


I would tend to agree. Except for the bit about meaning no offense to D&D players. I don't mind saying those guys are dorks.




imlooking4her -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 7:34:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

*sigh* I once knew a woman in the lifestyle. She took to calling every male she met sir. She would in effect, submit to every male she came in contact to. I asked her, why she did that, take an arbitrary blanket submissive position to any and every dominant. She said she thought that was how every submissive was supposed to act, that it was their duty to "submit" to all of us, as a sign of respect. Well, after sitting the poor, overworked girl down, I told her, the only one she actually had to submit to, was the one she chose. The rest of us, she could show respect, sure. Or not, completely up to her. Submissive, dominant, slave, switch, these labels don't inherently earn you rights and privileges, grant you special powers... I can't knock on a red door somewhere in downtown Philly, and begin to order scantily clad women to perform depraved acts of debauchery just because I have my "Dom" card... sorry, my mind wandered. Anyway, my point is respect is earned, submission is as well


Very well put. I often get strange looks when telling a submissive that she is not "duty-bound" to address all dominants the same way. Such titles I tell them, ( in my view at least) are earned, not conferred by someone's claims or profiles or even past experience. A variant of that is when I have been asked at the outset of a relationship, how I want to be addressed. I say to use my first name, until enough time and interaction has passed by, that addressing me in some other way has been earned and we both feel it is time. I've never understood the whole "....submissives must address all doms as Sir " thing. That seems to water down the whole concept of earned respect and something special existing between the Dominant and the submissive. I'd rather enjoy the prestige of having earned that level of respect than being the recipient of some protocol-based everyday use of the term.





Musicmystery -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 7:39:39 AM)

I wondering why you think whiny masters are an improvement over wannabe submissives, and why you would want to announce to all the good submissives that you're not ready to master yourself, let alone them?

What did you accomplish here, other than that?

And who gives a damn about the masses? Look for the one right for you, and see if you can be worth following.




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 8:03:51 AM)

I think his post was a great blessing to any submissives in his area who might have been eyeing him.
Isn't "whiny master" an oxymoron?




Musicmystery -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 1:10:11 PM)

Unfortunate that's been your experience. Perhaps try a change of approach.




Bhruic -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 3:50:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2

I suspect they don't respond submissively to you because they don't get the feeling you are dominant. Big difference between labeling yourself dominant and having that intrinsic nature and its capabilities. Perhaps you are a top? Nothing wrong with that.


I agree with this assessment. Its unclear to me if the OP is talking about himself, since he talks in the third person... but I assume he is.

Being `submissive` doesn`t mean weak and pliant (although I guess it can). It sounds to me like the OP`s submissive was a strong willed woman, who wanted the experience of a man that could control and dominate her. I know this phenomenon well, as my love is just such a submissive. She tests me often, and I know that what she wants is for me to check her. It sounds like the OP failed to do so, and so she became disenamoured of him. It seems a bit disingenuous on his part to put all the blame on her.

There are times when my sub tests me and I fail to check her. It is frustrating, but I know that it is my failing, not hers... and what`s more important... I know that I am failing HER, and must resolve to do better.




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 8:56:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Unfortunate that's been your experience. Perhaps try a change of approach.


I don't have any experience with the OP. Don't understand your post.




MarkinLaredo -> RE: Thoughts about submissives who don't walk the walk and profiles (5/4/2014 9:18:54 PM)

I read this thread, and one thing I see here is that any time any "d" type says anything about how demanding some of the "s" types on here can be there seems to be a piranha attack type of situation on the "d" type.

I have noticed that there are a ton of sub profiles on here that look to me to be extremely demanding, and what I have in my mind when I read them is that the so called sub is looking for a sugar daddy, or a dupe. She sets up this laundry list of rules, determines that the only activities in the relationship will be those she has outlined in her demands, and anything more than that is somehow a slam on her "gift" of her submission.

I personally have met many people from across the spectrum from here and other sites and have been here on cm pretty much since the beginning. I moved and changed my screen name, but I have to say that I think the problem is that far too many women have lost sight of what it means to be a woman, and have fallen for some crazy feminist ideal. I am who I am, I make no apologies. I have opinions, I prefer a slave or sub who also has her own opinions. I have rules, and mine are the ones I place the most importance on. I see the problem as one that is fomented by people who are users. A woman who claims to want to submit to the man she chooses should not have to state a laundry list of rules and demands, when she chooses the right master or dominant it should be a choice based on mutual agreements, but just putting a list of " I will never do" statements on your profile makes you seem less intelligent, and kind of spoiled and demanding.

Me personally, I have a list of stuff I enjoy, and some very basic rules for my house. I get to do that because it is my house, and I pick the members and set the rules, not the other way around. If you hate being told what to do, hmmm, well there may be issues.

Most of cm has become a huge and very bad joke. Topping from the bottom was not permitted before we had the interwebs, and it still should not be tolerated. And trust me, most of what I have seen on here would have been considered topping from the bottom then, and should be now.

Just my thoughts, opinions and what have you. Feel free to attack piranhas.

Mark




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875