losttreasure
Posts: 875
Joined: 12/17/2005 Status: offline
|
It does make me curious about how the want/need issue plays into the D/s dynamic. I have a theory about a basic personality trait that I believe a lot of submissives share... where there is this need to please and be pleasing. I think that submissives generally thrive on relationships, are sensitive to the subtle nuances of interactions, and see serving those relations as the focal point of their lives. For me, I am a very independent woman; I am completely capable of taking care of myself and all aspects of my life, and I am relatively happy to do so. However, after many years and much "soul searching", I realized that there is this drive within me to "center" myself on a dominant man... it is what is required for me to be content and fulfilled. So, I would say that that makes it a need for me. Though I can live my life happily and without that fulfilment. But, I wouldn't want to. So does that make it a want? *grins* So... I can understand those who say it is both a need and a want. (Dark... I understand your differentiating between 'want' and 'desire', but here I'm using them in an interchangeable fashion.) I have spoken with several dominants who have expressed to me the desire to have a submissive or slave whose focus is to serve, obey and please them... where the sub's very reason for being is to cater to the dominant's needs and wants. Yet these same dominants complain of submissives who become dependent upon them... calling the submissives "clingy" and "needy" and "insecure". And I wonder if these dominants are merely indulging in a want but not a driving need, or if they simply had no real idea what they were asking for. I can say that, at least for myself, in those instances where my submissive nature has been evident in the "vanilla world", I have found that I am mostly misunderstood. I have been described as dependent, overly sensitive, weak, and occasionally obsessed. *laughs* In other words, clingy and needy and insecure. Yet in the world of D/s, that same depth of submission is touted with more noble adjectives such as devoted, loyal, dutiful, attentive, and insightful. Whether that holds true in established relationships, I've yet to see. At any rate, I'm curious to see if dominants generally consider a D/s relationship as a want, where submissives view it more as a need.
|