RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun"

RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

BamaD -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 5:10:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD And ten times as many will drown in swimming pools. Do you want to do something about deaths or are they alright as long as a gun isn't involved? By your reasoning we have to take into account that thousands will be killed by their pet dogs if you add up enough years. Responsible parents with pools and dogs do take precautions. And certainly the pool industry doesn't spend its money trying to keep parents from doing so. The gun industry sell locks and safes. Virtually ever new firearm comes with a booklet on gun safety so once again you come up with a stupid analogy when while not stating it implies a lie. In still remains that ten times as many kids drown as get shot, a fact that doesn't seem to sink in.. I'd call you an idiot but I don't want to inflate your intelligence.

Kirata -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 5:34:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The CDC proves it is isn't anywhere near 1 in 1,000,000 liar. You trier to exclude 15 to 18 year olds and you're still trying to make an annual rate into a lifetime chance. Now now, Ken. You're making shit up again. The 2010 CDC data on firearms deaths among children is exactly what I said it was. The tables are clearly labeled. The CDC does not consider youths aged 15-19 to be "children". To include that data in the total and misrepresent it as reflecting unintentional firearm deaths among "children" would be lying. You know, like you are. K.

DarkSteven -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 5:35:24 PM)
What a crappy article. I wanted to know two things. 1. How does it work? Saying some drivel about a RF stopwatch doesn't adequately describe it. 2. What are the grounds that the gun fans don't like this gun for?

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 6:16:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen The CDC proves it is isn't anywhere near 1 in 1,000,000 liar. You trier to exclude 15 to 18 year olds and you're still trying to make an annual rate into a lifetime chance. Now now, Ken. You're making shit up again. The 2010 CDC data on firearms deaths among children is exactly what I said it was. The tables are clearly labeled. The CDC does not consider youths aged 15-19 to be "children". To include that data in the total and misrepresent it as reflecting unintentional firearm deaths among "children" would be lying. You know, like you are. Funny thing about that liar. The CDC calls 15 to 18 year olds youth which is simply a synonym for child. http://thesaurus.com/browse/child So including that data is correct. Excluding it is incorrect and you remain a lying sack of shit.

BamaD -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 6:17:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What a crappy article. I wanted to know two things. 1. How does it work? Saying some drivel about a RF stopwatch doesn't adequately describe it. 2. What are the grounds that the gun fans don't like this gun for? With this incarnation the gun will not fire unless the hand holding the weapon has a "watch" on that wrist sending out an enabling signal. I will not presume to speak for everyone but for starters I don't have any faith in the technology. Second I oppose it being made mandatory, particularly at this early stage of development. The main effect of this, as I see it, would be to to make firearms too expensive for all but the wealthy.

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 6:26:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What a crappy article. I wanted to know two things. 1. How does it work? Saying some drivel about a RF stopwatch doesn't adequately describe it. 2. What are the grounds that the gun fans don't like this gun for? With this incarnation the gun will not fire unless the hand holding the weapon has a "watch" on that wrist sending out an enabling signal. I will not presume to speak for everyone but for starters I don't have any faith in the technology. Second I oppose it being made mandatory, particularly at this early stage of development. The main effect of this, as I see it, would be to to make firearms too expensive for all but the wealthy. Has anyone anywhere tried to make it mandatory? NO! Your paranoia is showing.

BamaD -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 6:29:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What a crappy article. I wanted to know two things. 1. How does it work? Saying some drivel about a RF stopwatch doesn't adequately describe it. 2. What are the grounds that the gun fans don't like this gun for? With this incarnation the gun will not fire unless the hand holding the weapon has a "watch" on that wrist sending out an enabling signal. I will not presume to speak for everyone but for starters I don't have any faith in the technology. Second I oppose it being made mandatory, particularly at this early stage of development. The main effect of this, as I see it, would be to to make firearms too expensive for all but the wealthy. Has anyone anywhere tried to make it mandatory? NO! Your paranoia is showing. Kcsub brought up the question of making it mandatory, not me. In fact while you must not realize it, but you jumped in on the response to his claim that making it mandatory would save thousands of lives. you might want to check this smartgunlaws.org/gun-policy

Kirata -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 7:40:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Funny thing about that liar. The CDC calls 15 to 18 year olds youth which is simply a synonym for child. http://thesaurus.com/browse/child So including that data is correct. Excluding it is incorrect and you remain a lying sack of shit. So you don't understand synonyms either. I shouldn't be surprised. But one would think it might have occurred to even the meanest intellect that if the CDC considered the words "children" and "youth" to be interchangeable, they wouldn't have presented the data for those groups in separate tables. Synonyms are words that may mean the same thing, but they may also be words that just mean something close, and while they may be interchangeable in some contexts, they are manifestly not in others. The words in list of synonyms almost never all mean exactly the same thing. See how that works? a person between birth and puberty ~Houghton-Mifflin a boy or girl between birth and puberty ~Collins a young person from the time they are born until they are about 14 years old ~MacMillan a young person especially between infancy and youth ~Merriam-Webster So how about taking a nap now? You must be tired from all this tough intellectual work. And if nothing else, maybe you'll wake up with some new names to call all those rude nasty people who disturb your peace by shooting holes in the shit-for-brains claims you post. Wouldn't a little variety be nice? K.

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 8:18:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Funny thing about that liar. The CDC calls 15 to 18 year olds youth which is simply a synonym for child. http://thesaurus.com/browse/child So including that data is correct. Excluding it is incorrect and you remain a lying sack of shit. So you don't understand synonyms either. I shouldn't be surprised. But one would think it might have occurred to even the meanest intellect that if the CDC considered the words "children" and "youth" to be interchangeable, they wouldn't have presented the data for those groups in separate tables. Synonyms are words that may mean the same thing, but they may also be words that just mean something close, and while they may be interchangeable in some contexts, they are manifestly not in others. The words in list of synonyms almost never all mean exactly the same thing. See how that works? a person between birth and puberty ~Houghton-Mifflin a boy or girl between birth and puberty ~Collins a young person from the time they are born until they are about 14 years old ~MacMillan a young person especially between infancy and youth ~Merriam-Webster So how about taking a nap now? You must be tired from all this tough intellectual work. And if nothing else, maybe you'll wake up with some new names to call all those rude nasty people who disturb your peace by shooting holes in the shit-for-brains claims you post. Wouldn't a little variety be nice? Give it up dumbass. I started out taking 18 and under and you accepted that definition. You didn't contest it at all.

Kirata -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 8:45:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen I started out taking 18 and under and you accepted that definition. You didn't contest it at all. Well you're right there. The "Who is a child?" question came up later. Initially, I was only contesting your wild claim that "thousands" were dying. I didn't realize you were counting every accidental death of anyone aged 18 or under since Sam Colt picked up his first screwdriver. K.

BamaD -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 9:19:57 PM)
fr From Fox Gun rights advocates worry that the firearm's availability will give a boost to a New Jersey law mandating that all handguns in the state be personalized within three years of a smart gun going on sale anywhere in the U.S. CNN says the same thing so I guess it is someone's ignorance showing and not my paranoia

lovmuffin -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/3/2014 11:33:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What a crappy article. I wanted to know two things. 1. How does it work? Saying some drivel about a RF stopwatch doesn't adequately describe it. 2. What are the grounds that the gun fans don't like this gun for? On question 2 it's what Bama said and a crap load of other stuff. If ya read the whole thread you'll pretty much get a complete perspective on why gun fans (most of them I would presume), don't like this gun or any other gun equipped with the same technogy.

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 7:33:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen I started out taking 18 and under and you accepted that definition. You didn't contest it at all. Well you're right there. The "Who is a child?" question came up later. Initially, I was only contesting your wild claim that "thousands" were dying. I didn't realize you were counting every accidental death of anyone aged 18 or under since Sam Colt picked up his first screwdriver. Lying dumbass. Thanks for finally admitting it.

BamaD -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 10:37:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen I started out taking 18 and under and you accepted that definition. You didn't contest it at all. Well you're right there. The "Who is a child?" question came up later. Initially, I was only contesting your wild claim that "thousands" were dying. I didn't realize you were counting every accidental death of anyone aged 18 or under since Sam Colt picked up his first screwdriver. Lying dumbass. Thanks for finally admitting it. Do you actually read posts before you respond to them?

Kirata -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 10:54:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Lying dumbass. Thanks for finally admitting it. Do you actually read posts before you respond to them? Well in all fairness, there probably isn't much light to read by down at the bottom of that hole. [:D] K.

BamaD -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 10:57:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Lying dumbass. Thanks for finally admitting it. Do you actually read posts before you respond to them? Well in all fairness, there probably isn't much light to read by down at the bottom of that hole. [:D] K. Considering that in the best of circumstances the light don't shine where his head is.

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 11:31:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Lying dumbass. Thanks for finally admitting it. Do you actually read posts before you respond to them? Well in all fairness, there probably isn't much light to read by down at the bottom of that hole. [:D] You admitted that you lied. Why are you pretending otherwhise?

Kirata -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 11:32:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen You admitted that you lied. You're making shit up again. K.

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 11:40:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen You admitted that you lied. You're making shit up again. LIAR quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen I started out taking 18 and under and you accepted that definition. You didn't contest it at all. Well you're right there.

Kirata -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (5/4/2014 11:47:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen LIAR This may have escaped your notice, but it's very important when accusing people of lying not to be lying yourself. Just trying to help, yanno. [:)] K.

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625