LookieNoNookie -> RE: Liberal delusions on racism (5/9/2014 8:10:21 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx What I thought you meant was Bend over, bozo. What you "thought" I meant, and claimed I meant, was that "blacks and blacks ALONE are responsible for the problems that afflict their communities." See here if you forget. Nice bit of quote trimming there, too. But hey, why let a little misrepresentation stand in the way? After all, it's just good family fun. K. Actually I, not thompson x, made the claim that you asserted "blacks and blacks alone are responsible for the problems that afflict their communities." in my post #262 on page 14. Please note that my original text didn't capitalise 'alone'* so not only have you wrongly attributed the claim, you also altered it without advising the reader that you have altered the original. And, amazingly, you accuse others of "misrepresentation" ....... The post of yours that I was responding to reads in full: "Put a sock in it, tweakabelle. Nobody has demonstrated more disrespect for the welfare of the black community than other blacks themselves. It ain't white folks driving into our inner cities at night to paint gang signs on buildings, shoot the place up, and punch a few heads of kids who are trying to do well in school." (post #260) In your post, you are clearly pointing the finger of blame at "blacks" and no one else. You specifically absolve "whites" of blame. You exclude all other racial groups from blame - " Nobody has demonstrated more disrespect for the welfare of the black community than other blacks themselves." The only available conclusion is that you are blaming all blacks, as you declined to qualify "blacks" in any way shape or form, and no one else. This conclusion could have been easily avoided by simply qualifying "blacks" in some way eg "some blacks ...." but you declined to do so. The post, and the thinking that inspired it, are racist to their cores. All blacks are judged solely on the basis of behaviour by black gangbangers. An entire racial group is judged on the basis of alleged behaviour of its worst members. Everyone else is excluded. A parallel would be judging all whites on the basis of Ku Klux Klan behaviour. Textbook racism. If you want to post such sentiments, that's your right and your problem (and I mean problem). But please defend it on the basis of what it is - textbook classic racism, nothing more, nothing less. It's not " just good family fun", It's hate speech, and to my mind, hate and hate speech are always putrid ugly and sick. * I have bolded 'alone' so that the alteration you made is clearer Hate speech. Interesting. How many Spanish music videos have anything in their final product about "my wetback"? How many Jewish music videos (or movies) talk about all the "Kikes" in the hood? How many Asian music videos go on and on about all the "Chinks" they work with, wanna fuck or think have fine booty's? About as many as videos by white people who talk about "crackers" and other epithets. None. Not "very few".....none. Why do you think that is? Because it's offensive. It's unproductive. It values themselves and their peers as "less than". And everyone (except for one class/race of people) agrees. And who's being affected by this disease of language? Not whites. Not Jews. Not Asians. Not Latinos. And who's complaining about the epithets? Not whites. Not Jews. Not Asians. Not Latinos. How many SNL sketches are there about "stupid white people"? A movie: "White men can't jump". How many TV shows with other nationalities pick on their white boss, neighbor, ex boyfriend, etc.? (More than a few). And it's always against white men....how dare they shoot a negative against a woman, black, white or any color or race. One would be bad enough, but one against black men would create a virtual firestorm. Against black women....get the Presidential football out....it's time for fingerprint analysis, verifying the counterbalancing corresponding codes and.....push the red button. WWIII. Yet no one seems to take offense at any of these negative backlashes against white people. Not even white people. Anyone remember any about stupid black people? None that I recall. Because it's perfectly politically correct to denigrate white people. And what do white people (and others) do about it when it does happen? Let it roll off their backs...because whining about words wastes their time and interrupts the goal: Success (or at least minimally avoiding failure). So, truly, who's the racist in this society? The ones that stand side by side with those who think it's offensive, ask that federal taxes be diverted overwhelmingly in favor of those who are (purportedly) disadvantaged, only to watch those very same folks argue that this same effort (demanded by them) keeps them "down", or, the ones who in nearly every environment, propagate the same vitriol against not only others, but themselves? Hate speech indeed.
|
|
|
|