BoleroMaster
Posts: 3
Joined: 1/25/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JerryInTampa Can you show me where a school has given credit for a "1+1=3" response? I doubt your assertion that it has. I doubt that such a literal view was the point of that argument, but if you cannot see beyond the words, to the meaning of the example, allow me to elaborate. In the "No Child Left Behind" system, when a few students of a larger class cannot understand a concept, idea, or fact (such as 2+2=4 . . . which btw was the actual example used by Mercnbeth) the teacher is told to spend more time re-covering the topic as many times as is needed to get the slower students to understand . . . all to the detriment of the students who had grasped the topic the first time around. Thus, the children who answer "4" are punished, while simultaneously, the children answering "3" are rewarded with more attention, and more time spent on their education. This system is terrible, all classes and grades need to be merit-based . . . after perhaps 2nd or 3rd grade, tests should be given to students, as well as teacher input to get to more teacher-controlled advancement. Also, students would be separated into leveled classes at the same time. The students who need more time and re-covering of topics, would all be together, so the teacher could get in-depth time spent focused on simpler concepts. At the same time, the advanced students would be in their own class, able to work and discuss concepts at a pace more suited to their learning style. "No Child Left Behind" does not make the slower kids learn faster, it just holds the faster students back. And please do not bother to point out that this view is not very politically correct, I know, I've had it since I was in middle school. If the point of our education system is to continue to push later generations to be active and more learned members of society, then how can this be bad. And being "PC" should never be more important than doing what is right for the future of society . . . -- S
|