DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave I seem to understand the topic better than you do Ken. I simply asked you to explain a few little things about your ridiculous assertion that this has anything to do with the First Amendment. I haven't created any strawmen Ken. I used yours. Since you refuse to explain how the First Amendment protects people from wrongdoing, or makes it possible to conduct surveillance on people who say suspicious things or hang out with suspicious people, I have to believe you're just grasping at straws. You keep pushing this narrative, but you still haven't explained why it's legal for cities and states to refuse people the right to assemble if they do not meet certain requirements. The more you talk, the more apparent it becomes that you are just talking out of your ass again... You have a childs understanding of the Constitution, that is largely incomplete and incorrect. I think this notion that you may, in truth, be delusional is the first thing MM and I have actually agreed on in months... -SD- I made none of those claims so why should I defend them? That is what a strawman is. You created a position that is not mine and then demanded that I defend it. I'm not playing that silly game. If you ever decide to actually discuss what I wrote and not the crazy shit you wish I wrote get back to me.
|