Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with a Gun


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with a Gun Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with ... - 6/20/2014 2:47:14 PM   
HunterS


Posts: 553
Joined: 10/21/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterS


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Given these things it behooves you to prove why he shouldn't have had a gun, other than you don't want him to.


Where have I said I don't want him to have a gun?

You asked for someone to justify him being engaged in a legal act, why would you do that if you approved of him doing so?


I did not ask anyone to justify anything, legal or other wise. I made it abundantly clear that his carry was legal, and that anyone else who wished to could do so legally so take your false statements and stick them up your ass. Do not try to hijack this thread with your personal 2nd ammendment agenda. This is not a 2nd ammendment issue just because you want it to be.
If you choose not to address the op or my opinions honestly then admit that you are a one issue moron and go masturbate with some hopes. If you have some constructive opinions then please lets hear them.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with ... - 6/20/2014 2:51:42 PM   
HunterS


Posts: 553
Joined: 10/21/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Why did you put my name on someone another persons post?


Because I made a formating error.
You, on the other hand, being unable to form cogent response to a reasonable statement would prefer to address minutia.Why is that? Is it simply ignorance or is it just plane stupidity?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with ... - 6/20/2014 2:55:38 PM   
HunterS


Posts: 553
Joined: 10/21/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

Don't drug dealers carry guns as a matter of course, has nobody seen The Wire?




My best guess is that many of the dead ones didn't.


(in reply to FullCircle)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with ... - 6/21/2014 1:47:45 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Third when the cops show up your firearm should not be aimed at them, on the ground would be good.

And that is where things get complicated. You assume that you will see the cops arrive and that the violence will be over. If that isn't the case...


...Better have that death insurance policy paid up and current. Those cops will see some guy waving a gun around, think, "That's the gunman" and drop him under a hail of gunfire.

Or worst, some CCW holder does not observe the initial situation, rounds the corner, see's the first CCW holder firing on someone, and shots him/her in the back....then the cops....drop him.

An who is to say a CCW holder is not part of the actual plan? Waiting to see if there are any 'heroes' that try to react to the original situation and eliminate them before joining their friends in the mayhem.

Joether, you know the cops don't do that with the actual shooters but you assume they will with the armed citizen, how obtuse.


You hold a belief that police officers are can tell the bad guys from the good guys. Because bad guys all wear black, right? Police officer see someone firing a gun toward someone else, they'll drop that guy without a second thought. How would the police officers know the CCW Holder is on their side? The answer is they don't.

Likewise, if the CCW Holder was aware of the police presence in pursuit of the 'evil person(s)', would they get involved? Most likely no. Which would therefore keep them from receiving friendly fire.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You also fall into the trap of assuming the ccw holder will shoot anyone but the bad guy.


Yes, because all CCW Holders are total deadshots. And I'm the Queen of England! Reality is that most CCW Holders are good shots against pieces of paper at a range where they can relax. Its a whole different story when shit is hitting the fan from multiple directions. Most people, do not train, nor keep these kind of skills up-to-date; law enforcement does it on a regular basis. And there have been a few noted instances in which the police shot bystanders while trying to bring down the evil person(s).

Its a fantasy to believe CCW Holders are deadshots. Even more so when things are out of control.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
The third point is pure paranoia.


Is it? Sounds more like squad tactics. Initial group storms in, while those in the second group wait for a response. That group neutralizes the response while its focused on the first group. Its called a moving ambush. Or do you live in a fantasy world were no CCW would ever do horrible things to Americans?



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with ... - 6/21/2014 12:04:13 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Third when the cops show up your firearm should not be aimed at them, on the ground would be good.

And that is where things get complicated. You assume that you will see the cops arrive and that the violence will be over. If that isn't the case...


...Better have that death insurance policy paid up and current. Those cops will see some guy waving a gun around, think, "That's the gunman" and drop him under a hail of gunfire.

Or worst, some CCW holder does not observe the initial situation, rounds the corner, see's the first CCW holder firing on someone, and shots him/her in the back....then the cops....drop him.

An who is to say a CCW holder is not part of the actual plan? Waiting to see if there are any 'heroes' that try to react to the original situation and eliminate them before joining their friends in the mayhem.

Joether, you know the cops don't do that with the actual shooters but you assume they will with the armed citizen, how obtuse.


You hold a belief that police officers are can tell the bad guys from the good guys. Because bad guys all wear black, right? Police officer see someone firing a gun toward someone else, they'll drop that guy without a second thought. How would the police officers know the CCW Holder is on their side? The answer is they don't.

Likewise, if the CCW Holder was aware of the police presence in pursuit of the 'evil person(s)', would they get involved? Most likely no. Which would therefore keep them from receiving friendly fire.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You also fall into the trap of assuming the ccw holder will shoot anyone but the bad guy.


Yes, because all CCW Holders are total deadshots. And I'm the Queen of England! Reality is that most CCW Holders are good shots against pieces of paper at a range where they can relax. Its a whole different story when shit is hitting the fan from multiple directions. Most people, do not train, nor keep these kind of skills up-to-date; law enforcement does it on a regular basis. And there have been a few noted instances in which the police shot bystanders while trying to bring down the evil person(s).

Its a fantasy to believe CCW Holders are deadshots. Even more so when things are out of control.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
The third point is pure paranoia.


Is it? Sounds more like squad tactics. Initial group storms in, while those in the second group wait for a response. That group neutralizes the response while its focused on the first group. Its called a moving ambush. Or do you live in a fantasy world were no CCW would ever do horrible things to Americans?




1 The cops give the shooter a chance to surrender but they would shoot the ccw holder in a second? Not likely
2 The insistence is that fighting back increases casualties, this flies in the face of all known facts.
3 Again you assume that the good guys will always shoot the wrong person, when studies, which I have shown you repeatedly, show that they are less likely too than the cops.
4 When the cops show you drop your gun and fall on the ground.
5 When the cops show to a shooting situation and see two guys shooting at each other they will assume that one is defending themselves and order everyone to surrender.
6 I consider myself to be an average shot as a ccw holder and when I worked for the sheriffs office (in an administrative capacity) our range master was irritated with the officers because I could out shoot 75% of them. This does not mean that I think all ccw carriers are crack shots but on the average they are at least as good as the cops.
7 Never say never but none of these shootings have been by ccw carriers.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 6/21/2014 12:35:52 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 65
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rights and Responsibilities; Being a Good Guy with a Gun Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.059