RE: The ignorance of liberals (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Kirata -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 2:51:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

*really, really* should take a holiday outside of the USA some time.

Only a fool would leave this place. [:D]

[image]http://thwaits.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/sarasota-fl.jpg[/image]

K.




dryhump -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 2:57:46 PM)

yes it always bush's fault...especially six years after he left office.....Their is plenty of money, let alone the national guard to do the security of the border.....18 trillions....all we have to do is take away your health care.....border fixed....
take away your Obama phone, your contraception, your welfare check, get rid of the irs, get rid of the epa, board of education..........all of which really are state rights....and then their will be plenty of money for the border.....SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES




PeonForHer -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 3:15:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moderator3


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Done. Happy to oblige. ;-)



Thank you PeonForHer. You weren't the only member doing this, thus I had to change my post to FR, not wanting to point a finger at you!

Have a great weekend!


You may call me 'Peon', M3. I feel that we have reached that point of warm familiarity. :-)




subrosaDom -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 3:21:24 PM)

To admit it isn't all Bush's fault would be to admit that Obama is not "the one you've been waiting for." Blasphemy.

Having said that, Reagan's biggest mistake was nominating Bush I for VP. That set in stage the Bush dynasty, RINOs, "compassionate conservativism," "no new taxes," and the like.

Bush I and II were effectively RINOs. Bush I raised taxes and Bush II spent like he owned every water spigot in the world. Of course, Obama spends even more, but Bush II was an enabler. He meant well and he's far more intelligent than granted, but he's not a strategic thinker and had no philosophical grounding other than compromise with Democrats because he was a gentleman. Big mistake.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dryhump

yes it always bush's fault...especially six years after he left office.....Their is plenty of money, let alone the national guard to do the security of the border.....18 trillions....all we have to do is take away your health care.....border fixed....
take away your Obama phone, your contraception, your welfare check, get rid of the irs, get rid of the epa, board of education..........all of which really are state rights....and then their will be plenty of money for the border.....SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES





BamaD -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 3:53:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

How do you think the gas gets back to the action?
It goes into a tube near the muzzle it then is directed back to the action.
When it hits that turn sending it back to the action it reduces the recoil.
Anyone who knows a quarter of what you pretend to knows this, why don't you?
You have just given a demonstration of what this thread is about.

Do you have a fucking clue what you are talking about?
Do you know physics at all?

When you fire a weapon that doesn't have some sort of gas operated reload you feel the entire recoil directly back into your shoulder. When you fire a gas operated weapon you feel almost the same recoil, the difference is miniscule, but it is in your shoulder and every other point where you are in contact with the gun and it makes the gun after go off target (the recoil operation is what makes semis rise after each shot).
Please at least learn something about what you are talking about.

Congratulations you have just beaten you all time stupid comment record.
Distributing the recoil means more recoil than sending it directly to you, how stupid can you be.
What you more closely talked about is a straight blow back automatic where some of the recoil is used to work the action.
This too lessens the recoil.
A bolt is more accurate in skilled hands and Marines wouldn't complain about recoil if it broke their shoulder.
The .223 was not designed to kill, it was designed to disable, a wounded enemy does more damage than a dead one.

I never said more. Please for like the millionth time read what I write not  the crazy shit you wished I wrote!

That you don't understand opposite and equal reaction means this discussion is over.

I don't take orders from you sir robin.
And as usual you lie.
You said that less recoil is the reason that Marines like the bolt action sniper rifle,
That is either a lie or totally ignorant.
They preferred the bolt because it is more accurate and more dependable.
You said the AR was built to kill and nothing else.
A round that isn't big enough to hunt deer isn't much of a killer.
You don't understand that when energy is used to do things before it gets to the stock it uses up some of the energy.




subrosaDom -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 4:29:30 PM)

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

How do you think the gas gets back to the action?
It goes into a tube near the muzzle it then is directed back to the action.
When it hits that turn sending it back to the action it reduces the recoil.
Anyone who knows a quarter of what you pretend to knows this, why don't you?
You have just given a demonstration of what this thread is about.

Do you have a fucking clue what you are talking about?
Do you know physics at all?

When you fire a weapon that doesn't have some sort of gas operated reload you feel the entire recoil directly back into your shoulder. When you fire a gas operated weapon you feel almost the same recoil, the difference is miniscule, but it is in your shoulder and every other point where you are in contact with the gun and it makes the gun after go off target (the recoil operation is what makes semis rise after each shot).
Please at least learn something about what you are talking about.

Congratulations you have just beaten you all time stupid comment record.
Distributing the recoil means more recoil than sending it directly to you, how stupid can you be.
What you more closely talked about is a straight blow back automatic where some of the recoil is used to work the action.
This too lessens the recoil.
A bolt is more accurate in skilled hands and Marines wouldn't complain about recoil if it broke their shoulder.
The .223 was not designed to kill, it was designed to disable, a wounded enemy does more damage than a dead one.

I never said more. Please for like the millionth time read what I write not  the crazy shit you wished I wrote!

That you don't understand opposite and equal reaction means this discussion is over.

I don't take orders from you sir robin.
And as usual you lie.
You said that less recoil is the reason that Marines like the bolt action sniper rifle,
That is either a lie or totally ignorant.
They preferred the bolt because it is more accurate and more dependable.
You said the AR was built to kill and nothing else.
A round that isn't big enough to hunt deer isn't much of a killer.
You don't understand that when energy is used to do things before it gets to the stock it uses up some of the energy.





lovmuffin -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 4:40:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]




BamaD -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 4:41:04 PM)

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.



Makes more sense than anything he said.




subrosaDom -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 4:42:18 PM)

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-u-s-released-thousands-of-immigrant-felons-last-year/

But I suppose all of these illegal immigrant felons have a recidivism rate of zero, unlike any other collection of felons on the planet?

As far as actual crimes, yes, I can easily find that, too. This is just a start, should I feel inclined to do the addtional search. However, unlike kinksterparty's most generous $35/hr, my rate is $200/hr. But for you, I'll be special and make it $500/hr.


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: kinksterparty

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: kinksterparty
quote:

ORIGINAL: dryhump
The border crisis is nobody else's problem other than the Potus......but of course they hate that little thing called the constitution......

It's a problem for residents of the border states - TX, AZ, NM - who have to deal with increasing crime rates, including fun things like gang-rapes and child abductions.

Document this actually happening?


This may seem a little harsh, but I've learned a couple of things from participating in political blogs.

25 Rules of Disinformation - "Rule 14: Demand complete solutions" and "Rule 19: Ignore facts, demand impossible proofs".

You're playing both of those, and I'm not falling into your trap.

You want to disagree? Do your own damn research. Google is that way --->

I'm not your research assistant. PayPal me $ 35/hour, then we'll talk.

Look sock you made the wild claim And now you can't back it up. Come out from behind the sock and stop playing this lame game.





BamaD -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 5:18:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

He doesn't need a shotgun he once claimed that with a broken arm he subdued an armed assailant.




subrosaDom -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 5:24:20 PM)

He meant that the assailant had arms, as in 2 appendages.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

He doesn't need a shotgun he once claimed that with a broken arm he subdued an armed assailant.





Kirata -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 5:29:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

Let's just hope he doesn't take his shooting advice from Joe the Mouth.

K.





BamaD -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 5:45:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

He meant that the assailant had arms, as in 2 appendages.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

He doesn't need a shotgun he once claimed that with a broken arm he subdued an armed assailant.



He claimed it was a trained police officer with a nightstick.




BamaD -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 5:48:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

Let's just hope he doesn't take his shooting advice from Joe the Mouth.

K.



Why not Joe is Vice to the greatest President who ever lived with the courage to know that his wisdom is greater than the law or the Constitution.
Never mind that Biden's advice was illegal where Biden is from.




subrosaDom -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 5:53:30 PM)

I am not saying I believe you'd personally condemn someone of a crime, left or right. Problem is that most don't anymore. I didn't say YOU were clueless. In fact, I didn't even make the clueless comment and it wasn't directed at you.

The TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party has as much in common with Al Queda as you have in common with Hitler: nothing. Jesus didn't say to kill the infidels but to love your neighbor. And I don't think Jesus was God or anything other than a charismatic man. Now the O.T. did show God eradicating the homosexuals for sure, but it didn't show God telling his minions to execute each and every one last of them. So even if you take only the O.T. and compare it against the Quran, the Quran "wins." It is Islamic doctrine that earlier pronouncements are superseded by later ones, so all of Mohammed's peace-loving statements made in Mecca are superseded by his bellicose, evil ones in Medina. TEA Party activists (especially if you exclude leftists who have infiltrated rallies and put up racist posters specifically to attempt to discredit the TEA Party) are almost to a point decent, polite and well-mannered. OWS are so poorly mannered they'd be kicked out of Bill Ayers's classroom. TEA Party ralliers pick up garbage. OWS defecated on the ground. OWS rallies had numerous rapes. TEA Party? None, and if someone had tried it, they'd likely have been arrested or gunned down.

Are there right-wing extremists? Yes, there are. But they're not the TEA Party. That's simply organizational character assassination.

Are there honest leftists? Sure there are. Paul Wellstone was one. Christopher Hitchens (obviously I agreed with him on defense, but on little else) was another.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

In leftist ideology, ever killer is a killer. Period. The fact that they're left leaning or right leaning might simply add to motivation, it doesn't make it right. And I'm not entirely sure who Che is and what hagiographies you think I'm reading, but you're clearly clueless. I don't believe all right wingers are killers, extremists, or tea partiers, just as I dont believe the same as those on the left. If those on the left committed horrible crimes, I'd condemn them just as I would any right winger.

The problem with right wingers these days is that those who actively supporting the tea party/far right do come off as extremists. What they say isn't too different from what Al Queda says, except you simply have to replace The Quran with The Bible. If the repubs dont come back to the centre, it's unlikely they'll ever win another presidency, because most people aren't that extreme.

I as a Liberal dont hate conservatives, and in fact I find more centrist and logical conservative ideology quite convincing at times. But these days, the right wing is not logical, they're ideological and they are for a lack of a better word, extremists. Hell, you got militia members threatening to shoot government officials at a ranch, and similar people threatening to shoot children trying to come to your country for a better life. If that doesnt speak of extremism, I dont know what does.

Sure, there are left wing terrorists too, and while I understand why they do what they do, they're actions to achieve what they desire is completely wrong and they should be rightfully punished for it. The world can function without the need of extremism on both sides, and to blanket all liberals as people who are hypocrites about killers is completely wrong. I doubt you actually care about accuracy, because for you it's about vilifying the opposition. You are not an enemy of liberals, you are a person with a particular perspective. But you live with people in a world who share opposite perspectives, and if you can't learn to compromise and reach a moderate middle ground, then what's the point of politics? Seriously? Why not just start killing the people you disagree with? Go the full 9 yards and go full terrorist?





subrosaDom -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 6:00:34 PM)

I'd like Obama impeached, although that's impossible today given the composition of the Senate. So we'll have to settle for Lois Lerner's being put into jail and ratting on The Great One. Then even Dems would have to vote for impeachment (well, enough of them: 33 needn't turn at all).

Biden is maybe an idiot or perhaps it's a vaudeville act, but I don't think he hates the US and he lacks the support Obama has. You can't oppose Joe Biden and be called a racist. The country would benefit from a Biden presidency (as compared to an Obama one). Also Biden has some political chops. He'd actually talk to the Republicans. Not sure if that's good or bad for us, but I do believe he'd talk.



quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

Let's just hope he doesn't take his shooting advice from Joe the Mouth.

K.



Why not Joe is Vice to the greatest President who ever lived with the courage to know that his wisdom is greater than the law or the Constitution.
Never mind that Biden's advice was illegal where Biden is from.





DomKen -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 6:10:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

How do you think the gas gets back to the action?
It goes into a tube near the muzzle it then is directed back to the action.
When it hits that turn sending it back to the action it reduces the recoil.
Anyone who knows a quarter of what you pretend to knows this, why don't you?
You have just given a demonstration of what this thread is about.

Do you have a fucking clue what you are talking about?
Do you know physics at all?

When you fire a weapon that doesn't have some sort of gas operated reload you feel the entire recoil directly back into your shoulder. When you fire a gas operated weapon you feel almost the same recoil, the difference is miniscule, but it is in your shoulder and every other point where you are in contact with the gun and it makes the gun after go off target (the recoil operation is what makes semis rise after each shot).
Please at least learn something about what you are talking about.

Congratulations you have just beaten you all time stupid comment record.
Distributing the recoil means more recoil than sending it directly to you, how stupid can you be.
What you more closely talked about is a straight blow back automatic where some of the recoil is used to work the action.
This too lessens the recoil.
A bolt is more accurate in skilled hands and Marines wouldn't complain about recoil if it broke their shoulder.
The .223 was not designed to kill, it was designed to disable, a wounded enemy does more damage than a dead one.

I never said more. Please for like the millionth time read what I write not  the crazy shit you wished I wrote!

That you don't understand opposite and equal reaction means this discussion is over.

I don't take orders from you sir robin.
And as usual you lie.
You said that less recoil is the reason that Marines like the bolt action sniper rifle,
That is either a lie or totally ignorant.
They preferred the bolt because it is more accurate and more dependable.
You said the AR was built to kill and nothing else.
A round that isn't big enough to hunt deer isn't much of a killer.
You don't understand that when energy is used to do things before it gets to the stock it uses up some of the energy.

I said less felt recoil liar. If you can't read at least quote me.

The range you hunt deer at and the range you kill people at are different now aren't they?

Energy is never consumed. You feel less recoil if the weapon is heavier and you feel a tiny bit less if some energy is diverted to operate the action but you can do the math and see that the losses involved mean that those losses amount to such a trivial loss that what is really going on is a time delay and a transfer of where you feel it not a loss of how much energy.




BamaD -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 6:25:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

How do you think the gas gets back to the action?
It goes into a tube near the muzzle it then is directed back to the action.
When it hits that turn sending it back to the action it reduces the recoil.
Anyone who knows a quarter of what you pretend to knows this, why don't you?
You have just given a demonstration of what this thread is about.

Do you have a fucking clue what you are talking about?
Do you know physics at all?

When you fire a weapon that doesn't have some sort of gas operated reload you feel the entire recoil directly back into your shoulder. When you fire a gas operated weapon you feel almost the same recoil, the difference is miniscule, but it is in your shoulder and every other point where you are in contact with the gun and it makes the gun after go off target (the recoil operation is what makes semis rise after each shot).
Please at least learn something about what you are talking about.

Congratulations you have just beaten you all time stupid comment record.
Distributing the recoil means more recoil than sending it directly to you, how stupid can you be.
What you more closely talked about is a straight blow back automatic where some of the recoil is used to work the action.
This too lessens the recoil.
A bolt is more accurate in skilled hands and Marines wouldn't complain about recoil if it broke their shoulder.
The .223 was not designed to kill, it was designed to disable, a wounded enemy does more damage than a dead one.

I never said more. Please for like the millionth time read what I write not  the crazy shit you wished I wrote!

That you don't understand opposite and equal reaction means this discussion is over.

I don't take orders from you sir robin.
And as usual you lie.
You said that less recoil is the reason that Marines like the bolt action sniper rifle,
That is either a lie or totally ignorant.
They preferred the bolt because it is more accurate and more dependable.
You said the AR was built to kill and nothing else.
A round that isn't big enough to hunt deer isn't much of a killer.
You don't understand that when energy is used to do things before it gets to the stock it uses up some of the energy.

I said less felt recoil liar. If you can't read at least quote me.

The range you hunt deer at and the range you kill people at are different now aren't they?

Energy is never consumed. You feel less recoil if the weapon is heavier and you feel a tiny bit less if some energy is diverted to operate the action but you can do the math and see that the losses involved mean that those losses amount to such a trivial loss that what is really going on is a time delay and a transfer of where you feel it not a loss of how much energy.


Not good at running away are you robin
And you still don't know what you are talking about
you don't feel the recoil with a blow back or a gas operated auto loader like you do with a bolt of the same weight.
As usual you rattle on to sound like you know something when you don't.
And talk about misquoting I didn't say how much it dropped the recoil but when you drop
the caliber to a .223 plus the advantage of being gas operated you have a long gun I can shoot like a pistol.
And before you state another lie about me being taken in by the manufactures I have said several times before the first time you said that that I personally have no use for the .223.
And of course unlike you I can't subdue a trained police officer when I have a broken arm.
And Sir Robin what happened to you declaring this conversation to be over? Guess you even lied about that didn't you?




joether -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 7:56:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dryhump
yes it always bush's fault...especially six years after he left office.....Their is plenty of money, let alone the national guard to do the security of the border.....18 trillions....all we have to do is take away your health care.....border fixed....
take away your Obama phone, your contraception, your welfare check, get rid of the irs, get rid of the epa, board of education..........all of which really are state rights....and then their will be plenty of money for the border.....SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES


A Low Information Voter speaks up on the thread....




lovmuffin -> RE: The ignorance of liberals (7/12/2014 8:09:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom

BamaD you miss the point. DomKen is worried about home invasions from deer. Because nice peace-loving illegal immigrants with ties to Hizbollah and MS-13 -- or nice, peace-loving urban youths who play the knockout game and are beloved by Al Sharpton would never, ever, ever do something like that. After all, they all look like Obama's son that he never had.


He's not worried, he has a shotgun[8D]

Let's just hope he doesn't take his shooting advice from Joe the Mouth.

K.




Hope all ya want. You can even wish upon a star but that's where he takes it from. [8D]




Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125