BecomingV
Posts: 916
Joined: 11/11/2013 Status: offline
|
I'm really not concerned about terrorism in regard to this issue. Ebola is already here, in storage, and has been for some time... so the vulnerability is pre-existing. However, I am surprised that "they" transported infected people TO the U.S., or really, away from the origin of the infection. Here's why... In a biological ethics class I took some years ago, genetic engineering was covered. An example, was manipulating the gene that causes? sickle cell anemia. We can do that. But, then they discovered another expression of the same gene... that in Africa, it protects against malaria. Apparently we humans adapt to our environment. There can be unintended effects in science and medicine. So, I would need more information to allay my fears about this question... by transporting the ill person(s) from the location of original infection, are we changing something important? It does bring up fears like the effect Europeans had on Native Americans, or American missionaries introducing venereal diseases to previously robust and healthy Amazonian tribes. I travel. I always thought I was taking health risks in doing so and assumed the American government would NOT be coming to my rescue, should I become infected with a disease as potentially deadly as Ebola. Mixing issues is rarely productive, but seriously, if we care about the "threat of illegal alien children," why is this okay?
|