Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

What would the Republican Solution Be?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> What would the Republican Solution Be? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 6:49:08 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
To the troubled great lake: LAKE ERIE

Politically and scientifically the troubled state of Lake Erie cannot be denied -- and the impact costs affecting fishing, recreation, and clean drinking water are already severe. So, what would the Republican solution be to restoring lake?

You can't blame Obama, Hamas, Bergdahl, Islamists, welfare mothers, tree-huggers, immigrants, or liberals for the problem and conducting IRS hearings, Benghazi reviews and passing VOTER ID laws also won't help. Tax breaks and deregulation?

What kind of proposals could we even expect from Republicans?

TOLEDO, Ohio -- It took a serendipitous slug of toxins and the loss of drinking water for a half-million residents to bring home what scientists and government officials in this part of the country have been saying for years: Lake Erie is in trouble, and getting worse by the year.Flooded by tides of phosphorus washed from fertilized farms, cattle feedlots and leaky septic systems, the most intensely developed of the Great Lakes is increasingly being choked each summer by thick mats of algae, much of it poisonous. What plagues Toledo and, experts say, potentially all 11 million lakeside residents, is increasingly a serious problem across the United States.

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 8/8/2014 6:56:14 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 7:04:48 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
get rid of the EPA!!!!!!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 7:13:36 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
They already have given their answer, in their fabled 'jobs bill' it was to pour rat poison in our drinking water.

The Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act (H.R. 872), which would halt duplicative federal regulations on farmers and small business owners that are impeding job creation. (as the nutsackers would try to sell it)

But:

Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011 - Amends the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act [CWA]) to prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state from requiring a permit under the CWA for a discharge from a point source into navigable waters of a pesticide authorized for sale, distribution, or use under FIFRA, or the residue of such a pesticide, resulting from the application of such pesticide.
Exempts from such prohibition the following discharges containing a pesticide or pesticide residue:
(1) a discharge resulting from the application of a pesticide in violation of FIFRA that is relevant to protecting .........

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 7:28:27 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Well Ron, yanno, Erie runs into lake ontario and im less than 2 miles from that lake, and it forms most of my water supply ...so I was being facetious, but practically every rwnj on here and other places has stated getting rid of regs and the EPA, mind you with our own conservative prime minister, who has given fresh water lakes away willy nilly, the rwnj assholes on this side are almost as bad.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 7:55:36 AM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline
Don't warry, Jesus will solve the problem. Well after you died that's his jurisdiction. So just drink the water and be conifdent.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 9:49:40 AM   
DaNewAgeViking


Posts: 1009
Joined: 4/29/2004
Status: offline
I can tell you the Radical solution right now: offer a free bottle of water to everyone who votes R!

(in reply to eulero83)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 10:51:44 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Well Ron, yanno, Erie runs into lake ontario and im less than 2 miles from that lake, and it forms most of my water supply ...so I was being facetious, but practically every rwnj on here and other places has stated getting rid of regs and the EPA, mind you with our own conservative prime minister, who has given fresh water lakes away willy nilly, the rwnj assholes on this side are almost as bad.


Toledo has been Democrat-run for as long as I've lived here (22+ years; before that, I haven't ever looked into). The water treatment facilities are being fixed up so they no longer dump raw sewage into the Maumee River (actually, there is an issue coming up for the locals to vote on phase 3 [of 3] to upgrade the wastewater facilities after the EPA found them to be ridiculously lacking years ago). I don't think the actual water treatment plants that provide drinking water have been updated recently. The City of Oregon (borders Toledo's East side) gets about half it's water from Toledo, with the other half coming from Lake Erie. Oregon treats it's water from the city the same way it treats its water from the Lake. Oregon was not part of the drinking ban. No issues whatsoever with the water.

So, once again, we have an aging infrastructure that clearly (or unclearly, depending on your pun level) hasn't been kept up to date. Maybe the Feds should come in and rebuild Toledo's infrastructure. I'm sure that'll be a great use for taxpayer dollars coming from Idaho.

On a more comical note...



http://www.metacafe.com/watch/5378456/bill_murray_snl_classic_commercial/
(It's worth the few minutes to watch, especially in light of last weekend.)

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 11:10:16 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Well Ron, yanno, Erie runs into lake ontario and im less than 2 miles from that lake, and it forms most of my water supply ...so I was being facetious, but practically every rwnj on here and other places has stated getting rid of regs and the EPA, mind you with our own conservative prime minister, who has given fresh water lakes away willy nilly, the rwnj assholes on this side are almost as bad.


Toledo has been Democrat-run for as long as I've lived here (22+ years; before that, I haven't ever looked into). The water treatment facilities are being fixed up so they no longer dump raw sewage into the Maumee River (actually, there is an issue coming up for the locals to vote on phase 3 [of 3] to upgrade the wastewater facilities after the EPA found them to be ridiculously lacking years ago). I don't think the actual water treatment plants that provide drinking water have been updated recently. The City of Oregon (borders Toledo's East side) gets about half it's water from Toledo, with the other half coming from Lake Erie. Oregon treats it's water from the city the same way it treats its water from the Lake. Oregon was not part of the drinking ban. No issues whatsoever with the water.

So, once again, we have an aging infrastructure that clearly (or unclearly, depending on your pun level) hasn't been kept up to date. Maybe the Feds should come in and rebuild Toledo's infrastructure. I'm sure that'll be a great use for taxpayer dollars coming from Idaho.

On a more comical note...



http://www.metacafe.com/watch/5378456/bill_murray_snl_classic_commercial/
(It's worth the few minutes to watch, especially in light of last weekend.)

So the answer is to tax the locals so they can provide clean water that the Feds will no longer require and make sure it is local democrats, that have to do it to maintain any clean drinking water so the repubs can blame them for too much local regs and higher taxes ?

Sounds like a plan.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 11:16:33 AM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline
This is a fast reply.

It is a sad fucking statement when saving our natural resources becomes a matter of political bullshit instead of a genuine concern for our survival.

I guess when it is all gone we can all sit there and wring our hands and wonder what the hell happened.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 12:52:16 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
So the answer is to tax the locals so they can provide clean water that the Feds will no longer require and make sure it is local democrats, that have to do it to maintain any clean drinking water so the repubs can blame them for too much local regs and higher taxes ?
Sounds like a plan.


The answer is to tax those who are benefiting from the sewer system and the drinking water system, to pay for those systems. Absolutely. Nowhere did I say to make sure it's the local Democrats that do it. I said the City has been run by Democrats since I've been here, and that the water system is obviously not been kept up.

Funny how I'm saying the locals should pay for the infrastructure they benefit from, and I'm being chastised over it.

Toledo isn't going red any time soon. The Unions will make sure of that.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 12:54:54 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

What would the Republican Solution Be?


To sell the water rights, and use the money to give tax breaks to the higher tax brackets.







< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 8/8/2014 12:55:59 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 12:55:00 PM   
subrosaDom


Posts: 724
Joined: 2/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

To the troubled great lake: LAKE ERIE

Politically and scientifically the troubled state of Lake Erie cannot be denied -- and the impact costs affecting fishing, recreation, and clean drinking water are already severe. So, what would the Republican solution be to restoring lake?

You can't blame Obama, Hamas, Bergdahl, Islamists, welfare mothers, tree-huggers, immigrants, or liberals for the problem and conducting IRS hearings, Benghazi reviews and passing VOTER ID laws also won't help. Tax breaks and deregulation?

What kind of proposals could we even expect from Republicans?

TOLEDO, Ohio -- It took a serendipitous slug of toxins and the loss of drinking water for a half-million residents to bring home what scientists and government officials in this part of the country have been saying for years: Lake Erie is in trouble, and getting worse by the year.Flooded by tides of phosphorus washed from fertilized farms, cattle feedlots and leaky septic systems, the most intensely developed of the Great Lakes is increasingly being choked each summer by thick mats of algae, much of it poisonous. What plagues Toledo and, experts say, potentially all 11 million lakeside residents, is increasingly a serious problem across the United States.


A classic example of The Tragedy of the Commons.

_____________________________

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

- Nietzsche

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 2:41:52 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
ecologically; economically its called an externality. In other words, Adam Smiths 'invisible hand' is really only used for masturbation.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 8/8/2014 2:42:45 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to subrosaDom)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 2:56:25 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

get rid of the EPA!!!!!!!


Empower the states to handle their problems, where the leadership knows the people and the problems and is best suited to offer up and enforce practical solutions

While Adolf Hitler enjoyed total centralized federal control, we are not yet the Third Reich.

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 3:03:31 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
The state has handled the problem by putting 11 million people on the shoreline, and poisoning the water for several states.

That is what the fed is designed to do .... 'among the several'.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 3:18:55 PM   
Gauge


Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Empower the states to handle their problems, where the leadership knows the people and the problems and is best suited to offer up and enforce practical solutions

While Adolf Hitler enjoyed total centralized federal control, we are not yet the Third Reich.


Very good idea. Then, when a State disaster strikes, the government can deny Federal Aid to its people.


Way to prove Godwin's Law by the way.

_____________________________

"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick

I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 3:38:30 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Well Ron, yanno, Erie runs into lake ontario and im less than 2 miles from that lake, and it forms most of my water supply ...so I was being facetious, but practically every rwnj on here and other places has stated getting rid of regs and the EPA, mind you with our own conservative prime minister, who has given fresh water lakes away willy nilly, the rwnj assholes on this side are almost as bad.


Toledo has been Democrat-run for as long as I've lived here (22+ years; before that, I haven't ever looked into). The water treatment facilities are being fixed up so they no longer dump raw sewage into the Maumee River (actually, there is an issue coming up for the locals to vote on phase 3 [of 3] to upgrade the wastewater facilities after the EPA found them to be ridiculously lacking years ago). I don't think the actual water treatment plants that provide drinking water have been updated recently. The City of Oregon (borders Toledo's East side) gets about half it's water from Toledo, with the other half coming from Lake Erie. Oregon treats it's water from the city the same way it treats its water from the Lake. Oregon was not part of the drinking ban. No issues whatsoever with the water.

So, once again, we have an aging infrastructure that clearly (or unclearly, depending on your pun level) hasn't been kept up to date. Maybe the Feds should come in and rebuild Toledo's infrastructure. I'm sure that'll be a great use for taxpayer dollars coming from Idaho.

On a more comical note...



http://www.metacafe.com/watch/5378456/bill_murray_snl_classic_commercial/
(It's worth the few minutes to watch, especially in light of last weekend.)


Here's the facts....we're polluting our waterways.

(Democrats and Republicans).

There is a spot in the Gulf of Mexico that is growing larger every year which has no oxygen and fish are dieing....by exponential amounts.

We're killing our environment...skip the ozone and other stuff....we're destroying our planet.

I've said it before...we can do better.

It's no longer a question of who...it's a question of when. Blame is a waste of time.

Every day we read about water tables lowering, drought ensuing, plants not producing as well and...yes, our scientists will come up with something (they have no choice and, then world governments won't allow defeat) but....this is just horribly fucked up.

Malthus is finally correct...but he doesn't have to be...we all have back yards.

We all have the internet showing us how to grow potato's in stacks.

Strawberries in hanging rows...pick from above, water barrels....

We can do better, and we can do it locally.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 4:32:26 PM   
eulero83


Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Empower the states to handle their problems, where the leadership knows the people and the problems and is best suited to offer up and enforce practical solutions

While Adolf Hitler enjoyed total centralized federal control, we are not yet the Third Reich.


I agree, you're way closer to DDR.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 4:34:27 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
So the answer is to tax the locals so they can provide clean water that the Feds will no longer require and make sure it is local democrats, that have to do it to maintain any clean drinking water so the repubs can blame them for too much local regs and higher taxes ?
Sounds like a plan.


The answer is to tax those who are benefiting from the sewer system and the drinking water system, to pay for those systems. Absolutely. Nowhere did I say to make sure it's the local Democrats that do it. I said the City has been run by Democrats since I've been here, and that the water system is obviously not been kept up.

Funny how I'm saying the locals should pay for the infrastructure they benefit from, and I'm being chastised over it.

Toledo isn't going red any time soon. The Unions will make sure of that.


But the phosphorous that is causing the problem is not coming from the city of Toledo. It is agricultural runoff. The raw sewage isn't helping but the fertilizer and pesticide runoff is the actual culprit.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: What would the Republican Solution Be? - 8/8/2014 4:38:26 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

get rid of the EPA!!!!!!!


Empower the states to handle their problems, where the leadership knows the people and the problems and is best suited to offer up and enforce practical solutions

While Adolf Hitler enjoyed total centralized federal control, we are not yet the Third Reich.

4 states and a foreign nation border Lake Erie. Which one do you suggest be the one to be empowered?

If you consider the entire Great Lakes basin it is a much larger number of states and even more of Canada. Every state cannot institute its own solution over its own small segment of each lake that clearly won't work.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> What would the Republican Solution Be? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094