DomKen -> RE: Rioting is the answer (8/20/2014 10:51:06 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen Being hit doesn't give the cop the right to shoot. That you think it does is troubling. No, just being hit wouldn't. Since I never said any such thing, I find it troubling that you think I did. Now if Brown had hit him hard enough to cause real damage, and tried to take his weapon, and was coming back at the officer when the fatal shot was fired (all of which has been alleged but not proven), that's a very different story. So, as I've said already, if the facts come out supporting Brown, I'll be happy to see Ofc. Wilson put away. I'll even admit that I was wrong, as I've done before. I think it was even to you, Ken. But if the facts exonerate Wilson, are you willing to do the same? Even if what Wilson claims happened is what happened he was not justified in shooting. A LEO is only allowed to use deadly force in 3 circumstances. 1) to protect his life. 2) to protect the life of another 3) to stop a dangerous felon from fleeing If Brown was charging him 2 and 3 do not apply so he has to be claiming 1. But Brown was unarmed and Wilson is a trained LEO with nonlethal weapons at his disposal and he knows backup is on the way, since he called for it and has heard the radio response that it is arriving very soon (less than 2 minutes after the call was made), so his life was not actually threatened. So 1 does not apply either. So the use of lethal force was not justified. It was murder. I do not expect you to believe that or the pro cop DA to prosecute it but those are the facts. So the answer is no. You don't have the balls to admit that you're wrong if Wilson is exonerated. That's what I thought. You've also just admitted your bias, no matter what facts come out or evidence is found, you've already decided that he's guilty. Good to know. His life can't be in danger because he called for help and it should get there soon? Two minutes is an eternity if someone wants you dead. What happened to that Law & Order stance you were taking earlier? Where you insisted that the other shooting we were discussing was justified because the DA didn't prosecute. Now if this DA won't prosecute it's because there's an ulterior motive? What a fucking hypocrite you are. And finally, don't tell me what I think or what I'll believe. I've already said, over and over, that if the facts warrant it I'll be happy to see Wilson in prison. You're the asshole who makes every shooting out to be an execution, regardless of the details. Oh wait, that's right, every shooting but one. What was different about that one again? You know, the one where you reversed pretty much everything you've ever said about a shooting? Which of those 3 deadly force circumstances were valid in that case Ken? You've already refused to believe the facts so I know you won't accept them. If Brown had powder burns on the lethal wound then Wilson might have an argument but there isn't so Wilson shot him at a distance so even if you are arguing that he was in danger he shot him before the danger was imminent. So you are full of shit. The DA has already refused to prosecute other cops who killed unarmed men several times before. He has publicly said he won't ever do so. The guy's entire family are cops and his father was a cop killed in the line of duty. No one sane thinks he is unbiased.
|
|
|
|