BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
And the point I'm making is the courts won't have a chance to establish this cops guilt or innocence if the prosecutor puts the fix in at the grand jury stage. As every one knows grand jury's always indict so if it doesn't there is a reason and that reason is the prosecutor didn't want them to. The grand jury in question has been handling dozens of cases per day and has never yet refused to return any indictment requested but suddenly this one case needs multiple days of testimony and the indictment is in doubt? Sorry wrong again Grand juries do not always indict, if they did why bother with them. My wife was on a grand jury that virtually laughed the prosecutor out of the room. And of course by your "reasoning" if they don't indict it means the jury was fixed. Has it even occurred to you that maybe they are being very, very careful? I know you wouldn't because "grand juries always indict" anyway so details don't matter, it's just a rubber stamp. But I, and anyone else who thinks would.
< Message edited by BamaD -- 8/22/2014 7:46:21 PM >
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|