RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Politesub53 -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 11:53:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you didnt read his post about there not being a party to vote for on
page two, post 22????
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4726133
UKIP are like voting for the natiional front, or the KKK or the teaparty. imnsho



Lucy,

This just isn't true at all.

UKIP are to all intents and purposes a conservative party. The only difference being that they have placed giving the European Union a swerve at the top of their agenda.

Like it or not, most people in this country agree with them. If there was a referendum tomorrow what do you think the outcome would be? I'd say at the very least 75% would vote to come out of it.

The problem in this country is that people are so wedded to dualistic politics, Labour or Conservative, in many cases out of tradition as opposed to what they have to say; that there simply is no room for an alternative.

Regardless, on the Europe issue they have the backing of most of the country.

UKIP are nothing like the National Front. The National Front are an extreme party that have pretty much no support in England; UKIP resonate with English people on many issues, particularly Europe.


I agree UKIP are not like the National Front, but they do contain an above average share of racists, Islamophobes, homophobics and mysogynysts. They are cashing in on Camerons refusal to deal with the opinions held by many of the general public on the EU. If Cameron had held a referendum on the EU, which is why he got so many votes in 2010, UKIP would not be being taken as a serious entity.




Lucylastic -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 11:54:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


Lucy,

This just isn't true at all.

UKIP are to all intents and purposes a conservative party. The only difference being that they have placed giving the European Union a swerve at the top of their agenda.

Like it or not, most people in this country agree with them. If there was a referendum tomorrow what do you think the outcome would be? I'd say at the very least 75% would vote to come out of it.

The problem in this country is that people are so wedded to dualistic politics, Labour or Conservative, in many cases out of tradition as opposed to what they have to say; that there simply is no room for an alternative.

Regardless, on the Europe issue they have the backing of most of the country.

UKIP are nothing like the National Front. The National Front are an extreme party that have pretty much no support in England; UKIP resonate with English people on many issues, particularly Europe.


hiyas NG, that may well be true,
I said it was my opinion...and from what I have heard / read I have a dim view of them
The EU has been an issue since it started also. you should see some of my family stamping about the power limitations on the vaccum cleaner issue(yes honestly my knowledge IS deeper than just that.Im using it as an example)
I have a very poor view of ALLLLL political parties. And the politicians
It will NOT surprise me if they win, because like in the US AND Canada, people are sick of the "parties" they have. And with good reason.




Politesub53 -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 11:57:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

Cameron faces Ukip by-election bloodbath: Party set to win first Commons seat after shock poll reveals Farage's staggering 44-point lead over the Tories

Ukip set to win first Commons seat with a landslide 64 per cent of the vote
Douglas Carswell is set to win Clacton by-election sparked by his defection
Figures predict a record 48 point swing towards Ukip, humiliating the Tories


...Half or more agreed with the statements that Mr Cameron is ‘too keen’ on staying in the EU; refuses to ‘shake up the Westminster clique’; has lost control of the UK’s borders; should cut both spending and tax; and should bring in new laws to make it easier for voters to sack MPs in between general elections.


"Polite" sub should be happy at this news, that his fellow conservatives are set for a resounding upsurge. [;)]


UKIP are far to the right of where I ever am. I know you are an ignorant shit but Google would at least help you look a little bit less stupid.




Sanity -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 11:59:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

Cameron faces Ukip by-election bloodbath: Party set to win first Commons seat after shock poll reveals Farage's staggering 44-point lead over the Tories

Ukip set to win first Commons seat with a landslide 64 per cent of the vote
Douglas Carswell is set to win Clacton by-election sparked by his defection
Figures predict a record 48 point swing towards Ukip, humiliating the Tories


...Half or more agreed with the statements that Mr Cameron is ‘too keen’ on staying in the EU; refuses to ‘shake up the Westminster clique’; has lost control of the UK’s borders; should cut both spending and tax; and should bring in new laws to make it easier for voters to sack MPs in between general elections.


"Polite" sub should be happy at this news, that his fellow conservatives are set for a resounding upsurge. [;)]


UKIP are far to the right of where I ever am. I know you are an ignorant shit but Google would at least help you look a little bit less stupid.


Sorry "polite" [:D]

Its just hilarious to me how you constantly insist that you are right of center in American politics




subrosaDom -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:04:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you didnt read his post about there not being a party to vote for on
page two, post 22????
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4726133
UKIP are like voting for the natiional front, or the KKK or the teaparty. imnsho



Lucy,

This just isn't true at all.

UKIP are to all intents and purposes a conservative party. The only difference being that they have placed giving the European Union a swerve at the top of their agenda.

Like it or not, most people in this country agree with them. If there was a referendum tomorrow what do you think the outcome would be? I'd say at the very least 75% would vote to come out of it.

The problem in this country is that people are so wedded to dualistic politics, Labour or Conservative, in many cases out of tradition as opposed to what they have to say; that there simply is no room for an alternative.

Regardless, on the Europe issue they have the backing of most of the country.

UKIP are nothing like the National Front. The National Front are an extreme party that have pretty much no support in England; UKIP resonate with English people on many issues, particularly Europe.


I agree UKIP are not like the National Front, but they do contain an above average share of racists, Islamophobes, homophobics and mysogynysts. They are cashing in on Camerons refusal to deal with the opinions held by many of the general public on the EU. If Cameron had held a referendum on the EU, which is why he got so many votes in 2010, UKIP would not be being taken as a serious entity.



While there is no place for racism, homophobia or mysogyny, I would suggest that anyone who is NOT an Islamophobe needs a reality check. I am proud to be an Islamophobe, just am I am proud to be a Nazi-phobe. There is really very little difference in terms of morality between the two, except that the Nazis want to live in this world with sole dominion, whereas the Muslims wish to spend eternity in "Paradise."








Politesub53 -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:04:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Sorry "polite" [:D]

Its just hilarious to me how you constantly insist that you are right of center in American politics


FFS brains when have I ever posted that ?

I have said sm slightly right of centre with regards to UK politics, then again I would do, since I live here. [8|]




subrosaDom -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:05:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

Cameron faces Ukip by-election bloodbath: Party set to win first Commons seat after shock poll reveals Farage's staggering 44-point lead over the Tories

Ukip set to win first Commons seat with a landslide 64 per cent of the vote
Douglas Carswell is set to win Clacton by-election sparked by his defection
Figures predict a record 48 point swing towards Ukip, humiliating the Tories


...Half or more agreed with the statements that Mr Cameron is ‘too keen’ on staying in the EU; refuses to ‘shake up the Westminster clique’; has lost control of the UK’s borders; should cut both spending and tax; and should bring in new laws to make it easier for voters to sack MPs in between general elections.


"Polite" sub should be happy at this news, that his fellow conservatives are set for a resounding upsurge. [;)]


UKIP are far to the right of where I ever am. I know you are an ignorant shit but Google would at least help you look a little bit less stupid.


Sorry "polite" [:D]

Its just hilarious to me how you constantly insist that you are right of center in American politics


Sanity, she probably regards Bernie Sanders as the center! Good 'ole Barack would be to his left, and I suppose she would be to Bernie's right.




Kirata -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:08:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

no-one is asserting that the form of love they found themselves in was good or healthy

I assure that none of the girls found love in those relationship, no matter what they thought, and the report does not say otherwise.

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

Bless your heart, if you're as clever as you pretend to be, I am really comfy that whatever forum gymnastics you engage in to try to excuse first your ignorance and second your willingness to exploit the victims of child abuse, you know the truth of the matter, and that does give me a little hope.

My willingness to exploit the victims of child abuse? What a fucking slimeball liar you are!

Try not to bump your head on your rock when you crawl home.

K.




Politesub53 -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:09:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom
While there is no place for racism, homophobia or mysogyny, I would suggest that anyone who is NOT an Islamophobe needs a reality check. I am proud to be an Islamophobe, just am I am proud to be a Nazi-phobe. There is really very little difference in terms of morality between the two, except that the Nazis want to live in this world with sole dominion, whereas the Muslims wish to spend eternity in "Paradise."




The only reality check needed is to make I am not as racist as you. It was obvious someone would use this thread in the way you have constantly done, at least you didnt let me down.

Let me remind you of one simple fact, the majority of Muslims in the UK are against child abuse and terrorism, and bullshit opinions like yours do little to help




Lucylastic -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:10:12 PM)

Subrosa
you have no idea what you are fucking talking about AGAIN
Ass




Sanity -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:12:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Subrosa
you have no idea what you are fucking talking about AGAIN
Ass


Dear Ass,

Your opinion and ten dollars will get you a cup of coffee

Thomas




Kirata -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:12:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

The only reality check needed is to make I am not as racist as you.

How racist are you then? Tell us more about this racism you harbor.

[sm=popcorn.gif]

K.





Sanity -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:13:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom
While there is no place for racism, homophobia or mysogyny, I would suggest that anyone who is NOT an Islamophobe needs a reality check. I am proud to be an Islamophobe, just am I am proud to be a Nazi-phobe. There is really very little difference in terms of morality between the two, except that the Nazis want to live in this world with sole dominion, whereas the Muslims wish to spend eternity in "Paradise."




The only reality check needed is to make I am not as racist as you. It was obvious someone would use this thread in the way you have constantly done, at least you didnt let me down.

Let me remind you of one simple fact, the majority of Muslims in the UK are against child abuse and terrorism, and bullshit opinions like yours do little to help


Last I checked, Islam wasnt a race. Has that changed?





subrosaDom -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:14:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom
While there is no place for racism, homophobia or mysogyny, I would suggest that anyone who is NOT an Islamophobe needs a reality check. I am proud to be an Islamophobe, just am I am proud to be a Nazi-phobe. There is really very little difference in terms of morality between the two, except that the Nazis want to live in this world with sole dominion, whereas the Muslims wish to spend eternity in "Paradise."




The only reality check needed is to make I am not as racist as you. It was obvious someone would use this thread in the way you have constantly done, at least you didnt let me down.

Let me remind you of one simple fact, the majority of Muslims in the UK are against child abuse and terrorism, and bullshit opinions like yours do little to help


The majority? What's that? 51% 80%? I challenge you to find one single major religion (why major? - because there may be some obscure tribe somewhere in the world that is worse, but that isn't my point) as supportive of pedophilia as Islam. I challenge you to find one single major religion as supportive of genital mutilation as Islam. I challenge you to find one single major religion as supportive of "slaughtering the infidels" as Islam. I challenge you to find one single major religion that wishes to impose the equivalent of a Caliphate over the rest of humanity and that has the equivalent of jizya for those who wish not to be killed. I challenge you to find one major religion with the equivalent of taqiyya, the advocacy of dissimulation with all outsiders in order to achieve its objectives. I challenge you to find one major religion that has committed even 1/100 the number of suicide bombings as Islam. I could provide more challenges, but there's no need.

Oh, and by the way, since Islam is not a race, don't you fucking dare call me a racist. I don't give a damn what color anyone is. I care what their character and thoughts are.




Politesub53 -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:15:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

no-one is asserting that the form of love they found themselves in was good or healthy

I assure that none of the girls found love in those relationship, no matter what they thought, and the report does not say otherwise.

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

Bless your heart, if you're as clever as you pretend to be, I am really comfy that whatever forum gymnastics you engage in to try to excuse first your ignorance and second your willingness to exploit the victims of child abuse, you know the truth of the matter, and that does give me a little hope.

My willingness to exploit the victims of child abuse? What a fucking slimeball liar you are!

Try not to bump your head on your rock when you crawl home.

K.



Your the one exploiting the issue Kirata. The report is clear enough for most of us. "From the report. “I know he really loves me … (about a perpetrator convicted of very serious offences against other children)” I agree it isnt what i call love, nor what you call love, but it most certainly IS what the girl called love, so who the fuck are you to tell her she is wrong.

Again you are deliberately taking things out of context.




subrosaDom -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:17:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Subrosa
you have no idea what you are fucking talking about AGAIN
Ass


Right, it was the Taoist hoards responsible for atrocities in Rotherham. Beheading in Syria and Iraq. Yep, I got that.




Lucylastic -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:18:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Subrosa
you have no idea what you are fucking talking about AGAIN
Ass


Dear Ass,

Your opinion and ten dollars will get you a cup of coffee

Thomas

well ) PS is a male
fact...not opinion...
I dont drink that expensive shit....




NorthernGent -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:19:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


Lucy,

This just isn't true at all.

UKIP are to all intents and purposes a conservative party. The only difference being that they have placed giving the European Union a swerve at the top of their agenda.

Like it or not, most people in this country agree with them. If there was a referendum tomorrow what do you think the outcome would be? I'd say at the very least 75% would vote to come out of it.

The problem in this country is that people are so wedded to dualistic politics, Labour or Conservative, in many cases out of tradition as opposed to what they have to say; that there simply is no room for an alternative.

Regardless, on the Europe issue they have the backing of most of the country.

UKIP are nothing like the National Front. The National Front are an extreme party that have pretty much no support in England; UKIP resonate with English people on many issues, particularly Europe.


hiyas NG, that may well be true,
I said it was my opinion...and from what I have heard / read I have a dim view of them
The EU has been an issue since it started also. you should see some of my family stamping about the power limitations on the vaccum cleaner issue(yes honestly my knowledge IS deeper than just that.Im using it as an example)
I have a very poor view of ALLLLL political parties. And the politicians
It will NOT surprise me if they win, because like in the US AND Canada, people are sick of the "parties" they have. And with good reason.


Hello Lucy,

They certainly do have a few cranks in the party, usually disaffected Tory back benchers who were conceived from an altogether different age; but the majority speak for most of England.

They will not 'win' because this country moves into the future with luggage from the past very much in tow, which means Labour and Conservative will continue to dominate the political landscape for the foreseeable future.

But, where they undoubtedly will 'win' is on the Europe issue because it is absolutely nothing like what was sold to the British people in the 1970s. It was supposed to be a common market dominated by free trade which appealed to the English due to our history and political beliefs, but it has become a political union with unelected representatives which certainly does not resonate with our history and traditions.

I mean, we fought wars in Europe to prevent one nation dominating European politics and to promote liberal politics (democracy, free trade, tolerance), so there is absolutely no chance this country can accept what we have today: a German dominated political union with unelected representatives and a complete lack of respect for democracy.

The only reason we haven't had a referendum is because they know there will only be one outcome and that is to leave the European Union. As per usual, British politicians are attempting to strike a balance where we have a good relationship with Europe and a good relationship with the US, but it's not working because we don't have a good relationship with Europe: never have done and never will because they don't see life as we do and they largely remain wedded to centralised politics which is unEnglish.

Put bluntly, 50 years post WW2 simply can't change the way Europeans say politics and life and it's a vision with which we will never agree upon. They will always have centralising tendencies and we don't, so it's marriage of convenience (or stupidity depending upon point of view) which is heading for divorce.




Lucylastic -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:21:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Subrosa
you have no idea what you are fucking talking about AGAIN
Ass


Right, it was the Taoist hoards responsible for atrocities in Rotherham. Beheading in Syria and Iraq. Yep, I got that.

from the sublime to the fucking ridiculous, I was talking about your comments regarding PS being female and his political beliefs, get your head out of sanitys ass, you are choking on his hot air




subrosaDom -> RE: Rotherham child abuse and the cover up (8/31/2014 12:24:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrosaDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Subrosa
you have no idea what you are fucking talking about AGAIN
Ass


Right, it was the Taoist hoards responsible for atrocities in Rotherham. Beheading in Syria and Iraq. Yep, I got that.

from the sublime to the fucking ridiculous, I was talking about your comments regarding PS being female and his political beliefs, get your head out of sanitys ass, you are choking on his hot air


If I referred to PS as female, that is my error. Other than that, I don't really give a damn if PS is male or female. My comments stand and have nothing to do with his sex, dominance or submission or any other predilections or phenotypal expressions. I made no "comments" on his being female other than perhaps the use of an incorrect pronoun.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875