RE: Gop trying to break science education again (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


s4MC -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:04:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

First allow me to greet you to the forum. Second, it might help you to understand...why...I tore into you. Lets just say life has been...unpleasant...on my end for the last few days, and usually I'm more patient. Second, that this forum does see individuals from time to time that try to 'hide' their identity, support their original comments, and try to slink away. This is known as 'sock' or 'sock puppet' on here. Maybe in my....frustration of life....I figured you were such.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3
And what uncontroversial science isn't being taught? Catastrophic global warming caused by a human induced runaway greenhouse effect? Disproven. Global temperature anomaly fell outside of the IPCC's own error bars, and has continued to fall further outside of those error bars. That means that theory is disproven. The theory that race is a social construct? That's a rejection of the well established scientific concept of phenotype, and the underlying cause of phenotype, genotype. In other words, anyone who claims that race doesn't exist is a DENIER of science (or in all fairness, is scientifically ignorant, and that isn't really their fault, most people simply don't have the capacity to understand science and it's implications).


And I suppose you can give us links to each of these ideas, right?

The last one, 'race', is a social construct. Where does it exist in your brain, filtering out all you have learned of the world, to treat someone whose skin color is different from yours? Do you treat the opposite or same sex differently? When I see a black person, I see a person. Yes, they are black. They are also short, alittle on the over-weight side, with glasses, short black hair, and missing a finger. Should I treat this individual any differently due to any of these features? In your view, 'yes'. But I do not accept your view. I've known plenty of individuals from all different ethnic and regions of the world whom are really gifted, skilled, and intelligent. You might look at someone and assume a stereotype; I would not. Since I've known many individuals that look dumb as shit, but were very insightful, intelligent, and wise. A person that judges another based on the skin color tells me the person is of low education and intelligence. And that has more to do with their social upbringing than any physical genetics to date.



Thanks. No worries. Flame away. Safeword free zone afterall. Even if it wasn't, I underwent the Vulcan Discipline of Kolinahr long ago, you ain't gonna hurt my feelings. Sorry to hear that, I empathaize. Hope your situation improves.

Well those "ideas" aren't really ideas per say, those are logically consistent statements. Proofs. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/proof

But yea, I can.
http://www.principia-scientific.org/images/IPCC_1990_Temp_predictions.jpg
http://appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/IPCC1995_Fail.htm
http://www.c3headlines.com/predictionsforecasts/ <---- Comprehensive
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/05/benchmarking-ipccs-warming-predictions/
http://drtimball.com/2013/report-indicates-ipcc-ignore-facts-and-failed-predictions-to-claim-better-results-2/
http://guardianlv.com/2013/09/new-ipcc-report-to-crush-its-own-global-warming-predictions/

The last 3 sources deal with the IPCC's 5th (latest) Assessment Report.

As for your response to my contention that race is a biological fact rather than a social construction, you've constructed quite the straw man. Are you going to beat the fuck out of him? That's the fun part! :p

Seriously though, I didn't make any qualitative analysis, no value judgments whatsoever. I'm simply saying that "black" (brown) skin is a phenotypic characteristic, as is "white" skin. These phenotypic characteristics are caused by an underlying genotype. It's a factual statement. If you really want a source, check the dictionary definitions of phenotype and genotype, and read the works of Gregor Mendel and Francis Crick.







You are being quite narrow in your use of the word "race". You may want to consider the situation in some African countries, for example, where one "race" of people with black skin are trying to wipe out another "race" of people who also have black skin. Racial differences are just differences, noticeable differences. Skin colour is noticeable, so is clothing, rituals etc. Genetically there is one "race". To our eyes and minds skin colour may look very different, but genetically the difference is not significant.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:04:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: maidheather

Completely agree with you there. That's why I still ask the question, what did this girl do that was a 'white thing'? Shouldn't we, as a civilization, be more worried about doing things that are 'human things'?



Well said but there's another issue, here, also:

If you "reverse" the races, here a white girl beating up a white girl because she was "acting too black", the aggressive white girl would generally become known as a racist. Yes? There would be people on these boards, jumping up and down, screaming about how the attacker needs to be expelled and pay for her own tutor, etc. Where is that?

As the situation stands now, since the victim is a young girl of color, the event should meet the standards of a "hate" crime. Oh, but it doesn't because the attacker wasn't white. Is anyone really believing that the attacker wasn't racially motivated?

Where is the equality for which so many moan and gnash teeth? Nowhere, mon frère!







Screen captures still RULE! Ya feel me?




DomKen -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:11:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: maidheather

Completely agree with you there. That's why I still ask the question, what did this girl do that was a 'white thing'? Shouldn't we, as a civilization, be more worried about doing things that are 'human things'?



Well said but there's another issue, here, also:

If you "reverse" the races, here a white girl beating up a white girl because she was "acting too black", the aggressive white girl would generally become known as a racist. Yes? There would be people on these boards, jumping up and down, screaming about how the attacker needs to be expelled and pay for her own tutor, etc. Where is that?

As the situation stands now, since the victim is a young girl of color, the event should meet the standards of a "hate" crime. Oh, but it doesn't because the attacker wasn't white. Is anyone really believing that the attacker wasn't racially motivated?

Where is the equality for which so many moan and gnash teeth? Nowhere, mon frère!

I doubt anyone would really be calling for expulsion over a fistfight that resulted in a few bruises and a single cut even if it did have a racial overtone. Does the girl need to be in trouble, yes but she shouldn't be expelled that is way too extreme.




maidheather -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:15:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: maidheather

Completely agree with you there. That's why I still ask the question, what did this girl do that was a 'white thing'? Shouldn't we, as a civilization, be more worried about doing things that are 'human things'?



Well said but there's another issue, here, also:

If you "reverse" the races, here a white girl beating up a white girl because she was "acting too black", the aggressive white girl would generally become known as a racist. Yes? There would be people on these boards, jumping up and down, screaming about how the attacker needs to be expelled and pay for her own tutor, etc. Where is that?

As the situation stands now, since the victim is a young girl of color, the event should meet the standards of a "hate" crime. Oh, but it doesn't because the attacker wasn't white. Is anyone really believing that the attacker wasn't racially motivated?

Where is the equality for which so many moan and gnash teeth? Nowhere, mon frère!







Screen captures still RULE! Ya feel me?


You do make a valid point there. Being one of the marginalized groups of people (who until recently had zero federal protections in regards to hate crimes, now theoretically do, but i've rarely seen the government act on lgbt hate crimes yet) I've learned to wait until I have more information. Was the attack done because this other girl was being smart and doing smart things? If so, than the other party is an idiot, not racist. Being black does not mean you get a free pass to be stupid, to be a thug, to lie, cheat and steal or to get yourself on welfare for as long as you can (which isn't as long as some would have you think). If you apply those same stereotypes to a white person and say 'oh, they're bad people' or call them slackers, but a dark skinned person exhibiting the same traits is 'being black' ... well, there's part of the problem, to me at least.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 7:31:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
www.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136

and this:

www.dailycaller.com/2014/09/08/report-no-global-warming-for-215-months

And this:

www.us.wsj.com/articles/Matt-Ridley-whatever-happened-to-global-warming-1409872855


So....none of your links work. However, I recognize the name Matt Ridley is the last link yet another opinion piece by a guy with zero accreditation in the field of climate science?
Corrected the links for you. Of course, if they still don't work...then, as some are fond of saying, there is Google. And the titles should be enough to get you there.




GotSteel -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 9:25:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3
What qualifies one as a climatologist? Which climatologists? Define "overwhelmingly". Demonstrate that these alleged climatologists are in fact the most knowledgeable voices on this subject. E.g. Are "climatologists" more knowledgeable on this subject than atmospheric physicists? Have any of these alleged "climatologists" demonstrated scientific competence? I.e. Have they made accurate and reliable predictions based on a falsifiable hypothesis, and/or have they published reproducible experiments validating a falsifiable hypothesis?


I'm not playing the you can't find your ass with both hands game, if you want to troll the thread you'll have to find someone else to do it with.




LetstalkboutRAP3 -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 9:56:33 AM)

@Gotsteal

You just quote mined me, and accused me of trolling. That amounts to flagrant trolling, on your part. Quote me in context or refrain from making serious accusations, or else don't quote me at all. Also, you lose!


@Domken
You mention being smarter than [most of] your peers. How were you smarter than your peers? What do you think might have caused the discrepancy between your intelligence and that of your peers?




DomKen -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 10:13:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3

@Domken
You mention being smarter than [most of] your peers. How were you smarter than your peers? What do you think might have caused the discrepancy between your intelligence and that of your peers?

I just am. I have a very high IQ. I learn faster and integrate knowledge better than most people.

Whether it is genetic or some quirk of upbringing is still unknown. My siblings are smart but not as smart a I am. By the numbers I test at around a 145 IQ and my brothers all test in the 120's.




GotSteel -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 10:54:05 AM)

Here's a finger painting game for you to play:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teachersparadise.kidsfingerpaintingcoloring&hl=en




Lucylastic -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 10:56:43 AM)

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/greenhouse-gases-grew-at-alarming-rate-in-2013-un-weather-agency-says-1.2760281

Atmospheric volumes of greenhouse gases hit a record in 2013 as carbon dioxide concentrations grew at the fastest rate since reliable global records began, the World Meteorological Organization said on Tuesday.

Climate change impacts 'might already be considered dangerous'
Atlantic Ocean slows global warming, but scientists believe hiatus will end around 2030
Global warming dials up our risks, UN report says
"We know without any doubt that our climate is changing and our weather is becoming more extreme due to human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels," said WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud in a statement accompanying the WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin.

"Past, present and future CO2 emissions will have a cumulative impact on both global warming and ocean acidification. The laws of physics are non-negotiable," Jarraud said. "We are running out of time."

The volume of carbon dioxide, or CO2, the primary greenhouse gas emitted by human activities, was 396.0 parts per million in 2013, 2.9 ppm higher than in 2012, the largest year-to-year increase since 1984, when reliable global records began.

Methane levels rising

The second most important greenhouse gas, methane, continued to grow at a similar rate to the last five years, reaching a global average of 1824 parts per billion. The other main contributor, nitrous oxide, reached 325.9 parts per billion, growing at a rate comparable to the average over the past decade.

The world has the knowledge and tools to keep global warming within 2 degrees Celsius, a UN goal set in 2010, Jarraud said, which would "give our planet a chance and … our children and grandchildren a future".

United Nations Global Warming
Carbon dioxide, the heat-trapping gas blamed for climate change, was at global concentrations of 396 parts per million last year. (Martin Meissner/Associated Press)

"Pleading ignorance can no longer be an excuse for not acting."

The warming effect, or "radiative forcing," measures the net difference between the sunlight that the Earth absorbs and the energy it radiates back into space. More absorption leads to higher temperatures.

After carbon dioxide, methane has the biggest effect on climate. Atmospheric concentrations of methane reached a new high of 1,824 parts per billion in 2013, up 153 per cent from pre-industrial levels of about 700 parts per billion.

About 40 per cent of the methane comes from natural sources such as termites and wetlands, but the rest is due to cattle breeding, rice agriculture, fossil fuel burning, landfills and incineration, according to the agency.


https://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_1002_en.html



http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/09/09/environment-carbon-idINL5N0RA1YL20140909




Arturas -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 11:18:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Have none of you heard of the practice called "being black"? It is the intentional refusal to learn or do well in school by otherwise intelligent black children.

It's funny, I volunteer in Chicago schools and deal with gifted black kids every week and I've never yet seen this. They get the same flack I got as a white kid growing up smarter than my peers. What I do see is schools dying without maintenance or new materials. Teachers buying basic classroom materials because they aren't provided by the school administration. Kids having to share 10+ year old textbooks that are falling apart because the school board hasn't approved a new version and the old one is no longer made.


It's funny indeed. Perhaps you should volunteer to work with regular black kids, I dunno, kinda makes sense to me since you have not heard of this term, this reality, while working with kids in Chicago. That is the funny thing.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/24/opinion/wright-black-acting-white/index.html




Arturas -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 11:25:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Have none of you heard of the practice called "being black"? It is the intentional refusal to learn or do well in school by otherwise intelligent black children.

It's funny, I volunteer in Chicago schools and deal with gifted black kids every week and I've never yet seen this. They get the same flack I got as a white kid growing up smarter than my peers. What I do see is schools dying without maintenance or new materials. Teachers buying basic classroom materials because they aren't provided by the school administration. Kids having to share 10+ year old textbooks that are falling apart because the school board hasn't approved a new version and the old one is no longer made.


It's funny indeed. Perhaps you should volunteer to work with regular black kids, I dunno, kinda makes sense to me since you have not heard of this term, this reality, while working with kids in Chicago. That is the funny thing.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/24/opinion/wright-black-acting-white/index.html



I think the underlying point is this: Blacks put themselves where they are. I work with blacks who are valuable technical staff because although they grew up in poor areas, Mississippi and Chicago, they decided to ignore those pressures by their own culture to fail. It's so interesting to listen to them speak with perfect English while working but when they run into a fellow black they switch into another language, a different slang filled language. Fortunately for us they blamed no one for where blacks are in the U.S. and moved forward and up themselves. So, don't blame schools or the government or the right wingers but in stead place the responsibility where it correctly is, with the individual and the choices they make as it always is the case in life.




DomKen -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 12:12:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Have none of you heard of the practice called "being black"? It is the intentional refusal to learn or do well in school by otherwise intelligent black children.

It's funny, I volunteer in Chicago schools and deal with gifted black kids every week and I've never yet seen this. They get the same flack I got as a white kid growing up smarter than my peers. What I do see is schools dying without maintenance or new materials. Teachers buying basic classroom materials because they aren't provided by the school administration. Kids having to share 10+ year old textbooks that are falling apart because the school board hasn't approved a new version and the old one is no longer made.


It's funny indeed. Perhaps you should volunteer to work with regular black kids, I dunno, kinda makes sense to me since you have not heard of this term, this reality, while working with kids in Chicago. That is the funny thing.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/24/opinion/wright-black-acting-white/index.html



I think the underlying point is this: Blacks put themselves where they are. I work with blacks who are valuable technical staff because although they grew up in poor areas, Mississippi and Chicago, they decided to ignore those pressures by their own culture to fail. It's so interesting to listen to them speak with perfect English while working but when they run into a fellow black they switch into another language, a different slang filled language. Fortunately for us they blamed no one for where blacks are in the U.S. and moved forward and up themselves. So, don't blame schools or the government or the right wingers but in stead place the responsibility where it correctly is, with the individual and the choices they make as it always is the case in life.


I think the underlying point is that you are the worst kind of bigot.

There are always people who don't perform who try to hold others back. Every smart kid feels pressure to not "show up" his peers.

A black person speaking in dialect when appropriate is no different than me switching back to my southern accent when I'm back with my family or on the phone with them.




deathtothepixies -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:03:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Blacks put themselves where they are.


Boom, we have a winner!

Whitey has spoken




Aylee -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:54:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


The last one, 'race', is a social construct. Where does it exist in your brain, filtering out all you have learned of the world, to treat someone whose skin color is different from yours? Do you treat the opposite or same sex differently? When I see a black person, I see a person. Yes, they are black. They are also short, alittle on the over-weight side, with glasses, short black hair, and missing a finger. Should I treat this individual any differently due to any of these features? In your view, 'yes'. But I do not accept your view. I've known plenty of individuals from all different ethnic and regions of the world whom are really gifted, skilled, and intelligent. You might look at someone and assume a stereotype; I would not. Since I've known many individuals that look dumb as shit, but were very insightful, intelligent, and wise. A person that judges another based on the skin color tells me the person is of low education and intelligence. And that has more to do with their social upbringing than any physical genetics to date.





Ya know, this "we are all the same" stuff really gets to me.

Why would I treat a black person differently? Well, when I was working on medical imaging equipment and taking an x-ray of a black person (or Native American) I had to turn the kV up by 5 in order to get a good x-ray. Their bones are denser.

Why would I treat men and women differently? Well, it seems a bit of a time waster to ask a bunch of guys which ob-gyn they use and what they like about them. Speaking of that, you are aware that medications do NOT work the same on men and women, right? Do you know how hard women had to fight to be included in drug studies?

Ya see, for a very long time, the training patient was a 70 kilogram white male.

The problem was that different races and different sexes do NOT respond to medical stuff the same way a 70 kilogram white male does. Insisting that we are all really just the same does a horrible disservice to those of us that do NOT fit the standard rubric.

Suggesting that we not judge on skin color and just go ahead with some doses of radiation and ending up with an unusable x-ray that has to be re-done, instead of automatically changing the kV seems really wrong to me. That takes "equality" to a stupid place. Too bad you see it as "low-intelligence" to do so and would just give everyone the same x-ray and re-do the bad ones. A little extra radiation never hurt anyone, right? Oh wait. . . that is why people get radiation burns during cath labs. Hmmmm. . .




FieryOpal -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 4:56:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Have none of you heard of the practice called "being black"? It is the intentional refusal to learn or do well in school by otherwise intelligent black children.

It's funny, I volunteer in Chicago schools and deal with gifted black kids every week and I've never yet seen this. They get the same flack I got as a white kid growing up smarter than my peers. What I do see is schools dying without maintenance or new materials. Teachers buying basic classroom materials because they aren't provided by the school administration. Kids having to share 10+ year old textbooks that are falling apart because the school board hasn't approved a new version and the old one is no longer made.

It's funny indeed. Perhaps you should volunteer to work with regular black kids, I dunno, kinda makes sense to me since you have not heard of this term, this reality, while working with kids in Chicago. That is the funny thing.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/24/opinion/wright-black-acting-white/index.html

I think the underlying point is this: Blacks put themselves where they are. I work with blacks who are valuable technical staff because although they grew up in poor areas, Mississippi and Chicago, they decided to ignore those pressures by their own culture to fail. It's so interesting to listen to them speak with perfect English while working but when they run into a fellow black they switch into another language, a different slang filled language. Fortunately for us they blamed no one for where blacks are in the U.S. and moved forward and up themselves. So, don't blame schools or the government or the right wingers but in stead place the responsibility where it correctly is, with the individual and the choices they make as it always is the case in life.

Pardon the term if it offends anyone, but three of my nephews(-in-law) who were raised inside the metro-D.C. Beltway are "wiggers" who speak in Ebonics around their (African-American) friends, then shift over to *passable* English dialectic vernacular around their family. Needless to say, when in Ebonics mode, I couldn't understand 80% of what they were saying. Christmas gift-giving was easy. Wu Tang Clan CDs (not a Chinese band, for those not in the know). Now, let me pose this question: If one of them were to get into an altercation with an African-American, would this still be considered a hate crime?




stef -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 5:17:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

I think the underlying point is this: Blacks put themselves where they are.

Stormfront has spoken!




DomKen -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 5:39:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Ya know, this "we are all the same" stuff really gets to me.

Why would I treat a black person differently? Well, when I was working on medical imaging equipment and taking an x-ray of a black person (or Native American) I had to turn the kV up by 5 in order to get a good x-ray. Their bones are denser.

This is a generalization. It may be true for 60% of the population but we both know it isn't uniformly true. Did you really assume the frail elderly black woman had denser than average bones?




Arturas -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 6:50:59 PM)

quote:

I think the underlying point is that you are the worst kind of bigot.


Why? Why does stating facts make me a bigot? Everything I said was the truth which makes me the realist rather than a bigot. Only when we deal with things as they are rather than how we wish to see them can we correct any situation. Which is why blacks still hold themselves back while blaming others or the educations system or the justice system or whatever. So, regardless of how politically incorrect I might be this is the truth of things.




Arturas -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/9/2014 7:10:00 PM)

So, who is responsible for where you are today? The blacks? Whites? Dems? Isn't it you? Why is it different for blacks? Are they held in slavery still? Many have pushed that nonsense to the side and moved forward. I myself grew up poor raised by a single mom. I studied, I walked to work several miles to a Dairy Queen for months to buy my first car at 16 and when I finished High School I looked around and found only low paying jobs and so joined the service, which gave me an opportunity to make my own way, grow up and also pay for my education afterward and so when I got out I went straight into College and then had a job waiting for me when I got out.

So, I could have bitched that because I was poor back when I was 16 that I needed this freebie or that freebie but instead made my own way. The same for my black co-worker, he joined the Navy and went to school afterward and also had a job soon after and has had one ever since then.

So both poor black and white young people either can be successful or not but this all depends on them and not the taxpayer. Here is what I am saying...ask for only a fish and you have nothing but a single fish but learn to fish and you have fish for a lifetime.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875