Gop trying to break science education again (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


GotSteel -> Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 9:37:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/23/common-core-bill-sparks-creationism-debate-in-ohio/14507351/
"The standards in science shall be based in core existing disciplines of biology, chemistry, and physics; incorporate grade-level mathematics and be referenced to the mathematics standards; focus on academic and scientific knowledge rather than scientific processes; and prohibit political or religious interpretation of scientific facts in favor of another."




Musicmystery -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 10:17:18 AM)

Focusing on academic knowledge rather than scientific processes is exactly what keep Islamic science from continued dominance after the Mongol invasion of the 13th century.

Science is not a collection of facts -- it's a mode of inquiry.

http://producer.csi.edu/cdraney/archive-courses/fall07/engl102/e-texts/gould-essay.pdf




LetstalkboutRAP3 -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 11:49:03 AM)

http://reason.com/archives/2013/05/14/the-myth-of-the-scientific-liberal




joether -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 12:49:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3
http://reason.com/archives/2013/05/14/the-myth-of-the-scientific-liberal


From your article:

"The study compared the health status of adults who were randomly enrolled in Oregon's Medicaid program with those who weren't. It found that two years after patients received Medicaid, "no significant improvements in measured physical health outcomes" such as hypertension, cholesterol and diabetes resulted. Coverage did, however, lower depression rates and reduced financial strain."

A government program that is not designed to cure some harsh medical problems, but to help connect people to sources of treatment. Its not government's fault if people are not taking advantage of things. But that it did accomplish the primary goal of what it was set up to do: "...reduce financial strain."


"How should a scientifically-inclined liberal have reacted? By acknowledging that if the findings hold in subsequent years, Obamacare's plan to use Medicaid to achieve its universal coverage goal -- at half-a-trillion-dollar price tag over a decade -- would need to be reconsidered."

This guy has no objectivity nor understanding on the concepts of "Science", "The Afford Care Act", "Medicaid", "Liberal". A Scientific liberal is one that is free from constraint, rules, or dictatorships (i.e. not a creationist 'scientist'). The Affordable Care Act is a government program that very few in the United States (I'd say less then 12%) actually understand.


"How should a scientifically inclined liberal react to this trend? By inhaling deeply and backing off on economy-busting mitigation measures till science offers clearer answers."

How should a conservative idiot try to understand psychology? Maybe by attending a place of higher education than the 4th grade! Being 'scientifically liberal' and 'politically liberal' are really...TWO DIFFERENT CONCEPTS. The scientific one is open to the idea of later information turning current held understands in a totally different direction, and accepting it without a problem. A scientific conservative by contrast would be very slow to accept new information that basically debunks or undermines previously held thoughts on a concept. By contrast a scientific conservative is very different from a political conservative. How? A scientific conservative would more likely hold moderate political views than conservative ones. A quite more intelligent and educated than political conservatives.


"And how have liberals reacted? By sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting la-la-la."

This is....seriously....a childish statement to make.


"Liberals don't just want universal health insurance -- they also want universal preschool. But the evidence for government-funded preschool is even more dubious than for government-funded health care."

WOW....this guy knows what all liberals are thinking on. Or maybe its what it is: a generalization based entirely on bullshit. Since this guy is already taking a 'conservative' view from a political vantage point, its fair to assume he'll 'cook the books' to arrive at a 'viewpoint'....


"Numerous studies on Head Start, the federal pre-K program for poor kids, show that its reading and math gains virtually evaporate by fourth grade. And the latest evidence from Oklahoma and Georgia, two states that implemented universal pre-K in the 1990s, only confirms this."

When I think "Leading States in Education", I don't think 'Georgia and Oklahoma'. Georgia is 17 and Oklahoma is 40 for High School Rankings With schools in general, Georgia is 32 and Oklahoma is 36 If this guy was making a REAL argument, give the challenge to states that seem to have their acts together....like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.


"How should President Barack Obama, who had promised evidence-based policy, have responded? By renouncing his commitment to UPK. What did he do? Jetted to Georgia and declared its program a national model."

Maybe the President should respond how he feels he should respond? And not be dictated to by social conservatives that fluked out of the 4th grade. If the President said such a thing, its a good chance a conservative columnist has taken it way out of proportion to attack him on it. Oh wait, he did, and here's the info. Unlike former President George W. Bush, President Obama tends to explain things like an educated individual. That means a long, drawn out speech with supporting evidences and ideas. The stuff that completely...BORES...conservatives that need things reduced to 'sound bites' and 'buzz phrases' in order to keep up with the conversation.


"It's not that conservatives don't have ideological fixations that are impervious to science. However, they don't pretend to don the mantle of science. Liberals do."

Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.








Aylee -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 1:27:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.




Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.




kdsub -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 1:44:32 PM)

I don't believe religion is the problem in schools...but politics is. Many religious schools do a fine job of educating our youth in science and at the same time creationism through their church. This, I believe, is more a conservative liberal fight and not specifically about creationism.

If I want my child to be taught creationism I would send them to a parochial school. But... Public schools should stick to the observable and quantitative side of nature only. Creationism then should be taught at home or church. It is a study in faith not science and should not be used to deny the facts of nature.

Butch




joether -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 1:55:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.

Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.


For someone that doesn't understand mental and emotional health, I'm not really surprised by your view. Did those doctors ask you directly about your political viewpoints? And then observe, over a decent period of time (say 4-6 weeks, of 1 day visits), how you act and react to events in the political sphere? No....because they are professional. If you thought you had a problem, you would visit a mental/emotion health professional (a general practice medical doctor can help if none exist in your area), whom would try to determine if what your saying and viewing is indeed just 'political thought' verse "the squirrels...the squirrels control the White House! They look at me from the kitchen window.....planning....plotting....". There is no way even a skilled therapist could determine in a dozen questions if you had a mental and/or emotional health problem. Unless they had some evidence to say something was wrong before hand.

Its estimated by many sources that the number of individuals suffering form Depression, for example, is twice the actual number. And that those not obtaining treatment are not aware of how the illness is effecting their daily lives. Could the illness effect their political views? And the answer is 'yes'; more of the negative than positive. How would a paranoid-schizophrenia person behave whom held conservative political views and own firearms (for a specific example), to something the President does, and to which the conservative media blows out of proportion (they LOVE doing that)? The one that has been diagnosis properly, with medication (if directed), and therapy would most likely not fly off into a rage. Can we say the same of the undiagnosed individual? An society will have to deal with the undiagnosed individual....after....they fly into a rage.

Here is something that could aid you in understanding.






Musicmystery -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 2:00:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3

http://reason.com/archives/2013/05/14/the-myth-of-the-scientific-liberal

This is no improvement -- it just underscores that politics, not science, is the issue.




Aylee -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 2:12:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.

Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.


For someone that doesn't understand mental and emotional health, I'm not really surprised by your view. Did those doctors ask you directly about your political viewpoints? And then observe, over a decent period of time (say 4-6 weeks, of 1 day visits), how you act and react to events in the political sphere? No....because they are professional. If you thought you had a problem, you would visit a mental/emotion health professional (a general practice medical doctor can help if none exist in your area), whom would try to determine if what your saying and viewing is indeed just 'political thought' verse "the squirrels...the squirrels control the White House! They look at me from the kitchen window.....planning....plotting....". There is no way even a skilled therapist could determine in a dozen questions if you had a mental and/or emotional health problem. Unless they had some evidence to say something was wrong before hand.

Its estimated by many sources that the number of individuals suffering form Depression, for example, is twice the actual number. And that those not obtaining treatment are not aware of how the illness is effecting their daily lives. Could the illness effect their political views? And the answer is 'yes'; more of the negative than positive. How would a paranoid-schizophrenia person behave whom held conservative political views and own firearms (for a specific example), to something the President does, and to which the conservative media blows out of proportion (they LOVE doing that)? The one that has been diagnosis properly, with medication (if directed), and therapy would most likely not fly off into a rage. Can we say the same of the undiagnosed individual? An society will have to deal with the undiagnosed individual....after....they fly into a rage.

Here is something that could aid you in understanding.






Silly me. I thought that grief was a mental, emotional, and physical problem. Thank you for letting this widow know that grief is NOT a problem. All those books about it and the special counselors and classes MUST be a conservative conspiracy to make us just think that the death of a spouse has other complications. It is all just imaginary.

You are such a fucking putz to even consider suggesting such a thing. You are a troglodyte. And to suggest that it might be the news I watch or read that causes the grief reactions? You are an ass.




quizzicalkitten -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 2:24:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


When I think "Leading States in Education", I don't think 'Georgia and Oklahoma'. Georgia is 17 and Oklahoma is 40 for High School Rankings With schools in general, Georgia is 32 and Oklahoma is 36 If this guy was making a REAL argument, give the challenge to states that seem to have their acts together....like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.





But both OK and GA have moved away from the common core standards given from the government and moved to their own level of standards for their individualized states.

In fact its been an annoyance this past year to revamp our product to each states individualized standards as more and more states realize common core has made them not very bright.






Musicmystery -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 2:30:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.

Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.


For someone that doesn't understand mental and emotional health, I'm not really surprised by your view. Did those doctors ask you directly about your political viewpoints? And then observe, over a decent period of time (say 4-6 weeks, of 1 day visits), how you act and react to events in the political sphere? No....because they are professional. If you thought you had a problem, you would visit a mental/emotion health professional (a general practice medical doctor can help if none exist in your area), whom would try to determine if what your saying and viewing is indeed just 'political thought' verse "the squirrels...the squirrels control the White House! They look at me from the kitchen window.....planning....plotting....". There is no way even a skilled therapist could determine in a dozen questions if you had a mental and/or emotional health problem. Unless they had some evidence to say something was wrong before hand.

Its estimated by many sources that the number of individuals suffering form Depression, for example, is twice the actual number. And that those not obtaining treatment are not aware of how the illness is effecting their daily lives. Could the illness effect their political views? And the answer is 'yes'; more of the negative than positive. How would a paranoid-schizophrenia person behave whom held conservative political views and own firearms (for a specific example), to something the President does, and to which the conservative media blows out of proportion (they LOVE doing that)? The one that has been diagnosis properly, with medication (if directed), and therapy would most likely not fly off into a rage. Can we say the same of the undiagnosed individual? An society will have to deal with the undiagnosed individual....after....they fly into a rage.

Here is something that could aid you in understanding.






Silly me. I thought that grief was a mental, emotional, and physical problem. Thank you for letting this widow know that grief is NOT a problem. All those books about it and the special counselors and classes MUST be a conservative conspiracy to make us just think that the death of a spouse has other complications. It is all just imaginary.

You are such a fucking putz to even consider suggesting such a thing. You are a troglodyte. And to suggest that it might be the news I watch or read that causes the grief reactions? You are an ass.

What the hell are you talking about? None of this has anything to do with what was posted.




joether -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 2:49:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.

Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.


For someone that doesn't understand mental and emotional health, I'm not really surprised by your view. Did those doctors ask you directly about your political viewpoints? And then observe, over a decent period of time (say 4-6 weeks, of 1 day visits), how you act and react to events in the political sphere? No....because they are professional. If you thought you had a problem, you would visit a mental/emotion health professional (a general practice medical doctor can help if none exist in your area), whom would try to determine if what your saying and viewing is indeed just 'political thought' verse "the squirrels...the squirrels control the White House! They look at me from the kitchen window.....planning....plotting....". There is no way even a skilled therapist could determine in a dozen questions if you had a mental and/or emotional health problem. Unless they had some evidence to say something was wrong before hand.

Its estimated by many sources that the number of individuals suffering form Depression, for example, is twice the actual number. And that those not obtaining treatment are not aware of how the illness is effecting their daily lives. Could the illness effect their political views? And the answer is 'yes'; more of the negative than positive. How would a paranoid-schizophrenia person behave whom held conservative political views and own firearms (for a specific example), to something the President does, and to which the conservative media blows out of proportion (they LOVE doing that)? The one that has been diagnosis properly, with medication (if directed), and therapy would most likely not fly off into a rage. Can we say the same of the undiagnosed individual? An society will have to deal with the undiagnosed individual....after....they fly into a rage.

Here is something that could aid you in understanding.

Silly me. I thought that grief was a mental, emotional, and physical problem. Thank you for letting this widow know that grief is NOT a problem. All those books about it and the special counselors and classes MUST be a conservative conspiracy to make us just think that the death of a spouse has other complications. It is all just imaginary.

You are such a fucking putz to even consider suggesting such a thing. You are a troglodyte. And to suggest that it might be the news I watch or read that causes the grief reactions? You are an ass.


How am I suppose to know your mental, emotional, and physical medical background?

"All those books about it and the special counselors and classes..."

An here you are admitting exactly what I'm taking about. That you (directly) or others (indirectly) got some help to handle a problem that was not short term. Depression is not a short term illness. An there are several forms of Depression. To find what yours might be, takes a skilled individual a few weeks if not months to understand the depth of the problem(s). And that treatment is not as easy as 'take one pill a day', but more involved.

Those with Depression are also more likely to lash out violently. Either to themselves or others.

For what its worth, Aylee.....I am sorry for your lost.




DomKen -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 2:51:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


When I think "Leading States in Education", I don't think 'Georgia and Oklahoma'. Georgia is 17 and Oklahoma is 40 for High School Rankings With schools in general, Georgia is 32 and Oklahoma is 36 If this guy was making a REAL argument, give the challenge to states that seem to have their acts together....like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.





But both OK and GA have moved away from the common core standards given from the government and moved to their own level of standards for their individualized states.

In fact its been an annoyance this past year to revamp our product to each states individualized standards as more and more states realize common core has made them not very bright.

Common core is not a government product. And the math standards, at least, are excellent.





DomKen -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 3:09:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3

http://reason.com/archives/2013/05/14/the-myth-of-the-scientific-liberal

Do you think at all? The author of that nasty little hit piece clearly doesn't.

The Oregon experiment study was 2 years into the experiment.

It found that:
participants had higher rates of diagnosis and medication of hypertension, diabetes, high serum cholesterol and depression.
lower incidence of financial crisis due to health care issues
it didn't find:
a large increase in outcomes in hypertension and diabetes.

Now consider, those are lifestyle conditions that simply medicating won't usually do the trick. It takes changing how the person eats and getting the person to increase their exercise level to get under control. Medicaid is a very restrictive program and doesn't allow the sort of management of care that is conducive to fast changes of that sort.

Now look at the swipe at universal Pre-K education. The author complains that the gains disappear by the fourth grade. Logically then the place to look is after Pre-K. Why aren't the kids advancing at the same pace or at least maintaining? The reason for that is well known, the 180 day school year and long summer vacation. Our kids are simply in school too little with too long a break. Teachers spend a great deal of time each fall re-teaching what the kids forgot over the summer instead of covering new material.




joether -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 3:13:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
When I think "Leading States in Education", I don't think 'Georgia and Oklahoma'. Georgia is 17 and Oklahoma is 40 for High School Rankings With schools in general, Georgia is 32 and Oklahoma is 36 If this guy was making a REAL argument, give the challenge to states that seem to have their acts together....like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

But both OK and GA have moved away from the common core standards given from the government and moved to their own level of standards for their individualized states.

In fact its been an annoyance this past year to revamp our product to each states individualized standards as more and more states realize common core has made them not very bright.


I'm not as informed on Common Core as I should be. But I do understand the value in hiring good teachers and support professionals that help improve the educational standards. That unfortunately, takes tax dollars to implement. Lots of tax dollars. Certain towns in my state of Massachusetts for example do very well with education. The observation is the commitment to not just say 'education is important' but to back it up with tax dollars. As a result, drop out rates are lower, those obtaining higher proficiency on exams compared to other towns/states, and better social and educational skills learned. As a result the commonwealth does very well on education standards. Is there room for improvement? Always!

The more important question that might be asked is: Whose standards do we use to determine if children in one age group, grade and/or location are on par with children from other locations. Not just in the state and country but at large. If either or both states were within the top five states; then it would be curious to know what those stares are doing. When they are in the 30-40 range of states, its telling me their educational direction still needs much more work and funding to make it stand out.




GotSteel -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 4:01:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.


Yeah if that number is supposed to be taken literally it's quite a claim and I'd also like to see data. Here's an article that's sort of related which has an interesting take on why ammo hording paranoia bunker builders are so stereotypically conservative.

quote:

ORIGINAL: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/calling-truce-political-wars/
The Fear Factor

Psychologists have found that conservatives are fundamentally more anxious than liberals, which may be why they typically desire stability, structure and clear answers even to complicated questions. “Conservatism, apparently, helps to protect people against some of the natural difficulties of living,” says social psychologist Paul Nail of the University of Central Arkansas. “The fact is we don't live in a completely safe world. Things can and do go wrong. But if I can impose this order on it by my worldview, I can keep my anxiety to a manageable level.”

Anxiety is an emotion that waxes and wanes in all of us, and as it swings up or down our political views can shift in its wake. When people feel safe and secure, they become more liberal; when they feel threatened, they become more conservative. Research conducted by Nail and his colleague in the weeks after September 11, 2001, showed that people of all political persuasions became more conservative in the wake of the terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, in an upcoming study, a team led by Yale University psychologist Jaime Napier found that asking Republicans to imagine that they possessed superpowers and were impermeable to injury made them more liberal.






quizzicalkitten -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 4:05:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
When I think "Leading States in Education", I don't think 'Georgia and Oklahoma'. Georgia is 17 and Oklahoma is 40 for High School Rankings With schools in general, Georgia is 32 and Oklahoma is 36 If this guy was making a REAL argument, give the challenge to states that seem to have their acts together....like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

But both OK and GA have moved away from the common core standards given from the government and moved to their own level of standards for their individualized states.

In fact its been an annoyance this past year to revamp our product to each states individualized standards as more and more states realize common core has made them not very bright.


I'm not as informed on Common Core as I should be. But I do understand the value in hiring good teachers and support professionals that help improve the educational standards. That unfortunately, takes tax dollars to implement. Lots of tax dollars. Certain towns in my state of Massachusetts for example do very well with education. The observation is the commitment to not just say 'education is important' but to back it up with tax dollars. As a result, drop out rates are lower, those obtaining higher proficiency on exams compared to other towns/states, and better social and educational skills learned. As a result the commonwealth does very well on education standards. Is there room for improvement? Always!

The more important question that might be asked is: Whose standards do we use to determine if children in one age group, grade and/or location are on par with children from other locations. Not just in the state and country but at large. If either or both states were within the top five states; then it would be curious to know what those stares are doing. When they are in the 30-40 range of states, its telling me their educational direction still needs much more work and funding to make it stand out.



Of the top 20 states 13 of them have abandoned common core for their own standards or never implemented them.




LetstalkboutRAP3 -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 6:42:21 PM)

@Joether

It's not my article. Unless I'm mistaken, It was written by an Indian woman. I haven't even read it yet, I just stumbled upon the link to it a little while before I saw this thread. Figured it was relevant, so I thought I'd share. Also, you have too much time on your hands...

@DomKen

Piss off, commie!




quizzicalkitten -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 8:20:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


When I think "Leading States in Education", I don't think 'Georgia and Oklahoma'. Georgia is 17 and Oklahoma is 40 for High School Rankings With schools in general, Georgia is 32 and Oklahoma is 36 If this guy was making a REAL argument, give the challenge to states that seem to have their acts together....like the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.





But both OK and GA have moved away from the common core standards given from the government and moved to their own level of standards for their individualized states.

In fact its been an annoyance this past year to revamp our product to each states individualized standards as more and more states realize common core has made them not very bright.

Common core is not a government product. And the math standards, at least, are excellent.





Common core was put in place by the department of education which is a federal program if Im not mistaken...

and the standards are bullshit
quote:


Examples of CC Standards

CCSS.Math.Content.5.NBT.A.2
Explain patterns in the number of zeros of the product when multiplying a number by powers of 10, and explain patterns in the placement of the decimal point when a decimal is multiplied or divided by a power of 10. Use whole-number exponents to denote powers of 10.

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.4
Understand that a two-dimensional figure is similar to another if the second can be obtained from the first by a sequence of rotations, reflections, translations, and dilations; given two similar two-dimensional figures, describe a sequence that exhibits the similarity between them.

CCSS.Math.Content.8.G.A.5
Use informal arguments to establish facts about the angle sum and exterior angle of triangles, about the angles created when parallel lines are cut by a transversal, and the angle-angle criterion for similarity of triangles.


They also allow for no deviation for the way other people might learn:

For example Division is taught currently in 6th grade, that you are to manually do a problem as follows

6/150

Six times 10 is 60 six times 20 is 20 six times 25 is 150 so 6/150 is 25 and you are to do multiplication and add your numbers up in a guess instead of going

6 goes into 15 twice with the remainder of 3, bring down the zero and you have 30 six goes in to 30 5 times, the answers 25.

Because of this instead of being able to do 10 to 20 math problems in an hour course you might be able to do 3 or 4, which means less practical skill is taught, you also spend longer explaining the "cc standard way" then the normal long division way, and if you deviate in most schools in my state as an example your given an F even if you come to the correct answer.




Aylee -> RE: Gop trying to break science education again (9/5/2014 8:21:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Yes, conservatives are like liberals in having strange and weird ideas on how best to run government and society. Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1. There really are a couple of crazy liberals; but its nothing compared to the throngs of conservatives that are not operating with a brain or exist in our reality.

Citation please. Because in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health, not ONCE was I asked questions about my politics.


For someone that doesn't understand mental and emotional health, I'm not really surprised by your view. Did those doctors ask you directly about your political viewpoints? And then observe, over a decent period of time (say 4-6 weeks, of 1 day visits), how you act and react to events in the political sphere? No....because they are professional. If you thought you had a problem, you would visit a mental/emotion health professional (a general practice medical doctor can help if none exist in your area), whom would try to determine if what your saying and viewing is indeed just 'political thought' verse "the squirrels...the squirrels control the White House! They look at me from the kitchen window.....planning....plotting....". There is no way even a skilled therapist could determine in a dozen questions if you had a mental and/or emotional health problem. Unless they had some evidence to say something was wrong before hand.

Its estimated by many sources that the number of individuals suffering form Depression, for example, is twice the actual number. And that those not obtaining treatment are not aware of how the illness is effecting their daily lives. Could the illness effect their political views? And the answer is 'yes'; more of the negative than positive. How would a paranoid-schizophrenia person behave whom held conservative political views and own firearms (for a specific example), to something the President does, and to which the conservative media blows out of proportion (they LOVE doing that)? The one that has been diagnosis properly, with medication (if directed), and therapy would most likely not fly off into a rage. Can we say the same of the undiagnosed individual? An society will have to deal with the undiagnosed individual....after....they fly into a rage.

Here is something that could aid you in understanding.

Silly me. I thought that grief was a mental, emotional, and physical problem. Thank you for letting this widow know that grief is NOT a problem. All those books about it and the special counselors and classes MUST be a conservative conspiracy to make us just think that the death of a spouse has other complications. It is all just imaginary.

You are such a fucking putz to even consider suggesting such a thing. You are a troglodyte. And to suggest that it might be the news I watch or read that causes the grief reactions? You are an ass.


How am I suppose to know your mental, emotional, and physical medical background?

"All those books about it and the special counselors and classes..."

An here you are admitting exactly what I'm taking about. That you (directly) or others (indirectly) got some help to handle a problem that was not short term. Depression is not a short term illness. An there are several forms of Depression. To find what yours might be, takes a skilled individual a few weeks if not months to understand the depth of the problem(s). And that treatment is not as easy as 'take one pill a day', but more involved.

Those with Depression are also more likely to lash out violently. Either to themselves or others.

For what its worth, Aylee.....I am sorry for your lost.


Background for me?

The part where I said, "in the last year where I have gotten tons of checks from doctors and such about my mental and emotional health"

You STILL have not given a cite on the "Unfortunately, the number of conservatives that suffer from mental/emotional issues far exceeds the liberal population by 17:1"

And by the way, no, it does not take 4-6 weeks of daily visits to be prescribed an anti-depressant. It may take a long time to get the best type and dosage, but it takes one visit to get a script. In fact, anti-depressants and all sorts of mental illness drugs get prescribed for all sorts of different things.

No darling, political views are NOT part of the treatment of mental illness. Unless perhaps you think you are Napoleon Bonaparte.

When you change someone's political views as treatment of mental illness, we call those re-education camps. I am not surprised that you are in favor of those.

I still want to see your cite.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875