Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 5:57:28 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Well damn, maybe I should start a poll asking, "Do you know the story of what happened on 9/11?" and see how many other people vote "No."

Well, you could.

But I'm puzzled by the coyness of your replies. If you believe that the U.S. government is putting out an erroneous 9/11 story line, why not simply say what it is and why you disagree with it?

Do you really want to rehash all of that ? Suffice it to say right or wrong, 9/11 is now solidly a part of American lore and as such, there will never be a grand jury. That there will not be, doesn't surprise me at all...there never is.

It being accepted that enough of the American public does not want to know the answers to all of the unanswered questions, it becomes a personal choice as to how one wishes to live...either in a sort of smug satisfaction or debilitating cynicism. Take your pick.


No need to rehash, just a few sentences explaining the real truth from one of you all knowing ones to us ignorant rabble. Maybe a small explanation of who the grand jury should have gone after. Should be simple unless of course you are just blowing hot air trying to imply you know something the majority of the country is too stupid to comprehend.

Well one need not go very deeply at all although there are gaping wholes in the 9/11 story the people got from govt. But suffice it to say, grand juries don't 'go after' people. Real investigators investigate to pursue ALL of the evidence and sufficient probable cause then supplies witnesses that would be compelled to testify before those grand juries.

As I said in a previous thread in this subject, it has become and sadly so, that a sufficient majority of the American people simply don't care to have that investigation even to pursue the answers all of those unanswered questions on 9/11.





Seems you didn't find it that simple after all.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 7:08:22 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
If 9/11 occurred as a result of religious zealotry, why were secular not religious targets chosen?

Do you really expect to decipher the motivations of a bunch of religious nuts? I know that they regarded the Twin Towers as representative of what they hated about America and capitalism. That's why they were targeted with a bomb before. Personally, I think they just wanted to do something "spectacular" and make a statement. Blowing up a church or synagogue doesn't quite hold the same value as flying jets into two skyscrapers, the Pentagon, and whatever else they were trying to destroy.


You suggestion that Al Quada "regarded the Twin Towers as representative of what they hated about America and capitalism" makes a lot more sense than your previous effort.

The targets on 9/11 were carefully chosen - the White House as the centre of American political power, the Pentagon as the centre of American military power and the Towers as the centre of American economic power. The people who conceived, designed and successfully executed such a daring attack can't be dismissed as "religious nuts". That 9/11 was an abhorrent crime against humanity shouldn't distract us from the fact that a great deal of thought and planning went into the largest, most daring and probably most successful terrorist attack in history.

There's little doubt that 9/11 was motivated by hatred of the US to some degree. However lots of people hate various things for lots of different reasons, and they manage to get by without causing atrocities on the scale of 9/11. Blind hate or even ideological hate/religious fanaticism don't seem to be a convincing or even adequate reason to explain why 9/11 occurred. What caused them to hate the US to the extent that they did?

Or was 9/11 a calculated political act designed to influence US policy towards the ME, as Polite suggests?

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 9/22/2014 7:09:07 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 7:29:56 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
If 9/11 occurred as a result of religious zealotry, why were secular not religious targets chosen?

Do you really expect to decipher the motivations of a bunch of religious nuts? I know that they regarded the Twin Towers as representative of what they hated about America and capitalism. That's why they were targeted with a bomb before. Personally, I think they just wanted to do something "spectacular" and make a statement. Blowing up a church or synagogue doesn't quite hold the same value as flying jets into two skyscrapers, the Pentagon, and whatever else they were trying to destroy.


You suggestion that Al Quada "regarded the Twin Towers as representative of what they hated about America and capitalism" makes a lot more sense than your previous effort.

The targets on 9/11 were carefully chosen - the White House as the centre of American political power, the Pentagon as the centre of American military power and the Towers as the centre of American economic power. The people who conceived, designed and successfully executed such a daring attack can't be dismissed as "religious nuts". That 9/11 was an abhorrent crime against humanity shouldn't distract us from the fact that a great deal of thought and planning went into the largest, most daring and probably most successful terrorist attack in history.

There's little doubt that 9/11 was motivated by hatred of the US to some degree. However lots of people hate various things for lots of different reasons, and they manage to get by without causing atrocities on the scale of 9/11. Blind hate or even ideological hate/religious fanaticism don't seem to be a convincing or even adequate reason to explain why 9/11 occurred. What caused them to hate the US to the extent that they did?

Or was 9/11 a calculated political act designed to influence US policy towards the ME, as Polite suggests?


They are religious nuts.

We are not Muslims and it is revert or die or pay a tax. Their holy book and their history of kill, slavery, rape, and conquest, lays it all out for you. Islam has never been peaceful.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 8:38:48 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Aylee

They are religious nuts.

We are not Muslims and it is revert or die or pay a tax. Their holy book and their history of kill, slavery, rape, and conquest, lays it all out for you. Islam has never been peaceful.


Your holy book and your christian history of kill,slavery,rape,murder and conquest, lays it all out for you. Christiaity has never been peaceful.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 8:42:37 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

Because a bunch of religious zealots decided they would have God's grace for killing people they hated.


The crusades are not part of this thread.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 8:46:39 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Sanity

What the FP article is trying to get through your thick head is that they were wrong about Glaspie when they blamed Saddams invasion on him in years previously


April is a girls name did you not notice?
Since she gets her orders from the president via the secretary of state she is just the messenger and not the cause.


Even that sentence you quoted says nothing LIKE Saddam had a green light to invade Iraq, unless you are totally desperate to blame everything Saddam on a US ambassadorA conflict betwen iraq and kuwait would be arab vs. arab.

Nope...the bitch said that arab arab conflicts are not the interest of the u.s.

Let me break it down a little further, because I know you and NG are stupid


This from the resident right wing asshole with a two digtit iq?







< Message edited by thompsonx -- 9/22/2014 8:50:37 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 1:06:55 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You suggestion that Al Quada "regarded the Twin Towers as representative of what they hated about America and capitalism" makes a lot more sense than your previous effort.

Or is it that you want to ascribe more to the reasons behind 9/11 than is actually required?


quote:


The targets on 9/11 were carefully chosen - the White House as the centre of American political power, the Pentagon as the centre of American military power and the Towers as the centre of American economic power. The people who conceived, designed and successfully executed such a daring attack can't be dismissed as "religious nuts". That 9/11 was an abhorrent crime against humanity shouldn't distract us from the fact that a great deal of thought and planning went into the largest, most daring and probably most successful terrorist attack in history.

Yes they can. But I suppose you see them as "freedom fighters"...which actually wouldn't surprise me. After reading your posts over time I keep wondering when you're going to stop hiding behind your coy tactics and finally plant your "I Hate America" flag next to your "I Hate Israel" flag.


quote:


There's little doubt that 9/11 was motivated by hatred of the US to some degree.

Just like your post that started this exchange?


quote:


However lots of people hate various things for lots of different reasons, and they manage to get by without causing atrocities on the scale of 9/11. Blind hate or even ideological hate/religious fanaticism don't seem to be a convincing or even adequate reason to explain why 9/11 occurred. What caused them to hate the US to the extent that they did?

Let's see if I'm getting this right. You're saying hate wasn't the reason for 9/11 but you're asking why they hated us enough to do it?

Do you have any idea how transparent you are?

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 1:11:18 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
The crusades are not part of this thread.

Neither is your brain.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/22/2014 4:13:41 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

You did not ask me for facts. You imply that apparently I should be a "Real investigators" and I should deliver some real evidence when you obviously don't care that the professional investigators didn't.

Then you imply that I am among the conspiracy nuts and I guess share with others that 'I have delivered little other than doctored photo and inuendo.' [sic] I am not a nut at all for having as I stated...many unanswered questions.

Then for some reason, throw in what others suggest that 'At least one of your number claims the poor souls in Auschwitz had "an "Olympic swimming pool" which is not even at all...on point.


You clearly stated the following
Well one need not go very deeply at all although there are gaping wholes in the 9/11 story the people got from govt.


Then you made the point about real investigators. Do you wish to clarify anything to back up your claim, or are you ust going to keep spouting nonsense.

My point about the swimming pool was on topic, since I was pointing out it is another conspiracy claim, made by someone who thinks GWB and company orchestrated 9/11. IE, conspiracy theorists tend to believe in conspiracies. No matter how absurd they are.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 1:08:11 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

You did not ask me for facts. You imply that apparently I should be a "Real investigators" and I should deliver some real evidence when you obviously don't care that the professional investigators didn't.

Then you imply that I am among the conspiracy nuts and I guess share with others that 'I have delivered little other than doctored photo and inuendo.' [sic] I am not a nut at all for having as I stated...many unanswered questions.

Then for some reason, throw in what others suggest that 'At least one of your number claims the poor souls in Auschwitz had "an "Olympic swimming pool" which is not even at all...on point.


You clearly stated the following
Well one need not go very deeply at all although there are gaping wholes in the 9/11 story the people got from govt.


Then you made the point about real investigators. Do you wish to clarify anything to back up your claim, or are you ust going to keep spouting nonsense.

My point about the swimming pool was on topic, since I was pointing out it is another conspiracy claim, made by someone who thinks GWB and company orchestrated 9/11. IE, conspiracy theorists tend to believe in conspiracies. No matter how absurd they are.

What needs clarification about the fact that there was never a real murder investigation or even what one might call any kind of comprehensive criminal investigation of 9/11 ?

I mentioned no conspiracy of my own and have repeatedly stated that there are many answered questions in what the govt. told the public about 9/11. And BTW, 9/11 as are all crimes involving more than one person...is a conspiracy the proving of which, all start with a theory. In fact, just a conspiracy to commit a crime...is a crime.

As I stated earlier in response to dcnovice, do you really want to rehash all of this when we know...nothing will change ?

You don't have the answers to those questions. I don't have the answers to those questions but I am sure in a 'real' investigation...the answers would have meant a lot.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 3:48:15 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You suggestion that Al Quada "regarded the Twin Towers as representative of what they hated about America and capitalism" makes a lot more sense than your previous effort.

Or is it that you want to ascribe more to the reasons behind 9/11 than is actually required?


quote:


The targets on 9/11 were carefully chosen - the White House as the centre of American political power, the Pentagon as the centre of American military power and the Towers as the centre of American economic power. The people who conceived, designed and successfully executed such a daring attack can't be dismissed as "religious nuts". That 9/11 was an abhorrent crime against humanity shouldn't distract us from the fact that a great deal of thought and planning went into the largest, most daring and probably most successful terrorist attack in history.

Yes they can. But I suppose you see them as "freedom fighters"...which actually wouldn't surprise me. After reading your posts over time I keep wondering when you're going to stop hiding behind your coy tactics and finally plant your "I Hate America" flag next to your "I Hate Israel" flag.


quote:


There's little doubt that 9/11 was motivated by hatred of the US to some degree.

Just like your post that started this exchange?


quote:


However lots of people hate various things for lots of different reasons, and they manage to get by without causing atrocities on the scale of 9/11. Blind hate or even ideological hate/religious fanaticism don't seem to be a convincing or even adequate reason to explain why 9/11 occurred. What caused them to hate the US to the extent that they did?

Let's see if I'm getting this right. You're saying hate wasn't the reason for 9/11 but you're asking why they hated us enough to do it?

Do you have any idea how transparent you are?

You seem determined to stick with the simplistic explanation that 9/11 was solely motivated by the hatred of "religious nuts". I am reminded of Bush the Dumber's absurd claim that AQ carried out 9/11 because they hated America's freedoms ..... so ridiculously self serving that it's almost an insult to one's intelligence to advance it. I am suggesting that this explanation is inadequate, that 'hatred' only explains part of the picture, not the whole. That is not too difficult for you to grasp is it?

I am interested in why you refuse to look beyond this simplistic explanation. Why is the possibility that there might be some political factors involved so threatening for you that you refuse to countenance it? Is it because you fear what you might find if you dig too deeply? If something like 9/11 happened here, I would be determined to get to the bottom of it and understand it fully. Unless these steps are taken, the possibility that something along the lines of 9/11 will occur in the future cannot be eliminated.

_____________________________



(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 5:14:40 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

They are religious nuts.

We are not Muslims and it is revert or die or pay a tax. Their holy book and their history of kill, slavery, rape, and conquest, lays it all out for you. Islam has never been peaceful.


Aren't we supposed to overcomplicate it, so as to be politically correct, though?

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 8:25:03 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You seem determined to stick with the simplistic explanation that 9/11 was solely motivated by the hatred of "religious nuts". I am reminded of Bush the Dumber's absurd claim that AQ carried out 9/11 because they hated America's freedoms ..... so ridiculously self serving that it's almost an insult to one's intelligence to advance it. I am suggesting that this explanation is inadequate, that 'hatred' only explains part of the picture, not the whole. That is not too difficult for you to grasp is it?


Yeah I remember Bush saying that they hated us for our freedom. The reason why he was able to get away with that was because a lot of people at the time didn't even care about the reasons. From the point of view of the average American who doesn't really know or understand the outside world - and who remains willfully ignorant of our history and foreign policy - they think that America is full of nice innocent people and can't understand why anyone would want to attack us.

Another thing to keep in mind is that many Americans get their information about the outside world from their friends and family members who serve in the military, since they may not know anyone else who has any extensive experience outside the country. So, in a typical group discussion of an issue like this, someone who merely reads books is going to be at a disadvantage and given less credibility than someone who can say "I was there; I understand these people better than you do."

You may have already noticed that that's a common thread in these discussions here, as the hawks invariably claim some level of "higher understanding" that gives them some kind of moral imperative that spoiled, sheltered, insular civilians (whom they see as nothing more than naive children) couldn't possibly understand. But if asked to elaborate, they invariably go silent or try to change the subject, which is very telling, in my opinion. The most you might get is something similar to Col. Jessep's speech in A Few Good Men.

quote:


I am interested in why you refuse to look beyond this simplistic explanation. Why is the possibility that there might be some political factors involved so threatening for you that you refuse to countenance it? Is it because you fear what you might find if you dig too deeply? If something like 9/11 happened here, I would be determined to get to the bottom of it and understand it fully. Unless these steps are taken, the possibility that something along the lines of 9/11 will occur in the future cannot be eliminated.


There are a number of ways one could look at this. Assuming that the hawks are correct and that Muslims hate America "just because," then one might well ask why we weren't targeted 25 or 50 years earlier? Either they didn't hate us back then, or they did hate us but didn't have the wherewithal to carry out any significant attacks against us. Or, it could also be that America itself has declined and weakened during this time, and those who hate us already might see an opening and strike out against us.

In that sense, the problem may not have anything to do with "them," but rather, the problem is in us. Instead of shoring up our own internal weaknesses and making America into a better nation, the hawks don't really want to face up to that. They see America as the greatest, most enlightened, most benevolent nation on Earth, and that everything in this world would be almost perfect if not for "them," whatever "enemy" there happens to be out there in the outside world. To explain it all away by saying they're "religious nuts" full of hatred for America avoids any examination of America itself and puts all attention and focus on "the other."

The thing is, there will always be a "them" out there to deal with. There will always be some group, nation, or group of nations which may hate us and might very well be "evil," however one understands the concept. Even if we were to view them as one-dimensional "religious nuts," then what does that make us, if we've allowed them to get to us like this?

Expanding a bit further on this point, let's assume that these are "religious nuts," totally full of zeal and unmitigated hatred for America from top to bottom, just because of our freedom. They see us as "weak" on multiple levels. Our materialism and insatiable love of money is our major weakness. They may see us as "soft," too wrapped up in complacent luxury and comfort. From the point of view of a "religious nut," they would see a great deal of spiritual and moral weakness which they can use as a point of attack. They can also see that there are political and other internal divisions within the country and view that as a weakness that they can exploit. We exposed ourselves as a paper tiger decades ago.

So, even assuming that the view that these are "religious nuts who hate us for our freedom" is correct, we also have to examine our own position and how we became so entangled in such a complicated mess. How did they get to us? How did they manage to pull this and other attacks off? Are we slipping? Are we just not able to cut the mustard anymore? Are we just getting too slow, too old, and too dull, as a nation? If we are an empire in decline and increasing weakness, then that's due to our own devices, not because of the "religious nuts" themselves.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 9:54:44 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You seem determined to stick with the simplistic explanation that 9/11 was solely motivated by the hatred of "religious nuts". I am reminded of Bush the Dumber's absurd claim that AQ carried out 9/11 because they hated America's freedoms ..... so ridiculously self serving that it's almost an insult to one's intelligence to advance it. I am suggesting that this explanation is inadequate, that 'hatred' only explains part of the picture, not the whole. That is not too difficult for you to grasp is it?

I am interested in why you refuse to look beyond this simplistic explanation. Why is the possibility that there might be some political factors involved so threatening for you that you refuse to countenance it? Is it because you fear what you might find if you dig too deeply? If something like 9/11 happened here, I would be determined to get to the bottom of it and understand it fully. Unless these steps are taken, the possibility that something along the lines of 9/11 will occur in the future cannot be eliminated.

You seem determined to make this more complicated than it really is.

A Wahhabist nut orchestrated an attack against what he perceived as the most prominent symbols of the US. His complaint was that we are too multicultural to be allowed access to Saudi Arabia and specifically Mecca. He threw in some whining about Israel because Arab religious loons always do but for AQ it is at best an after thought. 

< Message edited by DomKen -- 9/23/2014 9:55:21 AM >

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 12:31:48 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You seem determined to stick with the simplistic explanation that 9/11 was solely motivated by the hatred of "religious nuts". I am reminded of Bush the Dumber's absurd claim that AQ carried out 9/11 because they hated America's freedoms ..... so ridiculously self serving that it's almost an insult to one's intelligence to advance it. I am suggesting that this explanation is inadequate, that 'hatred' only explains part of the picture, not the whole. That is not too difficult for you to grasp is it?

I am interested in why you refuse to look beyond this simplistic explanation. Why is the possibility that there might be some political factors involved so threatening for you that you refuse to countenance it? Is it because you fear what you might find if you dig too deeply? If something like 9/11 happened here, I would be determined to get to the bottom of it and understand it fully. Unless these steps are taken, the possibility that something along the lines of 9/11 will occur in the future cannot be eliminated.

You seem determined to make this more complicated than it really is.

A Wahhabist nut orchestrated an attack against what he perceived as the most prominent symbols of the US. His complaint was that we are too multicultural to be allowed access to Saudi Arabia and specifically Mecca. He threw in some whining about Israel because Arab religious loons always do but for AQ it is at best an after thought. 

Well, you got to it before I did, Ken, but yeah, that's pretty much it. I would only add that she's forgetting that in the form of politics OBL and his followers practiced there is no seperation of church and state. Politics is dictated by religion.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 4:07:03 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You seem determined to stick with the simplistic explanation that 9/11 was solely motivated by the hatred of "religious nuts". I am reminded of Bush the Dumber's absurd claim that AQ carried out 9/11 because they hated America's freedoms ..... so ridiculously self serving that it's almost an insult to one's intelligence to advance it. I am suggesting that this explanation is inadequate, that 'hatred' only explains part of the picture, not the whole. That is not too difficult for you to grasp is it?

I am interested in why you refuse to look beyond this simplistic explanation. Why is the possibility that there might be some political factors involved so threatening for you that you refuse to countenance it? Is it because you fear what you might find if you dig too deeply? If something like 9/11 happened here, I would be determined to get to the bottom of it and understand it fully. Unless these steps are taken, the possibility that something along the lines of 9/11 will occur in the future cannot be eliminated.


yeh why would anyone be jealous of the fucked up franchise we have.....LOL

However its not an insult to the intelligence if you reference it back to the intent of the constitution, common law etc etc etc. where in fact the dumber may be the smarter and may be referring to 'corporate franchise' which definitions from the late 1700's early 1800's will show that is makes perfect sense, expecially since many americans are also in those terms very disatisfied with their own 'freedoms'.













That said the corporate government was created to govern and protect interests of the franchise members. Presumably citizens, american indians excepted.

The war in the ME and 911 was all about, you guessed it, the almighty dollar. All wars and nation crimes are about money. In this case the petro dollar.


quote:

Allow me to briefly explain the impact that a sudden loss of the petrodollar system would have upon the United States of America.

Foreign nations would begin sending a flood of U.S. dollars back to the United States in exchange for the new currency needed for oil.

The Federal Reserve would lose their ability to print more dollars to solve America’s economic problems.

The Treasury Secretary and the Federal Reserve Chairman would meet to determine the best course of action.

That action would involve an immediate and dramatic increase in interest rates to reduce America’s money supply.

Hyperinflation would ensue temporarily while the interest rates took time to take full effect.

All oil-related prices, including gas prices, would reach outrageous levels.

Washington would soon realize that the total amount of money in the system would have to be dramatically slashed even further, leading to an even higher increase in interest rates.

The clueless American public would demand answers. Those on the left would blame the right. The right would blame the left. And both political parties would seek to blame the Federal Reserve.

People with adjustable rate debts would be crushed and massive layoffs would occur as businesses would be suffering from the high interest rates.

Asset prices across the board would plummet in value.

Amid the financial carnage, an economic recovery eventually would begin to take place. But this new American economy would be tremendously smaller due to a drastically reduced money supply.

This brief scenario is far from exhaustive and is probably very incomplete. But I provide it to help you understand the great economic damage that you and I, and our nation in general, would sustain if the petrodollar system were to collapse suddenly.

The Washington elites are intimately aware of how serious the economic situation could become if the petrodollar system collapsed. After all, they were the architects and masterminds of the entire system. And if one considers Washington’s policies since the mid-1970’s, it is evident that they have no intention of allowing the petrodollar system to fail.

America - The Primary Guardian of the Petrodollar System




Saddam Hussein was trying to get the ME nations to switch to the petro euro. Very naughty boy and american asset. I am sure he is living it up somewhere and one of his doubles got lynched.

Otherwise it begs the question why anyone in the ME who can walk into a drug store and buy any medication they want without a script be jealous of americans whos freedoms mandate they have to pay a doctor and get permission?




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 4:24:21 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Feeling a wee bit defensive, little boy?

Leave the lunatic fringe conspiracy theories to RealOne & your cheeks wouldn't burn so badly when you get called out on your dopy rantings


Actually they have been studying people that cling to your position.

quote:

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.


The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between


Yeh I agree though, looking life square in the face can be pretty painful.

Then I suppose demolition evidence wont have any meaning for you?









_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/23/2014 8:38:36 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Feeling a wee bit defensive, little boy?

Leave the lunatic fringe conspiracy theories to RealOne & your cheeks wouldn't burn so badly when you get called out on your dopy rantings


Actually they have been studying people that cling to your position.

quote:

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled conspiracy theorists appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.


The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between


Yeh I agree though, looking life square in the face can be pretty painful.

Then I suppose demolition evidence wont have any meaning for you?




.....and what's really surprising is that Bldg. 7 is just the tip of the proverbial ice berg.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/24/2014 5:47:54 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You seem determined to stick with the simplistic explanation that 9/11 was solely motivated by the hatred of "religious nuts". I am reminded of Bush the Dumber's absurd claim that AQ carried out 9/11 because they hated America's freedoms ..... so ridiculously self serving that it's almost an insult to one's intelligence to advance it. I am suggesting that this explanation is inadequate, that 'hatred' only explains part of the picture, not the whole. That is not too difficult for you to grasp is it?

I am interested in why you refuse to look beyond this simplistic explanation. Why is the possibility that there might be some political factors involved so threatening for you that you refuse to countenance it? Is it because you fear what you might find if you dig too deeply? If something like 9/11 happened here, I would be determined to get to the bottom of it and understand it fully. Unless these steps are taken, the possibility that something along the lines of 9/11 will occur in the future cannot be eliminated.

You seem determined to make this more complicated than it really is.

A Wahhabist nut orchestrated an attack against what he perceived as the most prominent symbols of the US. His complaint was that we are too multicultural to be allowed access to Saudi Arabia and specifically Mecca. He threw in some whining about Israel because Arab religious loons always do but for AQ it is at best an after thought. 

Well, you got to it before I did, Ken, but yeah, that's pretty much it. I would only add that she's forgetting that in the form of politics OBL and his followers practiced there is no seperation of church and state. Politics is dictated by religion.


9/11 changed the world. It altered the politics of the world. It changed the way people live around the globe. Among other things it led to the "War on Terror", the Patriot Act in the USA, the growth of national surveillance States across the West, the invasion of Iraq and all that ensued that particular disaster. I could probably fill a couple of pages listing the political consequences of 9/11 and even then the list would be incomplete. It is probably the single most influential individual act of this century.

And you guys want to pretend that it wasn't political, that there were no politics involved at any level. Hilarious!

The contrast between this reaction and Zonie's thoughtful post is illuminating. I suspect he is correct to assert that you guys are really afraid of what you will find, so you just stick your head in the sand ostrich-like, and pretend that there are no difficult questions to be asked or answered, just blame it all on some religious whackos with a medieval mentality.

There's none so blind as they who will not see.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 9/24/2014 5:58:23 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy - 9/24/2014 8:06:27 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
A few thoughts:

-- "Hilarious!" was a jarring adjective to encounter in a 9/11 context.

-- With OBL and all the hijackers dead, discerning their motives will likely involve guesswork, which may be one reason folks haven't rushed to do so. Given that the folks who perished on 9/11 included people from my own life, I'm particularly wary of anyone's effort to use their deaths to make political points.

-- Is there really that much new to learn from the 9/11 attackers' motives? We already know that OBL resented the "defiling" of his homeland, that many Muslims detest our support of Israel, and the U.S. is far from perfect.

-- There's a fine line between offering an explanation of why something happened and excusing it. That's a line I'd prefer not to see crossed in this instance. I must confess I've sometimes wondered if the zeal to "understand" 9/11 springs, perhaps unconsciously, from a hunger to say, "You see: It really was the United States' fault."

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Never Forget! Sept 11th, A Day of Infamy Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141