RE: Reasonable Expectations (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Kaliko -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 7:28:41 PM)

quote:



Nope. Are you assuming that since I am looking for an /s that I am only going to find weakness? That a Domme is going to be an independent tower of strength because that is who they are and /s's are miserable puddles of weakness?



I'm sorry. You've lost me. Why would you think I'm suggesting that?

quote:



Because I do not "need" her, my life, happiness and well being doesn't revolve around her as the earth to the sun that I am incapable of praise, reassurance, gratitude, passion, and loving her with every fiber of my being, that's the theme, right?



No, it's not. I don't believe I've mentioned anything about your feeling that you don't need her. I don't have any argument with you, there. I agree with you, though possibly for different reasons. My Dominant wants me, cares for me, and enjoys me. But I am not under the misconception that he needs me. I wasn't speaking for him. I was only speaking for me, and my feelings.

quote:



The only power I need over her is what she gives me. Given from a place of strength, not weakness, and definitely not because she is overwhelmed by the number of pasta's available for purchase and too fear stricken to buy one cuz it might be the wrong one, and needs my leadership and guidance to cope with the beastly supermarket. I am not interested in being the "fix" to someone's fucked up life. Naturally, I must be incapable of providing emotional support because I lack the humanity to seek a head-case disaster of a /s.



I think you're under the assumption that because I (or any woman like me) feel like I need a man to exert a certain amount of control, then that means that I need any man to exert control in my life. Any man, any man will do. And you are saying you want your partners to be wrapped up tightly enough to choose to be with you rather than crumbling into your lap with broken wings. I'm right there with you. Truly. To me, that would be the head case territory. And I wouldn't begrudge anyone the freedom and good judgment to avoid such people.









PandoraFoxxx -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 7:36:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

~ FR ~
I guess I'll go on record then, as a non-submissive, that I know I need my Significant Other. Not just want, not just desire, but need--and emotionally, I need for him to need me.

It's one of those things you try to fight perhaps at different times in your life (especially when I was younger). You want to think of yourself as independent, as if being loved and loving others is an option. It isn't. At least not with me. I need it as much as I need air to breathe, food and water for physical sustenance.

When you're married, you might not be as aware of your more vulnerable needs. You are, but you aren't as much with the ones that are getting filled or met. I have kids, I have pets, I have close friends. They can only fill a portion of my psychological needs. Being in a non-D/s relationship dynamic with a partner would also not fill many of my needs. I recognize them as needs and not merely as elective wants that I could take or leave. And in large part, it is because I do recognize and acknowledge this about myself that I can value my Significant Other all the more.[sm=2cents.gif]


Well babe, it was bound to happen, but we are finally of different minds on a topic.

I'm in control of every aspect of my life. I've always been anti-social, we'll go with anti-social, it's not entirely accurate, but we'll go that way because an anomaly would beg too much explanation. There is no aspect of my life that I do not control, financial, domestic, health, entertainment, blah blah blah. I cook better than most, clean more thoroughly than most, and do not need anyone to take on or over any aspect of my life. My life has been structured to cater to my needs, and I cater to my needs. I make the entire bed, but the idea of making half of it is kind of exciting.

There is nothing, no part of my life that I need a /s for. I do want her, and knowing that she is with me because I want her, have no dependence on her, that it is simply the pleasure of her in my life that keeps her in my life should be a profound statement of her value to me. Me knowing that she is with me because she wants me and doesn't need me, would be quite profound to me. I want to be the prize, not life support, I want to be a partner, not an appendage, and I want the same of her, her to be my prize and partner. For not one moment that she is in my life will she ever be able to question my want of her. I have a "girl time" rule, I get 20 minutes a day that she is exclusive to me, sans distraction, she's in my lap and I will shower her in my want for her.

I'm not needy and that comes with some assurances in itself (bear in mind I am poly and "her" infers them):

Fidelity: I don't need to bolster my ego by poking my doink in anyone but her.
Honesty: Not needing her precludes fear of loosing her, and I will not compromise my values by lying... about anything. It will always be what it is, how it is, and not manipulated, distorted, or omitted... names will not be changed to protect the innocent.
Loyalty: It sounds suspiciously like the above, but I am loyal to the bone once that loyalty is earned. I will stand with her, right or wrong, to the end. However, if she's wrong, she'll hear about it, but I'll still stand with her.

Some people have wondered where an /s fits within my selfish, self centered, my way or highway plan. She stands with me, beside me, not behind, beneath, or ahead. I have a life for her to join, I'm not joining her in her life. As most of you know, I am on the mainland waiting... my parents are on palliative care and I've been burying family member, 13 of them, for the last three years. It has been a rough go and I've been doing it alone. It hasn't been 13 people wasting away in a hospital... what brought me back here was my aunt was murdered three years ago, and the other 12 have been a mixture of sudden death and expiration dates, mostly sudden, shocking, and out of the blue. I do have a pretty fucked up life, right now, but I will go home at some point, and want a girl that I want to go with me. All things considered, the time for me to "need" someone has been the last three years. I'm at a point now where I am past grief and need of comfort. After my brother was killed I got pretty numb, now I just accept death and ask who I make the check out to.

Jus sayin


I agree with Firey on this one.
It seems to me that you might be who equating "needing" something with somehow being incomplete/not in control of the controllable parts of their lives - let's be honest here, there are a lot of things in life that no one can possibly ever have control over, but I digress. I find this grossly misdirected way of thinking on the term "need" as it pertains to relationships. Ok, we get it, one doesn't "need" an s or a D in the same way one needs water, or food; but that does not mean that because one will physically suffer and rot away without something they do not "need" it to survive.

I also believe that sometimes we do not realize that we "need" something until we experience it in its ideal and unaltered state - or for some, after we have experienced it and it has gone from us. Similarly to "needing" to be in a D/s relationship. Do we all really "NEED" D/s? No. Of course we don't need it. We want it. But we equate the desire for it with a need because to us, it is something we feel we can not live fully without - even though we really can survive just fine.

On the s side of things, why on earth would I want to give every piece of myself to someone who does not feel they need me, even in the smallest sense of the word? I don't, and I'm willing to bet neither does any other s worth his/her salt that you would really want. [:)]





Kaliko -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 7:46:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PandoraFoxxx


On the s side of things, why on earth would I want to give every piece of myself to someone who does not feel they need me, even in the smallest sense of the word? I don't, and I'm willing to bet neither does any other s worth his/her salt that you would really want.




Well, I like to think I'm worth my salt. [:)]

But no, I don't feel the need (get it?) to have the feeling requited.




PandoraFoxxx -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 7:53:04 PM)

Oh I knew I should have used hyperbole for effect, LOL

Edit: I would personally rather feel needed in its smallest amount than feel like I am disposable (in the bad way, not the hot way *giggles*) Most of my "wants" are pretty fleeting.




ExiledTyrant -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:09:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PandoraFoxxx

Oh I knew I should have used hyperbole for effect, LOL

Edit: I would personally rather feel needed in its smallest amount than feel like I am disposable (in the bad way, not the hot way *giggles*)


Let me try and wrap my feeble mind around this.

You feel invalid if you're not needed, right?

Being chosen out of necessity/need/dependence is what defines the magnitude of your relationship. The very notion that you are "wanted" above all others is insignificant, it is the codependent "need of you" that defines the worth and value of the relationship, right?




Domnotlooking -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:21:47 PM)

You may be over thinking this.




FieryOpal -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:22:51 PM)

Guilty of using hyperbole over here, I know. Obviously the need for air, water and food is undeniably a higher priority than all else, vital necessities.

But when it comes to getting one's needs met, as opposed to getting one's wants met, I see wants as more of would likes.

I would like to retire in Hawaii, which I consider to be my home state. This is a want; it is not a need. I will not pine away or waste away for want of this.
I would like for both of my sons to be happy and successful throughout life. This is a want. If their lives turn out otherwise, then Oh well. I will still love them, value them, and cherish them just as much.
I would like my spoiled rotten kittens to listen to me for real instead of putting on their cute act every day as if they have amnesia and the same rules don't apply anymore. This actually might be a need. But I deal with this unmet need.[sm=hair.gif] Every. freaking. day.

There are a whole lot of Wants on my list. My Needs are fewer, but I won't settle for less than having them met (or trying to get them met). That's the crucial difference. I can't and don't want to do without those.




ExiledTyrant -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:26:31 PM)

Hmmm... I don't recall me ever eluding to my or their needs not being met. I do not "need" to be "needed".




Domnotlooking -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:32:28 PM)

You may be over-congratulating yourself for that.




GoddessManko -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:34:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Domnotlooking

You may be over thinking this.


Over thinking? On the collar chat? NO! [8D]

quote:

I would like for both of my sons to be happy and successful throughout life. This is a want. If their lives turn out otherwise, then Oh well. I will still love them, value them, and cherish them just as much.


Pretty awesome. Kids are the best humans, LOL. I had one (almost teenager) sing about my tragic self sabotage today to the beat of "Eye Of The Tiger". Kind of shared the ridiculously embarrassing story with my family (including my brother and his wife) to give them a good laugh. That's something everyone needs methinkst.




ExiledTyrant -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 8:55:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Domnotlooking

You may be over-congratulating yourself for that.


Do you need to be needed?




Domnotlooking -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 9:02:41 PM)

Like on a cosmological basis where I have a use in the universe? Sure, I mean when I think about it.

But my wife does in fact NEED me. For all kinds of stuff. That's just reality. I'm good with that.

Next week, I have to have some dental surgery done and I'm going to need her a bit too.

Sure, I could hire a nurse or something, but you get my drift.




ExiledTyrant -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 9:24:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Domnotlooking

Like on a cosmological basis where I have a use in the universe? Sure, I mean when I think about it.

But my wife does in fact NEED me. For all kinds of stuff. That's just reality. I'm good with that.

Next week, I have to have some dental surgery done and I'm going to need her a bit too.

Sure, I could hire a nurse or something, but you get my drift.


Yes, I get your drift.

Personally, I am about needed out. I've settled more estates, finalized more interment, and dealt with more legal issues than any reasonable person should ever have to deal with in a lifetime. That was the easiest of all the needy shit I have to deal with on a day to day basis. The last thing I need is another person that needs me. I am very interested in someone that has their shit together and just finds me peachy keen to be around. Not someone I have to fix, micromanage, blah blah blah... soon, my parents will pass away, I will go home, and I want nothing more than to NOT BE NEEDED!

Ideally, fortune favoring the fool, I will find the girl(s) that I will have equilibrium with; wants, needs, likes, dislikes. Failing that, I will sit upon black sands beach day after day and contemplate the age old question that has plagued Hawaiians for generations; Papaya or Mango... mango or papaya for dinner?




Domnotlooking -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 9:51:31 PM)

Yeah, like I said:

Your necessary stoicism of the moment may be making you front harder then you'll need to in the long run.

I too have swum thru some shit to get to my current bliss.

You sound cool, so maybe you can lighten up.




PandoraFoxxx -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 10:01:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant


quote:

ORIGINAL: PandoraFoxxx

Oh I knew I should have used hyperbole for effect, LOL

Edit: I would personally rather feel needed in its smallest amount than feel like I am disposable (in the bad way, not the hot way *giggles*)


Let me try and wrap my feeble mind around this.

You feel invalid if you're not needed, right?

Being chosen out of necessity/need/dependence is what defines the magnitude of your relationship. The very notion that you are "wanted" above all others is insignificant, it is the codependent "need of you" that defines the worth and value of the relationship, right?


No, I do not feel invalid if I am not needed. I personally, value myself regardless of how others feel about me. That's my point here with equating desiring being "needed" with being a needy person. The two are not the same, at all. It's about being treated as valued as opposed to being treated like something that can be easily replaced. :)

I am not co-dependent.




sexyred1 -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 11:20:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Domnotlooking

Like on a cosmological basis where I have a use in the universe? Sure, I mean when I think about it.

But my wife does in fact NEED me. For all kinds of stuff. That's just reality. I'm good with that.

Next week, I have to have some dental surgery done and I'm going to need her a bit too.

Sure, I could hire a nurse or something, but you get my drift.


Yes, I get your drift.

Personally, I am about needed out. I've settled more estates, finalized more interment, and dealt with more legal issues than any reasonable person should ever have to deal with in a lifetime. That was the easiest of all the needy shit I have to deal with on a day to day basis. The last thing I need is another person that needs me. I am very interested in someone that has their shit together and just finds me peachy keen to be around. Not someone I have to fix, micromanage, blah blah blah... soon, my parents will pass away, I will go home, and I want nothing more than to NOT BE NEEDED!

Ideally, fortune favoring the fool, I will find the girl(s) that I will have equilibrium with; wants, needs, likes, dislikes. Failing that, I will sit upon black sands beach day after day and contemplate the age old question that has plagued Hawaiians for generations; Papaya or Mango... mango or papaya for dinner?


I now understand where you are coming from, ET. At first I thought you were being too defensive about semantics, of need vs.mwant.

Everyone goes through times when they are needed out. I will say that even if you have your shit together, no matter who you are, you will eventually need someone, even just for support.

I also firmly believe that when you want someone, and end up,in a relationship with them, you do find yourself needing them, but in a positive, non blood sucking way. ;)




DerangedUnit -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/23/2014 11:49:33 PM)

i can understand where he is coming from. i was always very solitary, to an extreme. what 'friends' i had were people that just latched on and even bosses and clients i was forcing myself to pretend to enjoy the company of because it was required to make money. it made me really sick of the idea of needing anything. the onlything that countered tjat solitude was a person though, in the end i didnt last in my solitude nearly as long as i had hoped ha, but i actually enjoy the company of a human now and dont have to sacrifice or change myself in any way. everyone needs their time alone, and everyone needs someone who just gets them eventually.




ExiledTyrant -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/24/2014 6:22:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

I also firmly believe that when you want someone, and end up,in a relationship with them, you do find yourself needing them, but in a positive, non blood sucking way. ;)


Exactly. I have no desire to enter a relationship predicated on "need", it should evolve to that, not begin with it.




handym30 -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/24/2014 12:36:17 PM)

You have to be happy with yourself, in all aspects of life. There are a lot of good aspects that have been said here.

Having another person that is involved with you, for myself they have to be self sufficent to in all aspects. I don't need to fix them, been there done that, it never works.




NorthernGent -> RE: Reasonable Expectations (9/24/2014 2:34:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

quote:

ORIGINAL: littleladybug

Are you SURE you don't have a Y chromosome? LOL

Amen...and totally agreed.


[sm=ugh.gif] TOTALLY and UNEQUIVOCALLY SURE!

(Sh-sh, don't let the secret get out that we gals know these guys tend to need us more than we might need them. [;)] )

-----
@NorthernGent

"A knacker is a person in the trade of rendering animals that have died on farms or are unfit for human consumption, such as horses that can no longer work."
"1 British : a buyer of worn-out domestic animals or their carcasses for use especially as animal food or fertilizer."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knacker
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/knacker

This is more of a British English or Irish English term, and rarely used in American vernacular. So no, it isn't usually a colloquialism of ours. It may be commonly used within certain family in-groups, however, of English or Irish origin.

[ETA emoticons]


I see.

In England it is a term used only in the North East, and as such it caught my attention: has it travelled to foreign shores? why? is this the beginning of the 21st century enlightenment? I had no idea it was used in Ireland.

Anyway, Exiled Tyrant was pretty empathetic and gave the whole thing short shrift, but thank you for adding some meat to the bones.

If it helps, and for anyone still reading, knacker is usually followed by useless.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.445313E-02