DarkSteven
Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: smileforme50 quote:
ORIGINAL: Creative Dominant Butttt...those contracts specify pay for performance. Since you don't pay a slave, what the are you going to put down in these contracts as remuneration for duties performed? Spankings? Fun, but not legal tender. Whippings? Might draw legal eyes? Good food and fucking? Again, fun...but not legal tender. Just because you don't give a slave actual money doesn't mean she doesn't get financial support, or anything tangible in return. quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven In order for a contract to be legally binding, each party must receive some kind of benefit (consideration) in the contract. A one-sided contract would not hold up. It's obvious what the slave gives. What does the slave receive, that could be contractually written? A comfortable home....clothes on her back....food....health care. Can't someone hire someone to work in their home and provide all the things that they need to live....but not necessarily give them money? Wouldn't that still be legal? So the contract says that one party agrees to give the other party unquestioned service, and the other party agrees to give first party the basic essentials they need to live. It's not one sided. And as long as you don't use the words "slave" or "Master" or "property" or "own" etc....why can't it be a binding contract? I don't understand why everybody here thinks that the slave doesn't receive any tangible benefits that have some kind of monetary value. And why can't it be written into a contract that s/he will receive these things from the other party? Good point. I actually was a party to a contract like that once. I was a board member on a synagogue, and we had a small cottage on the property. We had a caretaker couple live in the cottage and they gave us ten hours of work per week doing custodial work, etc., in return for free rent. So, yes, it's possible, although of course sex cannot be a term of the contract. quote:
ORIGINAL: amaster5 If I am am understanding what the OP intends with this contract, and please correct me if I am mistaken, but he seems to be looking for a contract which he can not, at a later date, change his mind and chose to end said contract. One of the basic tenants of contract law is, it must be a mutually consensual agreement between both parties (you can hold a gun to someone's head and make them sign a piece of paper, but the contract is null and void if they can prove they were coerced) and unfortunately, along the lines of that mutually consensual idea is, any contract can be canceled, somehow. Any contract which claims to have provisions in it which make it 'uncancelable' would never be considered legally enforceable. Of course you can specify the method of cancellation...so that is something there. But basically speaking there is no way to make a contract which is legally binding which can't be withdrawn from assuming conditions set out are met. So no, I know I am long winded about coming to the point, but you simply can not make a LEGALLY BINDING, contract where your choice to withdraw from it is completely taken from you. No matter what wording you choose to use. Sort of. The contract can contain a penalty for violating it, akin to the Early Termination Fee of cell phone contracts. The problem is that the more onerous the penalty, the more effective it will be but also the greater chance that a judge would nullify the contract. To be honest, I'm having a hard time reconciling the concept of a binding legal contract with M/s, which I consider voluntary and nonbinding.
_____________________________
"You women.... The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs... Quit fretting. We men love you."
|