RE: Interesting Point

RE: Interesting Point (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 10:00:43 AM)
Actually zonie, no When am I ever "strongly attacked" on here. Usually the best offered up here against me are cheap low-brow insults... I don't follow people around slinging childish personal attacks at them as others here do, though when slimed I can and often do give a full serving of snark back, complete with a desert topping And I generally strive to keep threads on topic despite what the troll brigade brings as opposed to their deliberate derails I never demand apologies, ever. I know that it matters not what the trolls throw at me as they only discredit themselves with their over reliance on personal attacks and lack of facts or logic

Lucylastic -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 11:00:11 AM)
lololol [image]local://upfiles/228382/7EFC0D9A7481454D95786AB8E8F46843.jpg[/image]

Musicmystery -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 4:48:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery And yet, when for hundreds of years your dire predictions didn't happen...but suddenly that's the threat of undoing Citizens United for you and the masters you parrot. So much for honesty. So you never did condemn the crony leftist elites. The very best you can do to answer, is try to deflect. Then you reach low for your standard crutch, the personal attack Interesting that you take history as a personal attack. See a shrink about that. The point here is that doing away with the transparency that served us well for years is not a step toward transparency, whatever talking points you parrot. The "masters you parrot" line is a personal attack As is your "See a shrink about that" line As is your "whatever talking points you parrot" line You don't even realize that these cheap personal attacks are practically all that you and your fellow far left ideologues really have in any given "debate" do you Step one: the talking heads rant about their talking points. Step two: you repeat them. Now reality is a personal attack to you. Talk about paranoia.

Sanity -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 6:22:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Step one: the talking heads rant about their talking points. Step two: you repeat them. Your thread is based on a talking point

Musicmystery -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 6:40:14 PM)
You might address that point, instead of dodging it.

Sanity -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 7:01:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery You might address that point Why. Are you out of on topic posts to troll?

Musicmystery -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 7:18:09 PM)
Still got nothing, huh? * yawn *

Edwynn -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 7:53:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi ... Now I don't agree with a lot of what he says but that doesn't change the fact that he has a small group who jump on anything he says and often bring his name up in threads he hasn't even commented on yet. I am not one of the people in that group. I did not instigate the exchange, he did. I do not "jump on anything he says." I have never brought his name up in any thread, either before or after he commented. Speak to what actually transpired (which you did, however incompletely) but leave all the rest of the crap you made up that I have nothing at all to do with out of it.

Edwynn -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 8:27:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted I don't always agree with Sanity, but there does seem to be a group of people here who jump from thread to thread throwing out insults every time he posts. Which, as I understand it at least, is against the rules even in Feisty. Since he imposes himself on every single thread in this forum, does that mean that everybody else commenting in that thread is 'jumping from thread to thread' just to follow him around? Highly unlikely. Are you saying that all the other people who are habitually commenting in many threads are there just to stalk him? Did you actually think about that before you typed it? Most people would rather avoid him (I certainly would), and any thread would be that much cleaner with out the inanities he insists on polluting virtually every thread with. The scenario is that he made a comment in response to one of my posts (read post and responses) which had zero and zilch to do with anything I said, involved no thought whatsoever, and was nothing other than fatuous, inane, and irrelevant. My response to his -'I need to take a mental shit ... oh here's a good place'- "comment" to my post, that response wherin I merely told him that his meaningless (in every sense of the word) 'response' was with out thought troubled him, as anything truthful usually does. So he called it a personal attack, which it clearly was not. After that I got fed up with his incessant false accusations and torturous non sequitur, and being aimed at me in this case, I let him have it and did indeed make a 'personal attack.' If people have an issue with how I deal with idiots who attack my posts with no thought whatsoever, then I would say that ... You have issues.

Sanity -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 8:37:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwynn Since he imposes himself on every single thread in this forum... Is that a blatant lie, or are you hallucinating?

Edwynn -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 9:02:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Edwynn Since he imposes himself on every single thread in this forum... Is that a blatant lie, But then: quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity And I generally strive to keep threads on topic ... So is that. Though mine wasn't nearly as funny.

Sanity -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 9:05:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwynn quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Edwynn Since he imposes himself on every single thread in this forum... Is that a blatant lie, But then: quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity And I generally strive to keep threads on topic ... So is that. Though mine wasn't nearly as funny. Generally doesnt mean always or perfectly

Edwynn -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 9:15:21 PM)
The lie was in fact in the word "generally."

Edwynn -> RE: Interesting Point (10/30/2014 11:03:56 PM)
~NM~

Sanity -> RE: Interesting Point (10/31/2014 5:34:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwynn The lie was in fact in the word "generally." QFT "Usually the best offered up here against me are cheap low-brow insults..."

Lucylastic -> RE: Interesting Point (10/31/2014 5:55:42 AM)
You miss many higher brow insults cos you cant comprehend them. so its pointless, so its easier to use what you are used to. [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

Zonie63 -> RE: Interesting Point (10/31/2014 7:17:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Actually zonie, no When am I ever "strongly attacked" on here. Usually the best offered up here against me are cheap low-brow insults... I don't follow people around slinging childish personal attacks at them as others here do, though when slimed I can and often do give a full serving of snark back, complete with a desert topping And I generally strive to keep threads on topic despite what the troll brigade brings as opposed to their deliberate derails I never demand apologies, ever. I know that it matters not what the trolls throw at me as they only discredit themselves with their over reliance on personal attacks and lack of facts or logic I'm just saying that it takes two to tango and the criticisms you're making can go both ways. Complaining about insults around here is like complaining about fast drivers at the Indy 500. I don't really care about insults, although there are times when I genuinely wish to know where someone is coming from and how they reached their particular viewpoint. That makes it a bit more personalized than the typical canned arguments one might get.

Page: << < prev 5 6 7 8 [9]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875