camille65
Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007 From: Austin Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 quote:
ORIGINAL: littleladybug quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 Yes, that would change the relationship and to me, "husband/life partner" means someone you have sex and intimacy with as an expression of love.. any relationship without that is simply friendship.. I need the intimacy and feeling of connection that sex and cuddling and kissing and touching gives.. without that (for me) there is no love or "bond".. Without sex and intimacy and touching, one day I woke up and realized I no longer loved him.. without the sex and cuddling, touching, etc my feelings of love simply died over time.. so to put it into a relationship equation (for me).. Love = sex & sex = Love Why would I deny myself the chance to find Love again???????? And, that's the point. *For you* or *for me*, this is what it is about. My comments here were to someone who professed "not to understand" how someone could consider a relationship with a "life partner" without sex. "Life partner"...such an interesting term *for me*. When my fiancee passed away, we had some discussions as to how to refer to me in the obituary. I didn't want "fiancee". "Life partner" was suggested. When the obit was printed, the general consensus was that people who didn't know us would just assume that we were a same sex couple-- as his name was androgynous. We got a very good chuckle from that. Actually, as I was typing that, I thought that it was just going to be a random aside. But, I think it goes to the issue here, as I see it. I've never been one for "labels" or "categories" of people, including myself. Just not my thing. But here we are, in this forum, on this thread, speaking about that very thing. We all make our assumptions, and have our own views about people and relationships. Such is the beauty of life, IMO. Another "beauty of life" is the ability...albeit too rare, IMO...to respect others. It's not a question about "understanding" or not, it's an issue of respect. There were a heck of a lot of people in my life who didn't "understand" my relationship with my fiancee. But they respected it. One example was our age difference, with him being 25 years older than me. I can't even count how many conversations I had about that issue. I don't recall if anyone prefaced their comments with "I don't understand how....", but I *can* tell you that if they did, that was the last I spoke with them. The implication to me when someone does that is that they're trying to put forth their own views as the "right way" or that some sort of explanation is *necessary*. Certainly, we may not understand a lot of things...but the issue becomes, to me, are we willing to learn, and at the end very well say, "cool, not what I would do, or how I see things, but have at it"? Insofar as the topic of this thread goes...I'm still not sure that I fully *understand* asexuality. And there's a *spectrum* to boot?? In all seriousness though, from what I can grasp of it, it doesn't seem to be a trait that I would want in a partner. IMO, there's a VAST difference in saying it that way, versus "I don't understand why anyone would want to be in a relationship with such a person." Of course, in both instances, I'm speaking from my own perspective. One just shows a lot more respect than the other. a lot of people don't understand aspects of some other's lives cuz its foreign to them.. just like some Americans think the US is "the greatest country in the world" and can't possibly understand why I would not want to gratefully become an American citizen.. or just as I don't really understand how anyone can start do hard (or even soft) drugs and risk possibly go on to a life of drug addiction.. I know I cant do those things cuz that isn't me, (partly) its not how I was brought up, (partly) it was about things I thought about, analyzed in my mind and rejected long ago.. Greta is from a different country and so if she has a different experience of how things are in her country & how she was brought up, then that is how she sees it or perhaps English is a second language to her and she isn't as adept at expressing things exactly as nitpickers are online do.. I always try to qualify things I say with a "(for me)" or a "as I see it" for those people that are so.. exacting.. and even then, some still try to twist what I have said/meant to say.. I had a friend that had MS, it hit her hard and fast.. she knew she was going to die at some point (she was bedridden in hospital for quite some time) but her thoughts were more about who would take care of her husband and young son when she was gone.. Some people might find it strange that not only did her husband have a girlfriend but that she and her husband and his girlfriend went out shopping together... And that is part of the thing about not having sex with your life partner any more.. does the person no longer able to provide that (thru whatever situation) want the one they supposedly care about and supposedly love to be a martyr and suffer with that? (my husband would never have agreed to me seeking sex elsewhere btw) I would say that if you are no longer able to be that person to her/him then you should not be selfish and require them to suffer that.. even if it means you risk losing them.. Marriages/relationships end for a variety of reasons.. for most couples its due to differences in handing money, not due to sex differences.. is ending a relationship due to money differences/problems more acceptable??? and remember, that here in the US some people even want to know a potential mates credit score prior to dating (as a spouse with a bad credit score can become your credit score)... I freely admit that I'm one of those who are exacting about words in print, for me semantics really do matter and the smallest inflection can utterly change the meaning for me. That is why I tend to be rather careful about the words I choose. In turn I (probably unfairly) expect the same from others. Particularly when it comes to declarative statements. As to relationships that are not physical, I'm thankful that my owner is patient and an understanding man. Due to medication I was essentially asexual for about six years, the very concept of sex was incredibly remote and not something that occurred naturally to my brain. I was oblivious to sexual overtures and sexual situations, sexuality itself as a concept was gone. While I'm now past that incredibly weird time in my life, I have a litany of medical problems that often leave me essentially crippled at times. There are days where a simple touch is horrifically painful and not the fun kind of painful lol. Times when I cannot bear the touch of nipple clamps or even silken bonds. Thankfully he doesn't look at me as see someone useless for his needs. It may not be what he wanted in a submissive but he is accepting and supporting of me, of my health issues.
_____________________________
~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).
|