quote:

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.
Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a300383445d5a90dd6ca764c9e15/house-intel-panel-debunks-many-benghazi-theories

quote:

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.
Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

Shocking how that didn't get wall to wall coverage on FNC when the report was issued yesterday.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a300383445d5a90dd6ca764c9e15/house-intel-panel-debunks-many-benghazi-theories

quote:

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.
Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

Shocking how that didn't get wall to wall coverage on FNC when the report was issued yesterday.

New Headline: DomKen admits he watches FoxNews wall to wall.

ETA: I'm glad they didn't find any proof of wrongdoing during the attack. Now, how about we look at the Administrations lying about who and why?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Why bother, we didnt look into the who and why of the adminstrations lying about Iraq and so on in the W day.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Really. What Congressional investigations were those?

Instead . . . here's what ACTUALLY happened -- your favorite "leftist" protected Bush:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/us/politics/12inquire.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/12/02/wikileaks-obama-administration-secretly-worked-to-prevent-prosecution-of-war-crimes-by-the-bush-administration/

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Really. What Congressional investigations were those?

Instead . . . here's what ACTUALLY happened -- your favorite "leftist" protected Bush:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/us/politics/12inquire.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/12/02/wikileaks-obama-administration-secretly-worked-to-prevent-prosecution-of-war-crimes-by-the-bush-administration/

Did I write "congressional investigation"

No

I was referring primarily to the massive propaganda efforts

Re your point about Barack and other leftists... As if anything happens in a vacuum

These leftists didnt want the fact that every Democrat on the hill (going back beyond Bill Clinton) backed the liberation effort and was fully aware of all the available intelligence prior to the invasion spilled all over the place

They knew their propaganda would be ruined by the truth

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Full troll mode = every other word is the word "you"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Really. What Congressional investigations were those?

Instead . . . here's what ACTUALLY happened -- your favorite "leftist" protected Bush:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/us/politics/12inquire.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/12/02/wikileaks-obama-administration-secretly-worked-to-prevent-prosecution-of-war-crimes-by-the-bush-administration/

Did I write "congressional investigation"

No

I was referring primarily to the massive propaganda efforts

Re your point about Barack and other leftists... As if anything happens in a vacuum

These leftists didnt want the fact that every Democrat on the hill (going back beyond Bill Clinton) backed the liberation effort and was fully aware of all the available intelligence prior to the invasion spilled all over the place

They knew their propaganda would be ruined by the truth

Well since the topic is a chant of Congressional Republicans, I thought you'd like to stay on topic. I know how you get when people try to deflect the topic. [8|]

There's a reason he's Bush Lite. When it suits your purpose, they're all the same. When it conflicts with your parroted talking points, they're different in your mind.

It's hard to have discussions with you since you cling so hard to falsity. It's no "secret" that "every Democrat on the hill" supported the invasion (it's hardly been a "liberation"). They did vote, you know, as a matter of public record.

[8|]

quote:

Now, how about we look at the Administrations lying about who and why?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a300383445d5a90dd6ca764c9e15/house-intel-panel-debunks-many-benghazi-theories

quote:

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.
Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

Shocking how that didn't get wall to wall coverage on FNC when the report was issued yesterday.

New Headline: DomKen admits he watches FoxNews wall to wall.

ETA: I'm glad they didn't find any proof of wrongdoing during the attack. Now, how about we look at the Administrations lying about who and why?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Full troll mode = every other word is the word "you"

Now the very act of addressing you is "full troll mode"? You are a strange one indeed.

It's the second person pronoun, used when talking to another person. See, that's what a discussion is.

you
yo͞o,yə/
pronoun
pronoun: you

1.
used to refer to the person or people that the speaker is addressing.
"are you listening?"
used to refer to the person being addressed together with other people regarded in the same class.
"you Australians"
used in exclamations to address one or more people.
"you fools"
2.
used to refer to any person in general.
"after a while, you get used to it"

Origin
Old English ēow, accusative and dative of gē (see ye1); related to Dutch u and German euch . During the 14th century you began to replace ye1, thou1, and thee; by the 17th century it had become the ordinary second person pronoun for any number and case.
Translate you to
Use over time for: you

dis·cus·sion
dəˈskəSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: discussion

the action or process of talking about something, typically in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.
"the proposals are not a blueprint but ideas for discussion"
* a conversation or debate about a certain topic.
plural noun: discussions
"discussions about environmental improvement programs"
synonyms: conversation, talk, dialogue, discourse, conference, debate, exchange of views, consultation, deliberation; More
powwow, chat, tête-à-tête, heart-to-heart, huddle;
negotiations, parley;
informalconfab, chitchat, rap (session), skull session, bull session;
formalconfabulation, colloquy
"a long discussion with her husband"
* a detailed treatment of a particular topic in speech or writing.
synonyms: examination, exploration, analysis, study; More

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Really. What Congressional investigations were those?

Instead . . . here's what ACTUALLY happened -- your favorite "leftist" protected Bush:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/us/politics/12inquire.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/12/02/wikileaks-obama-administration-secretly-worked-to-prevent-prosecution-of-war-crimes-by-the-bush-administration/

Did I write "congressional investigation"

No

I was referring primarily to the massive propaganda efforts

Re your point about Barack and other leftists... As if anything happens in a vacuum

These leftists didnt want the fact that every Democrat on the hill (going back beyond Bill Clinton) backed the liberation effort and was fully aware of all the available intelligence prior to the invasion spilled all over the place

They knew their propaganda would be ruined by the truth

Well since the topic is a chant of Congressional Republicans, I thought you'd like to stay on topic. I know how you get when people try to deflect the topic. [8|]

There's a reason he's Bush Lite. When it suits your purpose, they're all the same. When it conflicts with your parroted talking points, they're different in your mind.

It's hard to have discussions with you since you cling so hard to falsity. It's no "secret" that "every Democrat on the hill" supported the invasion (it's hardly been a "liberation"). They did vote, you know, as a matter of public record.

[8|]

# of words you ignored instead of addressing: 114

# of words you saw: 7

When it's not about you, nothing registers.

What an ego. But the rest of us are discussing reality.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Shocking how that didn't get wall to wall coverage on FNC when the report was issued yesterday.

Shocking how you didn't quite convey the content of the story...

The report did find, however, that the State Department facility where Stevens and Smith were killed was not well-protected... that State Department security agents knew they could not defend it from a well-armed attack... that requests for security improvements were not acted upon in Washington.

Thanks for playing.

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

Now, how about we look at the Administrations lying about who and why?

If you look in the report you will find where this was addressed as well. It was determined that immediately following the attack all available intelligence pointed to a protest over the video. So the information given out by the Obama administration was correct. Later it was determined to be both a protest and a terrorist attack. Otherwise EVERY thing was truthful...correct...and handled properly and professionally.
There is no getting around the fact the the Republican party falsely accused the administration of incompetence and wrong doing simply for political gain.
Butch