DesideriScuri -> RE: I HATE Rioting (12/2/2014 3:38:00 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy Civil unrest serves notice on the rest of the nation to pay attention to the underclass. The underclass has been devastated by the war on drugs, foreclosures, the great recession, under-performing schools, and the outsourcing of jobs overseas. Combine this with a local police department full of out-of-district white cops who prey on the local populace via fines, citations, bench warrants, and drug arrests and you have a recipe for problems. I'm not mad at the people in Ferguson, I'm concerned for our nation. The underlying causes of this disturbance remain fully in place. School reforms mandating testing and "teacher accountability" have failed to improve anything since 2000. Wages remain stagnant. Employer's don't pay living wages or offer decent benefits packages. On top of all that, the police are hassling you. ----- "It's not a war on drugs, don't ever think it's a war on drugs. It's a war on the blacks, it started as a war on the blacks," says Ed Burns, the co-creator of the television show The Wire. "It's now spread [to] the Hispanics and poor whites, but initially it was a war on blacks. And it was designed, basically, to take that energy that was coming out of the civil rights movement and destroy it." Ed Burns of THE WIRE http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestoryus2012/2012/08/2012823103039675592.html How do you explain riots after a sports team loses their championship game (or even when they win, sometimes)? Is there some sort of attention needing to be paid to those fans or their team? Riots can do what you state. But, that's not the only reason we have them. And, how often are the riots focused on the ones doing the affronting deed? In Ferguson, they oppose how they perceive cops treat blacks (accurate in their perceptions or not), so they riot and destroy businesses? There's a difference between destroying police property and private property that has no ties to the cops (other than relying on the police for public defense, as any other business). That's what blows my mind more than anything else. How does standing up to police oppression by destroying store fronts and looting stores make any sense at all? That's going to impact those stores more than the police. Plus, how is standing up to police oppression by breaking the law make any sense? You're shining a spotlight on abuse by inviting legitimate police action?!?
|
|
|
|