mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitYakin quote:
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery So are you against using waterboarding or for it? Or does it depend on which party tells you? I know this won't be popular but I will share, anyway. I don't think the first question (part) is as black-and-white as some might. If it could be proven to me that torture had saved an innocent life, I might be able to condone it. Of course, at that point, I'd have the benefit of hindsight but let me put it a different way: Your child/grandchild/significant other/cute innocent little kid from down the block/pick your victim has been taken hostage by an evil doer of any stripe (kidnapper/rapist/terrorist/whatever). The authorities believe that if they use some extreme methods, your loved one might be found alive. I cannot totally condemn getting the car battery and jumper cables, at that point. I wish I could claim to be more evolved than that but I can't. As a neutral concept, of course I'm against torture, always, but when I make it personal, the value of standing on principles lessons compared to my desire to keep my loved ones safe. Michael I have to say I think that's one of the most realistic posts on this subject I've heard yet... kind of reminds me a lil of the anti-gun people who say, if it saves JUST ONE LIFE blahhhhhhhhhh blahhhhhhhhhhhh blahhhhhhhhhh now let the attacks begin, or is it resume.... Here is the blah blah blah, if it does save lives, then the CIA has accurate, credible, citable, researchable documentation of that fact. Show the fucking stuff. The game is over.
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|