Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: BREAKING NEWS


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: BREAKING NEWS Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 8:05:54 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

So are you against using waterboarding or for it?

Or does it depend on which party tells you?



I know this won't be popular but I will share, anyway.

I don't think the first question (part) is as black-and-white as some might.

If it could be proven to me that torture had saved an innocent life, I might be able to condone it. Of course, at that point, I'd have the benefit of hindsight but let me put it a different way:

Your child/grandchild/significant other/cute innocent little kid from down the block/pick your victim has been taken hostage by an evil doer of any stripe (kidnapper/rapist/terrorist/whatever). The authorities believe that if they use some extreme methods, your loved one might be found alive.

I cannot totally condemn getting the car battery and jumper cables, at that point. I wish I could claim to be more evolved than that but I can't.

As a neutral concept, of course I'm against torture, always, but when I make it personal, the value of standing on principles lessons compared to my desire to keep my loved ones safe.



Michael


So first, thanks for actually addressing the issue, Michael. And for taking it out of the partisan bullshit for an honest look.

I don't know whether your position is unpopular, but it makes sense to me. Like many issues, it's not cut and dried. It's complicated. And you've nicely painted out why.

The deciding factors for me in this instance are:
- what's the quality of coerced intel? evidence suggests people just say whatever you want to hear.
- we've already thoroughly investigated the cost/benefits of torture long ago (we didn't come to this all pristine)...somebody just decided wtf, let's do it.
- the risk to our personnel as torturers is high -- that's the concern over the report and in prosecution of our war criminals (which seems a little backwards to me, but I get the point anyway)

I do get the point you raise about the pressure of the moment. But this is the military and central intelligence -- they are (supposedly) experienced and well-trained, not immature hacks. Until civilian leadership decides to ignore their experienced counsel and just make it up as they go for political and ego purposes (which is what I believe happened here).

Thanks for your thoughts.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 8:25:53 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

So first, thanks for actually addressing the issue, Michael. And for taking it out of the partisan bullshit for an honest look.



One tries.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I don't know whether your position is unpopular, but it makes sense to me. Like many issues, it's not cut and dried. It's complicated. And you've nicely painted out why.

The deciding factors for me in this instance are:
- what's the quality of coerced intel? evidence suggests people just say whatever you want to hear.
- we've already thoroughly investigated the cost/benefits of torture long ago (we didn't come to this all pristine)...somebody just decided wtf, let's do it.
- the risk to our personnel as torturers is high -- that's the concern over the report and in prosecution of our war criminals (which seems a little backwards to me, but I get the point anyway)



Yep. I know the consensus that tells us that no useful information is obtained from torture. I don't know if I can make that a blanket statement. I have known people that have sworn to me that they've used "torture" (I put that in quotations because to be fair, they described it as "a little physically violent persuasion" which could mean just a slap in the face in a police interrogation room) and got useable information or "intel".



quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I do get the point you raise about the pressure of the moment. But this is the military and central intelligence -- they are (supposedly) experienced and well-trained, not immature hacks. Until civilian leadership decides to ignore their experienced counsel and just make it up as they go for political and ego purposes (which is what I believe happened here).

Thanks for your thoughts.



Yep. The military and CIA are professionals who are supposed to remain emotionally neutral. One of the points I was trying to make in the first post was that if my grandchild were in danger, it would (presumably) be the emotionally neutral authorities who would be conducting the interview to get the potential life-saving information.

My eldest son was a Marine from 1998 until his death in 2012. He was in Bosnia, twice, Afghanistan, twice, Iraq, four times and he was killed in Syria. At any time, he could have been taken hostage. If the CIA or Marine Corps came to me and said: "We've got a scumbag from ISIS and we're almost positive he knows where your son is being held. You have heard what these scumbags are capable of. If we beat the guy's balls off, we might be able to find your son and mount a rescue ... or, should we stand on ceremony?"

I wouldn't have to think for too terribly long before I gave my answer.

I do realize that my only reason for that course of action is as I stated, earlier in this post: I'm not thoroughly convinced that torture doesn't work. People I trust have told me, otherwise.



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 12/10/2014 8:27:01 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 8:26:29 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
That's pretty much the story our government sold us, but 11 years later they still haven't offered any proof. They're just playing to our emotions to cloud the issue. It's been really difficult for me to accept the fact that as a nation we still need to debate whether or not torture is bad. We executed Japanese soldiers for doing the same thing under the same pretense.

"R. John Pritchard, a historian and lawyer who is a top scholar on the trials, said the Japanese felt the ends justified the means. "The rapid and effective collection of intelligence then, as now, was seen as vital to a successful struggle, and in addition, those who were engaged in torture often felt that whatever pain and anguish was suffered by the victims of torture was nothing less than the just deserts of the victims or people close to them."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2007/dec/18/john-mccain/history-supports-mccains-stance-on-waterboarding/

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 11:27:04 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

FR

Barack nods his head and entire families die in drone strikes, and leftists then happily lick the shittiest parts of Baracks nether regions as if they are candy

But another administration from a different political party supposedly exposing the worst of the worst of al Qaeda masterminds to loud music or whatever, calls for war crime trial?

And you say this is t about politics?

Really?

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 11:43:42 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Why didn't the drone program bother you under Bush? Oh yeah...another administration from a different political party.

And when did waterboarding become "loud music"?

We get that, for you, everything is about politics. But despite your "ridicule as if argument" response, Michael laid out clearly the non-partisan issues. It's not about parties -- it's about people, consequences, long term thinking vs. hot-headed reaction. The real world is more complicated than Rs and Ds.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 12:53:19 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
The 'ticking timebomb' mentality, was the justification to use 'enhanced interrogation techniques' on 'enemy combants'. Lets break the G. W. Bush administration's bullshit down into real terms:

'Enemy Combatant'.

Did we declare war on Al Qaeda? The simple answer is 'No'. Al Qaeda is not a nation, so Congress declaring war on them would not work. But it worked in the Bush administration's favor, because many treaties the nation holds world-wide would dictate anyone caught during fighting with our forces would be subjected to the Geneva Conventions related to Prisoners of War. That those POW's would be treated at a much higher level than 'enemy combatants'.

Further, the G. W. Bush administration decided to transport them to a small chunk of land on Cuba rather than any of the fifty states of the nation. Why? That administration lied about the 8th amendment. One of the first things most law students are taught is that the purpose of the US Constitution is to explain the powers of the federal government, and its limits to.....ALL PERSONS...found under its control. Would the enemy combatants, whom are controlled by the US Military, whom is controlled by the US Government, be limited by the 8th amendment? 'Yes'. But anyone daring to say that during that administration was branded 'a sympathizer to evil' And that is how tyranny can start; being afraid of holding government accountable and responsible when it does something wrong. All those that re-elected Mr. Bush to a second term, either didnt know the 8th amendment existed, or, were fully 'oik' with it being violated.

'enhanced interrogation techiques'

Basically, a politically correct way of saying torture. I have always found it amusing that every host on FOX 'news' and many conservative talk radio hosts, believe that water boarding is not torture. Yet, not a single one of them would subject themselves to the process to metaphorically.....'put their money were their mouth was'. They were all in lock-step with the G. W. Bush administration's viewpoint. In reality, water boarding....*IS* ....torture. So if that practice, or any of the other numerous practices explained in the Senate report are true; it is torture. And torture is not allowed per the 8th amendment. How many Americans could recite or explain what the 8th amendment covers?

'A ticking timbomb'.

The TV series '24' was known for this concept (apart from Keither Sutherland being tortured or torturing someone else). That the 'ends justify the means' when dealing with someone that might have intel regarding an imminent threat to people. The Senate report shows not one instance did the torture used, give 'actionable intelligence' of information. They used torture for the sake of torturing, nothing more. Many of those individuals probably viewed that if they gave any real intelligence, they would be killed by their jailers or by others once outside of that prison; what did they have to gain from it? In fact, many times, those individuals gave false or not-entirely-true information.

The G. W. Bush administration violated not only the 8th amendment, but the 5th and 6th amendments. If an illegal alien is pick up by the police for 'bordering hopping', they do receive legal counsel even if they cant afford it (found under the 6th amendment). If that was true for a non-US Citizen, would it be the same for a foreign national terrorist? 'Yes'. So why was the members of that administration not held accountable and responsible with their power by those whom elected them to office? Because to those people, the 'ends justify the means'.

What does it mean to be an enemy combatant?

You have no freedoms nor even simply human dignities, and the government can do....anything....to you, including torture. Curious how over fifty million Americans are 'ok' with this view point, since they reelected Mr. Bush back in 2004. I suspect some of our more....conservative/libertarians....on this forum also support the notion of 'enemy combatants' and 'enhanced interrogation techniques'. They just cant say it publically. But if you touch a single hair on their head, or touch their guns, they will cry foul louder than a E.L.E. event on planet Earth!

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 5:16:47 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why didn't the drone program bother you under Bush? Oh yeah...another administration from a different political party.

And when did waterboarding become "loud music"?

We get that, for you, everything is about politics. But despite your "ridicule as if argument" response, Michael laid out clearly the non-partisan issues. It's not about parties -- it's about people, consequences, long term thinking vs. hot-headed reaction. The real world is more complicated than Rs and Ds.


"You, you, you"

I am not the topic here

Go troll on someone else for a while







< Message edited by Sanity -- 12/10/2014 5:31:40 PM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 5:30:33 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

The military and CIA are professionals who are supposed to remain emotionally neutral.


Who get thrown under the bus at the drop of a hat if ever the Dems need a distraction

Just so happens Jonathon Gruber was testifying before congress on the day this "breaking news" hit the fan

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 5:50:06 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Thats what I mean by "codify" butch...The Bush administration took a practice that was illegal in its entirety(under our system of laws) ,a violation of the Geneva Convention(which we are a signatory to)and in direct contradiction of our values as a people and made a tortured(pun intended)case for the legality of these heinous practices.
As I said ....I was ashamed when my country went down this road and I remain ashamed today
This country is supposed to be better than that...and I believe is ,in fact,better than that...I am heartened that Sen.McCain chose to stand with Sen. Feinstein and once again declare that torture is anathema to our values




"Dam yooooooooo!!!"


Interesting point Sanity

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 5:55:18 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Did you watch any of it??? or just read the spin.

http://www.c-span.org/video/?323115-1/hearing-jonathan-gruber-marilyn-tavenner-health-care-enrollment
heres a handy dandy link.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 6:03:03 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

What is wrong with you? On SO MANY LEVELS you just DON'T GET IT.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/10/2014 8:08:01 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why didn't the drone program bother you under Bush? Oh yeah...another administration from a different political party.

And when did waterboarding become "loud music"?

We get that, for you, everything is about politics. But despite your "ridicule as if argument" response, Michael laid out clearly the non-partisan issues. It's not about parties -- it's about people, consequences, long term thinking vs. hot-headed reaction. The real world is more complicated than Rs and Ds.


"You, you, you"

I am not the topic here

Go troll on someone else for a while



Not about you, Ego Boy.

Address the questions and points instead of whining, and there will be *gasp* discussion.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 12:05:40 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


As I said ....I was ashamed when my country went down this road and I remain ashamed today
This country is supposed to be better than that...and I believe is ,in fact,better than that...I am heartened that Sen.McCain chose to stand with Sen. Feinstein and once again declare that torture is anathema to our values


I wouldn't be so depressed if I was you mike. Just as it takes a big person to admit their mistakes publicly, it takes a big country to admit its past mistakes publicly. That deserves respect. This report and the admissions it includes will go some way to repairing the many hits the US's reputation took under the Bush Administration. So kudos to the US.

I can't imagine the same thing happening here, where anything that comes under the rubric "operational military" (ie. anything that our military actually does) is kept hidden from public view by our defence chiefs and politicians, aided and abetted by a quiescent media that acts as little more than cheerleaders for the Australian Defence Forces (ADF). While I have no doubt that the ADF has used such practices (and might very well continue to do so) for the life of me, I can't see them admitting it publicly. Not in a million years.

That said it is sad that such a progressive initiative is cheapened by some (are you listening Sanity?) who are using the report's publication to attempt to score (very dubious) political points.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 12/11/2014 12:12:27 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 4:20:43 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Our allies will be extremely hesitant to share intel with us in the future as the Democrats are also throwing many of them under the bus in this

Purely for political reasons

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 4:46:46 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Why didn't the drone program bother you under Bush? Oh yeah...another administration from a different political party.

And when did waterboarding become "loud music"?

We get that, for you, everything is about politics. But despite your "ridicule as if argument" response, Michael laid out clearly the non-partisan issues. It's not about parties -- it's about people, consequences, long term thinking vs. hot-headed reaction. The real world is more complicated than Rs and Ds.


"You, you, you"

I am not the topic here

Go troll on someone else for a while



Not about you, Ego Boy.

Address the questions and points instead of whining, and there will be *gasp* discussion.


Grow up little Johnny

Try hard

Focus

Discuss the topic, rather than me

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 5:07:20 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
so did you watch the testimony gruber gave ??


Now how important is someone calling the american public stupid, even in the same universe as a six year (in the making), report on the "torture"
since 2008 the righties have been hounding every scandal , how many hearings, how many mistakes made, how much time has been spent on 50 attempted repeals of obamacare, how many investigations into benghazi,how much time on the irs, lies of holder, How much did the shutdown of the goverment cost....??
oh thats not political, but gruber is more dangerous politically than what the report means to the world and mostly the US.

PS surely the best time to politically arrange this report would have been before the election???
The attempts to brush it all under the carpet and screaming "but gruber"....is the saddest spin Ive seen in a couple of years.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 5:11:44 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
British role in torture: Clegg has ‘open mind’ about judicial inquiry
Deputy prime minister says he is confident UK agents are not using torture but inquiry may be necessary to reach truth

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/dec/11/uk-torture-role-nick-clegg-judicial-inquiry

Nick Clegg has suggested there could be a case for a full judicial inquiry into the possibility of British complicity in torture in the wake of a report into brutal and ineffective methods used by the US Central Intelligence Agency.

The deputy prime minister said he was completely confident that torture “cannot, will not and is not being used under any circumstances by UK agents”. However, he said, there were still questions about the past that were being investigated by the police and the intelligence and security committee (ISC), which is considering the findings of the interim Gibson report into torture.

Clegg said the preliminary inquiry by Sir Peter Gibson “did not pull its punches in saying frankly the standards were not being adhered to in the way that they should have been in the crucial days after 9/11”, as it raised 27 serious questions about British involvement in practices such as rendition.

Speaking on his LBC 97.3 radio call-in, the Liberal Democrat leader said the ISC was looking at this first, but he raised the prospect of a full judicial inquiry into the issue if it did not get to the bottom of what had happened.

“Once the police investigations are done, once this report from the intelligence and security committee is done, we should keep an open mind if we need to about moving to a full judicial inquiry if there are any outstanding questions,” he said. “Because I’m like everyone else, I want the truth out there.”

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 5:18:09 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so did you watch the testimony gruber gave ??


Now how important is someone calling the american public stupid, even in the same universe as a six year (in the making), report on the "torture"
since 2008 the righties have been hounding every scandal , how many hearings, how many mistakes made, how much time has been spent on 50 attempted repeals of obamacare, how many investigations into benghazi,how much time on the irs, lies of holder, How much did the shutdown of the goverment cost....??
oh thats not political, but gruber is more dangerous politically than what the report means to the world and mostly the US.

PS surely the best time to politically arrange this report would have been before the election???
The attempts to brush it all under the carpet and screaming "but gruber"....is the saddest spin Ive seen in a couple of years.


More intelligent Democrats are painfully aware of just how damaging Jonathon Gruber has been to the Democrat party and their "liberal" causes

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 5:30:07 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
LMAO from national review, snickers, of course idiots like gruber piss off lefties, but they are "liberal" causes only if you are on the right . Because of course liberal causes like healthcare have nothing to do with the right
Any idiot that makes that kind of comment is harmful to "the perceptions" when you are already biased. It happens all the time, on both sides of the aisle, and in all walks of life.


So you arent going to answer the questions....


quell surprise


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: BREAKING NEWS - 12/11/2014 5:32:01 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LMAO from national review, snickers, of course idiots like gruber piss off lefties, but they are "liberal" causes only if you are on the right . Because of course liberal causes like healthcare have nothing to do with the right
Any idiot that makes that kind of comment is harmful to "the perceptions" when you are already biased. It happens all the time, on both sides of the aisle, and in all walks of life.


So you arent going to answer the questions....


quell surprise



Just how liberal is it to send IRS goons in to force individuals to patronize big insurance

Obamas crony friends



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: BREAKING NEWS Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125