Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/19/2014 1:54:09 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It is in our household.


I really do not think that you are Mr. Rapey-McRaperson. I do not even agree with the "affirmative consent" rules/laws being in place because they are so stupid. The point was the government intrusion into the bedroom.

(Under the rules/laws all the sex I have ever had has been one of us raping the other one, depending on who initiated. )

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/19/2014 1:57:59 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So we are raping for lunch today? Could you make my rape, "well done!!"

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/19/2014 2:28:46 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So we are raping for lunch today? Could you make my rape, "well done!!"


Ughhhhhhhh!

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/19/2014 2:46:24 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Maybe one of Bill's "Happy Meals" for Monica...

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/19/2014 6:30:58 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
If government were to dictate, under penalty of law, that each individual in the US had to perform 30 minutes of qualified exercise every day, would that be okay, since exercise is good for people?

That is a fair perspective but children have no idea what they are eating, be it good or bad. Do we guide them to healthier choices or simply let them eat "mystery meat" and "sugared drinks of no nutritional value" while demanding they perform academically and physically. During which time they are going through "growing pains". Don't we want them to have the best chance at performing their best in a reasonable context of their health being our priority? Not theirs?

I'm not in favor of kids eating unhealthy food. But, if kids aren't eating the healthy food, shouldn't they at least be eating something? There are also schools that ban kids from bringing bagged lunches. Isn't it a parent's responsibility to determine what a child eats?
At issue isn't healthy vs. unhealthy food choices; it's authoritarian control by government over choices that aren't theirs to make.

Unfortunately Desi, not all parents make a sensible choice; that's the problem.
Sometimes the government have to make those choices for them.
They did it here starting this school year for infant-school kids (aged 4-7) where every child has the option of a free school meal. Apparently, it has gone really well.

Unless the child has been removed from the parents for abuse or neglect, the government should NOT be raising the child and making such choices for them. That is just crazy.

I didn't say to raise the child - just give the parents the option of having the school provide a healthy option to what many kids have as a processed food lunch or no lunch at all.
Not all parents are savvy as to what is healthy and what isn't.
My neighbour is a prime example.
She isn't stupid but she thinks a good packed lunch for school is Dairylea cheese dippers, a choccy bar and two bags of chips.


So, the answer is to offer healthy food choices that kids aren't eating? That

At least your neighbor's kid might actually eat that stuff. While it isn't exactly the picture of a healthy meal, I'd rather my kids eat that than eat nothing.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/21/2014 10:55:04 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Seriously, there is no reason that people need to be able to discuss the gylcemic index of different foods to make healthy choices. You needn't even make the "best" food choices. "Good" food choices, in most cases, will be just dandy.

Most "super foods" are not. Drink water. Eat a variety of colors (unfortunately M&Ms do not count). Fresh or frozen is better than canned. Less processing is better. Try to avoid sugar and simple carbs ~ not avoid them like the plague, but reduce where you can. If you buy boxed cereal make sure that sugar is not in the first 6 ingredients. You do not need to eat as much meat as you think you do. Lunchmeat is not as healthy as beef, ham, turkey, or chicken roasted and sliced by yourself (although I suppose that falls under processing.)

That is pretty much all the education you need to make healthier choices.

Dans ses écrits, un sage Italien
Dit que le mieux est l'ennemi du bien.

(In his writings, a wise Italian
says that the better is the enemy of the good) ~ Voltaire


As far as not washing fruits and veggie? Harmful strains of E. Coli and other food borne illnesses are a great way to loose weight! Don't think of the glass as half empty! (no, I do not REALLY recommend those for anyone.)

I disagree.. Imo the reason for a lot of illnesses is inflammation and you get that (at least in my experience) from eating too much processed food (like tv dinners, kraft mac&cheese, "food" like that) and getting too many carbs from bread, pasta and food like that (it doesn't matter if its whole wheat bread or whole wheat pasta, carbs are carbs).. So yes, I do think people need to educate themselves.. not that its any skin off my nose if they don't.. its their future health at risk..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/21/2014 1:01:11 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Seriously, there is no reason that people need to be able to discuss the gylcemic index of different foods to make healthy choices. You needn't even make the "best" food choices. "Good" food choices, in most cases, will be just dandy.

Most "super foods" are not. Drink water. Eat a variety of colors (unfortunately M&Ms do not count). Fresh or frozen is better than canned. Less processing is better. Try to avoid sugar and simple carbs ~ not avoid them like the plague, but reduce where you can. If you buy boxed cereal make sure that sugar is not in the first 6 ingredients. You do not need to eat as much meat as you think you do. Lunchmeat is not as healthy as beef, ham, turkey, or chicken roasted and sliced by yourself (although I suppose that falls under processing.)

That is pretty much all the education you need to make healthier choices.

Dans ses écrits, un sage Italien
Dit que le mieux est l'ennemi du bien.

(In his writings, a wise Italian
says that the better is the enemy of the good) ~ Voltaire


As far as not washing fruits and veggie? Harmful strains of E. Coli and other food borne illnesses are a great way to loose weight! Don't think of the glass as half empty! (no, I do not REALLY recommend those for anyone.)

I disagree.. Imo the reason for a lot of illnesses is inflammation and you get that (at least in my experience) from eating too much processed food (like tv dinners, kraft mac&cheese, "food" like that) and getting too many carbs from bread, pasta and food like that (it doesn't matter if its whole wheat bread or whole wheat pasta, carbs are carbs).. So yes, I do think people need to educate themselves.. not that its any skin off my nose if they don't.. its their future health at risk..


Less processing and reduction of simple carbs are both things I listed in "education you need to make healthier choices."

And no, not all carbs are equal.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/22/2014 5:56:10 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Seriously, there is no reason that people need to be able to discuss the gylcemic index of different foods to make healthy choices. You needn't even make the "best" food choices. "Good" food choices, in most cases, will be just dandy.

Most "super foods" are not. Drink water. Eat a variety of colors (unfortunately M&Ms do not count). Fresh or frozen is better than canned. Less processing is better. Try to avoid sugar and simple carbs ~ not avoid them like the plague, but reduce where you can. If you buy boxed cereal make sure that sugar is not in the first 6 ingredients. You do not need to eat as much meat as you think you do. Lunchmeat is not as healthy as beef, ham, turkey, or chicken roasted and sliced by yourself (although I suppose that falls under processing.)

That is pretty much all the education you need to make healthier choices.

Dans ses écrits, un sage Italien
Dit que le mieux est l'ennemi du bien.

(In his writings, a wise Italian
says that the better is the enemy of the good) ~ Voltaire


As far as not washing fruits and veggie? Harmful strains of E. Coli and other food borne illnesses are a great way to loose weight! Don't think of the glass as half empty! (no, I do not REALLY recommend those for anyone.)

I disagree.. Imo the reason for a lot of illnesses is inflammation and you get that (at least in my experience) from eating too much processed food (like tv dinners, kraft mac&cheese, "food" like that) and getting too many carbs from bread, pasta and food like that (it doesn't matter if its whole wheat bread or whole wheat pasta, carbs are carbs).. So yes, I do think people need to educate themselves.. not that its any skin off my nose if they don't.. its their future health at risk..



While I agree that there are a lot of people out there who have no clue how to eat healthy, I think a big part is they don't have the time or motivation to do it.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/23/2014 11:29:16 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Seriously, there is no reason that people need to be able to discuss the gylcemic index of different foods to make healthy choices. You needn't even make the "best" food choices. "Good" food choices, in most cases, will be just dandy.

Most "super foods" are not. Drink water. Eat a variety of colors (unfortunately M&Ms do not count). Fresh or frozen is better than canned. Less processing is better. Try to avoid sugar and simple carbs ~ not avoid them like the plague, but reduce where you can. If you buy boxed cereal make sure that sugar is not in the first 6 ingredients. You do not need to eat as much meat as you think you do. Lunchmeat is not as healthy as beef, ham, turkey, or chicken roasted and sliced by yourself (although I suppose that falls under processing.)

That is pretty much all the education you need to make healthier choices.

Dans ses écrits, un sage Italien
Dit que le mieux est l'ennemi du bien.

(In his writings, a wise Italian
says that the better is the enemy of the good) ~ Voltaire


As far as not washing fruits and veggie? Harmful strains of E. Coli and other food borne illnesses are a great way to loose weight! Don't think of the glass as half empty! (no, I do not REALLY recommend those for anyone.)

I disagree.. Imo the reason for a lot of illnesses is inflammation and you get that (at least in my experience) from eating too much processed food (like tv dinners, kraft mac&cheese, "food" like that) and getting too many carbs from bread, pasta and food like that (it doesn't matter if its whole wheat bread or whole wheat pasta, carbs are carbs).. So yes, I do think people need to educate themselves.. not that its any skin off my nose if they don't.. its their future health at risk..



While I agree that there are a lot of people out there who have no clue how to eat healthy, I think a big part is they don't have the time or motivation to do it.

so they stick their head in the sand then?.. they trust the govt and "food" manufacturers? Yes, they do that at their own (& their children's) peril tho.. again, no skin off my nose..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 6:44:38 AM   
sloguy02246


Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline
FR

Maybe the question about how people choose to eat comes down to deciding what's important in their lives.
If food choices are important to them, then they make the time available to become informed and choose wisely.
If not, their food choices may be somewhat less than consistently healthy.
Same for the effects of those choices on their children.




(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 7:03:36 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It is in our household.


I really do not think that you are Mr. Rapey-McRaperson.

Good...people would have trouble spelling it.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 7:26:31 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


so they stick their head in the sand then?.. they trust the govt and "food" manufacturers? Yes, they do that at their own (& their children's) peril tho.. again, no skin off my nose..


Are you not aware of "Decision Fatigue"? It disproportionately effects lower income people making purchases.

http://www.opiniondynamics.com/2013/12/decision-fatigue/

Perhaps you might try being less dismissive of the poor and try to understand the actual challenges they are facing when it comes to shopping, preparing, and eating food.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 7:53:14 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
FR
of course the fact that "nutrition" and what is good and bad for you changes constantly, people like Dr Oz, lying labels and research, the paleo diet, the atkins diet, fuck all diets, are confusing and cost more money than they are worth.
It amazes me that ANYONE believes that all people poor or not, have the knowledge, access, ability and money to live on perfect food choices.

Backk when I was a kid(damn dinosaurs ate my lunch money) we had lunch tickets that were sold every week , one per lunch.
Huge numbers of girls in my school(yes I went to a girls only school) used to sell them, for money for cigs, money for eye shadow, money for shoes, they would then go without a meal at lunch, ALL week.
I had a mum at home, I had a mum who fed us a good breakfast and a meal at night, from scratch. she never knew about the meals being missed at lunch, she woulda had my hide,
When I was nursing, I lived on cofffe and paddington sammiches(orange marmalade on toast/bread), ramen noodles and white bread and ketchup, when I was homeless I lived on shit that would just stop the hunger pangs and warm me on the inside, and I HAD Nutritional education.
When my kids were little I used to go without "decent food" so we could feed the kids when the ol man was out of work. They didnt eat the correct number of servings a day, but they were fed as well as we could afford, but lots of mums I knew at the kids school, didnt have the first clue. And many of them were confused by the idea of labelling and that mac n weiners were normal.

You may have found the "right way" to eat, but not everyone can or will and to expect otherwise is a pointless exercise.
TO ensure that all kids can get a decent meal at lunch while their families are working or for whatever reason shouldnt be political




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 9:51:48 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
of course the fact that "nutrition" and what is good and bad for you changes constantly, people like Dr Oz, lying labels and research, the paleo diet, the atkins diet, fuck all diets, are confusing and cost more money than they are worth.
...
I had a mum at home, I had a mum who fed us a good breakfast and a meal at night, from scratch. she never knew about the meals being missed at lunch, she woulda had my hide,
...
You may have found the "right way" to eat, but not everyone can or will and to expect otherwise is a pointless exercise.
TO ensure that all kids can get a decent meal at lunch while their families are working or for whatever reason shouldnt be political


First of all, I also had a Mom at home that made food from scratch damn near every day. I understand how wonderful that is, and consider myself blessed by that.

Second, schools aren't necessarily ensuring that kids can get a decent meal at lunch. If a family makes "too much money" and doesn't feel it can afford for the kid(s) to buy lunch, it doesn't matter what the school offers, it's not available to the student(s). There are questions about how nutritious the lunches are (when you classify "pizza" as having a vegetable because of the sauce, that might lead to some questions), and if the kids aren't eating the lunches offered, they aren't getting a decent meal anyway.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 9:55:20 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
force feed the little shits
Oh that would be taking things a lil too far huh.
grins

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 12:49:01 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
Here is a really awesome article about the realities of healthy eating and the poor:

http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/09/classism-of-eating-healthy/?utm_content=buffer24b09&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

quote:

As a nation, we’re slowly realizing that whole, fresh foods are good for you and that cooking at home can save you money and provide you with better nutrition.

Overall, this is a great trend. It’s becoming easier and more common to get fresh food, whole foods, local foods, and organic foods.

Unfortunately, though, this shift in culture has also begun to produce a toxic byproduct: better-than-thou attitudes and judgments about low-income people’s decisions about food.

“Why do they waste their money on junk food?” “Why doesn’t she cook for her children?” “Ugh, look, he’s buying his toddler a Happy Meal.”

Many of us have thought things like this or heard other people say things like this. We are very concerned with how poor people (or people we assume are poor) spend money on food.

The truth is, though, we rarely have all the facts when we judge these people. Let’s change that.


< Message edited by Aylee -- 12/24/2014 1:03:32 PM >


_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 1:04:42 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

force feed the little shits
Oh that would be taking things a lil too far huh.
grins


Oh I don't know. Eating disorders and unhealthy eating habits (like eating until your plate is empty instead of until you are full) have never hurt anyone. Oh. . . wait.

LOL

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 1:21:16 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
yeah really
my gran was a eat everything on your plate woman.
she was a mean old lady

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 2:20:45 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Second, schools aren't necessarily ensuring that kids can get a decent meal at lunch. If a family makes "too much money" and doesn't feel it can afford for the kid(s) to buy lunch, it doesn't matter what the school offers, it's not available to the student(s). There are questions about how nutritious the lunches are (when you classify "pizza" as having a vegetable because of the sauce, that might lead to some questions), and if the kids aren't eating the lunches offered, they aren't getting a decent meal anyway.

And that's where our "social" system works where in the US it doesn't.
All kids in infant school (4-7 year olds) qualify, regardless of parental income.
It's down to the parents whether they choose to accept it or provide their own.

And for most of our infant schools, pizza is not considered a 'healthy' option.

You can say what you like about our social system here Desi, but it works and it works for everyone, not just the fiscally endowed.

The problem with the US is that a huge number of people, maybe even the majority, are soo embedded in individualism, profits and fear of the government that they trust absolutely nothing to it.
Oh wait... they do!! They trust it for their military and to line the pockets of profiteering capitalists!!


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches - 12/24/2014 3:11:39 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
force feed the little shits
Oh that would be taking things a lil too far huh.
grins


Just a bit...


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gambling on Michelle O's horrid lunches Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125