RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 4:17:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

FR

Just found this video which is a bunch of highschoolers doing their own ethics audit of a fox news segment. They might be kids, but they're completely right when they take apart this news segment point by point. Not to mention, if you watch any other segment of fox news, they're likely breaking those exact same ethical guidelines as they are in this segment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&x-yt-cl=84503534&v=VzYymuslGDw

In conclusion: Fox news is a propaganda network, not a news network.



have you even watched fox?

and not surprising the teacher choose fox---as opposed to lets say msnbc or any of the other all left all the time networks.

I cant watch videos where I am at---could you please enumerate, in detail, just what "journalistic ethics" bill o'reilly violated?

and also---just to be clear, you determined from one segment that high school kids examined that fox is "propaganda?"




Tkman117 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 4:20:35 PM)

Sure I have, it's propaganda, pretty easy to recognize a turd when I see one.




bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 4:35:28 PM)

forgive me if im skeptical of your understanding of the word "propaganda" since you believe the United States is in anarchy...or maybe you were just using hyperbole. how do you understand the word?

anyway...I edited my post to ask you this: I cant watch videos where I am at---could you please enumerate, in detail, just what "journalistic ethics" bill o'reilly violated?






Tkman117 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 4:40:03 PM)

I use the definition of the word as it was meant to be:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/propaganda

the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person

ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect


Fox news isn't balanced, it isn't news, it's right wind propaganda.

And as to which ethics he violated, I'm not going to go back and re-watch and retype every single one, but the video even admitted they lost count of the number of ethical violations the news segment committed. I'd recommend you look at it when you are able to, it might prove pretty enlightening.




bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 5:03:38 PM)

by your definition then, can you please tell me how any other "news" network/news show out there isn't propaganda?

and do you understand the difference between news and opinion?

and further whats meant for entertainment or comedic purposes?

excuse me--all the other news stations and networks are all left all the time---fox, while on the whole leans right, includes balance in ALL their shows and whats more, has multiple personalities with their own shows, or who are regulars on shows, who are liberal.

it beats the living daylights out of me how anyone who watches any other network, and then fox by comparison, could come to the conclusion they are not balanced in the regard I just pointed out.

the only thing I can imagine is you liberals are so immersed in the rest of the media that you think it passes for normal reality, and when you see fox, it jars your status quo.





Politesub53 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 5:19:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

FR

Just found this video which is a bunch of highschoolers doing their own ethics audit of a fox news segment. They might be kids, but they're completely right when they take apart this news segment point by point. Not to mention, if you watch any other segment of fox news, they're likely breaking those exact same ethical guidelines as they are in this segment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&x-yt-cl=84503534&v=VzYymuslGDw

In conclusion: Fox news is a propaganda network, not a news network.


Actually...and I know it may make little difference to you, the college student at...I'd be willing to bet...a liberal college, but the piece they took apart is a part of The O'Reilly Factor. A COMMENTARY program...you know, much like the Rachel Maddow Show or Anderson Cooper 360. Those two aren't exactly known for adherence to "journalistic ethics".

As to O'Reillycs claim that Vermont is liberal, see if you can find anything in here that, at a national level politically, disputes that.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/fivethirtyeight/2012/10/01/new-vermont-is-liberal-but-old-vermont-is-still-there/



Spoken like a man who couldnt be arsed to view the video, hardly creative eh bruv ?

If you had watched it you would have know three things. Firstly, the kids refuted Fox by stating facts, secondlyit wasnt, as you claimed "The college student" it was several. And thirdly, you cant possibly know which party these students support.

It seems to me their video was way more gfrown up than your post defending Fox.

PS...... The good folk of Birmingham said hello, and even if you are a dumb arse, you too are welcome to visit. (Okay I made the last bit up)




CreativeDominant -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 6:49:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

FR

Just found this video which is a bunch of highschoolers doing their own ethics audit of a fox news segment. They might be kids, but they're completely right when they take apart this news segment point by point. Not to mention, if you watch any other segment of fox news, they're likely breaking those exact same ethical guidelines as they are in this segment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&x-yt-cl=84503534&v=VzYymuslGDw

In conclusion: Fox news is a propaganda network, not a news network.


Actually...and I know it may make little difference to you, the college student at...I'd be willing to bet...a liberal college, but the piece they took apart is a part of The O'Reilly Factor. A COMMENTARY program...you know, much like the Rachel Maddow Show or Anderson Cooper 360. Those two aren't exactly known for adherence to "journalistic ethics".

As to O'Reillycs claim that Vermont is liberal, see if you can find anything in here that, at a national level politically, disputes that.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/fivethirtyeight/2012/10/01/new-vermont-is-liberal-but-old-vermont-is-still-there/



Spoken like a man who couldnt be arsed to view the video, hardly creative eh bruv ?

If you had watched it you would have know three things. Firstly, the kids refuted Fox by stating facts, secondlyit wasnt, as you claimed "The college student" it was several. And thirdly, you cant possibly know which party these students support.

It seems to me their video was way more gfrown up than your post defending Fox.

PS...... The good folk of Birmingham said hello, and even if you are a dumb arse, you too are welcome to visit. (Okay I made the last bit up)

Actually...I did watch the video. Where you got the idea I didn't, I don't know.

2nd, as I noted...O'Reilly isn't a news show...nor is Maddox, nor is Cooper...so he's not held to a journalistic code of ethics because he is NOT REPORTING the news, he's commenting on it. The students acted as if he was a reporter. He's not.

3rd, the college student I was referring to...since apparently you didn't read my post or, more likely, knee-jerk responded rather than carefully reading it, for if you had you'd have known this...wasTkman, not the students in the video. And you would know I didn't say ANYTHING about which political party the students in the video support.

Not very good comprehension, polite. And I'm not your "bruv". I've got one already and he's enough of an ass to deal with.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/23/2015 10:36:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata



... but I do know that Rotherham, Bradford, Dewsbury, and the East End of London were mentioned, and I'm pretty sure they still speak English there.





... for now

Fixed it for ya, K.!



Michael




bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 1:33:03 AM)

worth injecting into the "argument"

"Fox Derangement Syndrome

"Fox Derangement Syndrome is an idiomatic phrase used to refer to wildly exaggerated overreaction to the news, opinion shows, and very existence of the Fox News Channel. Although the term did not exist at the time, a good example occurred during the December 1, 2003 broadcast of Hardball with Chris Matthews, in which liberal Democrat political commentator Chris Matthews asked liberal Democrat politician Howard Dean, "Would you break up Fox?", to which Dean replied: "On ideological grounds, absolutely yes."[1] "






bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 1:57:55 AM)

agreed!

[image]local://upfiles/1936645/45E9B5A59CE14B74B0B40FC757ED8E90.jpg[/image]




CoSubGirl -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 4:38:39 AM)

I'm sorry but my aggravation at the bad reporting about supposed "no go" zones isn't any kind of hatred of Fox. It's because the it was so wrong. My roommate was watching it when it came on and he got all outraged by these "no go" zones and the "fact" that these zones were controlled by Muslims and run by Sharia law. I looked at him and said "that's utter bullshit" but he goes on to cite what the "expert" was saying. I continued to declare it bullshit, but told him I'd call my mom and look at the "map" they talked about. That's when I discovered that what the ZUS in France actually were. It didn't take me long to do the fact checking that Fox should have done. It was obvious that the report was meant to cause fear and outrage - which it did with my roommate. He was equally outraged to find out that Fox's experts had basically lied and that the story wasn't true. Fox has been tripping over itself to apologize, and rightly so.

Bounty - the fact is that the ZUS are NOT Muslim "no go" enclaves. The sources you cited basically picked up what one guy opined and repeated it. Repeating a lie won't make it true. Did you look at the link I posted to the French Wikipedia?

While I can't speak for the UK and the Netherlands, I can certainly speak for the situation in France and in particular Paris.

I've been to some of these "no go" zones as recently as November. Nope - frankly they're not a whole lot different than other parts of Paris.................




Lucylastic -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 5:03:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

by your definition then, can you please tell me how any other "news" network/news show out there isn't propaganda?

and do you understand the difference between news and opinion?

and further whats meant for entertainment or comedic purposes?

excuse me--all the other news stations and networks are all left all the time---fox, while on the whole leans right, includes balance in ALL their shows and whats more, has multiple personalities with their own shows, or who are regulars on shows, who are liberal.

it beats the living daylights out of me how anyone who watches any other network, and then fox by comparison, could come to the conclusion they are not balanced in the regard I just pointed out.

the only thing I can imagine is you liberals are so immersed in the rest of the media that you think it passes for normal reality, and when you see fox, it jars your status quo.



Fox's lies and attempts at propagandizing is based on simple facts.

and there are so many of them, Ive seen more balance in a six month old baby attempting to tiptoe.
Jindals claims in the UK were given to him by John Bolton, yes "founder" of gatestoneinstitute AND has been PROVEN WRONG. Fox apologised for its bullshit, the mayor of paris wants to sue...its not a hoax. FOX LIES and all you wanna do it serve up more utter rwnj links to prove your point.
You cant be taken seriously, nor will be.
Very few people will tolerate the kind of wilfull bullshit in your posts.


By the way, how many cities in the US(or anywhere) have a "chinatown, or a little italy or lil greece or lil any bloody country, that has times in the past have had crime issues in that the police wont go unattended or without backup, run by mafia, drug cartels, russian mobs, triads,

I remember in the UK when some jamaican posses took over parts of some towns that couldnt be attended by ambulance crews, even pollice didnt wanna go there(personal experience) because of the danger from the gangs. But I guess its ok cos most of them would be classed as "christians" not muslims./
Fact is fox and their "experts" are lying blatantly and spreading fear to the gullible idiots who wouldnt know the truth if it spat up their nostrils.




Sanity -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 5:36:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

worth injecting into the "argument"

"Fox Derangement Syndrome

"Fox Derangement Syndrome is an idiomatic phrase used to refer to wildly exaggerated overreaction to the news, opinion shows, and very existence of the Fox News Channel. Although the term did not exist at the time, a good example occurred during the December 1, 2003 broadcast of Hardball with Chris Matthews, in which liberal Democrat political commentator Chris Matthews asked liberal Democrat politician Howard Dean, "Would you break up Fox?", to which Dean replied: "On ideological grounds, absolutely yes."[1] "





Thats the whole thing

"Liberals" (Newspeak for 'Leftists') are enraged by an actual free press / media, and they habitually lurch around for any excuse they can get their hands on to beat voices of dissent into total oblivion





bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 5:47:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CoSubGirl

I'm sorry but my aggravation at the bad reporting about supposed "no go" zones isn't any kind of hatred of Fox. It's because the it was so wrong. My roommate was watching it when it came on and he got all outraged by these "no go" zones and the "fact" that these zones were controlled by Muslims and run by Sharia law. I looked at him and said "that's utter bullshit" but he goes on to cite what the "expert" was saying. I continued to declare it bullshit, but told him I'd call my mom and look at the "map" they talked about. That's when I discovered that what the ZUS in France actually were. It didn't take me long to do the fact checking that Fox should have done. It was obvious that the report was meant to cause fear and outrage - which it did with my roommate. He was equally outraged to find out that Fox's experts had basically lied and that the story wasn't true. Fox has been tripping over itself to apologize, and rightly so.

Bounty - the fact is that the ZUS are NOT Muslim "no go" enclaves. The sources you cited basically picked up what one guy opined and repeated it. Repeating a lie won't make it true. Did you look at the link I posted to the French Wikipedia?

While I can't speak for the UK and the Netherlands, I can certainly speak for the situation in France and in particular Paris.

I've been to some of these "no go" zones as recently as November. Nope - frankly they're not a whole lot different than other parts of Paris.................


I understand your point about the ZUS not being muslim "no go" enclaves and yes I've done some reading about them afterwards, and I don't totally disagree with you.

I believe I reported Daniel pipes recanting/wishing he never called those places by that name. however at the same time, he also made the point (having been there himself too) that they are nevertheless what he would call places of semi autonomous rule.

some of what I posted came from other sources and people, so no, it wasn't the same "lie" picked up and spread around.

here is this from a former national geographic employee who blogs about travel:

"In France no-go zones are referred to as Zones Urbaines Sensibles (Sensitive Urban Zones). A few are truly no-go zones while most are just areas where the government is focusing more devlopment and police require special procedures to operate. A few (NOT ALL of the 751 ZUS, as falsely report in "anti-jihadist blogs," of these zones, primarily around Paris) are under control of radical Islamists. From these no-go zones around Paris and other urban centers, Islamic militants are waging a cultural and sometimes even guerrilla warfare against French police. The police are now taking to the streets in protest against the violence targeted at them in Lyons with police unions claiming there is a civil war against them."

there is also this:

"Jan. 16, 2008 update: Paul Belien of Brussels Journal provides an update on the ZUS, connecting them to organized crime in a way that helps explain police reluctance to intervene:


"In May [2007], the French voters elected Mr. [Nicolas] Sarkozy as president because he had promised to restore the authority of the Republic over France’s 751 no-go areas, the so-called zones urbaines sensibles (ZUS, sensitive urban areas), where 5 million people – 8 percent of the population – live. During his first months in office he has been too busy with other activities, such as selling nuclear plants to Libya and getting divorced. While the French media publish nude pictures of the future (third) Mrs. Sarkozy, the situation in the ZUS has remained as “sensitive” as before.

"People get mugged, even murdered, in the ZUS, but the media prefer not to write about it. When large-scale rioting erupts and officers and firemen are attacked, the behavior of the thugs is condoned with references to their “poverty” and to the “racism” of the indigenous French. The French media never devote their attention to the bleak situation of intimidation and lawlessness in which 8 percent of the population, including many poor indigenous French, are forced to live. Muslim racism toward the “infidels” is never mentioned.

"Xavier Raufer, a former French intelligence officer who heads the department on organized crime and terrorism at the Institute of Criminology of the University of Paris II, thinks that organized crime has a lot to do with the indifference of the French establishment.

"The ZUS are centers of drug trafficking. According to a recent report of the French government’s Interdepartmental Commission to Combat Drug Traffic and Addiction (MILDT) 550,000 people in France consume cannabis on a daily basis and 1.2 million on a regular basis. The annual cannabis consumption amounts to 208 tons for a market value of 832 million euros ($1.2 billion in U.S. dollars). MILDT estimates that there are between 6,000 and 13,000 small “entrepreneurs” and between 700 and 1,400 wholesalers who make a living out of dealing cannabis. The wholesalers earn up to 550,000 euros ($820,000) per year. Since they operate from within the ZUS the drug dealers are beyond the reach of the French authorities.

"The ZUS exist not only because Muslims wish to live in their own areas according to their own culture and their own Shariah laws, but also because organized crime wants to operate without the judicial and fiscal interference of the French state. In France, Shariah law and mafia rule have become almost identical."

and this:


"Despite the scale of the damage, French police have hesitated to make any arrests for fear of sparking more riots. Residents of the neighborhood know the names of the perpetrators but "nobody dares to speak for fear of reprisals." "You can no longer order a pizza or get a doctor to come to the house."

The French government has announced a plan to boost policing in 15 of the most crime-ridden parts of France in an effort to reassert state control over the country's so-called "no-go" zones: Muslim-dominated neighborhoods that are largely off limits to non-Muslims.

The crime-infested districts, which the French Interior Ministry has designated as Priority Security Zones (zones de sécurité prioritaires, or ZSP), include heavily Muslim parts of Paris, Marseilles, Strasbourg, Lille and Amiens, where Muslim youths recently went on a two-day arson rampage that caused extensive property damage and injured more than a dozen police officers.

The crackdown on lawlessness in the ZSP is set to begin in September, when French Interior Minister Manuel Valls plans to deploy riot police, detectives and intelligence agents into the selected areas. The hope is that a "North American-style" war on crime can prevent France's impoverished suburbs from descending into turmoil.

If the new policy results in a drop in crime, Valls is expected to name up to 40 more ZSP before the summer of 2013.

The initial 15 ZSP are: Seine-Saint-Denis (Saint-Denis, Saint-Ouen), Paris (Paris XVIIIe), les Yvelines (Mantes-la-Jolie, Mantes-la-Ville), l'Essonne (Corbeil-Essonne), la Somme (Amiens), le Nord (Lille), l'Oise (Méru et Chambly), la Moselle (Fameck et Uckange), le Bas-Rhin (Strasbourg), le Rhône (Lyon IXe), les Bouches-du-Rhône (Gardanne et Bouc-Bel-aire), Marseille (Marseille IIIe, XIIIe, XIVe, XVe et XVIe), le Gard (Vauvert et Saint-Gilles), l'Hérault (Lunel et Mauguio) et la Guyane (Cayenne, Matoury, Remire-Montjoly).

Many of these new ZSP coincide with Muslim neighborhoods that previous French governments have considered to be Sensitive Urban Zones. (Zones Urbaine Sensibles, or ZUS) -- also "no-go" zones for French police.

At last count, there were a total of 751 Sensitive Urban Zones, a comprehensive list of which can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated five million Muslims live in the ZUS -- parts of France over which the French state has lost control.

Consider Seine-Saint-Denis, a notorious northern suburb of Paris, and home to an estimated 500,000 Muslims. Seine-Saint-Denis is divided into 40 administrative districts called communes, 36 of which are on the French government's official list of "no-go" zones.

Seine-Saint-Denis, also known locally as "Department 93" for the first two digits of the postal code for this suburb, witnessed fierce rioting by Muslim youths in 2005, when they torched more than 9,000 cars.

Seine-Saint-Denis, which has one of the highest rates of violent crime in France, is now among the initial 15 ZSPs because of widespread drug dealing and a rampant black market. Because, however, the suburb also has one of the highest unemployment rates in France -- 40% of those under the age of 25 are jobless -- it remains unlikely that a government crackdown will succeed in bringing down the crime rate in any permanent way.

Also on the list of ZSP is the department of La Somme, which encompasses the northern French city of Amiens. On August 12 and 13, around 100 Muslim youths in the impoverished Fafet-Brossolette district of Amiens went on a rampage after police arrested a man for driving without a license. Muslims viewed the arrest as "insensitive" because it came as many residents of the neighborhood were attending a funeral for Nadir Hadji, a 20-year-old Algerian youth who had died in a motorcycle accident on August 9. It later emerged, however, that police were called to an estate in northern Amiens after reports that youths were loading fireworks into a car. Police discovered as well the ingredients for petrol bombs, including empty bottles and a canister of gasoline -- hence the arrest.

In response to the riots, about 150 policemen and anti-riot police were deployed to the Fafet neighborhood and used tear gas, rubber bullets and even mobilized a helicopter after Muslim youths shot at them with buckshot, fireworks and other projectiles from nine in the evening until four in the morning.

At least 16 police officers were injured in the melee, one of them seriously. Youths also torched and destroyed a junior high school canteen, an anti-juvenile delinquency sports room, a leisure center, and a kindergarten, as well as 20 automobiles and 50 trash bins. The cost of repairing or rebuilding structures that were damaged or destroyed could run to €6 million ($7.4 million). (Photos here.)

Gilles Demailly, the Socialist mayor of Amiens, said the violence reflected a descent into lawlessness orchestrated by ever younger troublemakers: "There have been regular incidents here but it has been years since we've known a night as violent as this with so much damage done. The confrontations were very, very violent." He added, "For months I've been asking for the means to alleviate the neighborhood's problems because tension has been mounting here. You've got gangs of youths playing at being gangsters who have turned the area into a no-go zone. You can no longer order a pizza or get a doctor to come to the house."

The Fafet-Brossolette district of Amiens is home to mostly Muslim immigrants from former French colonies such as Algeria, Cameroon, Gabon, Mali, Morocco and Tunisia. Unemployment in the riot-hit part of Amiens runs at 45%. Among people under 25 years of age, who account for half the population, two out of three are out of work.

Despite the scale of the damage, French police have hesitated to make any arrests for fear of sparking more riots. Police did not, in fact, make any arrests until more than three days after the riots ended. A spokesperson for the local police said that four people between the ages of 15 and 30 were arrested in an overnight swoop on August 17 in connection with arson, robbery and trafficking stolen goods. Two of the individuals were immediately tried at the criminal court in Amiens and were quickly released on probation.

The clashes in Amiens follow more than five days of violence between rival Muslim gangs in the southwestern French city of Toulouse. Police in the city's Bagatelle district (officially classified as a ZUS "no-go" zone) have characterized the Muslim-on-Muslim violence as "a kind of guerilla war" between two gangs of individuals between the ages of 15 and 20. The violence was apparently due to "the result of a settlement of accounts between drug dealers, as well as because of old resentments exacerbated by boredom and the heat of the month of Ramadan."

On August 14, two local imams in Bagatelle organized a march through the streets calling on the youths to stop the violence. Local media reports say the residents of the neighborhood know the names of the perpetrators but "nobody dares to speak for fear of reprisals." According to the deputy imam of Bagatelle, Siali Lahouari, "it looks as if we are in Bosnia or Afghanistan, not Mirail [a suburb of Toulouse]."

In July 2010, Muslim youth in the La Villeneuve suburb of the southern city of Grenoble went on a rampage after police shot and killed an armed robber, Karim Boudouda, who had led police on a car chase after holding up the casino at Uriage-les-Bains, near Grenoble. The rioting started when an imam recited a prayer for the dead man in the presence of 50 Muslim youths who had gathered in a park. One of the youths fired a gun at riot police who were deployed to the neighborhood; the police then opened fire to disperse the crowd -- who then went on to torch 80 cars as well as several businesses.

In August 2009, around 40 Muslim rioters in the Paris suburb of Bagnolet hurled Molotov cocktails at police and firefighters; torched cars, and one person fired a handgun during a rampage prompted by the death of a teen pizza deliveryman who was fleeing from the police. The violence broke out after an 18-year-old, riding his motorcycle through the neighborhood, tried to flee a document check by police; the man lost control of his motorcycle, hit a barrier and died en route to the hospital.

In July 2009, Muslim youths torched more than 300 cars across France after the suicide death of an Algerian youth held in police custody on charges of extortion.

In October and November 2005, thousands of Muslim youths in Paris and other major cities in France went on a rampage after two young men in the Paris suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois were electrocuted when they entered an electric power substation while running away from police. Overall, the riots affected 274 towns and cities across France, and resulted in more than €200 million in property damage.

In response, the French government declared a "three-month state of emergency."


http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3305/france-no-go-zones


so it seems to me, such places, whatever we want to call them, exist.




CoSubGirl -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 6:10:47 AM)

Was there unrest in Paris in 2009 and 2010? Absolutely. But that was 5 years ago. That's like saying well there were riots in Brooklyn last year, so that must be a "no go" zone that has been taken over by criminals. Or declaring areas in US cities that have experienced riots after sports team victories to be unsafe.

Are there high crime areas in France? Sure. Just like any other industrialized country? However phrases like this become problematic because it leads readers to believe these are Muslim enclaves:"

"At last count, there were a total of 751 Sensitive Urban Zones, a comprehensive list of which can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations.
An estimated five million Muslims live in the ZUS -- parts of France over which the French state has lost control. "

Again, this is a total misrepresentation of what the ZUS are. ZUS are zones where they have urban renewal policies, including tax incentives for businesses to set up shop and real estate incentives for people to buy in those areas. The result is that in certain of the Paris ZUS,
they are becoming sought after neighborhoods by young people who have been priced out of more central Paris locations. Hardly areas where the police have "lost control".

The author cites St. Denis - fact is that St. Denis has been a problem area for full on 50 years - well before the most recent influx of immigrants.

My problem with the article that you quote is that it not only totally misinterprets the ZUS, it combines it with citing events of 5 or so years ago, mixes in Muslim immigration and draws the false conclusion that
there are areas of France that are lawless Muslim enclaves.

That is simply not the case.

I could continue to pick apart the factual errors and misleading statements in this article, but I think you get my drift.




Musicmystery -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 7:06:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

"Liberals" (Newspeak for 'Leftists')


Wait. You said recently that leftists aren't liberals.

Or is it just that the news media that are getting that wrong and equating them?






Sanity -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 7:14:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

"Liberals" (Newspeak for 'Leftists')


Wait. You said recently that leftists aren't liberals.

Or is it just that the news media that are getting that wrong and equating them?





Try to keep up, fool

What I wrote was that there is nothing liberal about liberals

Theyre leftists




mnottertail -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 7:16:31 AM)

Nothing rightist about rightists, they are nutsuckers.




Musicmystery -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 7:19:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

"Liberals" (Newspeak for 'Leftists')


Wait. You said recently that leftists aren't liberals.

Or is it just that the news media that are getting that wrong and equating them?





Try to keep up, fool

What I wrote was that there is nothing liberal about liberals

Theyre leftists

So liberals are leftists, and that's what you wrote when you said leftists weren't liberals.

So wonder you're such an angry, confused soul.




bounty44 -> RE: Fox News -- Textbook Case of Baseless Right Wing Hysteria (1/24/2015 7:24:45 AM)

a little bit more

From mark steyn:
“Likewise, there are no-go zones in parts of Birmingham in the Midlands, where in nothing flat, a city that was 0% Muslim 50 years ago now is 22% Muslim. They're the demographic energy in the city. A senior British police officer was talking about this. He was saying, he wasn't calling them 'no-go zones'. He was putting it in a sort of positive way, that these communities 'prefer to police themselves', as it were. 'And that's why we just leave them to get on with it'. And one consequence of that is that nobody who isn't a member of those 'communities' likes to go there... Those no-go zones are not as advanced as they are in France, but they are real and they are growing in British cities.”

From chuck Norris:
“Political correctness is the cultural petri dish in which Shariah is accepted and developed. In "Muslim Mafia," Frank Gaffney, head of the Center for Security Policy, explains it this way: The Muslim Brotherhood's "object is to establish, initially, a separate society for Muslims within that of their host nations in which non-Muslims are the majority. This is accomplished by insinuating preferential arrangements for Muslims -- religious accommodations, their own legal code and courts (that is, Shariah), territorial 'no-go' zones, and assorted political benefits.”

And there is this from here:
http://www.libertarianrepublican.net/2015/01/frances-official-list-of-sensitive-areas.html
“Remember, the most evil thing in the world is over-reaction to Islamic violence. Whether it is "hysteria" to refer to no-go zones, consider that this past New Year's Eve, 940 cars were torched in the sensitive urban areas of Paris; or, is it to be accepted that Muslims do such things? Maybe we should thank them for merely burning cars as opposed to killing us. Oh, wait, they are killing us. Not simply cartoon-drawers, but Jews going to a grocery store. The torching of cars on New Year's Eve has become an annual ritual for the Muslim communities of Paris.

Russia Today ran a weird story on this year's festival. Their headline ran "12% fewer cars torched." Russia Today noted that, a few years ago, French officials thought it best to stop reporting the arson, because it was reflecting badly on the city. Could be bad for tourism, you know. Similarly, the Mayor of Paris thinks it is best nobody talks about the little problem her city has with enclaves of Muslim immigrants who subsist on welfare, sell drugs, rape women, set fire to cars and murder Jews.”

Fox’s apology, which if you read carefully is saying, “our language wasn’t correct but the essence of our message was pretty darn close:”
“Over the course of this last week we have made some regrettable errors on air, regarding the Muslim population in Europe, particularly with regard to England and France. This applies especially to discussions of so-called no-go zones, areas where non-Muslims allegedly aren’t allowed in, and police supposedly won’t go. To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country, and no credible information to support the assertion there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion. There are, certainly, areas of high crime in Europe, as there are in the United States and other countries, where police and visitors enter with caution. We deeply regret the errors and apologise to any and all who may have taken offence, including the people of France and England.[“





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625