RE: Three Muslims shot

RE: Three Muslims shot (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

joether -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 1:09:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: joether quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Most of the leftists on here just throw out nonsense bounty, because they are incapable of fact-based debate Garbled nonsense, disinformation, blatant ad hominems, straw men... Reasoned articulate discussion of the issues? Not so much. So spoken by the individual that....NEVER....gets his facts straight.... Its fitting as well as funny that you responded with an ad hominem Its not an attack you you, but at what you stated. So 'ad homienem' it is not. There have been....MANY TIMES...over the past three years in which you have posted stuff. One or more of us 'leftists' as you think on things, have shown you the actual facts on the issue. My post would only be an attack on you, if you got your facts straight. You for reasons I know not, get your 'facts' screwed up time and again. This is why many roll their eyes when reading your posts. "Fucking-A, another one of these stupid posts in which he didnt bother using a search engine?" So you are pushing an ad hominem towards me. So if you do it, its 'OK', but if others do, its just wrong, right?

Sanity -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 1:16:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: joether quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Most of the leftists on here just throw out nonsense bounty, because they are incapable of fact-based debate Garbled nonsense, disinformation, blatant ad hominems, straw men... Reasoned articulate discussion of the issues? Not so much. So spoken by the individual that....NEVER....gets his facts straight.... Its fitting as well as funny that you responded with an ad hominem Its not an attack you you, but at what you stated. So 'ad homienem' it is not. There have been....MANY TIMES...over the past three years in which you have posted stuff. One or more of us 'leftists' as you think on things, have shown you the actual facts on the issue. My post would only be an attack on you, if you got your facts straight. You for reasons I know not, get your 'facts' screwed up time and again. This is why many roll their eyes when reading your posts. "Fucking-A, another one of these stupid posts in which he didnt bother using a search engine?" So you are pushing an ad hominem towards me. So if you do it, its 'OK', but if others do, its just wrong, right? No, your post was a direct personal attack on me, nothing whatever about what I posted A veritable textbook example of an ad hominem

shyadventures -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 1:20:32 PM)
Meanwhile, two muslim terrorists attacked and killed people attending a free speech symposium in Denmark today. They failed to assasinate their main target, though: a Danish cartoonist...

Lucylastic -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 1:41:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic we have had those discussions ad nauseam, try sticking the topic at hand which is muslim victims, by an american ugly murdering pig The "random people" Barack was referring to were Jews, shot up by Muslims Which that runs counter to your short-sighted assertion, and therefore follows the topic you were posting in regard to perfectly lets back to the topic.......innocent muslims shot in your own country by a american. stop deflecting. Again, what I posted was perfectly in line with what you posted. If you dont want something discussed then dont bring it up. For you to complain about a supposed derail that you yourself begat is just more tiresome nonsense on your part stop making it about me, try the actual topic. i wont respond you about anything that is not about the people involved in this case. its not about paris or jews or obama You will not get this thread pulled with my help. simple...im not playing the game.

Moderator3 -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 1:58:16 PM)
Hello. [:)] I just wanted to assure you all that I will not shut down this thread for a couple of people going a bit too far or continuing something, that really needs to be tempered. I will close it only if the amount of people going too far after mod warnings means that I have do do mass moderation. If I shut it, I may not have to be mean with a lot of people, though it seems I am being mean. I can't seem to win on the mean thing, so I guess, I am just mean. [:D] Though posting styles may have brought out my mean stance. I just cycled didn't I? My job is so much fun some days!

Sanity -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 2:00:47 PM)
For a refresher - you posted this... and I replied thusly: quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Reverse the scenario.....1 muslim kills three american students. I can guarantee you this topic would have been pulled off the board the day it started. Nobody would be calling it a lone wolf, a mentally ill man or blaming the victims religion The Obama administration called the Fort Hood shootings "workplace violence" And theres this: quote: Barack Obama told VOX News today that “zealots” randomly shot “a bunch of folks in a Paris deli.” Via Twitchy: [img]http://2-ps.googleusercontent.com/hk/9dO3E1tyAM9FEJoQjUgzLfLy1j/www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/575x253xobama-jews-575x253.png.pagespeed.ic.BsAuZowYst9mJ00ceehE.png[/img] And so again, my post was in line with yours, and your protests make absolutely no sense

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 2:21:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moderator3 Hello. [:)] I just wanted to assure you all that I will not shut down this thread for a couple of people going a bit too far or continuing something, that really needs to be tempered. I will close it only if the amount of people going too far after mod warnings means that I have do do mass moderation. If I shut it, I may not have to be mean with a lot of people, though it seems I am being mean. I can't seem to win on the mean thing, so I guess, I am just mean. [:D] Though posting styles may have brought out my mean stance. I just cycled didn't I? My job is so much fun some days! Puhleeeeezzzzz do not make me explain the joke [sm=nervous.gif]

joether -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 4:06:28 PM)
My apologizes to the Moderators. I am forced to explained concepts to Sanity.... quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: joether quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: joether quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Most of the leftists on here just throw out nonsense bounty, because they are incapable of fact-based debate Garbled nonsense, disinformation, blatant ad hominems, straw men... Reasoned articulate discussion of the issues? Not so much. So spoken by the individual that....NEVER....gets his facts straight.... Its fitting as well as funny that you responded with an ad hominem Its not an attack you you, but at what you stated. So 'ad homienem' it is not. There have been....MANY TIMES...over the past three years in which you have posted stuff. One or more of us 'leftists' as you think on things, have shown you the actual facts on the issue. My post would only be an attack on you, if you got your facts straight. You for reasons I know not, get your 'facts' screwed up time and again. This is why many roll their eyes when reading your posts. "Fucking-A, another one of these stupid posts in which he didnt bother using a search engine?" So you are pushing an ad hominem towards me. So if you do it, its 'OK', but if others do, its just wrong, right? No, your post was a direct personal attack on me, nothing whatever about what I posted A veritable textbook example of an ad hominem Let me show you the difference, because your having trouble..... Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries. You sucks tauntaun ass. What are you; some sort of bottom feeding, scum sucking algae eater? 笨天生的一堆肉! You moon-face assassin of joy! That's attacking you directly, not what you wrote. That I'm replying here and being forced to give this sad example, is writing directly to what you wrote. Points to anyone that gets all the references...

Politesub53 -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 4:23:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Thing is though Ron, we westerners grew up and evolved from those awful days of old. Doesn't matter what brand of christianity you follow, most of us live in the 21st century society. Islamics only tolerate us and still follow 4th century doctrines. So things like beating women, treating them like chattel, killing gays and lesbians, owning human slaves etc is few and far between in our society. We also have free speech, acceptance of same-sex associations, education for all and many other things that Islam fundamentally forbids. I agreed with you, right up until you started typing. All the obnoxious shit you claim is "few and far between" still goes in in the UK and the West, not just amongst Muslims but also amongst almost all sections of society. For someone who lives in the UK, your posts are blinkered and bigoted. No doubt a few republicans will be praising your bullshit again though.

Politesub53 -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 4:27:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery You know, I think I'm tired of hanging out with a group of bigots. Yes, and I don't understand why any of you would support a religion that has instructions on how to beat women. Unless you secretly approve of it. ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....................you got those instructions anywhere handy, I could get a gander at em? Jus sayin Dont hold your breath. [;)]

slvemike4u -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:00:27 PM)
So what did I miss ? Anybody ? Just the short version [:)]

Lucylastic -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:08:35 PM)
Nothing of muuch interest mike

slvemike4u -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:12:27 PM)
Bet I had more fun than You [sm=modxiiswatching.gif]

Lucylastic -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:13:34 PM)
Grins im glad;)

slvemike4u -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:19:31 PM)
Lol,so we still talking about guns? Or has a certain someone moved the conversation somewhere else ?

lovmuffin -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:20:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u So what did I miss ? Anybody ? Just the short version [:)] Someone else got the last word[8D]

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:26:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Bet I had more fun than You [sm=modxiiswatching.gif] Someone should smell his fingers. Jus sayin

slvemike4u -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:31:17 PM)
Not quite yet muffin [:)] Fingers are all good here ET(of course smell is subjective)

ExiledTyrant -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 5:35:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Not quite yet muffin [:)] Fingers are all good here ET(of course smell is subjective) That sounds positively hopeful tho ;) I'm glad your VD was memorable. (Valentines Day, you sickos)

slvemike4u -> RE: Three Muslims shot (2/14/2015 6:00:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u Not quite yet muffin [:)] Fingers are all good here ET(of course smell is subjective) That sounds positively hopeful tho ;) I'm glad your VD was memorable. (Valentines Day, you sickos) Thanks,I spent it with a mutual friend

Page: << < prev 15 16 [17] 18 19 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875