RE: Hillary's E-Mails

RE: Hillary's E-Mails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

DesideriScuri -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/10/2015 7:14:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic megyn kelly and the washington exxaminer......conspiracy experts LMAO hows bill o reilly doing Bounty? LMFAO Smear the messenger rather than address the message. Typical strategy. Hillary addressed the situation today, which, crazy as it might sound, made Megyn Kelly correct. Now, what are you going to do, Lucy? Hillary's comments, though, probably aren't going to quell any on the right side of the aisle, though. I think, in the end, this scandal is only going to be usable to create a cloud of doubt about Hillary's transparency and accountability, which most of the people who will be voting GOP probably already have those doubts firmly entrenched.

Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 4:24:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic megyn kelly and the washington exxaminer......conspiracy experts LMAO hows bill o reilly doing Bounty? LMFAO Smear the messenger rather than address the message. Typical strategy. Hillary addressed the situation today, which, crazy as it might sound, made Megyn Kelly correct. Now, what are you going to do, Lucy? Hillary's comments, though, probably aren't going to quell any on the right side of the aisle, though. I think, in the end, this scandal is only going to be usable to create a cloud of doubt about Hillary's transparency and accountability, which most of the people who will be voting GOP probably already have those doubts firmly entrenched. LOL Im sorry, I didnt watch what megyn said, I also didnt watch what Hilary said..... neither of them interest me enough. but SMEAR???? LMFAO typical strategy indeeed, and one even you are doing right now. As far as Hilary is concerned? she has always had issues with her "honesty" and "transparency"This is a continuation of benghazi, and because she is favoured to beat the shit out of the GOP in the next election. Every breath she takes in the next 2 years is going to be called into question by people who are so intent on ignoring their own parties issues (ie their continuous flubs and failures since january, actually eclipses the last 6 years of complete idiocy) they have no clue on how imbecilic they look to others outside their own base.

bounty44 -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 5:59:58 AM)
it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late.

KenDckey -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 6:19:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. I didn't watch it but sounds like she needs Toastmasters LOL They had a club in Congress. And yes. Legal means seems appropriate.

KenDckey -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 6:54:22 AM)
Someone needs to go through that server and find out if in fact all the e-mails have been provided. I think this person needs the expertise in automation to do the job and the appropriate security clearance as well. I don't care who does it. They could choose a person or team from the US or some other country. I also think that SCOTUS or some other judicial body should appoint this person/team to do the job. I think this will always be a cloud of over the head of Hillary until it is done. I also recognize that if they choose someone that is a registered voter, that their political affiliation will be an issue to some. But it doesn't really make a difference, at least to me. Maybe someone registered as an independent. I also think someone from Canada would be good. Let the Canadian PM select the person/team. And I don't believe anyone cares about personal e-mails, but official ones are the publics business and the public should have access to them.

thishereboi -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 7:06:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. I don't, I hope they leave her alone and let her make the run in '16. That way I will get the chance to vote against her and watch her crash and burn.

KenDckey -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 7:12:12 AM)
LOL Boi

Sanity -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 7:22:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-says-obama-clinton-exchanged-emails-during-174415479.html POTUS did know that Hillary had a private email system. He E-mailed it several times. Wonder how he is going to reconsile this with his statement over the weekend that he learned about it from CBS If he didn't set up Hillary as a contact himself, he could simply type her name in, and never actually see the email host. I wouldn't be surprised if he had someone else setting email contacts up for him. He does have more pressing needs than entering email contact info. It might be a bit difficult to believe, but it's still possible he didn't know she wasn't using a .gov email account. How come no one on Obamas staff has asked, in this most transparent administration ever, doesnt [email protected] seem unusual? Has he surrounded himself with mental midgets? How would they know that presidential emails to some bizarre home server was secure and legit, and why would this not raise serious red flags What about everyone else in government who emailed her. All morons? Every one of them?

mnottertail -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 7:26:52 AM)
Yes, they call themselves 'conservative' goons and thugs.

Sanity -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 7:39:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. I don't, I hope they leave her alone and let her make the run in '16. That way I will get the chance to vote against her and watch her crash and burn. Seeing Hillary win in 2016 will be like seeing a car drop off a 100 foot cliff, burn into a heap of twisted metal then... Drive away without a scratch.

Aylee -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:07:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. Didn't it take something like 6 months of litigation to get her to release ANY of the emails from her "private" server?

Sanity -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:11:27 AM)
The majority of us who do not live in GruberVille with the Democrats know that shes lying. I know teenagers who are aware that you can have 12 email accounts on your phone (all with different server domains) if you want. If shes too stupid to know that (or if she cant surround herself with people who know such things) shes too stupid to be the president of a PTA

mnottertail -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:17:14 AM)
Well, thats pretty stupid, if thats all you know. In order for a email to be used other than internally,(in this case on its own server (clintonemail)) it will be registered, otherwise it wont go anywhere, and that registration is public, more or less. It cannot be hidden.

bounty44 -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:26:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. Didn't it take something like 6 months of litigation to get her to release ANY of the emails from her "private" server? I think its tough to keep track of all this stuff unless its your full time job, but I remember trey gowdy recently saying something about how she wasn't forthcoming at all in a timely fashion and how she kept having to be pursued, and pursued...and the days turned into weeks turned into months. one other very unsettling thing about the whole episode is the fact that all the foia requests and prior litigation that has occurred is not going to be honored consistent with the "new" batch of emails that have just been released.

joether -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:38:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. Oh, you dont like that things are unrehearsed? That she might have been speaking 'off the cuff'? Because if it was, you would simply suspect her of wrong doing even more. Then again, you suspect her of wrong doing....BECAUSE....of who she is. Not one shred of....ACTUAL....evidence, that she did something wrong. Not by one conservative on this forum! And all of you want to hang her. This whole thing is politically motivated....NOT....legally motivated. I think we should have those 47 Republican Senators arrested and charged with TREASON, and have all their stuff investigated. Unlike Hillary, their guilt is undeniable. The evidence is pretty open for the nation to see. And they broke the law to score political points. But that's a different topic right?

mnottertail -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:39:06 AM)
Harry Gowdy is not a fount of truth at all. Really doesn't matter what he says. Insofar as FOIA goes, there are legal reasons why a Secretary of States emails may not be for a casual reader. Although it appears at this point that has been satisfied, that there is no Executive privilege or national security concerns in them.

joether -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 8:46:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The majority of us who do not live in GruberVille with the Democrats know that shes lying. I know teenagers who are aware that you can have 12 email accounts on your phone (all with different server domains) if you want. If shes too stupid to know that (or if she cant surround herself with people who know such things) shes too stupid to be the president of a PTA Curiously enough Sen. Lindsey Graham, whom heads up the Senate committee on 'Privacy, Technology, and the Law' has never used email. Yes, a 2016 hopeful has even LESS knowledge of the internet than Hillary, but your 'ok' with him running for the White House.... Whether she is lying or not would be for a court to decide. Not for the likes of someone like you. Given your bias nature, its fair to say you would look at anything and everything that....might....be illegal as totally illegal. Likewise, any evidence that would show the opposite to be true, you would immediately discard. If she is charged, I hope she has access to a lawyer. That she is given a fair court with jury. Her or her lawyer is allowed to cross examine the evidence against her in a fair and just manner. Until she is found guilty, Sanity, she is INNOCENT. I know in your backwards reality, anyone you disagree with is automatically guilty and has to prove they are innocent. The reality you live in, is so..... ....draconian.....

Aylee -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 9:14:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 it was difficult to both watch and listen to her. apart from all the "ums" and "uhs" and constant lack of eye contact with either the camera, or the journalists in question (she flitted incessantly from reading from her notes, to looking off into left field, and then right field), and the inconsistencies/inexplicable things in her speaking---the most disturbing thing she said was "the server will remain private." I hope someone takes the next step and pursues legal means to compel her---although by then, I suspect it will be too late. Didn't it take something like 6 months of litigation to get her to release ANY of the emails from her "private" server? I think its tough to keep track of all this stuff unless its your full time job, but I remember trey gowdy recently saying something about how she wasn't forthcoming at all in a timely fashion and how she kept having to be pursued, and pursued...and the days turned into weeks turned into months. one other very unsettling thing about the whole episode is the fact that all the foia requests and prior litigation that has occurred is not going to be honored consistent with the "new" batch of emails that have just been released. Since you are suppose to sign a paper upon leaving the State Department that all correspondence has been turned over. . . umm. . . yeah, "years" does not equal "timely fashion." Her actions violated regulations and policies of the Obama admin. Not to mention we have no way (without subpoening the server) of knowing how many times it was hacked. Of course this does play into her pattern. Weren't there some missing law firm files years ago. . . PS Maybe Nixon should have just said, "I gave you enough audio tape!"

mnottertail -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 9:18:20 AM)
Uh, he did.

Sanity -> RE: Hillary's E-Mails (3/11/2015 9:19:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee Since you are suppose to sign a paper upon leaving the State Department that all correspondence has been turned over. . . umm. . . yeah, "years" does not equal "timely fashion." Her actions violated regulations and policies of the Obama admin. Not to mention we have no way (without subpoening the server) of knowing how many times it was hacked. Of course this does play into her pattern. Weren't there some missing law firm files years ago. . . PS Maybe Nixon should have just said, "I gave you enough audio tape!" Richard Nixon in a pantsuit and that server is the eighteen minutes we'll never hear. I suspect that Hillary's private server will suffer the same fate that Vince Foster did.

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875