NookieNotes
Posts: 1720
Joined: 11/10/2013 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kittenluv954 quote:
ORIGINAL: jerry292 Brings up an interesting thought reading some of these replies... If a man was truly submissive, wouldnt he have a more passive personality? He's not likely to be the one that runs laps around a bar asking any woman out he can until one happens to say yes. If someone is sending multiple e-mails a day to 50 different women, I wouldn't think that kind of aggression would be a hallmark of a "submissive." Instead, a real sub would be the one that sends one single thoughtful email that he had to work up courage to send. (Unfortunately, his message will likely be lost in the pile.) I mean it just seems like a personality mismatch to be THAT aggressive while saying you are submissive. sounds like someone got "shy and timid, meek type who walks around quietly with downcast eyes" confused with submission. Yes. This. ^^^ Submissive is being able to open yourself to another to be lead. It has NOTHING to do with extroversion/introversion or outgoing/shy. quote:
ORIGINAL: jerry292 If you like aggressive people chasing you, that's your business. Im just saying there is a mismatch in personality there. Don't whine when he starts to "top from the bottom." First, this comes across as bitter. Sounds like a nerve was struck. Second, topping from the bottom means that the bottom/sub/slave has taken the lead, the the top/Dom/Master is no longer in control. That does not happen with me, nor does it happen with any other competent Top/Dom/Master I know. Why? Because we have experience, and do not allow even aggressive subs (actually my preference) to take control away. Anyone whining about topping from the bottom is really (in my view) whining about their lack of ability to lead. quote:
ORIGINAL: jerry292 quote:
ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote:
ORIGINAL: jerry292 Brings up an interesting thought reading some of these replies... If a man was truly submissive, wouldnt he have a more passive personality? He's not likely to be the one that runs laps around a bar asking any woman out he can until one happens to say yes. If someone is sending multiple e-mails a day to 50 different women, I wouldn't think that kind of aggression would be a hallmark of a "submissive." Instead, a real sub would be the one that sends one single thoughtful email that he had to work up courage to send. (Unfortunately, his message will likely be lost in the pile.) I mean it just seems like a personality mismatch to be THAT aggressive while saying you are submissive. Submissive does not mean that a person can't take the initiative, in dating, relationships, work, life, etc. They are not wallflowers or doormats or too shy to go after something they want. Just because someone is submissive does not mean that they are more focused, or thoughtful, or patient than the next. Thinking otherwise is ignorant stereotyping. So when you have an inbox full of these people, who probably sent the same exact message to 20 other women, you shouldn't complain. They are taking the initiative to get what they want. Wow, you went from slightly off-base to full-blown wrong headed in two posts, and now you're continuing your losing streak. Are you really that hurt by the idea that some submissives do not have the apparent lack of social skills you think they should? You are obviously not good at this logic-ing thing. 1. Submissive means submissive, not weak, not shy, not insecure, not thoughtful. That why we have different words for those things. 2. On a site where "submissive" is the only option for people who like to get kinky things done to them (versus bottom, kinkster, hedonist, etc.), there are going to be many more submissive labels than are actually submissives. 3. Being submissive does not automatically make someone less of a jerk. 4. Receiving messages from jerks is no fun, whatever side of the slash they are on (or whatever sex they are).
_____________________________
Nookie -- https://datingkinky.com I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes
|