Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: thoughts on the power of religion


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: thoughts on the power of religion Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/1/2015 8:15:45 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Count me as one of those who frequently thinks, "Wouldn't it be good if, now that we humans have managed to survive to the 21st Century, we could finally jettison all religion as a thing of the past?

Well, YMM and probably will, V. It's just not an argument that I can be bothered to broach here.



and who would make the multitudes of moral determinations that we make on a daily basis as a matter of course for self governance?

every thought that is accepted as true correct or fact starts with a personal 'belief' in its being true, then acting upon your accepted belief, (esp moral beliefs) are in fact 'your religion' and that holds true even for atheists since they have a moral code of conduct.


You are trying to use a size 29 word to cover a size 38 ass. According to definitions, it just will not stretch that far.




well most everything can be reduced to its primary elements. I'd be interested to hear a couple examples how you are connecting your dots.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to NookieNotes)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/1/2015 1:05:13 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

. But while the truth must remain an open question, there is one thing that simply is not: Beliefs have effects on the person who holds them, and those effects are independent of whether or not the object of belief is real.


I have been preaching this for a long time. It really does not make a difference if God or a God exists or not... In fact he absolutely does exist if nothing else in the minds of the believer... And the actions of that believer are very real and can and do have power over everyone on this earth. So how can anyone say..." God does not exist" when his believers shape the world as we know it... It is simply reality.

Butch


That's a perspective I can understand.

But, to me it does matter whether or not a God exists because points of view really matter.

I personally do not believe there is God because seeing is believing for me, but I would love there to be one as it would be a happy ending and would wipe the smug smile from the likes of Dawkins.

What I object to is the smug satisfaction directed at anyone who dares to dream, while they themselves do not and never will have the answers.

The reality in our country is that organised religion, particularly the Church of England, consistently argue against invading people's countries, and if you ever talk to these people, religious or otherwise; you couldn't fail to think it was 10 minutes well spent, unless you're a fool like Dawkins who because he's read a few books thinks he's un a position to run world thought.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/1/2015 1:27:03 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

But, to me it does matter whether or not a God exists because points of view really matter.


I do understand what you are saying but my point is... if a believer is acting according to his belief in a God... and is in the process of placing a bullet between your eyes... or pressing the button to blow you to bits... your belief means nothing.

God is absolutely real in this context... because his teaching are taking your life.

But keep in mind this same God could be saving your life through support of a hospital or charity... This God is also real... denying these realities are dangerous and that is the mistake many atheists make. Just like the bloggers that just got hacked to death because they made fun of a religion... God does not like that... or rather men believe God does not and it is the same to that headless man.

Butch


< Message edited by kdsub -- 4/1/2015 1:29:56 PM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/1/2015 2:45:30 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Count me as one of those who frequently thinks, "Wouldn't it be good if, now that we humans have managed to survive to the 21st Century, we could finally jettison all religion as a thing of the past?

Well, YMM and probably will, V. It's just not an argument that I can be bothered to broach here.



and who would make the multitudes of moral determinations that we make on a daily basis as a matter of course for self governance?

every thought that is accepted as true correct or fact starts with a personal 'belief' in its being true, then acting upon your accepted belief, (esp moral beliefs) are in fact 'your religion' and that holds true even for atheists since they have a moral code of conduct.


You are trying to use a size 29 word to cover a size 38 ass. According to definitions, it just will not stretch that far.




Yep, that's my feeling, too, regarding this line of 'if you're an atheist you have your own religion of atheism [or similar]'.

But my overall point is that this argument is much, much too big to be dealt with here - well, for me, anyway.

If we were to talk about it in any useful way, though, I think it'd take rules of discussion that aren't generally followed on these forums.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to NookieNotes)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/2/2015 8:00:33 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Count me as one of those who frequently thinks, "Wouldn't it be good if, now that we humans have managed to survive to the 21st Century, we could finally jettison all religion as a thing of the past?

Well, YMM and probably will, V. It's just not an argument that I can be bothered to broach here.



and who would make the multitudes of moral determinations that we make on a daily basis as a matter of course for self governance?

every thought that is accepted as true correct or fact starts with a personal 'belief' in its being true, then acting upon your accepted belief, (esp moral beliefs) are in fact 'your religion' and that holds true even for atheists since they have a moral code of conduct.


You are trying to use a size 29 word to cover a size 38 ass. According to definitions, it just will not stretch that far.




Yep, that's my feeling, too, regarding this line of 'if you're an atheist you have your own religion of atheism [or similar]'.

But my overall point is that this argument is much, much too big to be dealt with here - well, for me, anyway.

If we were to talk about it in any useful way, though, I think it'd take rules of discussion that aren't generally followed on these forums.



on one hand its very simple and can be reduced into its constituent elements then on the other hand not so much.



What that says in todays english is:

Natural RELIGION, is what men might know, and be obliged to by mere principles of reason, improved by consideration and experience, without the assistance of divine revelation.


Hence the (all inclusive) application of its use in the 1st amendment (from a late 1700 dictionary)

some atheists have 'HUGE' difficulty with being classified as a religion despite with the exception to being in a coma it is nearly impossible for any thinking being by definition "not" to have a religion as it is as universal as claiming all humans have red blood.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/2/2015 8:37:49 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
OK. I'm not greatly concerned by a definition of religion that's dragged through three centuries in order to justify even atheism as a kind of religion. But in contemporary use of English, that wouldn't apply - and contemporary use of English trumps archaic use of English, as far as I'm concerned. I don't buy the idea that the older use of words is somehow more correct or more true than the newer use of them simply by virtue of being older.

If on the other hand you want to claim that the atheist still has to rely on a certain level of faith - even a major level of faith - yep, I'm not going to argue with that. You need to have faith that what you feel to be 'reason' is actually reason, albeit imperfect at times, and you need to have faith that what you see is, in general, actually there. Amongst other things. And put crudely. (Yep, I know what a can a worms could be opened up with these statements!)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 2:58:47 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

OK. I'm not greatly concerned by a definition of religion that's dragged through three centuries in order to justify even atheism as a kind of religion. But in contemporary use of English, that wouldn't apply - and contemporary use of English trumps archaic use of English, as far as I'm concerned. I don't buy the idea that the older use of words is somehow more correct or more true than the newer use of them simply by virtue of being older.

Well get over it, because it matters very much when interpreting the Constitution, hence the (all inclusive) application of its use in the 1st amendment (from a late 1700 dictionary). It is precisely that broad understanding of religion that has secured religious protection for Atheists in the U.S. (e.g., here).

K.


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 3:24:15 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

OK. I'm not greatly concerned by a definition of religion that's dragged through three centuries in order to justify even atheism as a kind of religion. But in contemporary use of English, that wouldn't apply - and contemporary use of English trumps archaic use of English, as far as I'm concerned. I don't buy the idea that the older use of words is somehow more correct or more true than the newer use of them simply by virtue of being older.

Well get over it, because it matters very much when interpreting the Constitution, hence the (all inclusive) application of its use in the 1st amendment (from a late 1700 dictionary). It is precisely that broad understanding of religion that has secured religious protection for Atheists in the U.S. (e.g., here).

K.




Not *my* constitution, old chap. And I'll use that interpretation about the same time as I start wearing three-cornered hats.

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 4/3/2015 3:27:25 AM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 3:40:18 AM   
NookieNotes


Posts: 1720
Joined: 11/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Count me as one of those who frequently thinks, "Wouldn't it be good if, now that we humans have managed to survive to the 21st Century, we could finally jettison all religion as a thing of the past?

Well, YMM and probably will, V. It's just not an argument that I can be bothered to broach here.



and who would make the multitudes of moral determinations that we make on a daily basis as a matter of course for self governance?

every thought that is accepted as true correct or fact starts with a personal 'belief' in its being true, then acting upon your accepted belief, (esp moral beliefs) are in fact 'your religion' and that holds true even for atheists since they have a moral code of conduct.


You are trying to use a size 29 word to cover a size 38 ass. According to definitions, it just will not stretch that far.



well most everything can be reduced to its primary elements.


Well, yes. They can. But they are not their primary elements. Water is not hydrogen or oxygen. It is water. A square is indeed a parallelogram, but a parallelogram is not a square, necessarily.

Religion is a thought process. Not all thought processes are religion, as you are trying to suggest.

quote:

I'd be interested to hear a couple examples how you are connecting your dots.


I'm not claiming to be connecting dots. I'm saying that yours are not connected.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
But my overall point is that this argument is much, much too big to be dealt with here - well, for me, anyway.

If we were to talk about it in any useful way, though, I think it'd take rules of discussion that aren't generally followed on these forums.


I agree.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


What that says in todays english is:

Natural RELIGION, is what men might know, and be obliged to by mere principles of reason, improved by consideration and experience, without the assistance of divine revelation.


Hence the (all inclusive) application of its use in the 1st amendment (from a late 1700 dictionary)

some atheists have 'HUGE' difficulty with being classified as a religion despite with the exception to being in a coma it is nearly impossible for any thinking being by definition "not" to have a religion as it is as universal as claiming all humans have red blood.


Ah, but we are not living in the 17th century. You DO know that English is a living language, yes?

For example:

quote:

re·li·gion
rəˈlijən/
noun: religion

1. the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
1a. a particular system of faith and worship.
1b. a pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance.


or

quote:

religion
noun re·li·gion \ri-ˈli-jən\

1. the belief in a god or in a group of gods
2. an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods


As another point to your 1700s vocabulary: A harlot used to be a clown or goofy guy. A "moot" point meant the point needed discussing. To apologize was to defend oneself. An angel used to be a human messenger. Awful meant amazing and inspiring wonder.

Words change as people change.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
Well get over it, because it matters very much when interpreting the Constitution, hence the (all inclusive) application of its use in the 1st amendment (from a late 1700 dictionary). It is precisely that broad understanding of religion that has secured religious protection for Atheists in the U.S. (e.g., here).


What matters for constitutional translation does not apply to contemporary conversation.

Just as someone else's D/s dynamics do not apply to me. Specific application and all.

Your point is a wonderful tidbit and insight, but it is not an open door to bring the meaning of the 18th century word into today's discussion. It has no current bearing.

_____________________________

Nookie
--
https://datingkinky.com

I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 4:30:05 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Not *my* constitution, old chap.

You don't have a constitution, old chap.

K.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 4:39:39 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Mistake.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_Kingdom

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 4:44:26 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes

What matters for constitutional translation does not apply to contemporary conversation.

I would think that what matters is the value of the definition. Contemporary definitions largely preclude any rational conversation.

a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe . . . a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons

Much of science is a religion by that definition, along with just about anything else that "a number of persons" decide to call one.

K.


(in reply to NookieNotes)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 4:46:59 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Mistake.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_Kingdom

This is sometimes expressed by stating that it has an uncodified or "unwritten" constitution.

I'll use that interpretation about the same time as I start wearing three-cornered hats.

K.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 4:54:58 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I'll use that interpretation about the same time as I start wearing three-cornered hats.



I'm surprised you ever stopped wearing them.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 5:18:37 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I'll use that interpretation about the same time as I start wearing three-cornered hats.

I'm surprised you ever stopped wearing them.

I haven't, actually. I always wear one to witch-burnings and the occasional flogging of an Englishman.

K.


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 5:45:30 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I'll use that interpretation about the same time as I start wearing three-cornered hats.

I'm surprised you ever stopped wearing them.

I haven't, actually. I always wear one to witch-burnings and the occasional flogging of an Englishman.

K.




Fair enough. ;-)

Actually, I quite like those three-cornered hats, come to think of it.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 9:04:29 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Not *my* constitution, old chap.

You don't have a constitution, old chap.

K.



We do. We have a written constitution in part. Yes, we do not have a word for word document governing our lives, but on the plus side this is what makes us the innovative, flexible people we are. This is a country short on dogma and it means that while in the United States you can be anything you want providing you conform to 'the American dream', in England you really can be anything you want, dream or otherwise, and nobody will bat an eyelid.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 9:38:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
This ain't bloody cockades for cockneys. We aint the fuckin red cross here, we don't have no state religion you anglican anglos.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 9:51:08 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

but on the plus side this is what makes us the innovative, flexible people we are.

And modest, too.

K.


(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: thoughts on the power of religion - 4/3/2015 10:02:56 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

This ain't bloody cockades for cockneys. We aint the fuckin red cross here, we don't have no state religion you anglican anglos.





We have a state religion, yes. But, for reasons of maintaining the English way of doing things.

So, ask a Church of England vicar how I could be a good Christian, and he or she will say something like: "well it depends, but it might help to keep your nose clean as everything will probably pan out fine. Whereas ask a Catholic priest and he will give you a list as long as your arm of dos and don'ts.

The whole point of the Church of England being involved with the government is a deliberate attempt to keep us open to options and not attracted to dogma.

And while you may not have a state religion, Ron, you certainly have far more authoritarians per head.

And, while we have a state religion, over the years it has encompassed Christian Socialism, Celtic Mysticism, Rural Conservatism, and all sorts of other things. It's a typically English institution vested in compromise, and imbued with sense of fuck it you can come in as well, probably unlike the more Puritan and Baptist American tradition.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: thoughts on the power of religion Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.110