Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

School Testing


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> School Testing Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
School Testing - 4/11/2015 3:43:05 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/09/testing-opt-out-effects_n_7035448.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

Schools can be punished because parents and educators don't believe that testing is the answer to where a student is in the educational process. This is a fairly good article about testing.

Personally, I feel that the educational system is broken and that standardized testing is not the way forward. I am not sure how to fix the problem except to go back to individual student based education based upon the abilities and work submitted by an individual student. More advanced students should not be held back because they exceed the "norm" of where they should be. Slower learning students, should not be pushed forward without first meeting some kind of standard, even if that means failing the student.

I believe that teachers should be rewarded for making improvements in the educational process of their students, regardless of whether or not they meet the "norm."

During Viet Nam, the Army had what it called project 100,000. It took 100,000 (more or less) draftees that could not otherwise meet the mental criteria for a soldier and continued them into the Army. It trained them in a profession. I worked with one who was trained as a stevedore/longshoreman. That is a high paying job. We put him in charge of 10,000 square feet of dirt that we temporarily stored cargo and associated equipment in. If someone moved anything in that area, he knew about it. He had something to be proud of. But, he literally could not walk down the street and chew gum at the same time. We were constantly making him spit the gum out. Likeable guy. But he could never pass the standardized tests of today's students without a lot of intensive personalized treatment by his overcorwed school. His personal aspiration was to become an ash truck driver in New England. Not as highly paid but a laudable goal.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 5:52:45 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/09/testing-opt-out-effects_n_7035448.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

Schools can be punished because parents and educators don't believe that testing is the answer to where a student is in the educational process. This is a fairly good article about testing.

Personally, I feel that the educational system is broken and that standardized testing is not the way forward. I am not sure how to fix the problem except to go back to individual student based education based upon the abilities and work submitted by an individual student. More advanced students should not be held back because they exceed the "norm" of where they should be. Slower learning students, should not be pushed forward without first meeting some kind of standard, even if that means failing the student.

I believe that teachers should be rewarded for making improvements in the educational process of their students, regardless of whether or not they meet the "norm."


I can understand how we got to the point where a lot of people believe that standardized testing is the answer. I recall 20-30 years ago, the big question was "Why can't Johnny read?" Kids were graduated from high school without the ability to read, write, or do basic math problems. People would wonder how such students could even get past first grade, let alone make it all the way to twelfth grade.

A lot of the responsibility should also rest with the parents. To blame the teacher for a child's failure in school is like blaming the doctor when a lifelong smoker dies of lung cancer.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 6:46:53 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
I don't mind standardized testing. It's existed for some time, now, in one form or another. We are a large country and data collection points are a necessary evil. (And I think that's what really gets people - the feeling that their child is just a number.) Anyway, the problem would be, of course, if standardized testing were the only way we assessed student progress or teacher effectiveness. But it's not. It's only one of a few tools. Which makes good sense.

There are problems with the current system, of course. I do think that the participation requirement for funding is sketchy, at best. And the demands placed on schools to meet the logistical testing requirements - technology, testing space, time away from teaching, etc... - are overly burdensome, in my opinion. Hopefully, that will all find its level. But when you say "Personally, I feel that the educational system is broken and that standardized testing is not the way forward. I am not sure how to fix the problem except to go back to individual student based education based upon the abilities and work submitted by an individual student. More advanced students should not be held back because they exceed the "norm" of where they should be. Slower learning students, should not be pushed forward without first meeting some kind of standard, even if that means failing the student.", I have to say - that is exactly what I see happening. Alternative Learning Plans, Extended Learning Opportunities, Competency Based Grading, Distance and Online Learning options - I wish I was in school again, honestly. I think the choices that are available now are fantastic. (At least in my area - I can't speak for elsewhere. I have to concede that living in New Hampshire, there probably isn't the same feeling of one's child being just a number as there are in some more populated areas.)

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 7:51:13 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
A lot of the responsibility should also rest with the parents. To blame the teacher for a child's failure in school is like blaming the doctor when a lifelong smoker dies of lung cancer.


This is very true. Parental support for academic achievement is, among my friends and relatives in the education business, one of the most important factors for academic success. Here's the problem, though, are we going to legislate requirements for parental support of academic studies? How do we force single-parent homes where the parent is struggling to get along?

This is one of my biggest issues with today's educational system. We continue to think that throwing more and more money into the schools is going to fix a problem that isn't in the school's ability (or authority) to fix. There is a parental responsibility for a child to succeed that is almost a requirement (it takes a special child to be able to succeed when the parent(s) aren't adequately supporting educational achievement). The breakdown of the family unit is a big problem that has to be solved by society. Adults not taking responsibility for the proper maturation of their children causes a lot of ills and increases costs to society.

It doesn't take a village, unless the parents can't or won't take the responsibility.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 8:51:38 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
I totally agree with the parental responsibility side of the argument. I push education, but then my work peers had Masters when I had to make my accomplishments with a HS education (I graduated in 1966).

As for federal funding I believe that it would be best served by deciding on a formula that is basically total budget allocated to schools divided by the total number of students equals the percapita portion to each school district in the country.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 11:36:44 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
I totally agree with the parental responsibility side of the argument. I push education, but then my work peers had Masters when I had to make my accomplishments with a HS education (I graduated in 1966).
As for federal funding I believe that it would be best served by deciding on a formula that is basically total budget allocated to schools divided by the total number of students equals the percapita portion to each school district in the country.


In Toledo, Ohio - Toledo Public Schools - there was a movement for kids to skip particular days, called "counting days." On those days. the headcount served as the number of students your school served, so skipping showed a lower headcount, and, thus, a lower level of funding (funding isn't tied strictly to a per capita number because poorer school districts get more money than school districts in wealthier areas. It's done as a protest against the school and the school's wasteful spending. It usually takes place at those schools in the poorer sections of Toledo, too.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 12:54:04 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

I can understand how we got to the point where a lot of people believe that standardized testing is the answer. I recall 20-30 years ago, the big question was "Why can't Johnny read?" Kids were graduated from high school without the ability to read, write, or do basic math problems. People would wonder how such students could even get past first grade, let alone make it all the way to twelfth grade....



that still occurs, and then it actually gets worse---many of those kids also end up in college in enrollment driven schools that have practically no admission standards. they have to take remedial math and English where it's mostly too little too late and they end up with a very high risk of dropping out or flunking out---or playing a sport for four years and never graduating after their eligibility is up.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 1:45:14 PM   
housebitch777


Posts: 74
Joined: 3/6/2015
Status: offline
this all has a simple solution. Return the child to the parents. Government, especially on a national level has no business being involved. If the parents cant be bothered to monitor the kids academic progress, then they have no business complaining about it when their child cant read his 9th grade English book. to late. those same parent are the one who cant figure why their kids hate them at that same age.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 3:44:08 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
What is a public school?

I'm reminded of the words of an anthropologist acquaintance back in the late 1970s.

[b]The public school system originated in the 1930s. The schools taught children to arrive on time, process the information presented in the manner prescribed, and to not cause any disturbances. This produced an excellent mind set for a good assembly line worker. It wasn't until we started expecting schools to teach something besides attendance that there was a problem.

Since the "no child left behind" movement went the cheap route and dumbed down the whole curriculum instead of making extra effort to educate those who were not up to average on academics; many companies require an A.S. or A.A. degree so they can be sure applicants can count change. (Yep, I'm talking fast food manager trainees.)

The system, as implemented fails at both imperatives; socialization and core skills. Common core standards might be a yardstick to measure a school. But, in the proposed manner of implementation it seems to just be making things more confused and futile.


(in reply to housebitch777)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 4:20:27 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
this all has a simple solution. Return the child to the parents. Government, especially on a national level has no business being involved. If the parents cant be bothered to monitor the kids academic progress, then they have no business complaining about it when their child cant read his 9th grade English book. to late. those same parent are the one who cant figure why their kids hate them at that same age.


Take your line of "reasoning" another step (which is where most fail in trying to figure out what to do).

Generation A (the parents) are mildly educated and have kids.

Generation B (Gen A's kids) are left to be educated by mildly educated people who don't participate in making sure their kids are educated. Gen B end up uneducated.

Generation C (Ben B's kids; you know they're going to go out and procreate) are left to be educated by uneducated people.

Educating kids by people trained to educate them will work just fine. We need to get all the other crap out of schools that aren't contributing to the education of the kids, and put that back on parents. And, we need to figure out a way to force parents into being responsible for their kids.

Nationally, I'm with you. Close down the DoEd. You want national standards? How about letting people choose where their kids attend school (vouchers) and then let the schools decide how they want to educate their kids. As these schools pump out kids with mush for brains, fewer kids will go there. More parents will choose schools that produce academic success.

You want your kids to make it into college? Make sure the schools are producing graduates that make it into college, and do your part.

Public schools aren't evil, or a problem, in and of themselves. It's how society has changed to almost require schools to do things that schools aren't really made to do. Schools haven't been developed to be a kid's parent(s). Too many schools have to be parents to the students because the student's parent(s) aren't doing it. The schools are doing it for the kids sake, but a school is not supposed to be the parent(s).



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to housebitch777)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 9:29:46 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
It is rare that I have enjoyed all the comments on a thread.
*So far anyway, that might change.

It's wonderful that people are not blaming the "teachers" for a change.

If more people wake up, there may be some hope for the public school system one day.

< Message edited by Marini -- 4/11/2015 9:32:12 PM >


_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: School Testing - 4/11/2015 11:03:35 PM   
housebitch777


Posts: 74
Joined: 3/6/2015
Status: offline
return education to the local, and more local the better, as small as neighborhoods. Let the parents hire their teacher, decide how much of their actual tax dollars they want spent on educating their kids. then give them a receipt they pay for. Teaching can still be a state paid job. But the state does only that.
The state can still maintain what it takes to qualify as a teacher. The state, all way down to the city commissioners cannot be sued. remove all possible scape goats for the parents, Putting their kids education right where it belongs, ON THEM.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 4:55:57 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
return education to the local, and more local the better, as small as neighborhoods. Let the parents hire their teacher, decide how much of their actual tax dollars they want spent on educating their kids. then give them a receipt they pay for. Teaching can still be a state paid job. But the state does only that.
The state can still maintain what it takes to qualify as a teacher. The state, all way down to the city commissioners cannot be sued. remove all possible scape goats for the parents, Putting their kids education right where it belongs, ON THEM.


Do you know what it takes to get into college? Do you know what colleges are looking for? Do you know what things are going to be needed to know for a child to succeed in college?

How are you going to hire a teacher that can teach your kids that, if you don't know what it takes? How are you going to check if Teacher A knows these things? Just ask?

How do the poor communities gather enough resources to hire a good enough teacher to end the cycle of poor academics?

All that still doesn't show how parents are going to be held responsible for their children's education. You're putting the responsibility on them, but so what. If Couple A thinks education is for suckers, then they might choose to not education their kids. If you force them to educate their kids, what happens if they don't have the resources?

Education needs a huge overhaul, but that has to start in individual homes, with the parental support of academic achievement. My Dad's parents didn't go to college (his mom left school after 6th grade to help earn money for her family). My Dad did go to college, and was a school administrator. He made damn sure we understood the value of education. College was something he had to work for. Not going to college wasn't even an option for my 3 siblings or me. I consider myself lucky that we had parents that pushed for academic success. This is the kind of attitude that needs to work its way through society. Until then, throwing money at schools isn't going to solve the problem of poor academic achievement.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to housebitch777)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 6:51:28 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:


Public schools aren't evil, or a problem, in and of themselves. It's how society has changed to almost require schools to do things that schools aren't really made to do. Schools haven't been developed to be a kid's parent(s). Too many schools have to be parents to the students because the student's parent(s) aren't doing it. The schools are doing it for the kids sake, but a school is not supposed to be the parent(s).




Very much this. Jamie Vollmer has developed a list of responsibilities that has been handed to schools over the years. (Link)

A sample:

In the 1950's, we added:
Expanded science and math education
Safety education
Driver’s education
Expanded music and art education
Stronger foreign language requirements
Sex education (Topics continue to escalate.)

In the 1970's, we added:
Drug and alcohol abuse education
Parenting education (techniques and tools for healthy parenting)
Behavior adjustment classes (including classroom and communication skills)
Character education
Special education (mandated by federal government)
Title IX programs (greatly expanded athletic programs for girls)
Environmental education
Women’s studies
African-American heritage education
School breakfast programs (Now some schools feed America’s children two-thirds of their daily meals throughout the school year and all summer. Sadly, these are the only decent meals some children receive.)

In the 1980's, we added:
Keyboarding and computer education
Global education
Multicultural/Ethnic education
Nonsexist education
English-as-a-second-language and bilingual education
Teen pregnancy awareness
Hispanic heritage education
Early childhood education
Jump Start, Early Start, Even Start, and Prime Start
Full-day kindergarten
Preschool programs for children at risk
After-school programs for children of working parents
Alternative education in all its forms
Stranger/danger education
Antismoking education
Sexual abuse prevention education
Expanded health and psychological services
Child abuse monitoring (a legal requirement for all teachers)

In the 1990's, we added:
Conflict resolution and peer mediation
HIV/AIDS education
CPR training
Death education
America 2000 initiatives (Republican)
Inclusion
Expanded computer and internet education
Distance learning
Tech Prep and School to Work programs
Technical Adequacy
Assessment
Post-secondary enrollment options
Concurrent enrollment options
Goals 2000 initiatives (Democratic)
Expanded Talented and Gifted opportunities
At risk and dropout prevention
Homeless education (including causes and effects on children)
Gang education (urban centers)
Service learning
Bus safety, bicycle safety, gun safety, and water safety education


I won't copy and paste all of it, but the link has more. And as he says, it's not that these topics don't have merit. (And some of them clearly are academically necessary. The list is comprehensive.) The issue is that these responsibilities have been added to the school's plate without adding any time to the calendar in the past 60 years to allow for all of this. So not only are school staff trying to teach, but they are trying to teach while having to make room in their day for so many other life lessons that parents (and politicians, and business and community leaders) now expect them to take care of.

< Message edited by Kaliko -- 4/12/2015 6:56:38 AM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 7:06:40 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
I won't copy and paste all of it, but the link has more. And as he says, it's not that these topics don't have merit. (And some of them clearly are academically necessary. The list is comprehensive.) The issue is that these responsibilities have been added to the school's plate without adding any time to the calendar in the past 60 years to allow for all of this. So not only are school staff trying to teach, but they are trying to teach while having to make room in their day for so many other life lessons that parents (and politicians, and business and community leaders) now expect them to take care of.


The abdication of parental responsibility is a HUGE issue; whether it was voluntary or forced upon the populace is debatable in some cases but not so in others.

When I hear people "complaining" (I'm not saying you were, specifically) about how much responsibilities schools have, my first thought is: Stop thinking you have to indoctrinate our children and get back to teaching them the three "R"s!

When my youngest was in kindergarten, his principal had the fucking gall to tell me it was his job to teach my son morality. That has NEVER (or should never have) been the task of the schools and that is part of the problem in this country also. The schools are more indoctrination centers than halls of academia.



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 4/12/2015 7:07:39 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 7:19:12 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
quote:

Public schools aren't evil, or a problem, in and of themselves. It's how society has changed to almost require schools to do things that schools aren't really made to do. Schools haven't been developed to be a kid's parent(s). Too many schools have to be parents to the students because the student's parent(s) aren't doing it. The schools are doing it for the kids sake, but a school is not supposed to be the parent(s).

Very much this. Jamie Vollmer has developed a list of responsibilities that has been handed to schools over the years. (Link)
A sample:
In the 1950's, we added:
Expanded science and math education
Safety education
Driver’s education
Expanded music and art education
Stronger foreign language requirements
Sex education (Topics continue to escalate.)
In the 1970's, we added:
Drug and alcohol abuse education
Parenting education (techniques and tools for healthy parenting)
Behavior adjustment classes (including classroom and communication skills)
Character education
Special education (mandated by federal government)
Title IX programs (greatly expanded athletic programs for girls)
Environmental education
Women’s studies
African-American heritage education
School breakfast programs (Now some schools feed America’s children two-thirds of their daily meals throughout the school year and all summer. Sadly, these are the only decent meals some children receive.)
In the 1980's, we added:
Keyboarding and computer education
Global education
Multicultural/Ethnic education
Nonsexist education
English-as-a-second-language and bilingual education
Teen pregnancy awareness
Hispanic heritage education
Early childhood education
Jump Start, Early Start, Even Start, and Prime Start
Full-day kindergarten (In my area, public schools charge parents extra for full or every day kindergarten, but not if it's only half or every other day.)
Preschool programs for children at risk
After-school programs for children of working parents
Alternative education in all its forms
Stranger/danger education
Antismoking education
Sexual abuse prevention education
Expanded health and psychological services
Child abuse monitoring (a legal requirement for all teachers)
In the 1990's, we added:
Conflict resolution and peer mediation
HIV/AIDS education
CPR training
Death education
America 2000 initiatives (Republican)
Inclusion
Expanded computer and internet education
Distance learning
Tech Prep and School to Work programs
Technical Adequacy
Assessment
Post-secondary enrollment options
Concurrent enrollment options
Goals 2000 initiatives (Democratic)
Expanded Talented and Gifted opportunities
At risk and dropout prevention
Homeless education (including causes and effects on children)
Gang education (urban centers)
Service learning
Bus safety, bicycle safety, gun safety, and water safety education
I won't copy and paste all of it, but the link has more. And as he says, it's not that these topics don't have merit. (And some of them clearly are academically necessary. The list is comprehensive.) The issue is that these responsibilities have been added to the school's plate without adding any time to the calendar in the past 60 years to allow for all of this. So not only are school staff trying to teach, but they are trying to teach while having to make room in their day for so many other life lessons that parents now expect them to take care of.


That's a helluva list, and points out many things that have been added.

Some of the things on the list don't necessarily increase the amount of time teachers should be teaching. For instance, smoking education, drug alcohol abuse education, and teen pregnancy education should be lessons within a "Health" class, as should other things listed. Other things on here are well within reasonable things that a school should teach, because of the changing times. In 7th grade, I remember my first "computer" class. It was the coolest thing walking into that room with the sweet "trash-80's" and Texas Instruments computers (TI-994A's; the main reason I remember the actual model is because we had one at home). Advanced math and science courses (there are AP courses for damn near everything now) weren't "over and above" for teachers. In the case of my school, each of those "advanced" classes were full classes, so we'd have had to be taught anyway. The only difference was the subject matter (or the speed/depth at which we went through that subject matter). The addition of "college" courses offered by schools is a great thing, too, but it doesn't take away from a teacher's time (it actually reduces it slightly because those students aren't being taught in the HS). I know a lady whose son is graduating HS this year, and has already completed his first year "general education" college curriculum.

The "early start" line, as with the pre- and post- school programs add time along with the added responsibility (as part of a "both parents work" couple that paid over $17k one year for daycare for 3 kids, I understand the need for these programs).

What's worse, and isn't necessarily mentioned in what you quoted, is the amount of parenting teachers and school staff are being required to do. Kids come in that haven't had solid parenting, and cause disruptions in the classroom. Not only does that force a teacher to have to parent that child, it take away from the educations of the rest of the class.

Teachers in Toledo Public Schools start off at $30k ($35K with a Masters) and have a solid salary increase step program. For all they're asked to do, they don't get paid enough. If they only had to teach, and not also parent, they'd be getting paid pretty damn well, imo.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 7:36:00 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I believe, and it seems in the minority, that common core is a wonderful idea. There is no truth to the idea that this testing holds back gifted students and it is essential for those having problems in school and needing additional help.

The common core is exactly what our children need at a basic level to compete on the world stage and being sure every student gets this necessary education across the system can only be common sense.

I believe all children of any race, ethnicity, rich or poor can succeed in school with the proper teaching methods, support, and curriculum. Common Core will show which children need extra help and should also weed out incompetent educators.

Common Core is a measure…yes it is not an easy one to meet and that is the way if should be. It is hard for underperforming schools who for years have failed to educate their children properly… but over time there will be no excuse as young children have their problems exposed and addressed. You will not have the so called 9th grade educator of the year complaining about the test because many of her students were reading at the 5th grade level… This is exactly why common core is needed.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 7:36:19 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

What's worse, and isn't necessarily mentioned in what you quoted, is the amount of parenting teachers and school staff are being required to do. Kids come in that haven't had solid parenting, and cause disruptions in the classroom. Not only does that force a teacher to have to parent that child, it take away from the educations of the rest of the class.



And that's the other side of it. There are a great number of things on these lists that I don't believe belong in schools. But as you say, kids come into the school without solid parenting. As a result, they disrupt the education of other children. At that point, then, is it the school's responsibility to take over where the parent has left off? Because not everyone in the school building is receiving the same access to education?


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


When my youngest was in kindergarten, his principal had the fucking gall to tell me it was his job to teach my son morality. That has NEVER (or should never have) been the task of the schools and that is part of the problem in this country also. The schools are more indoctrination centers than halls of academia.


Michael[/color]


Enter "Character Education."

I believe there have been a number of grants and funding programs over the years (especially a few years ago) to schools that required some sort of moral education. So as much as it might ruffle your feathers (and mine), the principal may very well have been correct. Their funding might have been based on proving that they've provided some sort of moral education.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 7:45:09 AM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
FR


edit since the pic is so damn small
"Everybody is a Genius. But If You Judge a Fish by Its Ability to Climb a Tree, It Will Live Its Whole Life Believing that It is Stupid."

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JstAnotherSub -- 4/12/2015 7:46:58 AM >


_____________________________

yep

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: School Testing - 4/12/2015 7:45:09 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I believe, and it seems in the minority, that common core is a wonderful idea. There is no truth to the idea that this testing holds back gifted students and it is essential for those having problems in school and needing additional help.

The common core is exactly what our children need at a basic level to compete on the world stage and being sure every student gets this necessary education across the system can only be common sense.

I believe all children of any race, ethnicity, rich or poor can succeed in school with the proper teaching methods, support, and curriculum. Common Core will show which children need extra help and should also weed out incompetent educators.

Common Core is a measure…yes it is not an easy one to meet and that is the way if should be. It is hard for underperforming schools who for years have failed to educate their children properly… but over time there will be no excuse as young children have their problems exposed and addressed. You will not have the so called 9th grade educator of the year complaining about the test because many of her students were reading at the 5th grade level… This is exactly why common core is needed.

Butch


I've no issue with Common Core at all. It's a set of standards. A few years ago, when we opened up our text book and saw an outline for what we were going to learn? That was a set of standards also. No big deal.

And as mobile as families are nowadays, it just makes good sense for a child to be able to easily pick up where they left off in another school. It's initially disruptive to school staff to have to adjust their curriculum, yes, but I think it's all good for kids.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> School Testing Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188