wannapleez
Posts: 358
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MistressRage I have always understood forced fem as a form of humiliation, hence it being forced rather than simple feminization. Thus, the more anti-androgenous they are, the better the humiliation aspect. And that's where my mind went on the "pro" side of things. On the "con" side was if (for the Mistress) it wasn't solely about humiliation, but if there was an aesthetic factor too. ETA: Case in point, the one Domme who was really into forced fem for me had me in lacy panties and stockings when we played, but when we were apart, I was still to wear panties that were definitely feminine, but not specifically pretty (e.g. colors and patterns that would never be found in men's underwear). So it was all humiliation for her when apart, but an added component of aesthetics when together.
< Message edited by wannapleez -- 4/18/2015 1:13:37 AM >
|