Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 6:43:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Hi Lucy,how are you feeling ?

doin good hon:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 7:04:25 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

The US government doesn't usually stand in the way of NGO's. Our leaders encourage volunteerism and charity every chance they get.

If NGO's haven't been able to end poverty with the government's help, they sure as hell wouldn't be able to without it. (And vice versa)

That much should be pretty obvious to anyone....not blinded by ideology or accustomed to finding answers to todays issues by reading the bible.


your ignorance of and contempt for the bible front and center, jesus said "the poor you will always have with you..." argue with him.

so there is no "ending" of poverty. the question isn't one of ending poverty, but rather, what is the best response to it to help the people who find themselves in it.

my contention wasn't that government shouldn't be involved, it was that to the extent they are, it effects what others do. and its not that government gets in the way of others by purposely/consciously stopping them---I see it like this:

consider you are poor---you have a choice of turning to welfare and food stamps and other government aid or you could turn to your family or the local church or your neighbors or local charity. many, if not most, will choose the government route and one reason they do, is because of the impersonal nature of the source.

consider that the government provides less, but there is still need. those needs could be, might be, and should be, met by the sources ive mentioned above but they wont be to the extent they might be, so long as the government is doing it.

but, for those of you whose god is government, and cannot see the human condition being helped apart from government, know that there are many of us who don't buy into your paradigm, which has perpetually been a failure.

"The War on Poverty After 50 Years"

quote:

In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, “This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.” In the 50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs. Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or Medicare) is three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution. Yet progress against poverty, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, has been minimal, and in terms of President Johnson’s main goal of reducing the “causes” rather than the mere “consequences” of poverty, the War on Poverty has failed completely. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now less capable of self-sufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began...Today, government spends 16 times more, adjusting for inflation, on means-tested welfare or anti-poverty programs than it did when the War on Poverty started. But as welfare spending soared, the decline in poverty came to a grinding halt. As Chart 2 shows, the more the government spent, the less progress against poverty was made...Although President Johnson intended the War on Poverty to increase Americans’ capacity for self-support, exactly the opposite has occurred. The vast expansion of the welfare state has dramatically weakened the capacity for self-sufficiency among many Americans by eroding the work ethic and undermining family structure....This lack of progress in building self-sufficiency is due in major part to the welfare system itself. Welfare wages war on social capital, breaking down the habits and norms that lead to self-reliance, especially those of marriage and work. It thereby generates a pattern of increasing intergenerational dependence. The welfare state is self-perpetuating: By undermining productive social norms, welfare creates a need for even greater assistance in the future.


http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/the-war-on-poverty-after-50-years

but then, results don't really matter to liberals compared to the feeling they get from promoting government "do gooding."



(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 8:43:55 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

You can't use Food stamp benefits online, aside from a handful of places. Schwann's is the only one I known of that offers delivery locally.

Of course, food stamps is a totally different beast than cash assistance, although both are under the umbrella of the EBT card. I believe Unemployment benefits are as well, in many states.

A power of attorney seems a bit excessive to me though.

How about just sending them an envelope with small unmarked bills?



Why should their bills be a any different in size from other people's bills? Why do you have to hate like that?

Now, if you are going to send regular sized bills to people, I will take two envelopes worth!

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 8:44:51 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

You can't use Food stamp benefits online, aside from a handful of places. Schwann's is the only one I known of that offers delivery locally.

Of course, food stamps is a totally different beast than cash assistance, although both are under the umbrella of the EBT card. I believe Unemployment benefits are as well, in many states.

A power of attorney seems a bit excessive to me though.

How about just sending them an envelope with small unmarked bills?



Why should their bills be a any different in size from other people's bills? Why do you have to hate like that?

Now, if you are going to send regular sized bills to people, I will take two envelopes worth!

LOL

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 8:44:57 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Hi Lucy,how are you feeling ?

doin good hon:)


Aww, how sweet. You two lovers remind me of that Captain & Tennille song, Muskrat Love







< Message edited by Sanity -- 4/20/2015 8:51:54 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 8:55:14 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Amazing.

Its as though you have endless patience. How do you do it?


Sanity, I have to say: I do wonder about people such as yourself. It's said that most people are just one wage-cheque away from being unemployed and on benefits. That's rough for people who've been on comfortable wages, are well-educated and stand a good chance of being employed at good wages in the near future. But I do wonder about someone such as yourself who, clearly, has the minimal level of education and ability, and who might just find himself one of the benefits claimants very soon.

Me, I would be able to get through it, I think. I have a lefty world view that's proof against seeing myself as the utter scum. However you, as a person with both the minimal education and ability, but also extremely right wing attitudes - if you went unemployed, surely you'd see yourself as utter scum. Wouldn't you? I mean, all the time I've seen you writing on this forum, you've held a condemning view of people at 'the bottom'. But, seriously, you're not so far off that bottom yourself, are you?

How would you handle that? The basic thing for me is: how do people at one step up off the bottom of the pile, who fall on bad times and end up jobless, for instance, see themselves? Would you hate yourself if you became unemployed and had to draw welfare - just as you've hated and despised those who've drawn benefits in your posts to date?


That has to be the most sanctimonious British pompous ass BS I've ever seen you post. How do you know he's at one step up off the bottom of the pile ? Oh, I know how. You're so fuckin smart.

The problem with people who suck off of government handouts are not those truly in need but those who are not in need just mooching off the system. I clearly remember, way back in the day, 2 individuals on 2 different occasions, literally bragging how they had it made so well financially selling pot and drawing welfare. Fast forward to today and there have been numerous laws passed to prevent this sort of thing, yet many find a way around them. I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:00:01 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

For the record I am doing pretty good. The value of my property alone could make for a comfortable retirement if it came to that, and I am currently self employed and doing great

I wont be firing myself any time soon so my job security is right up there. I am college educated and I easily earned high honors

And despite his idiotic straw man fallacy I have never spoken ill of the poor

The trollish little psycho's crystal ball must have a short circuit or three, and he obviously has several screws missing himself





< Message edited by Sanity -- 4/20/2015 9:05:24 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:11:30 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:21:45 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:26:14 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
The flipside of that is "They're unemployed and broke. Let's make sure that they're as miserable as they can possibly be by denying them anything that might boost their morale at all."

Jeez. As I've been reading this thread, it's been reminding me of a bit of childhood education:

One of the first things I noticed about photos and films set in WW2 Britain was that the women all wore lipstick. It was never banned or even frowned upon as a 'luxury' like so many other things here in the UK. Why? Because lippy on women was considered to be important for the morale of both sexes. Certain things that appear to be frivolous turn out not to be frivolous at all.



Another great example of a ridiculous straw man fallacy here

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:27:58 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Hardly a strawman. Isnt this thread about the state commanding that assistance cannot be spent on underwear?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:39:26 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hardly a strawman. Isnt this thread about the state commanding that assistance cannot be spent on underwear?


Which, that was proven a lie in this thread already, the same sort of straw man fallacy pushed by "journalists" in the national "news" media rather than just some Yahoo! poster






< Message edited by Sanity -- 4/20/2015 9:45:44 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:43:42 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

......Isn't this thread about the state commanding that assistance cannot be spent on underwear?


I agree. Why can't we get back to talking about bras and panties ? What color are you wearing today mnot ? Boyshorts or briefs ? It looks to me they might be a little twisted



_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:55:14 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:56:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hardly a strawman. Isnt this thread about the state commanding that assistance cannot be spent on underwear?


Which, that was proven a lie in this thread already, the same sort of straw man fallacy pushed by "journalists" in the national "news" media rather than just some Yahoo! poster








That still would not be a strawman.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 9:57:50 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

......Isn't this thread about the state commanding that assistance cannot be spent on underwear?


I agree. Why can't we get back to talking about bras and panties ? What color are you wearing today mnot ? Boyshorts or briefs ? It looks to me they might be a little twisted




Get off your knees, ain't gonna happen.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 10:10:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
A question for you non-native English speakers. What does lingerie mean?

For the native speakers it means women's underwear and nightclothes. Now, I am all for their being kept naked....but lets use our English properly.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 10:22:52 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

......Isn't this thread about the state commanding that assistance cannot be spent on underwear?


I agree. Why can't we get back to talking about bras and panties ? What color are you wearing today mnot ? Boyshorts or briefs ? It looks to me they might be a little twisted




Get off your knees, ain't gonna happen.


Oh Gawd, as if, I just lost my lunch.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 10:40:14 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Amazing.

Its as though you have endless patience. How do you do it?


Sanity, I have to say: I do wonder about people such as yourself. It's said that most people are just one wage-cheque away from being unemployed and on benefits. That's rough for people who've been on comfortable wages, are well-educated and stand a good chance of being employed at good wages in the near future. But I do wonder about someone such as yourself who, clearly, has the minimal level of education and ability, and who might just find himself one of the benefits claimants very soon.

Me, I would be able to get through it, I think. I have a lefty world view that's proof against seeing myself as the utter scum. However you, as a person with both the minimal education and ability, but also extremely right wing attitudes - if you went unemployed, surely you'd see yourself as utter scum. Wouldn't you? I mean, all the time I've seen you writing on this forum, you've held a condemning view of people at 'the bottom'. But, seriously, you're not so far off that bottom yourself, are you?

How would you handle that? The basic thing for me is: how do people at one step up off the bottom of the pile, who fall on bad times and end up jobless, for instance, see themselves? Would you hate yourself if you became unemployed and had to draw welfare - just as you've hated and despised those who've drawn benefits in your posts to date?


That has to be the most sanctimonious British pompous ass BS I've ever seen you post. How do you know he's at one step up off the bottom of the pile ? Oh, I know how. You're so fuckin smart.



In what way was it 'British', lovemuffin, you ludicrous windbag? And why is it only ever very right wing Americans who are so touchy about Brits and others 'looking down' on them and so determined to project that particular hang up onto them? Seriously: you and your ilk are going to have to find somebody else to oppress you. Neither I nor any other Brit can be bothered. You really will have to take that kind of self-pitying diarrhoea and reinject it back up your posterior. It's pathetic.

As for Sanity being at the bottom of the pile education wise - he posts have demonstrated that abundantly. If he were ever to want to show something else, I'd be more than happy to see it.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies - 4/20/2015 12:26:20 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Amazing.

Its as though you have endless patience. How do you do it?


Sanity, I have to say: I do wonder about people such as yourself. It's said that most people are just one wage-cheque away from being unemployed and on benefits. That's rough for people who've been on comfortable wages, are well-educated and stand a good chance of being employed at good wages in the near future. But I do wonder about someone such as yourself who, clearly, has the minimal level of education and ability, and who might just find himself one of the benefits claimants very soon.

Me, I would be able to get through it, I think. I have a lefty world view that's proof against seeing myself as the utter scum. However you, as a person with both the minimal education and ability, but also extremely right wing attitudes - if you went unemployed, surely you'd see yourself as utter scum. Wouldn't you? I mean, all the time I've seen you writing on this forum, you've held a condemning view of people at 'the bottom'. But, seriously, you're not so far off that bottom yourself, are you?

How would you handle that? The basic thing for me is: how do people at one step up off the bottom of the pile, who fall on bad times and end up jobless, for instance, see themselves? Would you hate yourself if you became unemployed and had to draw welfare - just as you've hated and despised those who've drawn benefits in your posts to date?


That has to be the most sanctimonious British pompous ass BS I've ever seen you post. How do you know he's at one step up off the bottom of the pile ? Oh, I know how. You're so fuckin smart.



In what way was it 'British', lovemuffin, you ludicrous windbag? And why is it only ever very right wing Americans who are so touchy about Brits and others 'looking down' on them and so determined to project that particular hang up onto them? Seriously: you and your ilk are going to have to find somebody else to oppress you. Neither I nor any other Brit can be bothered. You really will have to take that kind of self-pitying diarrhoea and reinject it back up your posterior. It's pathetic.

As for Sanity being at the bottom of the pile education wise - he posts have demonstrated that abundantly. If he were ever to want to show something else, I'd be more than happy to see it.

I am amazed by your perpetual fantasy that we feel oppressed by you. It is more like being irritated with a dwarf claiming to be able to whip the world heavyweight champion if they would only give him a fight.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156