RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:28:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too[8D]


Are you suggesting you and your buddies don't ?




lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:34:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Amazing.

Its as though you have endless patience. How do you do it?


Sanity, I have to say: I do wonder about people such as yourself. It's said that most people are just one wage-cheque away from being unemployed and on benefits. That's rough for people who've been on comfortable wages, are well-educated and stand a good chance of being employed at good wages in the near future. But I do wonder about someone such as yourself who, clearly, has the minimal level of education and ability, and who might just find himself one of the benefits claimants very soon.

Me, I would be able to get through it, I think. I have a lefty world view that's proof against seeing myself as the utter scum. However you, as a person with both the minimal education and ability, but also extremely right wing attitudes - if you went unemployed, surely you'd see yourself as utter scum. Wouldn't you? I mean, all the time I've seen you writing on this forum, you've held a condemning view of people at 'the bottom'. But, seriously, you're not so far off that bottom yourself, are you?

How would you handle that? The basic thing for me is: how do people at one step up off the bottom of the pile, who fall on bad times and end up jobless, for instance, see themselves? Would you hate yourself if you became unemployed and had to draw welfare - just as you've hated and despised those who've drawn benefits in your posts to date?


That has to be the most sanctimonious British pompous ass BS I've ever seen you post. How do you know he's at one step up off the bottom of the pile ? Oh, I know how. You're so fuckin smart.



In what way was it 'British', lovemuffin, you ludicrous windbag? And why is it only ever very right wing Americans who are so touchy about Brits and others 'looking down' on them and so determined to project that particular hang up onto them? Seriously: you and your ilk are going to have to find somebody else to oppress you. Neither I nor any other Brit can be bothered. You really will have to take that kind of self-pitying diarrhoea and reinject it back up your posterior. It's pathetic.

As for Sanity being at the bottom of the pile education wise - he posts have demonstrated that abundantly. If he were ever to want to show something else, I'd be more than happy to see it.


Your posts have demonstrated you think yer so much wiser, evolved, more civilized and smarter than some of us you disagree with politically, thus the sanctimonious pompous ass moniker. Since you're a Brit, it is why your pompous assedness is British.

One thing I can tell from all your posts is you're not stupid but neither is Sanity based on his posts. I could see where someone might get idealogical or extreme right from his posts, but I don't know where you're getting stupid from.

Why is it only ever very right wing Americans who are so touchy about Brits and others 'looking down' on them and so determined to project that particular hang up onto them you ask ? Maybe it's because we cling to our guns and religion and we know you guys abhor guns. If it were very right wing Brits and others looking down on Anerican lefties, I'm sure those lefties would be touchy about that too.




PeonForHer -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:35:30 PM)

quote:

I am amazed by your perpetual fantasy that we feel oppressed by you. It is more like being irritated with a dwarf claiming to be able to whip the world heavyweight champion if they would only give him a fight.


Right, of course. So if that's the case, why are you forever whining and bleating about it? If I were you (or lovemuffin, or various others), I'd re-read Kirata's Perpetually Offended thread. Seriously, Bama, this one has got very, very old.




BamaD -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:40:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

I am amazed by your perpetual fantasy that we feel oppressed by you. It is more like being irritated with a dwarf claiming to be able to whip the world heavyweight champion if they would only give him a fight.


Right, of course. So if that's the case, why are you forever whining and bleating about it? If I were you (or lovemuffin, or various others), I'd re-read Kirata's Perpetually Offended thread. Seriously, Bama, this one has got very, very old.

It is a shame that you can't tell the difference between whining and calling you on your arrogance. You stop being arrogant and we will stop calling you on it.




lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:44:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too[8D]


Are you suggesting you and your buddies don't ?


I'm not suggesting anything. I'm poking fun at the fact that when libs have no basis or logic to support thier political philosophy, they resort to name calling like racist, sexist and homophobe.




PeonForHer -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:44:19 PM)

quote:


ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

Your posts have demonstrated you think yer so much wiser, evolved, more civilized and smarter than some of us you disagree with politically, thus the sanctimonious pompous ass moniker. Since you're a Brit, it is why your pompous assedness is British.


Balls. You're just piling more projection onto more projection. And still whining. My being British has no relevance whatsoever, as I'm sure you'd realise were you to allow your logical head a look-in. Unless, of course, you can demonstrate that no Americans here think Sanity to be a dumbass? Hmm? If memory serves, one or two have indeed expressed that thought? No?





PeonForHer -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:46:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It is a shame that you can't tell the difference between whining and calling you on your arrogance. You stop being arrogant and we will stop calling you on it.


No, as previously mentioned, the shame is that you can't see when you're being oversensitive and projecting. If you stop that projecting, maybe I'll stop laughing at it.




slvemike4u -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:49:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too[8D]


Are you suggesting you and your buddies don't ?


I'm not suggesting anything. I'm poking fun at the fact that when libs have no basis or logic to support thier political philosophy, they resort to name calling like racist, sexist and homophobe.

Disregarding that often the folks,issues or legislation being addressed s indeed racist,sexist and homophobic [:D]




BamaD -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:49:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It is a shame that you can't tell the difference between whining and calling you on your arrogance. You stop being arrogant and we will stop calling you on it.


No, as previously mentioned, the shame is that you can't see when you're being oversensitive and projecting. If you stop that projecting, maybe I'll stop laughing at it.

You cant get past your delusion that I and others feel that you oppress us, this is false. You are too arrogant to know you are. If you think I am projecting you must feel oppressed by me, so sad.




lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:51:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

I am amazed by your perpetual fantasy that we feel oppressed by you. It is more like being irritated with a dwarf claiming to be able to whip the world heavyweight champion if they would only give him a fight.


Right, of course. So if that's the case, why are you forever whining and bleating about it? If I were you (or lovemuffin, or various others), I'd re-read Kirata's Perpetually Offended thread. Seriously, Bama, this one has got very, very old.


Being offended by someone with their nose in the air looking down thinking they're so much better does not even come close to the requirements needed for membership in The Society For The Perpetually Offended.




PeonForHer -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:53:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You cant get past your delusion that I and others feel that you oppress us, this is false. You are too arrogant to know you are. If you think I am projecting you must feel oppressed by me, so sad.


You can try saying the same thing any way you want, Bama. It will always be balls. You need to look at yourself and your projections.





lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 12:58:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too[8D]


Are you suggesting you and your buddies don't ?


I'm not suggesting anything. I'm poking fun at the fact that when libs have no basis or logic to support thier political philosophy, they resort to name calling like racist, sexist and homophobe.

Disregarding that often the folks,issues or legislation being addressed s indeed racist,sexist and homophobic [:D]


It's all in you're mind. And there you go again, using the exact same shit as a basis to disagree with, whatever legislation[8D]




mnottertail -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:00:05 PM)

what is the point of this legislation? dont women wear underwear?




PeonForHer -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:00:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Being offended by someone with their nose in the air looking down thinking they're so much better does not even come close to the requirements needed for membership in The Society For The Perpetually Offended.


Seriously - do you really think that if you keep on asserting it, I'll eventually agree with it?




lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:20:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

Your posts have demonstrated you think yer so much wiser, evolved, more civilized and smarter than some of us you disagree with politically, thus the sanctimonious pompous ass moniker. Since you're a Brit, it is why your pompous assedness is British.


Balls. You're just piling more projection onto more projection. And still whining. My being British has no relevance whatsoever, as I'm sure you'd realise were you to allow your logical head a look-in. Unless, of course, you can demonstrate that no Americans here think Sanity to be a dumbass? Hmm? If memory serves, one or two have indeed expressed that thought? No?




I'm not whining at all. Where is that projection coming from ? I simply have a disagreement with the most bald faced arrogant stuck up post you've ever written (post #48). There may be Americans here who have said he's a dumbass but that, in and of itself, doesn't make it true or lend any credibility to your notion that he is. You can call names all you want but what, and where is the real evidence ?




CreativeDominant -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:26:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too[8D]


Are you suggesting you and your buddies don't ?


I'm not suggesting anything. I'm poking fun at the fact that when libs have no basis or logic to support thier political philosophy, they resort to name calling like racist, sexist and homophobe.

Disregarding that often the folks,issues or legislation being addressed s indeed racist,sexist and homophobic [:D]
As defined by the left...but often, not by people of other races...Dr Carter, Thomas Sowell...other women...Anne Coulter, Star Parker...or gays...The Log Cabin Republicans.




lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:31:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Being offended by someone with their nose in the air looking down thinking they're so much better does not even come close to the requirements needed for membership in The Society For The Perpetually Offended.


Seriously - do you really think that if you keep on asserting it, I'll eventually agree with it?


LMAO, I wouldn't expect you to agree. I was just pointing out that it's more of a stretch than
it would be from here to your side of the pond to compare me taking offense at your arrogant post makes me a member of The Society For The Perpetually Offended.




lovmuffin -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:38:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

what is the point of this legislation? dont women wear underwear?


That's a good question. We should research this, one woman at a time. I would like to volunteer[8D]




slvemike4u -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 1:44:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I seriously doubt if any of the politiacally conservative types on this forum consider people who are truly in need as scum.


I totally agree---but it doesn't matter what the truth is unfortunately, because the truth doesn't serve the leftist narrative of that conservatives, or republicans, or libertarians, (whoever it is who opposes their positions) are mean spirited, selfish, greedy and all sorts of other evil things under the sun. we hate gays, we hate immigrants, we hate the poor. and when it serves their purposes, we hate blacks and women and muslims too.


Yes, and don't forget, besides being meany racist sexist homophobic Islamaphobes, we hate white liberals too[8D]


Are you suggesting you and your buddies don't ?


I'm not suggesting anything. I'm poking fun at the fact that when libs have no basis or logic to support thier political philosophy, they resort to name calling like racist, sexist and homophobe.

Disregarding that often the folks,issues or legislation being addressed s indeed racist,sexist and homophobic [:D]
As defined by the left...but often, not by people of other races...Dr Carter, Thomas Sowell...other women...Anne Coulter, Star Parker...or gays...The Log Cabin Republicans.


ROFLMAO.....there's a comprehensive,cross section of assorted voting blocs,lol


Keep feeding yourself this cherry picked ,narrow assed slice of things .Garbage in,garbage out.






Sanity -> RE: Kansans can't spend cash assistance on bras or undies (4/20/2015 2:19:31 PM)


NM




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.711914E-02