Noah
Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slavejali I like life to be simple and uncomplicated. Also, sex is spiritual to me (tantric) (and I'm trying to figure out a way to explain my thoughts around this in regards to why I'm against having multiple sexual partners)... I guess the best way to say it is, I feel the sexual energy we share with someone is a real transference, so having more than one partner would mean my energy is divided. I once saw an advertisment for AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases, it started with two people in bed together. The question was asked " Do you know who your partner has slept with?" Then it showed, 3 other people the woman had slept with and 4 other people the man had slept with, then it showed those partners to have other partners, then those partners other partners, within a short time, basically it was showing through a progression, that the one person had slept with maybe 10,000 people. That advert was about sexually transmitted diseases,,but it was a good way picture to describe how I feel energetically about sex. When you have sex with someone you are being effected by their whole history by transference and will have to cope with the repercussion of that energetically/spiritually. I could name other reasons why I'm not poly, but my spiritual understanding at this time is the main one. Hey jali, regarding the energy thing... This reminded me of my concern when my second replicant was in utero, the thought tthat I just didn't have enough love ("energy") to divide between his mother and his existing brother and then whoever he was going to turn out to be once he showed up. What I learned, as many parents do, is that it isn't a zero-sum, finite sort of thing. The love you get more than refills your tank is one way to say it. So I'm wondering about your situation as an analogy to that. Your math seems to account only for your "outgoing" energy and not for the fact that in a poly relationship there could be another person pouring his or her energy into you too. You could be taking it in both holes, as it were. I'm surely not trying to talk you into anything, just exploring the "energy" approach you took to describing your orientation toward poly. Any thoughts?
|