AAkasha -> Where can I find a good SEX slave? (7/15/2006 10:03:10 PM)
|
So I've been think about the term "sex slave" lately. Now there's a thought. A lot of men around here offer to be a "real sex slave" to a dominant female. Hmmm. That must take some sacrifice. Just you'd have to have sex with her maybe as much as once or twice a day. The horror! What man could survive that? It must take a truly dominant woman to break a man into this habit. To make him learn to service her body whenever she needs it, to have his cock hard and ready for her at the snap of her fingers. Sex on demand. Oh, life is so gruelling for the sex slave! We all know how much men hate to put their cocks inside a beautiful woman's tight cunt. I bet you are all recoiling as you read this, your cocks shriveling up hopelessly with the thoughts of being forced to perform such acts. Does it make you cringe in fear and hide in the corner? What kind of sadistic woman would subject a man to this? To make him her "sex slave"? Indeed there must be a shortage of these men willing to take this step, to submit to such horrible treatment. I bet if any willing man posted on the internet and offered his services, women would fill his mailbox with addresses and phone numbers. This world needs more men willing to perform sexual acts! *SARCASM MODE OFF* Is it just me, or is the idea of servitude in the form of "sexual slavery" sort of ...silly? Granted, there are sexual aspects in play, and some play is overtly sexual. But for me, it just kind of rubs me the wrong way when a guy thinks submission means simply serving a woman in a sexual manner, especially when this is all he wants anyway. I can't speak for all femdoms, but when a guy submits to my will, it isn't meant to get him off. It is meant to get me off. And I don't need to tie up a guy to lick my cunt; I can find them willing to do it without persuasion. Let's think about it for a minute. If we went out and polled all vanilla men, how many would object to being a sex slave? Why not focus more on the SLAVE part, not the SEX part. If I want a sex slave for the night, my play is going to probably lean more toward the vanilla side of things. It's fun - but this isn't a dominant experience for me. A sex slave game, for me, that is also a turnon for my dominant side, would be to take a man and have him suffer for the priveledge of pleasing me. If it were simultaneous, all the better - i.e., he can kneel down and lick me to orgasm, but he must do it while in some amount of pain, and the pain will increase as time goes on, urging him to *do a good job and get it done right*. It's interesting to point out that in a scene like the one I just described, I am generally *totally aroused* by the pain/sacrifice aspect of it, so much so that it even overshadows the feelings of being sexually served. Ironically, it means that at times I can be pretty stubborn about cumming. Maybe I am being a little too harsh. But when I see men parading around offering the huge sacrifice of being a "sex slave" for a dominant woman, I have to wonder who is serving whom. Akasha
|
|
|
|