RE: rightwing family values. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


bounty44 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 1:52:31 PM)

I can well imagine how a family with so many kids would of a necessity, have to pay particular attention to getting to them listen, and be quiet when asked.




ModAssistant5 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 1:56:41 PM)

OK guys,

We're here to debate/discuss current news topics. When people start throwing around accusations of being like a child molester, or anything of that sort, it gets out of hand. Spirited discussions are fine, just make sure they don't get too personal. We'll have zero tolerance on this.

I'm putting a first warning on this thread. Please take notice.

MA5




mnottertail -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 2:26:17 PM)

I understand that it is sort of taboo here, but that is what the op is about and we have been pretty good at avoiding it head on, for 11 pages.




GotSteel -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 6:39:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.




Kirata -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 7:08:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate.

It's everyone's duty.

Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated. ~George Bernard Shaw

K.




CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 7:47:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.

Then you must really hate these folks.

Martin Scorsese? Woody Allen? (of course, that's a case of pot...kettle). Debra Winger? Adrien Brody? Sigourney Weaver? David Lynch? John Landis?




BamaD -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 8:23:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.

Then you must really hate these folks.

Martin Scorsese? Woody Allen? (of course, that's a case of pot...kettle). Debra Winger? Adrien Brody? Sigourney Weaver? David Lynch? John Landis?

Don't forget Roman Palanski, whom the Hollywood community came out in mass to support.




CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 9:17:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.

Then you must really hate these folks.

Martin Scorsese? Woody Allen? (of course, that's a case of pot...kettle). Debra Winger? Adrien Brody? Sigourney Weaver? David Lynch? John Landis?

Don't forget Roman Palanski, whom the Hollywood community came out in mass to support.
Yes. I'd mentioned that in an earlier post in which I included the folks named above as supporters of Polanski.

And...as Aylee mentioned...I'm sure many of them also support Lena Dunham.






BamaD -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 9:33:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.

Then you must really hate these folks.

Martin Scorsese? Woody Allen? (of course, that's a case of pot...kettle). Debra Winger? Adrien Brody? Sigourney Weaver? David Lynch? John Landis?

Don't forget Roman Palanski, whom the Hollywood community came out in mass to support.
Yes. I'd mentioned that in an earlier post in which I included the folks named above as supporters of Polanski.

And...as Aylee mentioned...I'm sure many of them also support Lena Dunham.




Sorry, I don't follow this thread real close as it is based on a false premise. I wouldn't be surprised at all if they did support her.




Aylee -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 10:29:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.

Then you must really hate these folks.

Martin Scorsese? Woody Allen? (of course, that's a case of pot...kettle). Debra Winger? Adrien Brody? Sigourney Weaver? David Lynch? John Landis?

Don't forget Roman Palanski, whom the Hollywood community came out in mass to support.



Ron Burkle, Terry Bean, and Jeffrey Epstein as well.




JVoV -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 10:32:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Terry Bean and Jeffrey Epstein as well.


I think we need to wait for Bean's trial. Not saying he doesn't like them young, but there's possibly blackmail involved.




eulero83 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/8/2015 10:38:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
At last! A lefty finally admitted it was his duty to hate. All that has to be done is to codify what is politically correct and what is not. The first honest lefty.


It's everyone's duty. Tolerance is for that which is not harmful, intolerance is for that which is harmful.

Then you must really hate these folks.

Martin Scorsese? Woody Allen? (of course, that's a case of pot...kettle). Debra Winger? Adrien Brody? Sigourney Weaver? David Lynch? John Landis?


I'm not familiar with all those cases but yes I would like them to pay according for the harm they caused, it doesn't matter how rich and famous, let's add also Roman Polansky and Bill Cosby.




GotSteel -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 10:57:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83
I'm not familiar with all those cases but yes I would like them to pay according for the harm they caused, it doesn't matter how rich and famous, let's add also Roman Polansky and Bill Cosby.


[sm=agree.gif]





Arturas -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 12:40:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/05/22/heres-half-the-gop-presidential-field-chilling-with-child-molester-josh-duggar-screenshots/

This is what their family values are.

B-B-B-But but but BENGHAZI!!!!


Child molestation can only be conducted by adults. Josh is not a child molester since he is underage at the time. Underage boys do make mistakes and they cannot conduct child molestation by the legal and moral definition.

Nice try. Not really. Actually it sucked.




mnottertail -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 1:03:39 PM)

Well, you got some real stupid shit to say. By the legal definition in each state, if they are some years apart, and all that is relative to the victims age, it is. Morally, it is exactly that.

Go suck a wad of cowpiss, you ignorant fuck.




bounty44 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 1:27:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/05/22/heres-half-the-gop-presidential-field-chilling-with-child-molester-josh-duggar-screenshots/

This is what their family values are.

B-B-B-But but but BENGHAZI!!!!


Child molestation can only be conducted by adults. Josh is not a child molester since he is underage at the time. Underage boys do make mistakes and they cannot conduct child molestation by the legal and moral definition.

Nice try. Not really. Actually it sucked.


there is absolutely nothing the op can say to justify the post at all...but no doubt he still hopes and tries.




HunterCA -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 1:28:56 PM)

Interesting look at left wing values.

http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/building-the-new-dark-age-mind/




BamaD -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 1:32:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/05/22/heres-half-the-gop-presidential-field-chilling-with-child-molester-josh-duggar-screenshots/

This is what their family values are.

B-B-B-But but but BENGHAZI!!!!


Child molestation can only be conducted by adults. Josh is not a child molester since he is underage at the time. Underage boys do make mistakes and they cannot conduct child molestation by the legal and moral definition.

Nice try. Not really. Actually it sucked.

Candidates posing with someone on TV before they knew he did something wrong in no way means they approve of what he did. You are correct that children cannot be child moslesters (they are only using that term to make it sound even worse than it was). And yes Benghazi is much much worse. The worst that Josh could do would be becoming a UN peacekeeper so he would have access to young girls. He wouldn't hang ambassadors out to dry and then lie about it.




Sanity -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 1:38:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

Interesting look at left wing values.

http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/building-the-new-dark-age-mind/



Very good article. An excerpt:

quote:



History is not static and it does not progress linearly. There was more free speech and unimpeded expression in 5th-century Athens than in Western Europe between 1934-45, or in Eastern Europe during 1946-1989. An American could speak his mind more freely in 1970 than now. Many in the United States had naively believed that the Enlightenment, the U.S. Constitution, and over two centuries of American customs and traditions had guaranteed that Americans could always take for granted free speech and unfettered inquiry.

That is an ahistorical assumption. The wish to silence, censor, and impede thought is just as strong a human emotion as the desire for free expression — especially when censorship is cloaked in rhetoric about fairness, equality, justice, and all the other euphemisms for not allowing the free promulgation of ideas.

George Orwell devoted his later years to warning us that while the fascist method of destroying free expression was easily identified (albeit only with difficulty combatted), the leftwing totalitarian impulse to squelch unpopular speech was far harder to resist — couched as it was in sloganeering about the “people” and “social justice.” It is easy to object to the speech codes of a self-interested, corrupt dictator in sunglasses and epaulettes, but difficult to fight censorship that allegedly helps the poor, minorities, and the helpless.




Tkman117 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/9/2015 2:01:31 PM)

People are allowed to say whatever vile shit they want, no one is forcing them to not say it. Just because it's becoming socially unacceptable for people to spout hate does not prevent people from saying it. You can insult any religion, sex, or political group all you want, just be expected to be called out for the hate you're spewing. People have as much a right to rightfully label someone else as a sexist or a racist, just as you have the full right to think another group of people are inferior. You don't get arrested for such speech, unless it's done so in a way that makes a specific threat toward the safety and health of a group of people, then you by definition are conspiring to commit a crime or an act of terrorism, depending on the act. Society is moving in a direction where hate speech is frowned upon and even ridiculed, but in the end it does not prevent you from saying such things, the only ones preventing you from saying it is yourself. Although in your case sanity, it's clear you don't give a hoot about evolving social norms, so I'd at the very least give you props for staying true to what you believe in. You're a hater and you're not afraid to show it all across these forums, congrats [:)]




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875