RE: rightwing family values.

RE: rightwing family values. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 8:04:59 AM)
I have proven Schweitzers lies, and you have not proven anything about ERIC HANANOKI, you are still deflecting and dissembling and outright lying. So, old dickweasel is a known shill for righting felching, and no more.

CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 8:53:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I have proven Schweitzers lies, and you have not proven anything about ERIC HANANOKI, you are still deflecting and dissembling and outright lying. So, old dickweasel is a known shill for righting felching, and no more. When the only proof you offer is a a left wing shill calling Schweizer a liar...And that writer works for a paranoid, right-wing-left-wing whore...you haven't proved anything. Proof that Michael Moore did not have a stock portfolio which included stock on Halliburton? Proof that Barbara Stresand, for all her environmental concerns, did not have stock in a strip-mining venture? Etc, etc, etc.

JVoV -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 9:12:37 AM)
Still more to it than we know This isn't going away quickly.

markyugen -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 9:29:50 AM)
Michael Moore responds to Halliburton stock ownership https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wniNns1IZwk

CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 9:34:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Still more to it than we know This isn't going away quickly. I agree...And it shouldn't. If Josh did it...And all the evidence so far points to him having done so...he's guilty. If his parents interfered with the investigation, they're every bit as guilty, if not more so, simply because they were the adults in this situation.

mnottertail -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 9:40:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I have proven Schweitzers lies, and you have not proven anything about ERIC HANANOKI, you are still deflecting and dissembling and outright lying. So, old dickweasel is a known shill for righting felching, and no more. When the only proof you offer is a a left wing shill calling Schweizer a liar...And that writer works for a paranoid, right-wing-left-wing whore...you haven't proved anything. Proof that Michael Moore did not have a stock portfolio which included stock on Halliburton? Proof that Barbara Stresand, for all her environmental concerns, did not have stock in a strip-mining venture? Etc, etc, etc. And this is why the dissemblers and propagandists are looking to demonize people who have actual facts, because he admitted he is lying the brainwashed feeble minded. http://www.politicususa.com/2015/04/26/clinton-cash-crushed-facts-author-admits-evidence-clinton-crimes.html Its in the video.

CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 6:59:29 PM)
God, you reach. The same interview that led to Stephanopoulos admitting his questions were posed in a way to make the author look as bad as possible? The same interviewer who ABC apologized for? Another liar with an agenda...

JVoV -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 7:04:43 PM)
We've done this already. Schweitzer said the same thing on FOX News

BamaD -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/29/2015 7:11:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Still more to it than we know This isn't going away quickly. I agree...And it shouldn't. If Josh did it...And all the evidence so far points to him having done so...he's guilty. If his parents interfered with the investigation, they're every bit as guilty, if not more so, simply because they were the adults in this situation. It works out however the investigation works out, I don't think anyone has tried to sweep it under the rug. However the link that accused the father with knowing stated that the statute of limitations has run out. Thus the about the only thing that can be done is widespread disapproval. Seems that (which is the basis for canceling their show) has already kicked in.

mnottertail -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/30/2015 7:42:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant God, you reach. The same interview that led to Stephanopoulos admitting his questions were posed in a way to make the author look as bad as possible? The same interviewer who ABC apologized for? Another liar with an agenda... You have credible citation?

CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/30/2015 8:02:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant God, you reach. The same interview that led to Stephanopoulos admitting his questions were posed in a way to make the author look as bad as possible? The same interviewer who ABC apologized for? Another liar with an agenda... You have credible citation? His own apology for lying by omission. And given your unwillingness to provide citations for anything, your asking for others to do so is laughable.

mnottertail -> RE: rightwing family values. (5/30/2015 8:35:35 AM)
Oh, horseshit, you are about as stupid looking as you can be lying out here on the thread where the citations are given. But ya, you look stupid anyhow. Even faux nuze is making you out a liar and an ignoramus. Good job.

eulero83 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 9:46:33 AM)
FR Maybe it's to late, maybe someone already reported this article, anyway some pages ago I've been asked to support my disapproval of duggar's educative methods here is something: http://www.salon.com/2015/05/26/how_the_duggar_familys_over_the_top_beliefs_created_an_environment_that_fostered_child_sex_abuse/

HunterCA -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 11:05:05 AM)
You actually read Salon as nonfiction?

eulero83 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 11:16:15 AM)
there are other sources linked, anyway I feel sorry for their kids.

HunterCA -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 11:21:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: eulero83 there are other sources linked, anyway I feel sorry for their kids. I heard an interview with the kids yesterday. They say it would not be their first choice to discuss these things publicly. Yet, I can't help believe if they were from a prominent liberal family names would not have been mentioned in order to protect the kids. In the interview two of the girls spoke and were both agreed that the way this is being reported is much more detrimental than anything else because, as they said, most stuff being reported is false.

bounty44 -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 12:48:10 PM)
hunter was that with megyn Kelly?

CreativeDominant -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 1:00:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Oh, horseshit, you are about as stupid looking as you can be lying out here on the thread where the citations are given. But ya, you look stupid anyhow. Even faux nuze is making you out a liar and an ignoramus. Good job. Really? FOX News has now claimed Stephanopoulos didn't do anything wrong?

Aylee -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 1:15:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: eulero83 there are other sources linked, anyway I feel sorry for their kids. I heard an interview with the kids yesterday. They say it would not be their first choice to discuss these things publicly. Yet, I can't help believe if they were from a prominent liberal family names would not have been mentioned in order to protect the kids. In the interview two of the girls spoke and were both agreed that the way this is being reported is much more detrimental than anything else because, as they said, most stuff being reported is false. Well, yeah. But they are Duggers and so it is okay to re-traumatize them. Their family is a bunch of right wing freaks, ya know.

HunterCA -> RE: rightwing family values. (6/7/2015 1:34:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 hunter was that with megyn Kelly? Could have been. I was driving way to fast on mountain roads (go Rubio) where satellite radio is all I get and I didn't, therefore, pay close attention. Basically I heard a few snippets from the girls and went back to driving too fast.

Page: << < prev 7 8 [9] 10 11 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875