Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 6:38:43 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I haven't been following the thread and I might be missing some of the context/timing when I say what I am about to say---the democratic party platform and the communist party platform share a great deal in common.

ive mentioned this before here and some of the forum comrades got all bent out of shape over that.




http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2013/11/12/horowitz-blasts-left-heritage/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/962342/posts








He doesn't believe we should be there and it would just be enslaving the the brown people through colonization if we stayed.
Interesting. And you know what he believes?


MJ, in post 149 you said this to me, probably sarcastically. So I showed you the book to show you how I knew what he believed. Mostly to shut up your sarcasm though. You know I still have a problem with you with that.

Now hang on and I'll get your second question that I answered with the link to you can see you're confused and not I.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 6:41:17 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I haven't been following the thread and I might be missing some of the context/timing when I say what I am about to say---the democratic party platform and the communist party platform share a great deal in common.

ive mentioned this before here and some of the forum comrades got all bent out of shape over that.

quote:

That was the theme of Horowitz’s speech as he continued: how the communists had taken over the Democratic Party. “The communist party is the Democratic Party,” Horowitz stated. “In The Great Gatsby, [F. Scott] Fitzgerald describes the rich as people who break things and leave them for others to clean up. That is a wonderful description of the left.” Horowitz, who began as a radical Marxist, said that the modern left had learned stealth from their failures in the 1960s: “The left have learned from the 1960s…we in the 1960s didn’t want to pretend to be Jeffersonian democrats…That’s why we failed in the 1960s. That’s why they’ve succeeded now.”

But the right, Horowitz pointed out, has failed to acknowledge that reality. On Obamacare, for example, Horowitz railed against the language used by the left: “single-payer.” Instead, he said, “it is communism,” pointing out that it was state ownership of the means of production. He added, “The left hate the Constitution because Madison designed it to thwart them.”...

Horowitz summed up pessimistically: “We are within reach of a totalitarian state in this country…These are very very dark days for this country.” But, Horowitz held out hope: “there’s been an earthquake on the conservative side since I switched sides…the tea party is the earthquake. The best thing that Republicans can do is stop the fratricide.”



http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2013/11/12/horowitz-blasts-left-heritage/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/962342/posts



Wow... This Horowitz guy beats some of the most moronic posts I have seen on here. Is there such a thing as a super moron? If there is, then David Horowitz embodies super-moronism.

Who reads this stuff?

He starts off with healthcare. A topic he knows nothing about. Single-payer is Communism???
Why do you say that? I might ask :)

His answer: "State ownership of the means of production" Ummmm....

Does he know what single-payer is??? Does he know that health insurance is NOT production?

I am no expert on Marx, but this guy clearly isn't either. Nor is he an expert on anything.


Obama, Horowitz claimed, is a deep believer in this concept, all the way down to his carpet in the Oval Office, which assures those who enter that the moral arc of the universe bends toward justice. “Leftism is a crypto-religion,” he explained. “They see themselves as a savior. People who believe that redemption will take place in this life and I will be a part of it, that’s Hitler. That’s Mao…That’s the American left.”

Yes. It's Obama's carpet that represents seeing himself as a savior. How profound!


Third, Horowitz said that the left was characterized by “alienation from this country… What weakens America is actually good.” Horowitz cited the Obama administration’s eager withdrawal from Iraq as evidence of that proposition:

Yes. Obama withdrew from Iraq to weaken America, because it's good! Nothing to do with the fact that his predecessor signed a deal for our troops to leave. No.

Nothing to do with the fact, that there was no exit strategy when we went in there. Nope.

Nothing to do, with the fact that there was noting militarily to accomplish at that point for our troops that would help long-term Iraqi stability. Nope.

Obama was thinking, "I want to weaken America, because it's good!"


People actually read this stuff and drink this kool-aid. I haven't met one, but I have seen them on TV!

As previously commented on, David Horowitz is an expert on communism. If you don't understand that what he is saying is literal, perhaps that's why you don't understand people in this country do want it to fall. Maybe you should investigate.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/just-radical-people-influenced-barack-hussein-obama/

quote:


Throughout his life, Obama worked with and for a variety of prominent communists and socialists. He served on numerous boards – such as the Woods Fund — with Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, who calls himself a “small c communist.”
Obama launched his first campaign with a fundraiser at Bill Ayers’ house.
Obama’s father was a socialist economist for the Kenyan Government. His white mother was raised by socialists.
His African grandparents were socialists.
In Obama’s own biography, he says his main mentor from age 8 to 18 was Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Communist Party leader (Party #47544) who hated everything America stood for. Davis practically raised Obama since, contrary to popular mythology, his father NEVER lived with him and his mother pretty much abandoned him. Moreover, Davis was involved in espionage against the West, as his FBI file indicates. Go here to read portions of it.


Lots of people who have known him in the past say he was always hard core communist. It upset them the news media gave him so little vetting during two presidential campaigns. But, the media wouldn't out him. There have even been comments from conservative professors who worked with him at U. Of C.

Haven't seen the carpet, no comment.



What weakens the U.S. Is a normal tenant of the far left. It stems from the theory that the "Western (old white men) Imperialism (their words) from 1500 to 1800" enslaved all of the brown people in the world and that has created all of the evil in the world. That, not until all of the brown people in the world have equal stuff to what the U.S. has will there be Justice in the world. It's, in their mind, easier to destroy the U.S. (They expect a workers revolution...reference MNwhatever yesterday will do it). America, in their mind is the imperialist now and must be toppled for true Justice to come to the world. No shit MJ. Not kidding. Obama, if you payed attention believes the U.S. Must withdraw from the world, loss it's place and stop being imperialist, and become no more or no less than any country. He doesn't want the US to be a world policeman. He ran on ending the wars. The reason he won't fix ISIS is because he believes that would be imperialism.

Obama could have kept troops in Iraq for stability but he believes that would be imperialist. Come on MJ, his entire campaing revolved around getting out of the Middle East. He doesn't believe we should be there and it would just be enslaving the the brown people through colonization if we stayed.











Obama could have kept troops in Iraq for stability but he believes that would be imperialist. Come on MJ, his entire campaing revolved around getting out of the Middle East. He doesn't believe we should be there and it would just be enslaving the the brown people through colonization if we stayed.

No... U.S. Troops remaining in Iraq, would provide no lasting stability. The surge, which included bribing the Sunnis not to attack us, was getting old. Sunnis were still disaffected in a Shia-controlled government, and ripe for Al Qaeda, ISIS, or whomever, even MUCH MORE so as U.S. troops become a target. Our military is designed to fight wars, not to provide stability. Providing stability is a diplomatic and political mission. (Not a military one).

He doesn't believe we should be there and it would just be enslaving the the brown people through colonization if we stayed.
Interesting. And you know what he believes?

One other comment... I call B.S. on Obama, who now says he wanted to leave 10,000 troops in Iraq, but didn't ONLY because Bush signed an agreement to remove all forces. He CAMPAIGNED on removing troops from Iraq! He is getting a bit revisionist.

I know what he's stated he believes:

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0927/politics-socialism-capitalism-private-enterprises-obama-business-problem.html

quote:

What then is Obama’s dream? We don’t have to speculate because the President tells us himself in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father. According to Obama, his dream is his father’s dream. Notice that his title is not Dreams of My Father but rather Dreams from My Father. Obama isn’t writing about his father’s dreams; he is writing about the dreams he received from his father.



quote:

Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama’s acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, “The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races.”


quote:



It may seem incredible to suggest that the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. is espoused by his son, the President of the United States. That is what I am saying. From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America’s military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father’s position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America’s power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe’s resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.




So your point is, the autobiography he wrote in 1995 is evidence that he wanted to pull out of Iraq and not leave troops there, BECAUSE he felt it "colonial" to do so, and in spite of that desire, negotiated with the Iraqis to leave troops there anyway.


Sorry, if I don't buy it.

MJ, here is your third post that shows you didn't understand what I'd answered with my book link. I think I was very polite not to tell you that it was you who was confusing questions and just went ahead and answered this with the link.

< Message edited by HunterCA -- 6/15/2015 6:45:57 PM >

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 6:44:25 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
You're getting confused. There are two things. In this you asked me how I knew what he believed. This is a reasonable response to that question. How do I know what he did, is responded to later. You need to keep the two straight.


Actually, you are confused.

You are correct in stating that they are two distinct things. You tied them together when you said that Obama's decision in 2011 to pull out of Iraq was based on his belief NOT to colonize (or be seen as colonizing) the brown people in Iraq. Your "evidence", was a book he wrote in 1995.



There you go MJ, it took a little looking through the threads to show you your muddled understanding, but I did it for you. See the three posts above.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 6:54:42 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

“The Arc of the Moral Universe is Long, But it Bends Towards Justice”
“No Problem of Human Destiny is Beyond Human Beings”
“The Welfare of Each of Us is Dependent Fundamentally Upon the Welfare of All of Us”

I see those quotes, despite reverence or appreciation from whom they came (MLK jr, JFK and teddy Roosevelt), as being consistent with leftist agenda of using government to achieve their socialist (and eventually totalitarian) ends and being humanity's savior.





I sincerely do not mean to personally attack. I have to say, your last sentence represents the right-wing kool-aid very well. The constant hatred of Obama. Pure, vile hatred. The demonization. How is it rationalized? He is a Kenyan, a Socialist, a Keynseian, a (wait for it)... Democrat!!!! Then there is constant the "leftist agenda". These evil leftists. Leftists are communists. Democrats are leftists. Democrats are communists. Even these quotes, you see as being consistent with a "leftist agenda".

If ANYONE disagrees with the right wing message, he/she is labelled a leftist. And once one is a leftist, one is a communist. Horowitz embraces this nonsense in spades! "Obama pulled out of Iraq because he wants to weaken America!" It's his opinion, so be it. But, it is so absurd to anyone not drinking the right-wing kool-aid (to both liberals and conservatives alike), it appears to be moronic.

The right's tactic is to label and smear. Disagreement with right-wing line-->leftist-->democrat-->communist-->hates America

I love to debate here and am critical of both parties. (And have praised the very same people I have criticized when I feel it is warranted.) I can't COUNT the number of times I have been called a "lefty" here. That's the tactic. (Do a search!) ("He's a lefty, so his opinion doesn't matter")

I listed some easily provable facts to prove a point, and Hunter dismissed it as "drivel from the DNC" (as if I have any idea of what is coming out of the DNC)

Horowitz is a hate monger, and so intellectually dishonest, that he appears moronic.

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.

As someone who claims to know Marx very well, he is a fraud. I don't understand Marx very well, but I know that statement is more of the same kool-aid.

Maybe he was some type of leftist/socialist/communist, but his "epiphany" was not simply that pure socialism/communism was a dead end. His "epiphany" was that he could make a lot more money selling this moronic nonsense.

As I have said before, there are good ideas and bad ideas. Some are liberal. Some are conservative. (Both good and bad). Admittedly, I have an advantage because I am NOT an ideologue and not beholden to either party. But the tactic of saying that just because a person subscribes to an idea, means that he/she subscribes to an ideology, and further subscribes to every idea that any group subscribing to that ideology subscribes to is laughably intellectually dishonest.

Remember Glenn Beck and his chalkboard??? (With lines connecting photos) That is PRECISELY what he did.

People here call me "Lefty" all the time. Hunter engages in this nonsense in spades as well. "Typical Lefty" he likes to say. I just smile :)


Sorry for the rambling... Horowitz is an intellectually dishonest hate-monger, who can't even get his own subject matter correct (of which he claims to be an expert)

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 7:10:42 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

“The Arc of the Moral Universe is Long, But it Bends Towards Justice”
“No Problem of Human Destiny is Beyond Human Beings”
“The Welfare of Each of Us is Dependent Fundamentally Upon the Welfare of All of Us”

I see those quotes, despite reverence or appreciation from whom they came (MLK jr, JFK and teddy Roosevelt), as being consistent with leftist agenda of using government to achieve their socialist (and eventually totalitarian) ends and being humanity's savior.





I sincerely do not mean to personally attack. I have to say, your last sentence represents the right-wing kool-aid very well. The constant hatred of Obama. Pure, vile hatred. The demonization. How is it rationalized? He is a Kenyan, a Socialist, a Keynseian, a (wait for it)... Democrat!!!! Then there is constant the "leftist agenda". These evil leftists. Leftists are communists. Democrats are leftists. Democrats are communists. Even these quotes, you see as being consistent with a "leftist agenda".

If ANYONE disagrees with the right wing message, he/she is labelled a leftist. And once one is a leftist, one is a communist. Horowitz embraces this nonsense in spades! "Obama pulled out of Iraq because he wants to weaken America!" It's his opinion, so be it. But, it is so absurd to anyone not drinking the right-wing kool-aid (to both liberals and conservatives alike), it appears to be moronic.

The right's tactic is to label and smear. Disagreement with right-wing line-->leftist-->democrat-->communist-->hates America

I love to debate here and am critical of both parties. (And have praised the very same people I have criticized when I feel it is warranted.) I can't COUNT the number of times I have been called a "lefty" here. That's the tactic. (Do a search!) ("He's a lefty, so his opinion doesn't matter")

I listed some easily provable facts to prove a point, and Hunter dismissed it as "drivel from the DNC" (as if I have any idea of what is coming out of the DNC)

Horowitz is a hate monger, and so intellectually dishonest, that he appears moronic.

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.

As someone who claims to know Marx very well, he is a fraud. I don't understand Marx very well, but I know that statement is more of the same kool-aid.

Maybe he was some type of leftist/socialist/communist, but his "epiphany" was not simply that pure socialism/communism was a dead end. His "epiphany" was that he could make a lot more money selling this moronic nonsense.

As I have said before, there are good ideas and bad ideas. Some are liberal. Some are conservative. (Both good and bad). Admittedly, I have an advantage because I am NOT an ideologue and not beholden to either party. But the tactic of saying that just because a person subscribes to an idea, means that he/she subscribes to an ideology, and further subscribes to every idea that any group subscribing to that ideology subscribes to is laughably intellectually dishonest.

Remember Glenn Beck and his chalkboard??? (With lines connecting photos) That is PRECISELY what he did.

People here call me "Lefty" all the time. Hunter engages in this nonsense in spades as well. "Typical Lefty" he likes to say. I just smile :)


Sorry for the rambling... Horowitz is an intellectually dishonest hate-monger, who can't even get his own subject matter correct (of which he claims to be an expert)


Two points I'd like to make. Lefties say stuff about us all the time in public and get away with it because it's politically correct. We have to shut up in public. Here, I don't have to shut up. I can treat them just like they've treated me all of my life and I will continue to do so. I love to see shocked lefties being treated like they assume only they can treat us. So, until lefties become civil, you'll just have to put up with it. It pleases me. I can at least say that. Lefties do it without thinking (of course they don't think) because it's PC and acceptable to be biased toward us.

Second, they made fucking movies about assassinating George Bush, ridiculed him on every Chanel on TV, Saturday Night Live, you name it. You've got to be kidding throwing stones here. Obama said, as he was campaigning, he'd talk to anyone. When the republicans came to negotiate with them he said, "Hey, I won the election. It'll be my way." How do you expect us to react to that ignorant/arrogance. You're problem is that just like most lefties, you believe we should just shut up and take it.

Bull Shit.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 7:22:51 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

“The Arc of the Moral Universe is Long, But it Bends Towards Justice”
“No Problem of Human Destiny is Beyond Human Beings”
“The Welfare of Each of Us is Dependent Fundamentally Upon the Welfare of All of Us”

I see those quotes, despite reverence or appreciation from whom they came (MLK jr, JFK and teddy Roosevelt), as being consistent with leftist agenda of using government to achieve their socialist (and eventually totalitarian) ends and being humanity's savior.





I sincerely do not mean to personally attack. I have to say, your last sentence represents the right-wing kool-aid very well. The constant hatred of Obama. Pure, vile hatred. The demonization. How is it rationalized? He is a Kenyan, a Socialist, a Keynseian, a (wait for it)... Democrat!!!! Then there is constant the "leftist agenda". These evil leftists. Leftists are communists. Democrats are leftists. Democrats are communists. Even these quotes, you see as being consistent with a "leftist agenda".

If ANYONE disagrees with the right wing message, he/she is labelled a leftist. And once one is a leftist, one is a communist. Horowitz embraces this nonsense in spades! "Obama pulled out of Iraq because he wants to weaken America!" It's his opinion, so be it. But, it is so absurd to anyone not drinking the right-wing kool-aid (to both liberals and conservatives alike), it appears to be moronic.

The right's tactic is to label and smear. Disagreement with right-wing line-->leftist-->democrat-->communist-->hates America

I love to debate here and am critical of both parties. (And have praised the very same people I have criticized when I feel it is warranted.) I can't COUNT the number of times I have been called a "lefty" here. That's the tactic. (Do a search!) ("He's a lefty, so his opinion doesn't matter")

I listed some easily provable facts to prove a point, and Hunter dismissed it as "drivel from the DNC" (as if I have any idea of what is coming out of the DNC)

Horowitz is a hate monger, and so intellectually dishonest, that he appears moronic.

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.

As someone who claims to know Marx very well, he is a fraud. I don't understand Marx very well, but I know that statement is more of the same kool-aid.

Maybe he was some type of leftist/socialist/communist, but his "epiphany" was not simply that pure socialism/communism was a dead end. His "epiphany" was that he could make a lot more money selling this moronic nonsense.

As I have said before, there are good ideas and bad ideas. Some are liberal. Some are conservative. (Both good and bad). Admittedly, I have an advantage because I am NOT an ideologue and not beholden to either party. But the tactic of saying that just because a person subscribes to an idea, means that he/she subscribes to an ideology, and further subscribes to every idea that any group subscribing to that ideology subscribes to is laughably intellectually dishonest.

Remember Glenn Beck and his chalkboard??? (With lines connecting photos) That is PRECISELY what he did.

People here call me "Lefty" all the time. Hunter engages in this nonsense in spades as well. "Typical Lefty" he likes to say. I just smile :)


Sorry for the rambling... Horowitz is an intellectually dishonest hate-monger, who can't even get his own subject matter correct (of which he claims to be an expert)



Oh and MJ, one more thing. We're (the people on the right) discussing a sitting administration that has fouled up so well that he's squandered super majorities in both the house and the Senate, as well as his popularity rating that was one of the highest ever when he first entered office. We are not, seven years into his administration, blaming fuck ups on past administrations.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 7:34:11 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.


No, thats not true. Communism can and is communal living at the single home level, on up. And it is an ideology...

How do you think the USA could get there from here.

One step at a time. You would have to lie about your end goal, and bring it about gradually.

It wouldnt happen overnight. A catastrophic event (or a series of catastrophic events) could certainly force a lot of "progress" in a short period of time though

And yes, communal medicine at the national level would look a lot like single payer, the last step before you are there.

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 7:42:33 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.


No, thats not true. Communism can and is communal living at the single home level, on up. And it is an ideology...

How do you think the USA could get there from here.

One step at a time. You would have to lie about your end goal, and bring it about gradually.

It wouldnt happen overnight. A catastrophic event (or a series of catastrophic events) could certainly force a lot of "progress" in a short period of time though

And yes, communal medicine at the national level would look a lot like single payer, the last step before you are there.

A catastrophic event...a catastrophic event...where have I heard tha before? Oh yaa! Never let a crisis go to waste! Now who said that?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 7:46:00 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

A catastrophic event...a catastrophic event...where have I heard tha before? Oh yaa! Never let a crisis go to waste! Now who said that?


The usual

Uncontrolled immigration, Middle East spinning out of control, overloaded social programs... Race riots and other social unrest perhaps

Some things unforseen?

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to HunterCA)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 7:58:19 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline
Eric Holder, never let a crisis go to waste.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 8:14:35 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
No, thats not true. Communism can and is communal living at the single home level, on up. And it is an ideology...


Po-Tay-to, Po Tah to

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
How do you think the USA could get there from here.

One step at a time. You would have to lie about your end goal, and bring it about gradually.

It wouldnt happen overnight. A catastrophic event (or a series of catastrophic events) could certainly force a lot of "progress" in a short period of time though

And yes, communal medicine at the national level would look a lot like single payer, the last step before you are there.



Sure, many things could lead to Communism. Medicare Part D is one of them. (A system to bypass free market principles in order to divert taxpayer money to Pharmaceutical companies at FULL cost). I agree with you that it would be stealthy, and gradual. However Single-Payer by itself is not Communism.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 8:19:44 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
You're problem is that just like most lefties, you believe we should just shut up and take it.

Bull Shit.


You literally have absolutely no clue what I believe. I have never told anyone to shut up. (And that includes Horowitz!) :)

(in reply to HunterCA)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 8:23:03 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
No, thats not true. Communism can and is communal living at the single home level, on up. And it is an ideology...


Po-Tay-to, Po Tah to

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
How do you think the USA could get there from here.

One step at a time. You would have to lie about your end goal, and bring it about gradually.

It wouldnt happen overnight. A catastrophic event (or a series of catastrophic events) could certainly force a lot of "progress" in a short period of time though

And yes, communal medicine at the national level would look a lot like single payer, the last step before you are there.



Sure, many things could lead to Communism. Medicare Part D is one of them. (A system to bypass free market principles in order to divert taxpayer money to Pharmaceutical companies at FULL cost). I agree with you that it would be stealthy, and gradual. However Single-Payer by itself is not Communism.

MJ, don't be ignorant. Fabian Socialism.

https://thebluecollareconomist.wordpress.com/2013/09/29/creeping-communism-the-fabian-states-of-america/

quote:

The symbol of the Fabian Society is a stain glass window portraying a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Their motto is: “Let your mouth deny what your hands are doing”.



quote:

The core belief of the Fabian Society was an adherence to socialism without the violent revolution aspect. They concluded that anarchical communism and Marxist communism made a fatal mistake by either eliminating or supplanting the state. A fundamental understanding among the Fabians was that all government tended toward socialism. Democratic systems were the easiest to infiltrate and the most desirable vehicle. They believed that capitalism was doing a good job of producing goods and services but not at distributing those goods and services. Capitalism would be tolerated until, it too, would be trasnformed into socialism. A small elite group of especially intelligent people would lead them there. Their key plan of attack would be to infiltrate all levels of western society and through gradualism, transform the world into a socialist society. The focus would center on the emerging bureaucratic state in Great Britain, Australia, North America and western Europe along with public education and religious institutions.


< Message edited by HunterCA -- 6/15/2015 8:24:01 PM >

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 8:27:02 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
Another great link! A great illustration of Sanity's point, which I agreed with!

Thanks!

(in reply to HunterCA)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 8:36:17 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another great link! A great illustration of Sanity's point, which I agreed with!

Thanks!


Ok... I still agree with Sanity's point.

I get the Fabian Socialism concept, but then the article decays right into the tactics I elaborated on in my previous post. More of the same kool-aid.


I take back my praise of the link.


But that doesn't invalidate Sanity's point about the move to Communism being gradual, and stealthy, and the end goals being hidden.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 9:04:50 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another great link! A great illustration of Sanity's point, which I agreed with!

Thanks!


Ok... I still agree with Sanity's point.

I get the Fabian Socialism concept, but then the article decays right into the tactics I elaborated on in my previous post. More of the same kool-aid.


I take back my praise of the link.


But that doesn't invalidate Sanity's point about the move to Communism being gradual, and stealthy, and the end goals being hidden.

Here MJ, this was written in 2008 predicting what Obama's administration would be like.

http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/03/obama-fabian-socialist-oped-cx_jb_1103bowyer.html


(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 9:28:45 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another great link! A great illustration of Sanity's point, which I agreed with!

Thanks!


Ok... I still agree with Sanity's point.

I get the Fabian Socialism concept, but then the article decays right into the tactics I elaborated on in my previous post. More of the same kool-aid.


I take back my praise of the link.


But that doesn't invalidate Sanity's point about the move to Communism being gradual, and stealthy, and the end goals being hidden.

Here MJ, this was written in 2008 predicting what Obama's administration would be like.

http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/03/obama-fabian-socialist-oped-cx_jb_1103bowyer.html




Wow... This guy had the whole kool-aid pitcher!

He probably thinks that his prediction was right! Same tactics Obama-->The left-->Saul Alinsky (another favorite)

The left will identify, freeze, personalize and polarize an industry, probably health care. Not sure who these leftists are?

Healthcare is not frozen. Nor is it Polarized. And now we have competition in Exchanges (a free market principle).

The entire rest of the article is not a prediction. Rather it is right-wing claptrap... Same old tactics:

Now the arrows go to Chavez and Clement Atlee...

Just nonsense.


That would be like saying, in 2000... Will Bush be like Hitler in 1933? Or a softer, gradual, behind-the-scenes fascist like Fulgencio Batista. Only time will tell...


Also nonsense


A bad prediction, based on his personal kool-aid pitcher. So what else is new?

(in reply to HunterCA)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 9:37:40 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

Granted about population. Yet what is the population of Pittsburg compared to Canada. And, why am I paying the same as people in France while they have a 30% deductible and I dont. And I don't have to wisit until the government decides what I need. The last point alone is crazy to me. The concept that the State gets between me and my doctor is...well it's actually contrary to Roe vs Wade.

The govt in Canada doesnt get between the patient and the doctor.. if the doctor feels you need some test or operation then you get it, the govt doesnt keep you from getting it or decide what you need..

While you talk about Roe vs Wade, I just read about how many clinics here in TX have been shut down by your govt.. so what is all this you are talking about being crazy??? Thank gawd Canada doesnt keep dragging women & women's rights back into the dark ages like the govt in the US does..

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/06/federal-court-texas-law-will-close-majority-abortion-clinics

Excuse me, I may have misunderstood. Didn't you say,"if there is no compelling reason for them to be going to the US the province will say no, wait your turn in our system or pay it yourself." Isn't the Province the government?

A "compelling reason" might be if its a procedure that a Canadian doctor doesnt do or in a timely manner, such as critical medical surgery (which does sometimes get sent to other provinces or the US and paid for by the province). Knee surgery wouldnt qualify, if someone wants to jump the cue & get it done in the US or some other country, they do it on their own dime.. The govt doesnt tell a doctor or a patient what medical services they need.

When you go to a US doctor dont you have to wait your turn there too? Lots of Americans go outside the US for medical treatment too, medical tourism is a growing global industry.. In the US what stops people from getting medical care is the cost (even the cost of the deductibles).. under your system, its your insurance corps and govt that even dictate who your doctor can & cant be.. Is your insurance corp your friend??? I dont think so..

Have an online slave in Canada. Last year had to have 4 cancerous tumors removed from a lung. No extraordinary wait, NO cost at all...not a dime.

She is now cancer free.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 198
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 9:47:33 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Another example: "Single-Payer is communism." If, it were the only means of buying healthcare AND all healthcare providers worked for the state, it might be CLOSE to Communistic?. The whole statement is utterly ridiculous because a single policy cannot be "Communism". Communism is an entire system of government.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
No, thats not true. Communism can and is communal living at the single home level, on up. And it is an ideology...


Po-Tay-to, Po Tah to

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
How do you think the USA could get there from here.

One step at a time. You would have to lie about your end goal, and bring it about gradually.

It wouldnt happen overnight. A catastrophic event (or a series of catastrophic events) could certainly force a lot of "progress" in a short period of time though

And yes, communal medicine at the national level would look a lot like single payer, the last step before you are there.



Sure, many things could lead to Communism. Medicare Part D is one of them. (A system to bypass free market principles in order to divert taxpayer money to Pharmaceutical companies at FULL cost). I agree with you that it would be stealthy, and gradual. However Single-Payer by itself is not Communism.



And one more point. Just as Single-Payer could lead to Communism... The current FFS/Payer model could lead to Fascism (some say it has already)

All these things that you accuse the government of doing, private insurance companies are already doing (rationing care, making judgments on what care you should or should not have, even the infamous "death panels".


(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work - 6/15/2015 9:47:41 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Once communists get their prized single-payer system, by virtue of the fact that all funding comes from the state, the state does have control of the means of production. Has it by the balls.

As an example of this, in the UK right now theres a row going on about providing evening and weekend healthcare. Its all up to the state (and the unions) due to funding concerns. Nurse pay there is shit btw, compared to here.

And they are short physicians.

Re Iraq, the Iraqis pleaded for us to help stave off ISIS but Obama yawned and went golfing rather than help when the need was urgent. As a result Obamas fawning media has to work overtime to ignore the screams and rivers of blood coming from the region





Of course the idea that because govt. pays for it, in no way means it is communism or socialism. If that were the case then everything the pentagon pays for would also be communism.

Seems the single payer 'communist' military industrial complex in the US, enjoys many billion$ in private profits. We are constantly bombarded with how that great for-profit, single payer system does a bang-up job.

That would also go for TARP and the bankers are now under govt. control when nothing could be further from the truth. It is still heads [they] win...tails we lose.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stand back folks - Marxism at work Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109