dreamlady
Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007 From: Western MD Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady I don't get it either, not unless I didn't want a fully virile male partner to satisfy me sexually on a regular basis. . . because chastity is not the same as enforcing orgasm control - that's like comparing chuck-grade hamburger to filet mignon - and it undermines mental domination, imo. There's absolutely nothing intrinsic to the chastity fetish that should stop the keyholder from being satisfied sexually on a regular basis. My relationship's on the otherside of the kneel but we mix chastity with edging, orgasm control, orgasm denial, and forced orgasm torture. There's both chastity and a lot of sex going on AND the bondage props we use absolutely do not undermine mental domination, whether we're talking about her handcuffs, chastitybelt, collar, etc. That doesn't change. Ok, I get it now. I wasn't speaking about the entire spectrum of chastity practices, but without getting into a male vs. female gender debate, or how F/m differs from M/f, I'll keep to the salient points below. Btw, a cockcage is not a bondage prop. quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel Now I have seen a couple of relationships turn around (women looking to convince men) where the fetish initially came off as all about the chaste person but when they figured out a healthy couples dynamic so there was something in it for the keyholder, the vanilla guys got into it. In those two cases what the guys got out of it was sex whenever they wanted. There is a huge difference between male chastity and female chastity. Unless a Mistress has multiple male subs, she isn't going to be able to always get coital sex whenever she wants it (since there are anatomical hindrances and ejaculatory recovery time), nor do I know of a single Domme who wants penile penetration from every one of her male subs. There could be an exception here and there, but for the most part this is reserved for her primary partner or as part of a Cuckoldress arrangement. In other words, a Domme isn't ordinarily keeping her subs in chastity for the express purpose of copulating with them on demand. It doesn't work that way. In fact, the longtime male chastity slaves I've spoken with have lost their ability to perform sexually with being able to get and maintain a usable erection. (They don't act like it matters much because they'd rather be an oral slave and/or perform foot worship.) Theoretically, a woman is capable of having sex non-stop until she is too sore to do so, because there is no physiological readiness barrier to that possibility. Women in chastity do not require milkings either. A male Dom will not normally keep his female sub in chastity in order to prevent having sex with her, but this is not uncommon with a male sub where his service to a Domme prohibits varying degrees of sexual contact (other than the physical contact necessary for him to get milked on a regular basis, if applicable). It could be part of the arrangement a female non-sexual service sub has with her Master to be kept in chastity, but I personally haven't heard of it. She could want to be denied or prohibited from masturbating, but orgasm control via mental domination, without the implementation of a chastity belt. There may be a similar motivation, the sub's desire to feel controlled, monitored and regulated, but my personal opinion is that when it comes to male orgasm control with one's primary sexual partner, using a chastity device is an inferior method of conducting D/s. Inferior, in that it relies upon an external mechanism, rather than a strictly internally driven mindset due to having a compliant, submissive disposition. By the same token, I consider maintenance beatings and having a punishment dynamic to be an inferior method of practicing M/s. Most Dominant women I know do not want to have to play prison warden 24/7 over their charge like a ball & chain, and definitely not over their mate. I don't know about female chastity slaves, but males are notorious for cheating and finding ways to get off. Many have a que sera sera attitude about cheating and then confessing, figuring that they'll simply take whatever punishment their Mistress decides to dole out. Why would I want a sub who basically needs to be constantly disciplined because he lacks enough self-control to comply with my wishes? I believe that this practice with males breeds disobedience and sneakiness, rather than reinforcing obedience to his Mistress. DreamLady
|