quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Otherwise, this illegal immigrant...excuse me, "undocumented citizen-to-be"...would'be been deported (again).

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2015/07/06/illegal-immigrant-kills-woman-in-san-francisco-chose-city-for-sanctuary-policies-n2021735#

Aren't we glad that San Franciso knows when to let the Supreme Court interpret the Constitution...gay marriage is o.k....and when San Francisco should...holding an illegal immigrant (excuse me, undocumented citizen-to-be)...is not.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/03/us/san-francisco-killing-suspect-immigrant-deported/

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

If the Sanctuary Cities would just take their secession movement all the way... the rest of us could get back to following the law and good government. <snicker>

quote:

At home the progressive Left is on the scent of another scalp, this time Donald Trump’s for his uncouth and blunderbuss stereotyping of illegal immigrants from Mexico, who, he implies, are for the most part not Mexico’s choice citizenry and who have a tendency to commit various crimes upon arrival.
The best way to refute the shoot-from-the-hip Trump’s stereotyping of an entire illegal immigration population as inordinately committing crimes and relying on state subsidies should be easy: his critics should not quote creased-browed professors and outraged ethnic activists, but first cite federal and state statistics of crimes committed by illegal aliens as well as the legal status of those on federal and state assistance, and then calculate to what degree these percentages are not — or in fact are — in line with the native American population.

Of course, Trump’s opponents rarely do that, partly because governments, both state and federal — which love to categorize Americans by race, class, and gender — strangely claim that they do not have accurate and up-to-date statistics on illegal aliens. When the liberal PolitiFact stitches together what facts it can find to properly refute Fox pundit Gavin McInnes’s erroneous claim that 50 percent of Texas murders were committed by illegal aliens, does it then go on to correct the record with a more accurate percentage?

No. PolitiFact trumpets that 50% of Texas murders are not committed by illegal aliens. End of story? But it does not then tell us that its own data of refutation nevertheless might suggest that 17% of Texas murders may well be committed by illegal aliens — an astounding figure in its own right.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

the same as the ones who invaded Iraq under false pretenses, or who ignored fining and jailing corporations for criminally violating immigration law?
Or the ones who insured that the Bin Laden family were out of the country on 9/11 when no American could fly?

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


Mayor Ed Lee distanced himself from the release, saying in a statement that “San Francisco’s Sanctuary City policy protects residents regardless of immigration status and is not intended to protect repeat, serious and violent felons. Our city’s policy helps immigrant and limited-English speaking communities where sometimes people fear and mistrust the criminal justice system.”

Lee called for an investigation into what happened by all of the local and federal agencies involved, saying, “I afm concerned about the circumstances that led to the release of Mr. Sanchez.”

However, Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi said his agency had no choice but to release Lopez-Sanchez under an October 2013 city ordinance — one signed by the mayor.

http://m.sfgate.com/news/article/S-F-drug-warrant-helped-accused-killer-stay-in-6369360.php

The mayor is concerned...except when he's not. Anybody want to guess what his political affiliation is?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Not deflecting, I am on topic here, you asked (as always with some little chickenshitted bit of worthless snark) and I answered. Now, wonder what party the sheriff was who thought he had to let an outstanind murderer go, without checking the BCA on the guy before he ran thru some little bodunk town statutes?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


Mayor Ed Lee distanced himself from the release, saying in a statement that “San Francisco’s Sanctuary City policy protects residents regardless of immigration status and is not intended to protect repeat, serious and violent felons. Our city’s policy helps immigrant and limited-English speaking communities where sometimes people fear and mistrust the criminal justice system.”

Lee called for an investigation into what happened by all of the local and federal agencies involved, saying, “I afm concerned about the circumstances that led to the release of Mr. Sanchez.”

However, Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi said his agency had no choice but to release Lopez-Sanchez under an October 2013 city ordinance — one signed by the mayor.

http://m.sfgate.com/news/article/S-F-drug-warrant-helped-accused-killer-stay-in-6369360.php

The mayor is concerned...except when he's not. Anybody want to guess what his political affiliation is?

In San Francisco he would have to be a far left (for that party) Democrat.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Not deflecting, I am on topic here, you asked (as always with some little chickenshitted bit of worthless snark) and I answered. Now, wonder what party the sheriff was who thought he had to let an outstanind murderer go, without checking the BCA on the guy before he ran thru some little bodunk town statutes?

On topic? What part of your bullshit deflection has to do with sanctuary cities? With politicians who are breaking federal laws by helping other evade federal authorities? With illegal immigrants committing crimes?

As for your latest piece of bullshit...what sheriff? What town? Did the sheriff let him go when his department knew there was another law enforcement agency with a "hold order" on the felon?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Not deflecting, I am on topic here, you asked (as always with some little chickenshitted bit of worthless snark) and I answered. Now, wonder what party the sheriff was who thought he had to let an outstanind murderer go, without checking the BCA on the guy before he ran thru some little bodunk town statutes?

On topic? What part of your bullshit deflection has to do with sanctuary cities? With politicians who are breaking federal laws by helping other evade federal authorities? With illegal immigrants committing crimes?

As for your latest piece of bullshit...what sheriff? What town? Did the sheriff let him go when his department knew there was another law enforcement agency with a "hold order" on the felon?

What? Are you on fucking stupid pills? You asked a question what party the guy who got the statute passed was, and I took a guess at the shitbreather rightwing party, since they are the ones who have passed the current fucked up national law, but I am betting the sherriff is one too, since he didnt check bca before deciding a town statute was trumping a state statute. Read the fuckin article, you posted that ignorant piece of shit, not me.

Not that party matters here.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

I want to know more about why this man, that had committed many prior offences was allowed to continue to walk the streets freely, in a country that he was not even a citizen?

Where is the outrage about this situation?

What other country in the world, can you commit crimes, and continue to be released besides this one?

This man had been departed 5 times, and was back in this country, and was wanted on drug charges?

WTF? is going on in this country? WTF