RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 5:00:23 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
20% of the democrat party views her as honest.

Why do you find that 20% of any group being delusonal to be unusual?




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 7:34:06 AM)

Its not "coverage" its recycling the same partisan opinions over and over again, hyping yourself up into a terrible mental state...

There is a huge difference between denial of the "Hillaries situation" and waiting until a decision has been made.

By the way, your "denial" of what is happening to the GOP and the presidential candidates is Very showing,.lol




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 8:00:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

just to point you back to the origination here of "delusional"---my use of it had to do with vile critter parts' (incessant) refusal to accept the reality of Hillary Clinton's goings-on, and the coverage it.

And my use of it was to point out that nutsuckers are et up with delusional pants shitting factless hysteria.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 8:09:21 AM)

I am not reading 26 pages of Malarkey.

My love, I mean Hilary, is a pure as wind driven snow, and should duel with buffoonery Star Trek Best Fight Scene EVER
US election 2016: Security scare at Donald Trump event I thought Kirk v spock the more realistic of the two

Here is a more factual, sips his afternoon sipping Chardonnay, bah I cannot find the article i whapped on another thread the other day..but take my word for it.
Here is a factual, yet inferior article, from today Could Hillary Clinton face the same fate as David Petraeus? who is this David pterodactyl fellow




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 8:18:02 AM)

http://giphy.com/gifs/3o7abkti7UphSopcl2




WickedsDesire -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 8:25:07 AM)

hehe that made me laugh lucylastic thank you




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 8:25:23 AM)

me too, heh




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 10:52:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: bounty44

just to point you back to the origination here of "delusional"---my use of it had to do with vile critter parts' (incessant) refusal to accept the reality of Hillary Clinton's goings-on, and the coverage it.


Since you have stuffed your head up your ass let me point you back to what I said..

Why do you find that 20% of any group being delusonal to be unusual?



your question has nothing to do with me or what I brought up, but any chance to be vulgar and insulting works for you huh?




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 10:56:55 AM)

another reason to vote for ted cruz:

"Cruz: As President, I’d prosecute Hillary on e-mail server if Lynch takes a pass"

quote:

Does this beat four years of Supreme Court nominations when it comes to choosing the nominee for the Republican Party? Ted Cruz has to hope so. Stumping through Florida, Cruz told Sean Hannity at a rally interview to be broadcast tonight that if Barack Obama and Loretta Lynch aren’t up for prosecuting Hillary Clinton in the e-mail scandal, he certainly will be:

Appearing during an Orlando rally that also served as an interview to air on Fox News’s “Hannity,” host Sean Hannity asked Cruz if he’d continue to go after Clinton.

“Let’s say that the FBI makes a criminal referral to the Justice Department and it is ignored. And you become president, the statute of limitations had not passed — would you aggressively go after Hillary Clinton if the FBI believes she committed felonies?” Hannity said.

“Absolutely yes, and there is a principle here that matters,” Cruz said.

“This country was founded on the principle that no one is above the law, and whether it is the Clintons or whether it is some in the Republican Party who think they are above the law, that the law doesn’t apply to them, that’s not how it works.”


http://yuuuuup8000.blogspot.com/2016/03/cruz-as-president-id-prosecute-hillary.html

[image]http://www.isthatbaloney.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/hillary-for-prison-2016.jpg[/image]




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 10:59:44 AM)

Nutsuckers are always going to throw somebody in jail that disagrees with their pantshitting witch hunting, and Cruz already got the Tailgunner Joe look with a big schnoz.

Fuck that constitution, thats the nutsucker hue and cry. If we can smear you, you're fuckin guilty, cry the nutsuckers.

Proof? They dont need no fucking proof. Nutsucker slobber blog says its so, case closed.





thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/15/2016 11:12:04 AM)


ORIGINAL: bounty44
Fascist always prefer to imprison their enemies rather than run against them in an election.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/16/2016 11:08:12 AM)

quote:

A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll indicates one third of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders' supporters cannot see themselves voting for Hillary Clinton in November. This could spell trouble for Clinton who will likely need Sanders' backers in order to win the White House.


one wonders to what extent the rest of the country might be like Vermont---and one can hope.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/33-percent-of-bernie-sanders-not-vote-hillary_b_9475626.html




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/16/2016 11:15:42 AM)

And 30% of republican voters will not vote trump.

Big fuckin deal.

How many days till nutsucker bombshells, now?

Or are they going to shit their pants some more still?




KenDckey -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/16/2016 12:54:16 PM)

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/12192975/The-KKK-leader-who-says-he-backs-Hillary-Clinton.html


LOL KKK now supports Hilary




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/16/2016 12:55:45 PM)

LOL. Trump put him up to it. Hes trumps man.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/16/2016 12:56:52 PM)

I wondered who would be the first to comment on that, LMFAO




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/17/2016 2:26:24 PM)

watched judge Napolitano (oh no fox news!) on Deirdre Bolton's (oh no fox news!) risk and reward yesterday on fox business (oh no fox business too?) and he seemed very confident Hillary is going to be indicted. I am assuming (I cant verify) the video link below is what I saw yesterday. if so, he talks about other things also that make the video well worth watching.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4784479019001/judge-napolitano-mr-pagliano-is-their-nightmare/

a couple of companion pieces:

"Napolitano: If indicted, Clinton will be forced to drop out"

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4795358737001/napolitano-if-indicted-clinton-will-be-forced-to-drop-out/?#sp=show-clips

"Napolitano: almost inconceivable that Clinton wont be charged with something

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4789798035001/napolitano-almost-inconceivable-that-clinton-wont-be-charged-with-something




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/17/2016 2:34:14 PM)

LOL Napolitano the useless fuckstick. he is felching cuz trump is gonna put him on the supreme court.

So a nutsucker is pretty sure the indictment is just around the corner. Jesus fuckin christ, how big is the corner.

I am confident he is a cretinous nutsucker.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/17/2016 2:34:56 PM)

ive posted plenty of right wing links, and ive also put up links to fox videos, and even quoted napolitano.
You are just strange...its not that you insist on using rabidly partisan sites, its that you believe your own propaganda.

He's (napolitano) made more prognostications than nostradamus...and he can think all he wants....its all just ramping up the bullshit...
and you are eating it up like an addict




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/17/2016 3:27:25 PM)


ORIGINAL: bounty44


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


just to point you back to the origination here of "delusional"---my use of it had to do with vile critter parts' (incessant) refusal to accept the reality of Hillary Clinton's goings-on, and the coverage it.


Since you have stuffed your head up your ass let me point you back to what I said..

Why do you find that 20% of any group being delusonal to be unusual?

[/quote]

your question has nothing to do with me or what I brought up, but any chance to be vulgar and insulting works for you huh?


Wrong junior. A vulgarity would be me calling someone a punkassmotherfucker. Pointing out that your head is up your ass most of the time would usually come under the heading of profanity.




Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375