RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/17/2016 4:02:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And 30% of republican voters will not vote trump.

Big fuckin deal.

How many days till nutsucker bombshells, now?

Or are they going to shit their pants some more still?

You keep saying the Repubs are a minority party so 30% of Dems is more than 30% of Reps by your "logic" and is thus a bigger deal.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/17/2016 4:24:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And 30% of republican voters will not vote trump.

Big fuckin deal.

How many days till nutsucker bombshells, now?

Or are they going to shit their pants some more still?

You keep saying the Repubs are a minority party so 30% of Dems is more than 30% of Reps by your "logic" and is thus a bigger deal.



The numbers are growing, its at 40%. Nevertheless:
47(%) (nutsucker count by nutsuckers) * .7 (-30%) = 32.9 (this is nutsuckers. There are not 33% of the population that are Republicans nor same conservatives, we can count those on the magnatude of possibly hundreds period.

53(%) * .7 = 37.1

Lets call that millions of voters, just for scalar.

The picture doesn't look a great deal different, just makes it harder to get into gerrymandered legislative districts, (and that is the true downside of losing those 30%ers.


I shall not be tutoring innumerate nutsucker math to nutsuckers. Thats the numbers.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/18/2016 7:15:25 AM)


Ah Hillary, will you be able to surpress the truth long enough to get elected.. Its interesting to see you run that race.

News today, here: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone/

1. Hillary was notified of the risks of doing secure email on a blackberry.
2. The state department turned down her request to do so.
3. She did it anyway, by setting up her own server...




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/18/2016 7:35:19 AM)

How is a server like a blackberry? Let me count the ways.

So, another day and not one Ass Guzzler nor Felching slobberBlogging Imbecile has quit.

We are not yet around the corner, after 1 year.




hot4bondage -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/18/2016 8:15:43 AM)

Sounds like her insecure Blackberry was linked to her insecure server. Obama's phone, Obamaphone, potato, potahto?




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/18/2016 8:20:48 AM)

Since the state department wouldn't give her a secure blackberry, her IT guy setup and insecure server and linked her insecure blackberry to it.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/18/2016 9:04:10 AM)

Well, thank god she wasn't using the insecure government servers, because there would be a much much bigger bunch of hackers on it.




Aylee -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/18/2016 9:07:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


Ah Hillary, will you be able to surpress the truth long enough to get elected.. Its interesting to see you run that race.

News today, here: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone/

1. Hillary was notified of the risks of doing secure email on a blackberry.
2. The state department turned down her request to do so.
3. She did it anyway, by setting up her own server...



Which means she knew the rules.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/19/2016 5:45:24 AM)

So, is hillary collared today? Or doesn't the FBI work weekends?

Guess this is either all nutsucker asswipe, or the spending cuts are working.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/19/2016 6:31:26 AM)

i found this:

quote:

They say that people resort to mockery when they have no logical argument against something. Is that why most satirists are liberals?


that seems like a good answer for you.





mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/19/2016 6:41:06 AM)

I think that nutsuckers quoting nutsuckerism when they are without fact (always) makes a mockery of nutsuckers, and is noisome to us all.

I think that most satire is actually derision of cretinous nutsuckers and their clinging to their hallucinations in spite of fact.

I know I hold them in derision. They are beneath contempt.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/19/2016 11:47:03 AM)

No one pays attention to Mnotter. He brings nothing to the table and is therefore properly ignored.

As for Hillary...

Yep, two new stories out,
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/17/herridge-report-hillary-clinton-tried-change-rules-use-blackberry-secure-facility

and a video - where she acknowledges that she knew her blackberry is insecure. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/18/andrea-tantaros-says-hillary-clinton-knew-risks-having-private-email

Things like patriotism, laws, don't really affect democrats - if they did they'd be republicans - but it might sway a few on the edges.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/19/2016 2:21:16 PM)

its interesting you say that---I was just earlier today thinking if he were student in a class presenting his "arguments" he'd fail.

if his job were to present arguments with some degree of cogency, he'd get fired.

and if he had these conversations in real life with anyone he'd get his lights punched out.

saw similar articles today---one on breitbart, one on fox nation, and one on the daily caller (oh no comrades x 3!)




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/21/2016 7:33:42 AM)

"EXCLUSIVE – Bolton: FBI Will ‘Explode’ If Hillary Not Indicted Over Email Scandal Due to Politics"

quote:

Speaking in a radio interview on Sunday, John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, stated he believes the FBI will “explode” if Hillary Clinton ultimately is not indicted for her email infractions due to what he described as politics triumphing over the legal system...

“I think that the pressure is definitely building,” Bolton responded. “And just take the politics out of this for a second. What Hillary Clinton and her top aides did is not just make a few small violations of laws to protect classified information. They made wholesale violations and they did it for a sustained, indeed for a four-year period.”

He continued:

quote:

So this is a far more serious than what happened to General Petraeus. And it’s one reason why I think that both the FBI and I believe the people in the Justice Department, the prosecutors who would oversee the handling of the case, are moving more and more to the conclusion that serious indictments are warranted here.

Now it’s possible that in this administration that politics can triumph over the legalities. But I think if that does happen, there’s a real risk for Obama and for the Attorney General that the FBI will explode. And a lot of things that we don’t know about, that are not on the public record at the moment, will come on the public record.

It may not be the same thing as firing Archibald Cox (the discharged Special Prosecutor) in the Watergate investigation, but if this potential prosecution is tanked for political reasons, it will be a very loud explosion. And it will stain Obama’s legacy forever. It will damage Loretta Lynch’s professional reputation and I think it will have a profound impact on the presidential election, as well.




http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/20/bolton-fbi-will-explode-if-hillary-not-indicted-over-email-scandal-due-to-politics/




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/21/2016 7:54:59 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

No one pays attention to Mnotter. He brings nothing to the table and is therefore properly ignored.

You seem enjoy the spankings he administers to you on a regular bassis...you keep comming back for more.




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/21/2016 7:56:58 AM)


ORIGINAL: bounty44

"EXCLUSIVE – Bolton: FBI Will ‘Explode’ If Hillary Not Indicted Over Email Scandal Due to Politics"

Bolton????the republicrat clone of james carville...oh my...roflmfao




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/21/2016 8:01:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

No one pays attention to Mnotter. He brings nothing to the table and is therefore properly ignored.

As for Hillary...

Yep, two new stories out,
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/17/herridge-report-hillary-clinton-tried-change-rules-use-blackberry-secure-facility

and a video - where she acknowledges that she knew her blackberry is insecure. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/18/andrea-tantaros-says-hillary-clinton-knew-risks-having-private-email

Things like patriotism, laws, don't really affect democrats - if they did they'd be republicans - but it might sway a few on the edges.



Faux Nuze inside the felchline. Nutsuckers would not know if they affect republicans, having nothing whatsoever in common with them. But cockgargling continues nonetheless. Factless asswipe spewed by the toiletlickers, repeatedly and constantly as if someone will actually forget that they are morons and shiteaters.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/24/2016 11:03:55 AM)

"ED KLEIN: HILLARY CLOSER TO INDICTMENT"

[considering the source and its nature, I trust this post will unfortunately generate some "nutsuckers" and "slobberwhatevers"]

quote:

Ed Klein, one of the best investigative journalist on Hillary’s trail, says that his sources tell him that the “Justice Department is close to empaneling a grand jury and deciding whether to grant statutory immunity to Huma Abedin, Hillary’s closest adviser.”

Klein, who rarely gets it wrong, notes that such a development would force Abedin to testify under oath, facing perjury charges if she lies. He also adds that he is “also told that Hillary herself will most likely be forced to testify.”

Klein has previously reported that the FBI has notified Hillary’s three closest aides, Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and Jake Sullivan, that they will be required to testify. Klein concludes that these developments indicate that FBI director James Comey is “moving inexorably” toward recommending an indictment of Hillary. Klein says that his sources say that Attorney General Loretta Lynch would likely duck the decision on indicting Hillary, punting it to a special counsel to give it at least the appearance of nonpartisan impartiality...

Klein, the author of two recent bestselling books that document the rift between the Obamas and the Clintons: Blood Feud and Unlikeable, has demonstrated that his sources run deep into the FBI and the Justice Department...


http://thehillarydaily.com/ed-klein-hillary-closer-to-indictment/




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/24/2016 11:10:46 AM)

Another article today says that the FBI is running into stonewalling at DOJ.




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (3/24/2016 11:11:53 AM)


ORIGINAL: bounty44

Would you care to put a time line on this? How long do your "sources" think it will take to indict her?
Are you thinking a month, six months, a year, two years? If she is not initicted in two years will you shut up or will this go on longer?




Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125