|
bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/15/2016 5:52:09 AM)
|
not that I think what im about to say will effect the 2-3 comrades complaining about "right wing news, blogs and bullshit" but perhaps for others who are reading...
ive said this before: motherjones, alternet, mediamatters, and other preferred collectivist sites just aren't telling the whole story.
i went through the thread and took a look at all the sources my non-comrade fellow posters and I have used to create it. this isn't exhaustive but its informative.
not counting phydeaux's post #300 in which he used a very large amount of sources for one particular instance, we've used 74 different sources, citing them roughly 154 times. so theres been good variety.
104 of those references came from 23 sources being used multiple times. with, in descending order, breitbart, fox news, town hall, yahoo news, politico, the national review, the hill, and judicial watch, being used most frequently. given that these places are established news and commentary sites, with broad followings, and for the most part whose reporters and writers are judges, lawyers, psychiatrists, educated/trained/experienced journalists, intelligence agents, and other reputable and recognizable figures---they hardly qualify as "blogs" much less "slobber blogs" (sorry comrade vile critter parts, you lose).
nor, since some of them are clearly not "right wing" but are instead libertarian, non-partisan, legal, or even left leaning, does that "right wing" argument hold up. sorry, that whine is spoiled too.
on another hand, to dismiss everything away by attaching tribal monikers to them is to not give a fair hearing to the reality of the situation or to deal effectively with the content. something the comrades try to do frequently. as ive said before---if you did this in the classroom, youd fail. if you did this as a part of your critical thinking job, youd be fired.
other sites used multiple times include CNN, the NYT, CBS news, reuters, AP, USA today, Wikipedia, drudge, and the huffington post. a veritable pantheon of a right wing conspiracy against Hillary!
of the sites used only once, while there are more, they include msnbc, daily kos, daily beast, time, npr, the NIH, speaker.gov, mother jones, the Washington post, forbes, pjmedia, abc news, IBD. another right wing conspiracy hit list! (try not to cherry pick here comrades when you complain)
as for "bullshit"---the only load of that i see is from the lefties here who cannot effectively deal with the material and instead, denigrate the source, perpetuate debunked lies and myths, or distract from the main issue at hand.
the short of it is---the comrades' queen did lots of things wrong, badly, and criminally---and they don't have anything of substance to defend her but will go to their graves doing so anyways because "party" matters more than honesty and their hatred of the other side clouds their ability to think justly.
|
|
|
|
