RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/19/2016 11:27:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Shall we start with the nutsuckers in the legislature?


How about we start with Hillary.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/19/2016 12:04:48 PM)

Nah, lets start with the nutsuckers in the legislature.

Hillary has been done to death, and nothing has been found in 25 years.

We could go in the bathrooms in the houses down there and get them all.

When Hillary is president, you can better believe its going to happen anyway, might as well get on the right side of history.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/19/2016 4:42:56 PM)

Among them are Gabrielle Fialkoff, finance director for Hillary Clinton’s first campaign for the U.S. Senate; Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who has traveled the globe with Bill Clinton; the Chagoury family, which pledged $1 billion in projects to the Clinton Global Initiative; and Chinese billionaire Ng Lap Seng, who was at the center of a Democratic fund-raising scandal when Bill Clinton was president. Also using the Panamanian law firm was the company founded by the late billionaire investor Marc Rich, an international fugitive when Bill Clinton pardoned him in the final hours of his presidency.

There's nothing illegal about the Clintons' close ties to these various international money-stashers, but it's a reminder of how much of their recent life has been spent hobnobbing with the 1 Percent, and sharing their intimate concerns. Indeed, it's important to note that tax havens, by and large, are not illegal, because the most serious graft is almost always the legal kind -- like the tax codes written by the billionaire-backed politicians that have enabled the massive, kleptocratic upward flow of wealth. At the time the Panama Papers story broke, U.S. tax experts said there was no need for Americans to hide wealth in places like Panama when we have havens right here in places like...Delaware.

In fact, you'll be shocked (OK, probably not shocked) to learn that when Bill and Hillary Clinton found themselves in private life and making the real dough, the couple was involved in the creation of five Delaware corporations -- three related to the Clinton Foundation non-profit, one for Bill's "consulting" fees, and one for a $5.5 million Hillary book advance. Why take advantage of the low tax rates and limited public-disclosure laws of the American Cayman Islands? I guess that's what Delaware offered.


Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Hillary-the-Panama-Papers-and-the-fall-of-kleptocracy.html#IZkRk5PGLFXQAtfe.99




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/19/2016 5:31:47 PM)

Yup, you go to washington you get rich, thats the american way, been so since the days of credit mobilier.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/19/2016 10:20:22 PM)

So, lets hear the report of the 147 FBI agents, what do the nutsucker slobberblogs got on this grand jury pick, on the indictment just around the corner?




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/22/2016 4:32:06 AM)

"FBI Director Says Hillary Email Investigation Could Stretch Past DNC Convention"

quote:

FBI director James Comey said Thursday that he has no set timetable for wrapping up the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server and that the probe could even extend beyond the Democratic National Committee’s convention in July...

“There’s no timetable on any investigation,” Comey said, adding that he has been asked if the Democratic National Convention is “a key date” for wrapping up the investigation, which centers on whether classified information was mishandled on Clinton’s server.

“No,” Comey said about whether he had a deadline timed for before the DNC event.


http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/21/fbi-director-says-hillary-email-investigation-could-stretch-past-dnc-convention-video/

last night I heard judge Andrew Napolitano say he was 100% convinced that Hillary has committed crimes and that there is enough evidence to indict and if I am remembering rightly also, convict her.

cannot help but think the longer it takes, the more political pressure will be brought to bear concerning keeping her safe.






mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/22/2016 5:05:12 AM)

The headline is yellow journalism, and he did not say such a thing.

Tell me, is it true that two years ago, you were cutting sugar cane?
No.

FBI director says he was cutting sugar cane only a year ago.

LOL. The desperation and pants shitting of the nutsuckers.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/22/2016 3:03:03 PM)

News today

30 companies giving donations to the clinton fund lobbied and received government contract.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/22/clinton-gave-paid-speeches-to-firms-who-lobbied-contracted-with-us-government.html?intcmp=hplnws

General Electric, which paid her $225,000 for a speech in Boca Raton, The company won $1.7 million from the State Department for lab equipment and data processing during Clinton's tenure.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/23/2016 5:47:26 AM)

i cant imagine anyone paying that kind of money for a speech, especially from a robotic platitude maker, without some promise or expectation of a quid pro quo.

while im here:

"FBI could leak Clinton email investigation, Grassley warns"

quote:

The FBI could leak internal reports of its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a home-brewed email server if the Obama administration stifles the inquiry, Sen. Chuck Grassley warned on Friday.

A hypothetical leak could occur, he said, if officials believed Clinton was not being prosecuted for political reasons...

“And if there’s political interference, then I assume that somebody in the FBI is going to leak these reports and it’s either going to have an effect politically or it’s going to lead to prosecution if there’s enough evidence," he said.


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-emails-chuck-grassley-fbi-leak-222345




TallClevDom -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/23/2016 7:06:46 AM)

Your personal opinion aside....First, $250K is not an outrageous speaking fee for someone of her stature (Trump would command a similar fee). Second, $250K is a drop in the bucket, there's plenty of $1M+ donors out there on both sides, so it won't get you much influence, if any at all.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 2:00:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i cant imagine anyone paying that kind of money for a speech, especially from a robotic platitude maker, without some promise or expectation of a quid pro quo.

while im here:

"FBI could leak Clinton email investigation, Grassley warns"

quote:

The FBI could leak internal reports of its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a home-brewed email server if the Obama administration stifles the inquiry, Sen. Chuck Grassley warned on Friday.

A hypothetical leak could occur, he said, if officials believed Clinton was not being prosecuted for political reasons...

“And if there’s political interference, then I assume that somebody in the FBI is going to leak these reports and it’s either going to have an effect politically or it’s going to lead to prosecution if there’s enough evidence," he said.


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-emails-chuck-grassley-fbi-leak-222345



Or the FBI could take a leak on the bullshit being touted by Chuck Grassley, a rather senile and useless old fuck.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 4:01:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TallClevDom

Your personal opinion aside....First, $250K is not an outrageous speaking fee for someone of her stature (Trump would command a similar fee). Second, $250K is a drop in the bucket, there's plenty of $1M+ donors out there on both sides, so it won't get you much influence, if any at all.



I think you miss the more salient point. The optics are terrible.

Clinton doesn't need the money - and frankly she chose to take the bank's money rather than consider what opinion the average voter would take. It speaks of smugness. She should have known this would bite her in the ass. Was it really worth it?

Her calculus must be - the dems are going to vote for me regardless. Lets get some money.

The other bit thats biting her - her refusing to release the transcripts. The only reason not to if she's on record saying - laudatory things about the banks. And maybe, help elect me and I'll defeat any regualtion of wallstreet.





Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 4:02:49 PM)

Speaking of bad optics...

Another Clinton ally, facing charges for corruption.

Gee, what a surprise...http://nypost.com/2016/04/24/the-mayor-is-going-down/




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 4:53:06 PM)

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


I think you miss the more salient point. The optics are terrible.

Only to partisan hacks like yourself

Clinton doesn't need the money

You are obviously a communist to say such a thing. What exactly does her or any other capitalist's "need" have to do with anything?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



- and frankly she chose to take the bank's money rather than consider what opinion the average voter would take. It speaks of smugness.

One would think it speaks directly to self agrandisement which is the hallmark of capitalist.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



She should have known this would bite her in the ass. Was it really worth it?

Has it?

Her calculus must be - the dems are going to vote for me regardless. Lets get some money.

Typical communist hatred of those who have made some money that they themselves were too phoquing lazy to earn.






itsSIRtou -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 5:10:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Shall we start with the nutsuckers in the legislature?


How about we start with Hillary.



if we do.... lets ask Mr.Trump how much influence did HE buy contributing to the Clintons? How many years did he do that? and now one of the Koch brothers likes her enough that he might be tempted to support her like trump did...

interesting....




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 6:45:53 PM)

Oh please, show me a cite showing Koch is tempted to support her....




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/24/2016 7:00:22 PM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Oh please, show me a cite showing Koch is tempted to support her....


I heard from my cousin's hairdresser's brother inlaws nephew that 187 fbi agents were sure that she and monica were going to double team him in exchange support in the up comming election...or was it a theat that they would if he didn't.[8|]




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/25/2016 2:30:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: TallClevDom

Your personal opinion aside....First, $250K is not an outrageous speaking fee for someone of her stature (Trump would command a similar fee). Second, $250K is a drop in the bucket, there's plenty of $1M+ donors out there on both sides, so it won't get you much influence, if any at all.



I think you miss the more salient point. The optics are terrible.

Clinton doesn't need the money - and frankly she chose to take the bank's money rather than consider what opinion the average voter would take. It speaks of smugness. She should have known this would bite her in the ass. Was it really worth it?

Her calculus must be - the dems are going to vote for me regardless. Lets get some money.

The other bit thats biting her - her refusing to release the transcripts. The only reason not to if she's on record saying - laudatory things about the banks. And maybe, help elect me and I'll defeat any regualtion of wallstreet.


a little more from the broader general electric history a year ago:

"Quid Pro Quo: Hillary Lobbied For GE, GE Donates To Hillary’s Foundation"

quote:

So when Hillary told us that she wanted all the e-mails from her time in the State Department released, we were supposed to believe her.

Even after she destroyed her personal e-mail server, she insisted there was nothing official on it. We were supposed to believe her.

Nothing to see here, right?

So now that the Daily Caller is reporting General Electric donated massive amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation right after she lobbied as secretary of state for a lucrative foreign job on their behalf, GE has said they won’t release the official e-mails between them and the State Department.

quote:

General Electric (GE) CEO Jeffrey Immelt said Wednesday that he will not release the emails that GE exchanged with Hillary Clinton’s State Department during the period in which GE was donating to the Clinton Foundation.

“Again, I think that’s not something we would do. Right?” Immelt said at GE’s shareholder meeting in Oklahoma City, OK in response to a question from Justin Danhof of the National Center For Public Policy Research, who pressed the CEO to release written communications with the State Department.

Secretary of State Clinton lobbied the Algerian president in 2012 to pick GE as a contractor for Algerian power plants. GE got the Algeria deal and quickly thereafter donated to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton also lobbied on behalf of Clinton Foundation donors including Boeing and Chevron.


But there’s nothing to see here, folks. Right? This is all fine. Everything is fine. You don’t need to know what’s going on because there’s nothing going on. Now move along, peons


http://hillarydaily.com/robert/2015/04/23/quid-pro-quo-hillary-lobbied-for-ge-ge-donates-to-hillarys-foundation/





epiphiny43 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/25/2016 3:36:41 AM)

quote:


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Oh please, show me a cite showing Koch is tempted to support her....

Koch's actual quote was that HRC might well make a better president than any remaining on this year's Republican offerings. He commented that she would be pursuing a different agenda than 'current rhetoric'. (Doesn't everyone?) And said he wasn't going to spend any money trying to block Trump at the convention. Also the comment was interesting from a Con that Bill Clinton had been better than Bush (who was a good man but 'misled') about spending and growth of govt.
Interview on Sunday, This Week at ABC News.




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/25/2016 4:12:26 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Oh please, show me a cite showing Koch is tempted to support her....


Even laura bush seems to prefer bill's wife for pres over the mop...whodathunkit???




Page: <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625