quote:

ORIGINAL: bigjb62

quote:

Not to mention half of the posts here is motter trying to spoil the thread by posting his usual obscenities, thereby lowering the information density past where most will bother to wade through.

I'll probably start another thread, link all the good articles leaving out his comments entirely.

I think most people just skip over everything he post anyway.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

egads I think im leaning towards "cringeworthy!"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I don't expect mnotter to stick on topic - but I'm going to ask all those in the middle or right to please keep to the topic of hillary's email investigation.

quote:

By Monica Crowley - The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 27, 2016

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Several weeks ago, I wrote a column titled “Is Bill Clinton in the FBI crosshairs?” That question appears to be increasingly relevant because of the emergence of another, more central one:

Was Hillary Clinton’s unsecure, private email server set up by her husband’s top political operative in order to turbocharge their own political and financial interests?

Justin Cooper may hold the answer.

Mr. Cooper is a central player in the shadowy worlds of Bill and Hillary Clinton — serving as Mr. Clinton’s top aide since 2015, when his predecessor, former right-hand man and “surrogate son” Doug Band, resigned from the Clinton Foundation — yet he has largely escaped notice.

The obscure Mr. Cooper may, in fact, be the linchpin of the case swirling around the Clintons. Perhaps more than anyone apart from the principals themselves, he is at the nexus of the Clinton Foundation, Hillary’s work at the State Department, and her possession of highly sensitive government documents. After all, Mr. Cooper was the one who, before she became secretary, negotiated with the Obama White House over the parameters of acceptable conduct by Bill Clinton and the foundation to minimize the possibility of “conflicts of interest.”

I have previously reported that the server in question actually belonged to, was paid for and was housed by Mr. Clinton, raising questions about his possible legal exposure. Now it appears that it wasn’t just his server, but his team and their co-motive: to leverage Mrs. Clinton’s position as secretary to expand their contacts and raise ever more exorbitant amounts of money for their foundation…

Mr. Cooper served as a coordinator between the overlapping worlds of Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Clinton and the foundation. He is a top fundraiser for the Clinton Foundation…

As investigator Charles Ortel has put it, “Lightly regulated and opaque businesses such as the Foundation and Teneo are perfect vehicles through which government influence can be monetized. Overlay secretive ‘members only’ conclaves such as Clinton Global Initiative gatherings and you can hide corruption in the guise of charity.”

In an interview last year on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Mrs. Clinton denied communicating with the foundation while at State. “Other people in the State Department did,” she said, “in accordance with the rules that had been adopted [per Mr. Cooper’s arrangement with the Obama administration].” But according to an Oct. 28, 2009 email, Mrs. Clinton wrote longtime adviser Sidney Blumenthal and copied Mssrs. Band and Cooper at the foundation. I suspect the email’s content is of interest to the FBI…

A source familiar with Mr. Cooper’s arrangement with the Clintons tells me that they have paid his legal fees associated with the FBI investigation, amounting to “hundreds of thousands of dollars.” They aren’t paying those costs out of a sense of decency. They’re paying them because he knows the “why” of the server, which may very well have been to make it easier for the foundation to hustle big donations.

One wonders what, if anything, Mr. Cooper is telling the FBI — and whether the whole sordid Clinton house of cards will be left standing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I don't expect mnotter to stick on topic - but I'm going to ask all those in the middle or right to please keep to the topic of hillary's email investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

45 pages and the usual are still at it

um, that's because the investigation is still ongoing and there is always news to share...

Not to mention half of the posts here is motter trying to spoil the thread by posting his usual obscenities, thereby lowering the information density past where most will bother to wade through.

I'll probably start another thread, link all the good articles leaving out his comments entirely.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and to that point...

"Are Bill Clinton and his team the key to the FBI’s Hillary investigation?"

quote:

By Monica Crowley - The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 27, 2016 ...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/27/monica-crowley-the-linchpin-of-the-fbis-hillary-cl/

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and to that point...

"Are Bill Clinton and his team the key to the FBI’s Hillary investigation?"

quote:

By Monica Crowley - The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 27, 2016 ...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/27/monica-crowley-the-linchpin-of-the-fbis-hillary-cl/

Dude, what's wrong with you? You know the Washington Times is a "nutsucker blog" and, as such, is not an acceptable "source".

WTF happened to your "conversion". You're going to hell (That's pronounced: "Moral integrity", if you're a PPL)

[:D][:D][:D]



Michael

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I don't expect mnotter to stick on topic - but I'm going to ask all those in the middle or right to please keep to the topic of hillary's email investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and to that point...

"Are Bill Clinton and his team the key to the FBI’s Hillary investigation?"

quote:

By Monica Crowley - The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 27, 2016 ...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/27/monica-crowley-the-linchpin-of-the-fbis-hillary-cl/

Dude, what's wrong with you? You know the Washington Times is a "nutsucker blog" and, as such, is not an acceptable "source".

WTF happened to your "conversion". You're going to hell (That's pronounced: "Moral integrity", if you're a PPL)

[:D][:D][:D]

Michael

quote:

The Obama State Department last week admitted it withheld a key Benghazi email of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from Judicial Watch since at least September 2014. If the State Department disclosed the email when first supposedly found, Clinton’s email server and her hidden emails would have been disclosed nearly two years ago, before Clinton authorized the alleged deletion of tens of thousands of emails...

[gee there comrades, that first sentence looks like a "fact" to me and that second sentence looks like a logical deduction from the first sentence.]

Contradicting an earlier statement to the court, an April 18, 2016, State Department letter admits that it found the email at issue in 2014 but was held back in its entirety:

quote:

Also, upon further review, the Department has determined that one document previously withheld in full in our letter dated November 12, 2014 may now be released in part.

“Now we know the Obama administration consciously refused to give up key information about Hillary Clinton’s email in 2014. It covered up this email both from the court and Judicial Watch,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Judge Lamberth was right when he suggested that Obama’s State Department acted in bad faith. This cover-up provided Hillary Clinton enough time to hide potentially thousands of government records. One aim of our court-order discovery will be to get to the bottom of this cover-up.”

quote:

You will recall that on the evening of September 11, Mrs. Clinton issued an official State Department press statement, approved by the White House, placing the blame for the attack on an Internet video:

[we've recently revisited this elsewhere]

"Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind."

[but this part of the story hasn't been "out there" to the extent one would think it should]

Yet the next day, September 12, in her conversation with Kandil, Clinton said, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest.” Kandil responded, “You’re not kidding. Based on the information we saw today we believe that group that claimed responsibility for this is affiliated with al-Qaeda.”

Nevertheless, two days later, at the ceremony when the bodies of the four Americans who were killed arrived in the United States, Clinton again left the implication that it was all due to the video:

“This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

some other news from the site:

"New Clinton Benghazi Documents"

quote:

You will recall that on the evening of September 11, Mrs. Clinton issued an official State Department press statement, approved by the White House, placing the blame for the attack on an Internet video:

[we've recently revisited this elsewhere]

"Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind."

[but this part of the story hasn't been "out there" to the extent one would think it should]

Yet the next day, September 12, in her conversation with Kandil, Clinton said, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest.” Kandil responded, “You’re not kidding. Based on the information we saw today we believe that group that claimed responsibility for this is affiliated with al-Qaeda.”

Nevertheless, two days later, at the ceremony when the bodies of the four Americans who were killed arrived in the United States, Clinton again left the implication that it was all due to the video:

“This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/new-clinton-benghazi-documents/

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

some other news from the site:

"New Clinton Benghazi Documents"

quote:

You will recall that on the evening of September 11, Mrs. Clinton issued an official State Department press statement, approved by the White House, placing the blame for the attack on an Internet video:

[we've recently revisited this elsewhere]

"Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind."

[but this part of the story hasn't been "out there" to the extent one would think it should]

Yet the next day, September 12, in her conversation with Kandil, Clinton said, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest.” Kandil responded, “You’re not kidding. Based on the information we saw today we believe that group that claimed responsibility for this is affiliated with al-Qaeda.”

Nevertheless, two days later, at the ceremony when the bodies of the four Americans who were killed arrived in the United States, Clinton again left the implication that it was all due to the video:

“This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/new-clinton-benghazi-documents/

What's truly a travesty is (unless I've missed something), the guy that made the video was arrested by Hillary's jack-booted minions (a politically expedient move) on a trumped-up charge and is still there.



Michael