RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 1:47:38 PM)

Yeah, snore, we have had that re-felched here at least a time per page.

It doesn't really have much informational value, Comey says its an investigation, Clinton a security investigation.

We have no tape or credible citation, only assurances from Faux Nuze. But its all there is to report.









Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 1:59:34 PM)

It just documents Clinton's (the rape shammer) continuing lies. I'm sure more will come out as the investigation proceeds.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 2:32:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

It just documents Clinton's (the rape shammer) continuing lies. I'm sure more will come out as the investigation proceeds.

The investigation has proceeded for over a year now, and I don't see any lie there.

And we have no reputable quote from Comey himself, just a politco heard that faux heard....(lying?)

Is it a lie when a nutsucker says he is for fiscal responsibility? (even though none of them actually are capable of executing the same?) Why are we trillions of dollars in debt under nutsuckers if they are fiscally responsible? (could it be they are lying?) or how about their love of the constitution, yet felching voter id day in and out? (lying?) for freedom but want to restrict bathrooms? (lying) want to restrict same sex marraige? (lying?) small sample but the elucidation of that list would be so massive as to bring down the internet.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 2:58:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

It just documents Clinton's (the rape shammer) continuing lies. I'm sure more will come out as the investigation proceeds.

The investigation has proceeded for over a year now, and I don't see any lie there.

And we have no reputable quote from Comey himself, just a politco heard that faux heard....(lying?)

Is it a lie when a nutsucker says he is for fiscal responsibility? (even though none of them actually are capable of executing the same?) Why are we trillions of dollars in debt under nutsuckers if they are fiscally responsible? (could it be they are lying?) or how about their love of the constitution, yet felching voter id day in and out? (lying?) for freedom but want to restrict bathrooms? (lying) want to restrict same sex marraige? (lying?) small sample but the elucidation of that list would be so massive as to bring down the internet.

Here's the lie:

Clinton and her allies have repeatedly called the probe a routine “security inquiry.”

But Director James Comey told reporters that wasn’t an accurate description.
"It's in our name. I'm not familiar with the term 'security inquiry,' " Comey said at a roundtable with reporters, according to Politico.

“We’re conducting an investigation ... That’s what we do,” he said, according to Fox News.


Everyone is aware the rape shamer is struggling to explain her desire to keep her work and her charity a secret and as stuff comes out she continues to modify her lies. This is just the latest. That you don't see it isn't unusual. It's a flaw in your thinking.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 4:39:44 PM)

The ends justifying the means has always been their underlying concern. They actually sat so, so why shouldn't we believe them?




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 6:32:00 PM)

"Former Clinton Chief of Staff Walks Out of FBI Interview Due to 'Off-limits Topic'"

quote:

The FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server is already laced with tension. Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills, who investigators initially praised as a cooperative witness, surprised them by walking out of her interview after she and her lawyer thought the questioning went a bit too far.

Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said.

The question reportedly had to do with procedures used to provide emails to the State Department, notes The Washington Post.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/05/11/cheryl-mills-walks-out-of-fbi-interview-n2161457

this is rich; judge Napolitano explained it---it turns out Cheryl mills is a lawyer and so she/they decided that any conversation between she and Clinton as concerns this matter falls under attorney-client privilege.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 6:39:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"Former Clinton Chief of Staff Walks Out of FBI Interview Due to 'Off-limits Topic'"

quote:

The FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server is already laced with tension. Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills, who investigators initially praised as a cooperative witness, surprised them by walking out of her interview after she and her lawyer thought the questioning went a bit too far.

Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said.

The question reportedly had to do with procedures used to provide emails to the State Department, notes The Washington Post.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/05/11/cheryl-mills-walks-out-of-fbi-interview-n2161457

this is rich; judge Napolitano explained it---it turns out Cheryl mills is a lawyer and so she/they decided that any conversation between she and Clinton as concerns this matter falls under attorney-client privilege.

nm
lol




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 6:50:14 PM)

Means Mills is being considered the person who copied them from the secure server to the unsecure server...




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 6:51:02 PM)

cite?




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 8:16:35 PM)

Lol




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/11/2016 8:40:39 PM)

oh goody another one who cant




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 8:35:44 AM)

No - he's just mocking your request that I provide a cite for my opinion on a previous cite. Both he and I cite far more frequently than you.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 9:37:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

No - he's just mocking your request that I provide a cite for my opinion on a previous cite. Both he and I cite far more frequently than you.

Your opinion....aaaaaah well, ok then, no cite, not even one thats been scrubbed??, or where you argue something blatantly untrue and cant read the time, let alone the content. yet you continue to bullshit on?
As for citing sources "more than me", how sad and troubled you are to think posting more links means you are right..




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 11:44:40 AM)

No, I'm more right than you regardless of links. Links only provide credibility to those that are undecided.




KenDckey -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 3:17:44 PM)

http://www.examiner.com/article/verified-russia-possession-of-20-000-hacked-hillary-clinton-emails

Seems the Rissians got about 20k of Clintons e-mails from her server




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 3:33:24 PM)

ken, I would not put a lot of stock into that...

I listened to Napolitano say it and more or less it came across as a quip.




markyugen -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 3:59:56 PM)

And Putin loves Trump, so who's going to be the first to predict that he puts in a few faked emails to get Clinton booted, just because he's Putin and that's his political style?




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 4:27:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: markyugen

And Putin loves Trump, so who's going to be the first to predict that he puts in a few faked emails to get Clinton booted, just because he's Putin and that's his political style?

That would instantly backfire, the experts would see through it.
Also if he adds a few he still has thousands making a few unneeded.
You also forget that thanks to Hillary he got a lot of uranium.
If he likes Trump so much he is in a no lose situation.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 5:22:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: markyugen

And Putin loves Trump, so who's going to be the first to predict that he puts in a few faked emails to get Clinton booted, just because he's Putin and that's his political style?


Why would he do that when they're easily authenticated? Oh that's right, you're a leftist dispensing koolaide with no real thought.




Greta75 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 5:36:53 PM)

I find it interesting that Jon Stewart, a super left wing dude, has publicly called Hillary a fake.

I guess he must be for Bernie.




Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125